Amazing Video :3

ok lol

Thanks, this helped me better understand an ongoing quantum mechanics course.

thank you very much

Clear, concise and well timed... Thank you! 🤩🤩🤩

Thank You for the whole playlist, it's very practical and well explained. By the minute 7:36 it is written that Δnp_0=np_0(e^(Vd/Φt)), so it becomes zero when I don't apply any voltage? Thank You again (still here in 2024)

why do you say we calculated fermi energy constant i've been looking through your past videos i cant find it

Your teaching is incredibly good! And as the comments show, I'm not the only one who thinks so. :) - Nevertheless, I have a question: the way you are passing on your knowledge now, you must have been taught it (at least to some extent). And of course this also requires a certain talent and curiosity about this subject. I would be interested to know from which sources you gained such a deep understanding of this subject area - also from other teachers or books? And if through books, which ones would you recommend? I would really appreciate an answer!

As a physics students, to be honest the idea of this video is awesome~

If anyone confused about the direction of the band bending, I was too, until I've found out that it depends on the fermi level of the metal. So if there's a "low work-function" metal (fermi level above the p-type's), you'll get the band bending shown here. If the metal is "high work-function" (fermi level beneath the p-type's), you'll get upwards band-bending. Also, for the latter you'll be in accumulation mode to begin with, i.e. at any voltage less than the flat band voltage (including 0). You'd need to overcome the flat band voltage to get into inversion. I hope I'm not terribly wrong.

Can anyone please tell me what software he uses to teach this?

Wave guide. It guide wave

such a succinct explanation

The element T12 is not ro1. the correct is -r10 which is not equal to r01 in general! could you clarify this? and also could you explain why t01t10 -r10r01 is 1?

You are REALLY good at explaining MOSCAP. i already screwed up the middle exam but thx i finally understand this

Isn't this the farsightedness?

GOD I'M SO HAPPY YOU'RE NOT INDIAN

Thank you so much! It's the bestest and such a precious explanation for me! Your channel is such a Gem.

This might be a dumb question, but is anything different whether the load is resistive or inductive? And also if there is an imbalance, is it a power factor thing or something else. I'm obviously no EE...

good voice

the continuity of E(x) and V(x) could be explained using the integration constants that we get when integrating. If we define the Q(x) a piecewise function then E(x) and V(x) also could be expressed as piecewise functions. The integration constants could be set such that there is continuity at the boundary (which becomes the inflection point in V(x).

why k=0?

my prince

My study ASMR 😂

excellent (from someone who has designed these)

@JordanEdmundsEECS i’ve been trying to reach you for a while. I work in audio processing and wanted to know if you could help with some consulting work on Fourier analysis.

can someone tell me why is the volume taken as ( pi/ L)^3 in one step and L^3 in another

Very good explanation, thank you 🙏

amazing!!!!!

Are you planning on making a part 3? 😅

I will be citing your videos a lot - thank you very much - this was exactly what i neeeded

your videos actually give me hope that i will pass materials science thank you! I wish everybody explained things as good as you

Me remembering the late nineteen hundreds. 💀

is there a playlistt ?

Can any confirm this comment is posting, by replying to it? Did a search for photonics to find a video with few comments, so this comment would be easy to notice. Sadly have to use a vpn to get on youtube and wondering if the vpn server's IP address was blocked from commenting on yt.

THANK YOU

5:25 LOWKEY SCARED THE SHIT OUT OF ME 😭 im studying and taking breaks where i watch a video called "Very Creepy and Weird Stuff in Old Minecraft" so yeah this really was weird

I'm asking that vgs is dc biasing voltage . Also one more doubt ,why you keeping a vin dc voltage in small scale analysis . That will be grounded right .

you emphasize that body effect is just an artifact because we are appling Vgs instead of Vgb (a matter of where we reference the voltage to). I think this is not correct. physically speaking, even if you keep the absolute Vg voltage constant (Vgb constant), as you increase the absolute value of source voltage Vs (hence changing Vsb), the required absolute Vg (or Vgb since bulk is ground) voltage to get inversion will still increase, hence altering the definition of device Vth. therefore, there is in fact a "real" physical change that happens to Vth of the device when we change the absolute value of Vs, hence the name, "body effect"

8:26 why is k in dk squared all of a sudden?

in 4:37 is the charge density "row" in Q = ρ x V constant through any value of r? "hope you understood my question"

1:00 No sane person would study physics in general.

Hey Jordan, great videos...very helfpul. Just a quick question; at 5:15 you said some holes vacate the oxide semiconductor interface leaving behind negative ions....why does that happen from a theoretical perspective?

thanks so much!

Sir, how is g(E) zero between Ev and Ec? Isn't the fermi level between them, which would mean the probability of occupancy is 0.5??

this is the best explanation of signal orthogonality

for 2d materials, would the vol be replaced by area?

"the fermi level is powerful" yet not one definition. you are teaching physics be more precise thank you. In all your calculations, how can you skip something so Important as stating what a fermi Level Is. You just said it is located somewhere between the conduction and valence bands. Is that a definition?

If we apply an electric field, how does that energy band diagram change?

Others were trying to explain through definition but you were explaining it like a kindergartener could understand thankyou very much for making it easier