Al hamdoulilAllah for Islam. All the prophets (as) came with the same message, worship the One God. Submit to the One God Allah. Submit in Arabic is Islam. Prophet Jesus (as) submitted to God as all the prophets did before him. The last prophet Muhammad (saw) came with the final testament for all mankind.

Sure do miss Chuck Missler's teachings

11 ft? Doesn't sound like the biblical flood.

Any time my husband criticises me for dog-earring my books, I’m going to remind him that Newton did it.

Don't believe the unsaved antichrist anti trinity people, or the erroneous so-called earliest Greek manuscripts, because the most and most accurate manuscripts had Mt 28: 19 in them, and the Biblical Greek proves that Mt 28: 19 is the correct and only way of baptism.

Every Christian and Israeli needs to hear this

Metaphysical, supernatural, cryptids, nephilim subspecies

I live near Harrison Hot Springs, and I know a Christian whos father Mr Green who encountered a Bigfoot years ago as he was back in the Harrison mountains

Also tree cameras !!

"Evidence of a subspecies of nephilim...these evolutionists look at the bones of ancient beings , they say they are neandrethals and other homenads . But in actual fact , they are looking at subspecies of the nephilim that STILL EXISTS IN THE WORLD " WOW !!!

Yes I learned that from Gary Stearmans Bible prophesy show. A subspecies of nephilim ? Interesting !

Satan inspired terriliun and Justin martyr to change Matthew 28 19 and introduce the Trinity to make salvation of none effect and turn into dead religion Broadway to hell

Tim is spot on here. Order 1st then chaos. Evolution theory banks on chaos then order, the same error crept into the church and out of that error came evolution theory, survival of fittest. Darwin began as a christian.

This whole video is debunked just by reading the Didache. Earliest Christian writing - Father, Son and Holy Spirit

I am a ex jw and I love Jesus Christ so very much

💪💪💪😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭💔💔💔💔💔💔💔🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢

What kind of belief is this ? Three Gods to form one God? Is it an egg type of thing that you believe in ?

since you're all too stupid to understand basic science, here's an actual biological scientist that explains how the cambrian explosion works. my god christians are the biggest fucking liars on the planet. kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y4a3XmqJbMxplas

Oh okay, glad you got into the actual ante nicene church father's in depth like this dude kzbin.info/www/bejne/i6GznouLerBmfJofeature=shared

Holy crap.. excuse my language.. listen. I don’t know why God is leading me into this. I live in the cascades. I’ve never believed in Bigfoot. But I guess I do now recently after listening to military stories album and then all the natives have stories of them too and match with the Giants species. I mean, I wish I wasn’t pursuing all this. It sounds crazy. You guys know cause you’re here too. What shall we all make of this?

False. Megiddo Mosaic proves that Christians believed Jesus is God before it was even legalized.

The trinity wasn't mentioned by anyone until over 200 years after the Messiah'. It was made up. The Roman pagans believed in a triune God. Christians adopted the concept of the trinity because they wanted to make Christianity more appealing to the pagans, so they would convert. It was never taught in the old testament and it was not taught during the life of the Messiah. It's a blasphemous farce.

Super glad to discover Dr. Michael S. Heiser as I begin my bible study!

That Napoleon dynamite ship tho

When I started listening, I was like, what is going on, why is Chris Fisher in this podcast? 😂

Revelation 20:11ff is clearly speaking of where the false prophet and the Devil are cast into, as being the same place that those whose name is not written in the book of life will also go. That place is the lake of fire. Consider Rev 14:11 is very specificcaly speaking of those who worship the beast and his image, and whoever receives the mark of his name." "And the smoke of their torment ascends forever and ever; and they have no rest day or night." Those who align themselves with the Devil will receive the same destination and longevity (eternal)

Treasure He is missed

The biggest secret about ALL of these things is, God and Jesus are real. Government knows the truth about these topics, and they consort with the demonic and hide the truth.

Thank God for Edward Fudge!

I was there a few years ago and it was truly one of the most amazing experiences of my life.

What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision? Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God. Romans 3:1-2 Notice that the Old Testament oracles of God were not committed to the Greeks. In a synagogue in the 1st century, one could only read the Hebrew scrolls or the Targum (a translation of the Hebrew Bible into Aramaic). Greek was forbidden. Recall that Antiochus Epiphanes desecrated the Solomon’s temple circa 170 BC. Thus, the need for Herod to build the 2nd temple. The Jews of the 1st century despised the Greeks, for that and other reasons. Recall what Peter said in Acts 10:28 ”…, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company, or come unto one of another nation;” Recall what happened when it was rumored that Paul brought a Greek into the Temple in Acts 21:28 “Crying out, Men of Israel, help: This is the man, that teacheth all men everywhere against the people, and the law, and this place: and further brought Greeks also into the temple, and hath polluted this holy place.” This event precipitated Paul’s journey to Rome resulting ultimately in his martyrdom. If the Jews refused to keep company with men of other nations what makes anyone think that they would tolerate the language of other nations being read in a synagogue? Some scholars say that Hebrew was lost to the Jews by the first century and only Greek was spoken. If the Jews lost their language, why was Paul speaking to the people in the Hebrew tongue? “And when he had given him licence, Paul stood on the stairs and beckoned with the hand unto the people. And when there was made a great silence, he spake unto them in the Hebrew tongue, saying, Men, brethren, and fathers, hear ye my defense which I make now unto you. (And when they heard that he spake in the Hebrew tongue to them, they kept the more silence: and he saith,): Acts 21:40 - 22:2. If the Jews lost their language, why when Paul met Jesus on the Damascus road, why did Jesus speak to him in Hebrew? "And when we were all fallen to the earth, I heard a voice speaking unto me, and saying in the Hebrew tongue, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?..." Acts 26:14 The only evidence for a BC Septuagint is the letter of Aristeas (LOA), which no one believes but everyone quotes. It is a fantastic tale (read fantasy). There is no reference to a Septuagint prior to Philo of Alexandria 50 AD (+/-). If you trace all the reference to a BC Septuagint, you will find that each and every on them reference the LOA to one degree or another. Josephus is often referred to as an independent witness to the Septuagint, but Josephus does nothing more than plagiarize the LOA and change the first person singular pronouns to second or thirds person singular pronouns. Some historian! If one believes the LOA, one has to believe also that the 10 northern tribes of Israel were not dispersed to four winds after 721 BC, from which diaspora they never returned. Rather you have to believe that they were still in Israel in 285 BC, since the LOA claims that 6 scribes from each of the 12 tribes of Israel were assembled in Egypt by Ptolemy II Philadelphus. Incidentally, a land to which the Jews were forbidden ever to return to (*). Incidentally, none of the ancient writers who refer to the LOA agree on which Ptolemy it was. (*) . Deuteronomy 17:16, Deuteronomy 28:68, Jeremiah 42:13-17, Jeremiah chapter 44. Only the Levites were allowed to copy the scriptures (with the exception of the King who had to make a copy for himself by law). So, one has to add to that belief that 72 scribes (not Levites) defiled themselves among the Greeks and defied the scriptures and God’s express wishes in order to copy the scriptures as well as going to a land to which they were forbidden. Moreover, add to that belief, that 72 scribes, each without a copy of the Hebrew scriptures, translated them from memory into Greek in 72 days and every single word was identical, all the while being locked up in 72 chambers on the isle of Pharos without any collaboration between them. ( by the way, why is it called LXX "The 70" and not LXXII 72?) Incidentally, the Pharos light house was not built until 280 BC, 5 years after the blessed event. A minor point. To sum up, we are to believe that God inspired the work of 72 (not 70) disobedient, non-Levitical scribes who rendered 72 identical copies of the Hebrew scriptures from memory into Greek. Really? Incidentally, (may I say ”Incidentally” again?), the LOA section 176 says that the whole scroll was written in gold. Really? Where is it? You’d think that someone would have a vested interest in preserving such a priceless document. It doesn’t exist! If you were to get a copy of the Septuagint, you would find that it is nothing more than the Old Testament portions of the codex Alexandrinus, the codex Sinaiticus and the codex Vaticanus, along with the Apocrypha (depending which edition you have). Luke 24:44 “And he said unto them, These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me." The Law of Moses, The Prophets, and The Psalms" is how the Jews organized the Old Testament. There is no Greek copy anywhere in any century which organizes the Old Testament in that fashion. Jesus was not quoting a Septuagint. The only witness that anyone can point to, definitively, is the LOA. You really should read it. It is just not believable. And scholars have read it, and they don't believe it! But yet they point to it as proof. "But everybody knows, and all scholars agree... ". Be careful of the "argument from authority" which is what quoting “all scholars” is. It is very often the case that "all scholars" are quoting from someone who they hold in authority who just happened to be wrong. All Hebrew scholars agreed that “Baca” meant mulberry trees. They were all quoting a Hebrew scholar named Burchart. Dr Robert Dick Wilson of Princeton University proved conclusively that Baca meant aqueduct. “Who passing through the valley of Baca make it a well; the rain also filleth the pools.” Psalm 84:6. How does passing through the valley of mulberry trees make it a well? It doesn’t! its nonsensical. But passing through the valley of an aqueduct makes perfect sense to make it a well. Supposedly the LXX was written for the disaffected Jews living in Alexandria Egypt. That part has a ring of truth. But what would possess Jesus Christ to quote from it in Israel, where the vast majority of the population spoke Hebrew or Aramaic. The Scribes and Pharisees and Sadducees certainly spoke Hebrew and despised the Greeks and their language. Greek had been imposed on them by their oppressors the Romans and the Greeks before them. "...,And the common people heard him gladly." Mark 12:37. Heard Him gladly doing what? Reading from a Greek Old Testament? I don’t think so! You will say to me that "the Dead Sea Scrolls contain the LXX". They don't. They contain a few scraps of Old Testament words in Greek, certainly not the LXX. Carsten Thiede author of Rekindling the Word wrote that there are 6 fragments with a few Greek words that match what we call the Septuagint. Not even enough to fill a whole page. He says all the Greek fragments can be dated reliably only to the 1st century sometime before 68 AD. You will say that the earlier English translations included the apocryphal books as part of the old testament and that he KJB translators included the Apocrypha. They include the apocryphal books because it was part of their mandate from the king, but they placed them in a separate section called the “Apocrypha” which means “not considered genuine”. And they headed each page with the title Apocrypha to dispel any doubt that they did not consider these books to be genuine. A book is considered to part of the cannon of scripture if it was quoted by Jesus or written by and apostle or was quoted by an apostle. If you believe that Jesus and or the apostles quoted from the Septuagint, they by that definition you have to include the Apocrypha into the cannon of scripture. And for that reason, you have to also believe Jesus endorsed: • paying indulgences for the dead! • approving the committing Suicide! • An angel of God lied! • praying for the dead! • Praying to the dead (saints) • Sorcery and Magic! • praying to angels! • purgatory! The Septuagint? Really?

That background music is very disturbing

Ewwwwww

Who is the speaker

One of the great and fascinating figures of history that is sadly not well known. But that’s changing.

I can’t believe there’s another human that reached the same conclusion about the Holy Spirit as I did! I thought I was the only one.

Revelation cant be in dead sea scrolls, if they are written after romans drove Jews out, then revelation came 100years after crucifixion ffs!? What the fuck is goin on? How old dead sea scrolls, how old enoch, how old jesus, how old revelation, how old 70 ad? Answer please!

Everything whether in word or deed should be done in the name of Jesus, and in deed also includes water baptism.

As an adult, I started thinking about this and have never heard a sensible reason to believe in a Trinity. It is a bunch of double talk that makes no sense to anyone . If Jesus were God, would he actually pray to himself?

I think you meant Isaiah 45:7 😉

Maybe mosquito repellent

You debunked nothing.

I don't know where this is going I'm halfway through this, but God appeared before Abraham he appeared before Moses and that word appeared means he showed himself, but no man has seen God in his almighty form, but he appeared, then you had Melchizedek who was without mother and without father but was the king and priest of the most high God, he was flesh, there's so many passages as would back up the fact that Jesus was pre-existent. When God said let us create man in our own image, angels cannot take part in the creation so who was he talking to, and how would God send his son if his son did not exist before his birth. So many people try to discredit who Jesus really is, but the Bible says in 1st John that those who deny that Jesus has come into flesh is an antichrist

That the disciples thought Jesus being raised to heaven thought he BECAME deity just cannot be true when John wrote "The Revelation of Jesus Christ." There is only one throne in heaven and one sat upon the throne, and that one is Jesus! Jesus is the physical manifestation of the invisible God. "Great is the mystery of Godliness, God was manifest in the flesh."

Y’all gotta wake up those are Jesus’s chariots

In My Name Lord Jesus Christ!

Anybody understand 3:09?

100%true

You think Jesus literally resurrected. You are really crazy

But of course, without the original autographs it is impossible to say what version is the "true" one. Your opinion on bible codes is not an informed one.