JBI you nailed it.

Dear team, thanks for the video! What kind of extraction model do you recommend? Im a looking for a literatur extraction tool or an Example Excel Template for a Scoping Review. Do you have andy recomendations besides the one in your published paper?

amazing. I love this

What year did JBI refine and defined scoping review methodology?

That is so helpful, thanks!

If they’re preventable, what’s the strategy? Some might have been. Most of them are difficult to say between new procedures and old procedures, new hospitals and old ones, who’s to say what they could prevent and what they can’t?

How to remove duplicate records across the sources before screening?

Great explanations,

Thank you so much. It is very helpful

I have a student whose scoping review has so many articles, and this has helped to focus the presentation of the data. Thank you

Thank you ❤ from Philippines

excellent talk would love to get my hands on the manual ? is this possible?

Наташка привет! Я училась с тобой в одной группе в СамПи.

caca

Is an evidence summary not basically the same thing as a literature review?

a great and clear explanation

Excellent Ruth. Greetings from cpt RSA

I LOVE YOU ADAM

I am going to sign up for this network , this is beyond educational as an early career academic in the Caribbean

Saudações! Acompanhando aqui de Coari, Amazonas, Brasil.

how to log in

Great overview of the Aged Care Field resources available in the JBI EBP Database!

I'm getting an error message when importing to Sumari after following these steps - telling me to check that it's a correct XML file. Any suggestions?

Great presentation! Thank you

100% Muito Bom - very good"

That was so helpful, many thanks

Thank you very much for the valuable video. I just need to ask, Is blinding necessary in any stage of the scoping review ?

🤷🏾‍♀️

This was amazing and really helped focus my work on the scooping review. Thank you for all you and the JBI SCR group do.

There was a lot of responsibility placed on the pharmacist to educate hospital staff on a completely new form of medicine which they themselves most likely were not familiar with. If they looked at Australia, England, Canada or the US, I doubt it would have been that easy to palm off all the blame onto the pharmacist without a massive backlash! Why would they chose to look at countries with the smallest vaccine uptakes? Another form of cherry picking & plant seeds in attempt to bypass hospital administration and their duties when it comes to staff education & proper implementation of new procedures.

As a PhD candidate in the middle of a scoping review, this is both very timely and very helpful! Thank you so much!

Thank you so much! Very helpful

*Promo SM*

It looks 😮😮😮😮😮😮 amazing 🤩🤩🤩🤩

Quando irão fazer um vídeo desses em Português?

no me aparecen los efectos por mas que instale el pack no salen, sabes que se puede hacer ? espero respuesta

Great job

This was so incredibly helpful. You just saved an occupational therapy student. Thank you.

Good question [Steven]

Great presentation. How can I join JBI?

Let me see what is happening here!

Thank you, JBI. What is the minimum number of articles for a scoping review?

Worthy to watch for my scoping review. I have a query - Should i include abstract articles for my literature review? I have selected 24 articles for final review and 6 of them are Abstract articles.

Please don’t forget emergency veterinary medicine. I feel it gets overlooked, you have to also deal with people and animals suffering in some of the worst ways possible in very emotionally charged situations as well.

Love and support all of you out there working this field. ❤ Stay strong and I hope you have good support for when you go home and decompress.

My question is: if I got around 60 article of differrent sources, that covers all the questions of my thesis...can I simply map and categorize those articles into themes to show the dimensions of the issue on hand ( mine is about decision making) , where I am aiming to show what infulence the decision as in barriers and facilitators instead of putting all the 60 ones in a table of detailed extraction? I have already discussed in the reporting how all of these articles played a role in the decision making process as part of creating my literature review in the thesis and because I also wanted to show how existing literature is aligned with the validity and reliability of the tool chosen. Is that an acceptable approach for a PhD thesis? My supervisor keeps pushing for detailed analysis ( which now I know is not right for me, bcoz I have different sources and scarse ones too to adress each theme found since im trying to explore a third world country with inadequate studies emerging from them on the topic im studying). And also limiting my thesis to the 10 studies that are only peer reviewed with strong methodolgy, this is not adequate to cover the scope of decision making complexity.what are your recommendation for reporting a 60 result? I am currently reporting the number ,type of source and country origin in a table per theme...and opted to report extracted results in the form of narration in the literature review. which eventually..created for me a conceptual framework and aided in proving face and content validity for a tool that is adapted to cultural sensitivity by me. that tool was only used once before in a differrent ethnicity and the authors also opted for literature review to prove that the tool was developed in light of existing international literature, so I went that path while I additionally found that my included literature was aligned and similar in themes found in international literature. This is my motive and aim of going that way...but now doubt is created as supervisor argues the table and strength of evidence which can limit the understanding of the multiple dimensions of the Decision making process...help!

🌹🙏

And also, I try to join JBI Scoping Review Network, But I got failure massage. why? please guide me.

thank you. I have a question;In screening and selection process of scoping review did we allowed to include systematic review in our scoring review study? or we should exclude systematic reviews?