28 күн бұрын
2 ай бұрын
3 ай бұрын
3 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
5 ай бұрын
6 ай бұрын
6 ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@CarlLOlds 4 күн бұрын
Nice trick. The outer ring of Battery's may confuse some people but remember KVL always works!
@TheReinaLia 5 күн бұрын
And is why this other star gives off a totally different frequency is it? kzbin.info/www/bejne/j6XElXWYnrqGkNEsi=mqcyVzUjvtiWm92S. This looks fluid like water and there is more like this. I have a P1000. Planes do not have to calculate a moving target and calculate the descend accordingly to a flat surface.
@umitumit3217 7 күн бұрын
Dizici vidanın bir hesabı varmı
@fromjesse 7 күн бұрын
There probably is a calculation for the cross feed screw, but I just built it by guessing, then tried different sprocket ratios until I got a set that worked.
@umitumit3217 7 күн бұрын
Teşekkür ederim @@fromjesse
@fromjesse 6 күн бұрын
@@umitumit3217 You are welcome.
@umitumit3217 7 күн бұрын
Merhaba dizici milin bir hesabı varmı? 10 mm halat için nasıl bir mil yapmalıyım
@fromjesse 7 күн бұрын
I can't tell what you are asking, but the spool is a DIN200 spool but you can also get DIN250 spools that are bigger and probably better for 10mm rope.
@michaelsmith9046 8 күн бұрын
Thank you for the info, because I thought that might be what the stars really looked like... I am struggling to figure out manual focus on my P1000 that I recently got.. Thanks again for showing the streetlight/ focus deal
@sundaramguruswamy5490 9 күн бұрын
Space and sea gyroscope is differents. Checking procedures.
@gowdsake7103 9 күн бұрын
Aint nature wonderful
@ThatGuyM88 11 күн бұрын
Did anyone actually take some time to review this before blindly agreeing with it? The globe model claims the Mountain is hidden behind physical obstruction/Earth curve....what this demo shows is everything set on a 👉🏼Flat Surface👈🏼 taking place over a 👉🏼Flat Surface👈🏼 The rectangle he placed in front of the clay mountain is intended to represent the horizon, but this fails to reflect reality. The horizon is not observed to be above an object or an observer, it appears at eye level, regardless of the height of the observer. For a more accurate demonstration of the globe model's claims, the experiment should have utilized a curved surface✌🏼 Then there's the light source being directed and reflected off of a piece of paper which is not a direct representation of the Mount Canigou observation as it is the Sun itself/Light source itself that should be behind the object in order for the light source to be obstructed by the clay mountain. This demo failed on all accounts to capture and recreate what is observed of Mount Canigou😎✌🏼™️
@fromjesse 10 күн бұрын
If you're gonna say "Nuh-uh" it only takes 6 keystrokes and one click. Why you run from your debate with me 3 times bud? In any case, your rebuttal of the above video is bad faith and false. A curved surface was emulated because the box in the center was higher than the mountain. Do you really believe that the results would have been different if an actual curved surface was used? And what difference does the emulated sun make if it's a spot shining on paper? Do you really think it would make a difference if my model sun was a spherical light emitting object? If you are really good faith then your answer must be yes, that using an actual spherical surface and a spherical sun lamp would make it not work the same. What say you? Are you good faith or bad faith?
@ThatGuyM88 10 күн бұрын
@fromjesse Bud, this isn't a "nuh-uh", I've pointed out that you failed to recreate what you claimed to have recreated. You're entire setup was done over a relatively flat surface was it not? Your horizon fails to match reality and your light source was not directly behind the object in order to properly demonstrate what we observe with Mount Canigou. Work on actually matching the claims put forth by the model you clearly blindly believe in🤷🏻♂️. And debate with you? I don't even know you and have not interacted with you until now🤦🏻♂️✌🏼™️
@fromjesse 10 күн бұрын
@@ThatGuyM88 You didn't answer my question. I shall ask it again. If I were to have used a spherical surface instead of my kitchen floor, and if I were to have used a spherical light bulb for the model sun instead of a sheet of paper, would the results have been different? Or do you you think the prism would be unable to allow the camera to "See beyond the horizon" if I had used an actual spherically curved surface and a spherical model sun? Can you answer that simple question?
@ThatGuyM88 10 күн бұрын
@fromjesse Use a curved surface and the flashlight you used is fine, just position it directly behind the clay mountain. The point is to recreate what is observed based on the framework/model you believe the observation is taking place within/on. As for the sun/Light source being spherical, that's an assumption of the model you believe in, not what's observed✌🏼™️
@fromjesse 10 күн бұрын
@@ThatGuyM88 Well, if I'm testing the globe model then I would use a spherical model sun, right? The sun does appear to be spherical. The sun spot patterns move across the sun and become slanted as they get near the edge as if they are on the surface of a sphere that is turning. But regardless, you still have not answered my question!! Do you believe that if I had used a spherical surface and a spherical light bulb as a model sun, do you believe that the glass prism would have been unable to refract the silhouette? Why do you refuse to answer the question? You don't even believe the claim you're making, do you. That's a bad faith argument on your part if you don't answer the question.
@johnboon5330 13 күн бұрын
I'm just super frustrated... the software help available for these stepperonline closed loop units says: Download the software at this online link... Are they f&%ing kidding? I was able to communicate the drive with the software, but 4 hours later, no matter what I tried, the software didn't want to save any parameter change. I mean... what a piece of s*@t!!! software!!! And there are 2 other versions of the software that don't even communicate at all!!! I guess they put those files there to even get you more confused. There are no manuals or video tutorials to troubleshoot anything all... You buy these units, and you are on your own!!! This company is a complete joke!!! 😤😤😤😤😤
@TheSteelpony 13 күн бұрын
Fantastic!
@fromjesse 13 күн бұрын
Thank you!
@kevinsamuelbo 14 күн бұрын
Whats ur discord Name again, have a new phone, dont even find our convo anymore, maybe its still on pc. But hows ur fishing line? its getting cold
@kevinsamuelbo 14 күн бұрын
What temperature difference did you achieve Inside the Aquarium, within those few cm? Im planning something similar
@fromjesse 14 күн бұрын
About 140C I figure. The rocksalt+ice was about -10C and the top cellophane was about 130C to give you rough numbers.
@kevinsamuelbo 14 күн бұрын
@@fromjesse well to be exact a Thermometer need to be put inside, where the air is, because I doubt there is more than 50 degrees difference slightly above the ice and slightly below the celophane, but if I already manage 5C-10°C difference at 3 inches height over over about 30-40 feet, that scales the globe and I can check whether its theoretocally possible to curve the full visible light around a barrier
@extrajay4868 15 күн бұрын
Nice. I got a few pics of it from Thurston co.
@Requiem4aDr3Am 15 күн бұрын
Nice. I was unable to see them because of clouds in my area
@ConcaveHollowEarth 15 күн бұрын
Excellent Concavity Marvelous Celestial Sphere As if you're looking at an orb in the sky, only blown up and expanded We are facing a convex ceiling per sey as is shown in this video (layers going higher and higher, convexly facing the observer if earth were concave like shown in this video The light of these convex ceilings (at the edges) get pulled down towards the horizon before it reaches the observers eye This gives us the illusion of an actual concave ceiling (for the globe)
@Requiem4aDr3Am 15 күн бұрын
Beat it kid no one is buying it. We can disprove your hollow earth by pointing to flights. If the earth was concave flight times and distances would be shorter as we would fly up and thus have a smaller circumference to travel.
@flo-plus 15 күн бұрын
Nice capture!
@fromjesse 15 күн бұрын
Thanks!
@FreeAltairStar 20 күн бұрын
Such a nice looking star !
@xliquidflames 24 күн бұрын
I'm watching on Toon's stream right now. What a _cool_ demonstration. This is going in my favorite science videos playlist. It is so freaking good.
@fromjesse 24 күн бұрын
Thanks!
@Funnylocationrealreal 27 күн бұрын
cicada is save by u. cicada want u as frien
@tomclemans 28 күн бұрын
Most of the ground-level cobwebs are shaped like a funnel with the stem leading into the ground.
@fromjesse 28 күн бұрын
Hey Tom! So good to hear from you!
@SealionPrime 29 күн бұрын
That's a neat little boy! Beautiful specimen.
@roohif 29 күн бұрын
Epico! 🤌🤌
@PeterPete Ай бұрын
nice distortion of the real world - using a wide angle lens to distort everything!! well done!!
@tarsmoraes6726 24 күн бұрын
How a wide angle will change the results????
@PeterPete 24 күн бұрын
@@tarsmoraes6726 sure - tell me what's the alleged elliptical path of the moon and earth got to do with the observation?? I mean the uploader is trying to explain the paradox in a manner that best fits his way of thinking!! But it doesn't mean to say his explanation is true!! This is the problem!! Nobody can prove the globe MODEL (oh and it's called a model because it's never been proven!!)!!! Any reasonable sane person knows this!!
@DrEMichaelJones Ай бұрын
oh wow look, optical compression
@zuich3139 Ай бұрын
Where is the laser installed for the last experiment at the end of the video
@fromjesse Ай бұрын
Somewhere in the room. If you look @50:34 you can see that he has a little mirror glued to the metal beam to the right of the orange center hub. In the last experiment, he was bouncing the laser beam off that mirror I suspect.
@roohif Ай бұрын
Love this stuff Jesse 👑👑
@zel-master Ай бұрын
I watched the first video twice. January 16th, he (fromjesse) removes the first gyroscope 04:49 the case is open and spins the flywheel with a "barrel" 12:45 the case is closed, the tube is connected, the compressor starts. It is not visible how the flywheel spins. From the 13th minute the tube is disconnected and the sound tone shows a noticeable drop in the speed of rotation. Explains and shows how the rotation axis will be positioned. So far everything is ok. Then the confusion begins. January 16th from 8 to 8-40 shifts by 18 degrees and stops and for the next 20 minutes until 9 stands rooted to the spot. Apparently he does not like this, he makes excuses. The old man, they say, is acting up and turns it over on the table from north to south, while it is not clear whether it is running or not. From 9 to 9:20 it shifted by almost 5 degrees and stopped again and stood rooted to the spot for the next 40 minutes until 10 o'clock. He turns it over again and resets it. In the first five minutes it shifted by a degree and again stood rooted to the spot for 55 minutes until 11 o'clock. Again he turns it to the south. Finally. From 11 to 12 by 15 degrees, as expected, and finally he continues without turning or resetting. From 12 to 13 the gyroscope fucked up not by the expected 15, but by 25 degrees. And he turns it to the north again and again from 13 to 15 it is around the zero mark from minus 2 to plus 4 degrees. A complete failure. And how much stupid bullshit he spun... On January 20 he uses another gyroscope. In 50 minutes of southern orientation, the shift does not reach 12-13 degrees, but only 5-6 and it flips over, zeroes. In the next half hour, the gyroscope is in a hurry again, 10 degrees, it flips over and zeroes again. Every 10 minutes it pauses and confuses, confuses, confuses, for some reason specifies in seconds. Again it slows down. In 35 minutes only 5 degrees. Again it flips over and zeroes. Now too fast, in 15 minutes 5 degrees. Second failure. January 21, the third gyroscope to the north. In 40 minutes 22 degrees, and then it flips over. So it is not in the opposite direction, like the first and second, but in the same direction in 20 minutes by 15 degrees. Again a failure, and it says that everything is as it should be. It is spinning. I watched his other videos, he confuses and falsifies everything.
@fromjesse Ай бұрын
Welcome to the real world. For a gyroscope to have zero drift error, it needs to be absolutely perfect. Nothing in the real world is absolutely perfect. But I still controlled for the error drift in the gyroscopes and used them to show earth rotation. > _I watched his other videos, he confuses and falsifies everything._ You shouldn't make accusations like that without presenting evidence, it makes it look like you're not honest. Which other video did you watch which you think was falsified?
@zel-master Ай бұрын
@@fromjesse Thanks for the answer. This video also does not provide proof of the sphere. kzbin.info/www/bejne/bZu2k6CFer-sZtU In 8 minutes, the displacement is 1.1 degrees. Then you stop and cool the engine. This is a joke, not an experiment. This is a hat, not an experience. If you want to prove the rotation of the earth, then we (flat) need a multi-hour timelapse of a gyroscope against the background of a window and a clock. Outside the window, the wind quickly sways the branches, the sun rises and sets, or clouds quickly run across the sky, or better yet, a street with people and cars, and on the windowsill, there is a large alarm clock and a gyroscope. The hands are running fast, and the gyroscope is buzzing and blinking its LED, and its rotating disk is majestically shifting from a vertical position to a horizontal one, by 15 degrees per hour, and not standing still, showing a motionless world, as flat-earthers prove. Let's look for such a video.
@nickace843 Ай бұрын
God y'all are dumb lol 😆
@RealWoutLies Ай бұрын
Yes sir. Ingenuity is something many have not.
@fromjesse Ай бұрын
I can't take all the credit. Someone else put in the black and red control knob. But it was jury rigged at the engine and did not work well, so I re-jury rigged it so it worked better. Now the engine can be controlled for speed and shut off from within the cab. Previously, the operator would have to go outside and pull on a wire to shut off the engine.
@pablosdog2808 Ай бұрын
Planning to dig to China Jesse?
@fromjesse Ай бұрын
haha! No, just doing some repairs on a customer's old machine!
@pablosdog2808 Ай бұрын
@@fromjesse Will you be able to do your string in the lake test soon?
@fromjesse Ай бұрын
@@pablosdog2808 I don't know for sure! Work has been busy and I haven't had much free time. There's still a possibility that it happens this year!
@pablosdog2808 Ай бұрын
@@fromjesse On another thing...what are your thoughts on Sky Free's recent vid demonstrating downward displacement associated with IM conditions....even above the mirror line? I think it correlates well with my observations and possibly yours. So the more observations you make with your equipment the better...but consider what Sky Free demonstrated micro scale. Does it fit your angle measurements?
@roohif Ай бұрын
@@pablosdog2808I’ll answer since it’s been five days. And the answer is: get well above the surface. When you’re close to the surface, the gradient can be extreme in either direction. If you’re seeing an inferior mirage, then yes, objects will be displaced apparently lower. When you’re well above the surface, the gradient is stable, predictable, and will bend light downwards, displacing objects apparently higher. Then we can be satisfied that the elevation angle measurements do indeed imply a globe earth.
@Synaptic_gap Ай бұрын
Hey Jesse, Don't know how to get a hold of you otherwise, but currently listening to Allen and his "Battle of the Beams" derp, and wanted to let you know that Dave Mceegan thoroughly debunks everything Allen is talking about.
@fromjesse Ай бұрын
Indeed! I'm pretty sure Alan+team is somehow compensated to push their nonsense. There are enough flat earthers now that people are starting to make enough money off of them that a whole cottage industry is starting to grow to make more flat earthers to buy festival tickets and apps and merch. Basically a big fraud ring. The clever part is that 99.99% of the people involved by simply being flat earthers don't even know that it's a big fraud scheme and it only works because of them. Which is how fraud schemes usually work!
@Synaptic_gap Ай бұрын
@@fromjesse Ha! Pretty much the same way Trump is milking his maga faithful - $275,000 of campaign funds to pay for Melanias beauty treatments. And also, you get the gold medal for perseverance putting up with their hostile arrogance towards you - they know, deep down, that the evidence you worked very hard for is pretty much irrefutable...but it's fun listening to them squirm.
@Synaptic_gap Ай бұрын
@@fromjesse LOL!!! Is Geo actually this obtuse or is he being purposefully dishonest? Similar looking mountains? If you showed him 6 pictures with what he's asked for he'd just say that's not enough show me 8...ad infinitum
@fromjesse Ай бұрын
@@Synaptic_gap I'm about 99.9999% sure that Geo is somehow obligated and compensated to push flat earth even though he knows it's not flat. All he can do when presented with evidence to the contrary is to his claim, he just carries on the mantra in hopes of gaslighting the globers.
@Aleklawa Ай бұрын
Wow double wowo
@dpackman Ай бұрын
In focus or out, it's not a dying sun a gazillion miles away
@twodyefor4207 28 күн бұрын
Nope. All stars are angels and your seeing their energy field
@dpackman 28 күн бұрын
@twodyefor4207 Yes!
@sadfriedgamer6648 20 күн бұрын
how though, I’d like to hear the reasoning maybe I could learn something
@dpackman 20 күн бұрын
@sadfriedgamer6648 we can either believe what God says in the Holy Bible about the stars that He created, and trust that along with what our eyes see, or, we can believe in man made theories or doctrines with zero scientific evidence. God says the stars are Angels that are within the Firmament above, not dying suns trillions of light years away. I choose to believe in God's word myself, but each to their own.
@SealionPrime 2 ай бұрын
Neat, can’t wait!
@danthewaterman 2 ай бұрын
sweet
@SealionPrime 2 ай бұрын
Neat, how old is this? I love that vintage aesthetic
@fromjesse 2 ай бұрын
@@SealionPrime circa 1954!
@SealionPrime 2 ай бұрын
@@fromjesse wow!
@realcygnus 2 ай бұрын
they sure AF don't make em like that anymore
@Xander081987 2 ай бұрын
GReat job!!!
@lettybastien4624 2 ай бұрын
Carrier landing.
@lettybastien4624 2 ай бұрын
Everything is made cheap & crappy. My 2021 Chevy truck has four plastic headlight covers. Some new vehicles come with a plastic oil pan.
@gyro-cosmos 2 ай бұрын
Your’re totally right, this gyroscope is wonderful for its price but unable to show directly the earth rotation, due to friction. However, it can be used to built a home made gyrocompass to show the earth rotation. For people interested, here’s my experiment : kzbin.info/www/bejne/g4ull6aebb-Bq5o I tried to take into consideration all external disturbances I could think of.
@fepeerreview3150 2 ай бұрын
With The Final Experiment just a few months away it's too bad we don't see Flat Earthers around the globe taking advantage of this opportunity to collect some really interesting data sets and do their own experiments. Their guy in Antarctica could be recording the Sun, it's altitude and azimuth at specific times, as well as its orientation based on sunspots, while fellow Flat Earthers could be making the identical observations on different continents. I wonder why they seem so unwilling to take advantage of this great opportunity to research and experiment.
@babotond 2 ай бұрын
truly astonishing work! thank you!
@livingexiled 2 ай бұрын
Are you trying to confirm that the earth is a sphere, or that you have no idea how to do so? Here is an idea - how about you add a pencil mark at the exact point where the laser hits your crudely marked up already covered with pencil ledger pole? The idea is for exact measurement.
@DrN007 2 ай бұрын
#bamboozled
@fromjesse 2 ай бұрын
LOL
@BriansLogic 2 ай бұрын
So Diffraction then Jesse SMH, we know…. You change the zoom you change the diffraction limit…. Which was Mitchell’s point and all our point for years now, thanks for verifying :) Oh and Mitchell didn’t have a blockage that’s the POINT, you need to see an Optician…. If I’m looking at something in the distance with a camera, but I can’t see it with my eyes, is that because there’s a TANGIBLE obstruction in the way, or has my diffraction limit changed ? Oh and Cameras can’t Zoom around Tangible Obstructions Jesse.
@BriansLogic 2 ай бұрын
So Jesse when this effect happens does that mean that I can’t see the boat in the distance, but when I raise up slightly by a few feet I can see the boat more, as my eyes are only slightly blocked then kzbin.info/www/bejne/pXeQon1nrqd7oassi=xDVuTX2HSOYSxabw You see Jesse you answer your own questions, but then try to pretend that you didn’t ?
@fromjesse 2 ай бұрын
Did you even watch my video? Did you not see how the effective aperture area of the lens increases when zooming in?
@BriansLogic 2 ай бұрын
@@fromjesse Yes of course I did, and did you address diffraction by any chance ? YES but you tried to pretend that you didn’t, while your other video the one I linked kills all your nonsense in this video, your a fraud Jesse I have shown this in the past….
@kls2020 2 ай бұрын
would you be willing to make and sell just a shaft cut with threads for 12" of travel and if so how much would you charge ? Could it be done with lighter stock such as a nylon round shaft ?
@fromjesse 2 ай бұрын
I would be willing but I'm not set up for CNC yet, so it's not practical for me at this time.
@SealionPrime 2 ай бұрын
Good shit, I found a paper that did this but this demo is way better :)
@Nekoma_is_flexible 2 ай бұрын
John Savage actually tested his gyroscope with an artificially rotating platform at 15 degrees/h. His gyroscope can register the rotation of the platform, but not of the Earth, despite the same alleged speed. Video title: "Flat Earth - Gyroscope Trilogy - Earth Is A Stationary Plane" by John Savage
@fromjesse 2 ай бұрын
But John Savage had his tethered by the power cable, which kept it from drifting. This is visible when he takes and turns the tray and the cable, you can see that the gyro drifts to a new angle as pulled by the cord: kzbin.info/www/bejne/hIOZnqisqqilZ7M (Exact time stamp.) John Savage later did put batteries on the gyro itself to get rid of the power cord. But do you know what he never did? He never put the self-contained setup on the clock motor. The million dollar experiment, which he had all the parts for, he did not do. Why? I can tell you why. Because his gyroscope would not have held ridged in space on a rotating platform without the cord because the bearings have too much friction.
@Nekoma_is_flexible 2 ай бұрын
If we can trust this gyroscope, we have to conclude that the Earth stops rotating every now and then. Makes total sense. 🧐