Thank you for reaching out! We appreciate your interest. For further information, please email us at [email protected], and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thank you for reaching out! We appreciate your interest. For further information, please email us at [email protected], and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thank you for reaching out! We appreciate your interest. For further information, please email us at [email protected] and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thank you for reaching out! We appreciate your interest. For further information, please email us at [email protected] and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thank you for reaching out! We appreciate your interest. For further information, please email us at [email protected] and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thank you for reaching out! We appreciate your interest. For further information, please email us at [email protected] and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thank you for reaching out! We appreciate your interest. For further information, please email us at [email protected] and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thank you for reaching out! We appreciate your interest. For further information, please email us at [email protected] and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thank you for reaching out! We appreciate your interest. For further information, please email us at [email protected] and we'll be happy to assist you.

Glad you enjoyed it :)

G'day 2 POINT O - You can keep an eye out on Levi's FB Page here ==> facebook.com/leviclarkedrift

G'Day @TurboWank16v - We appreciate the enthusiasm! Keep it rockin with your Peugeot 205 🤟😎

G'day J H! We appreciate the feedback and we shall do our best for future videos! :)

G'day @VlahMMA. Great questions. There are pros and cons of both the Dual Mass Flywheel and Single Mass Flywheel system so as a start, take a read on our Tech Note 047 which can be found on our website for more insight prior to making a decision ==> exedy.com.au/ts1636412636/attachments/Page/155/TN047%20Issue%203.pdf

@@ExedyAustralia Thank you

No worries at all - Happy to help. Cheers.

G'day Trishu :)

G'day Adrian, thank you for your feedback.

G'day @up up and away, thank you for your enquiry. So that we can discuss your enquiry in more detail, would you mind contacting our customer service staff on 1300 366 592. Further, we suggest you have a read of our Tech Note 047 which discusses the pros and cons of single mass and dual mass flywheels. This note can be found at exedy.com.au/ts1636412636/attachments/Page/155/TN047%20Issue%203.pdf

Thanks Trent for your enquiry, the Safari Tuff HD known as the Extra Tuff is essentially an Exedy Safari Tuff clutch that we modify in our Melbourne factory to further enhance the performance of the clutch increasing the clutch torque capacity even further.

They put dual mass ones in many diesels for that reason some petrol cars do have them 2003 jetta 1.8 turbo i have has a DMF

ok... how exacly has the butterfly valve ruined diesel? Helping the car with shutting down and causing less vibrations is bad??? sure.... how exactly is maf bad? Helps to calculate the air intake and fine tune air mixture... more efficient is bad apparently how has egr ruined it? besides the carbon build up, theres 0 disadvantage to it and it reduces emmisions and might prolong engine life since it makes the internal combustuion process to be lower in temp, might use a bit more fuel. dual mass flywheel is for comfort and helps smooth things out with gearbox, how is that fkin bad? DPF is shit. Lack of knowledge pretty sums up your comment. Just complaining.

@@hmmm9183 butterfly valve....redundancy. it's not needed in a diesel, its purely adding complexity, Increasing pumping losses, and I've never seen a diesel continue to run without fuel. Shutting that off works perfectly fine. Leave the air alone MAF, same thing more unnecessary added complexity. It's only there to tell the computer how much fuel to inject, and I can do that with a cable and my right foot. When the sensor fails, the vehicle stops working. This is frustrating, counter productive, expensive and can all be avoided. EGR ... you said "besides the carbon build up, there's zero disadvantage to it" while being completely contradictive, that's also Incorrect. The addition of the heat exchanger, and recirc pipe, now allows the diesel engine to drink its own coolant in the event of an internal failure. And it absolutely happens. Go talk to a mechanic. My Dual mass flywheel complaint still stands, gearbox bearings last far longer than dual mass flywheel systems, in vehicles with engines that have well designed balancer shafts. Which is probably why there are so many 'single mass conversion kits' on the market today. It also, feels terrible to drive with, especially when combined with the "dead pedal" that arises by fitting all the other crap listed above to make a computer do something (again) that a human can do with a cable attached to a mechanical pump, a functioning brain, and a right foot. DPF, EGR, DEF....are all added complexity, designed purely to get manufacturers through increasingly stringent emissions tests/laws. That's all it is. Anything else you've heard, saving the planet or otherwise is called 'spin' and 'marketing'.

@@AJ-oj5eu butterfyl valve can be simply taken out, few screws... it helps to shut off and is not that more exprnsive. And what pumping losses are you speaking of? The valve stays open all the time when driving. Sure very minimal restriction, but if you argue maf is shit then your whole point suddenly make absolute 0 sense. Maf is an extra calculation. If you do it on your own you will simply spray load of fuel and get nowhere. Without maf car doesnt just stop working. It continues to work woth what is left. O2 sensor, charge air temp, map, but wait... lets remove them because you can do it on your own... yeah right, I mean you can, but the efficiency will be atleast 100 times worse. Egr can also be used to control engine temp. Theres just so much flaw in your logic... majorty of these things make things better. Theyre reliable, but just because they fail once in 200k mile or km you say remove it, not needed. You hear how stupid that sounds? Let go and remove everything. Fuel gauge? I can just drive and fill it up. Counting milage? I can just add up in google map. Tachometer? I can just listen to the sound. Speed? I can just go by eye. Knock sensors? I can just listen. And what more shit you can think of. Complex suspension? Aight. Just remove everything and build it like a carriage Id understand if all that was often. But when it happens to 0.001% of people in 200k mileage, its just plain stupid

@@hmmm9183 right one thing at a time here Einstein. You're gonna have to go away and try to understand "added complexity". Let's go back to the butterfly first and I'll try and explain "pumping losses" to you. In a "newer" diesel engine , When the computer decides it wants to recirculate EGR gasses, it has to partially close the intake butterfly as you drive along the road to create a vacuum in the manifold, and force it to suck a portion of the soot and inert gasses from the exhaust manifold into the engines intake. Creating this vacuum takes effort from the piston as it travels down the cylinder on the intake stroke. It's known as a parasitic loss, and requires some energy from the engine to overcome. In a "traditional" or older diesel engine, without EGR, there is no throttle butterfly in the inlet manifold, thus far less parasitic losses during the intake stroke, while driving along at cruising speeds. This is just one example. I'll agree, the power of a modern computer controlled diesel engine, "per cc" is far, far greater than a traditional "oil burner", however I'll argue they're no more fuel efficient. I get 10km/litre from an old diesel 4x4 and I get the same 10kms/litre from my modern one. Newer isn't always better, especially when you add in (that due to the added complexity of all the extra sensors and systems) the engine refuses to function WHEN one of those stupid MAF/MAP sensors, O2 sensors, craps out, or emission control related systems malfunctions , or the dual mass flywheel flys apart prematurely, and leaves you stranded at worst or in "limp home mode" at best. Because they do. I'm not interested in removing suspension and fuel gauges or any of that nonsense you brought up. I'm simply stating I'd rather drive a slightly shaky, partly noisy, manual gearboxed mechanical fuel pumped, non restricted, slightly slower, simple diesel vehicle, that's FAR more reliable, and much less costly to diagnose and repair if it does break down.

@@AJ-oj5eu alright, you got me there. Completely forgot that the butterfly valve is also used for egr control. This ones on me. EDIT: But it doesnt really introduce any pumping loss, as the the open egr valve just gives the air instead of the outside. The same when petrol engine get better mileage with egr than without it. But I still stand by my point that air monitor sensors should stay. As youve said, I have also noticed that newer vehicles get not so better mileage or worse. But that partly due to all the restriction systems dpf, multiple cats. Ive seen multiple cars with dual mass flywheels well above 400k km (thats something like 250k miles maybe) and theyre holding up just fine. Sure its annoying when the car goes into limp mode. But then again misreporting how much air youre getting can lead to very lean mixture which is not so good. Yeah, I lashed out by saying some stupid shit, but kind of just wanted to say that little things add up bit by bit.

I know, but it also says in the instructions

I've been wondering the exact same thing.

Besides the fact that a clutch already acts as a damper when changing gears…Usually the established clutch companies do tune their kits for the specific vehicles. Also most of the time cars with DMF’s had at one point or another an SMF with that transmission available, and get the DMF in a remodel or facelift update. That’s a very misleading generalized statement you made.

Bollocks isnt it

Your comment is missing alot of words.