Actually, it's not. The plane is called F-45 ingame, although it's clearly based off the real F-35.

@@Zonalyre oh thanks for telling me I didn't realise

You do that on the TSD: you move the cursor with your thumbstick over the enemy, click thumbstick and there you go. Note that you don't necessarily need to have your radar on to lock on to targets with the F-45, as it can acquire targets through datalink or even the RWR alone if your target is sending out radar signals.

Red button on the quest 2 is actually just B.

You’re awesome 👏

@@RED-wk1vh That’s you my friend!

but learning to land without it will make you a better pilot: )

yeah thats true but cant exactly use the classified systems in the f35

The “tablet” is just my desktop screen web browser on a full screen view of Dropbox paper. It’s not the most ideal set up but when I had it just right it came out pretty good looking on the stream

@@RED-wk1vh Sorry, I meant which application you used to get in in VR in this form

Oh no problem. It’s been a couple years so I’m not 100% sure but it’s something “overlay” could be screen overlay or something similar

@@RED-wk1vh Ok, thanks very much.

@@SnjP3RDrjv3R hey there, did you ever end up finding it?

i dont think its possible with TWR below 1.0

Dropbox paper And then a overlay program

I like how it’s marketed as a stealth fighter but has a big ass canard on the front. Nice.

@@starman4346 Canards do not somehow 'switch off' stealth. Not any more than tail planes do. Stealth is not a binary principle, but term for a significant gradient or degree of RCS reduction. Most of that reduction is in designing for angles and removing as many leading edges and protrusions as possible. Such as external hard points and long flat seams, or direct visibility of engine intake fan blades. That's why the biggest RCS reduction factor in the aircraft is the internal weapons bays and recessed, S-shaped inlets. Getting all those surface angles hidden inside the aircraft dramatically reduces RCS. After that, further RCS reduction is done with things like RAM coatings. About the only thing canards do is put some leading edges in front of your bigger leading edges... But you kinda' have to have leading edges SOMEWHERE on your plane, or you don't actually HAVE a plane. Seeing as... leading edges kinda, imply things that come behind them, and having no leading edges means nothing is behind them which renders your 3-dimensional object down to a point source and I'm pretty sure that we don't make aircraft out of singularities, thought that would certainly make them have an RCS of zero. (Note to self: Research making aircraft out of hyper-dense spacetime anomalies. Further note to self: Aircraft may not fly while having a density exceeding that of the core of the SUN. Also research anti-gravity repulsorlift technology.) Moving the tail planes to a canard position only really exposes the leading edge of the control surface to anything directly ahead of the aircraft. Radar beams from the sides, above, or below, would still strike the control surface whether it was in front or not. And actuating the canards to perform maneuvers is less important to the RCS of the plane than literally the entire aircraft's silhouette changing aspect in relation to the radar beam. The largest possible RCS that the aircraft could actualy have would be presenting your belly to the radar, with your weapon bay doors open. Not only are you presenting the largest possible flat surface fully perpendicular to the radar so as not to scatter the beam, but with the bay doors open, you expose lots of greebles from the the interior to give a larger return, as well as a lot of internal bay surface that doesn't have any RAM coatings applied. Basically the fighter equivalent to spinning around and sticking your ass out while dropping your trousers in front of a crowd. Mind, this crowd is armed with large spears, is rather irritated with your existence, and would love nothing more than to shove said spears right up your tantalizingly exposed nether parts. Don't do that.

@@atigerclaw im not reading that

@@FxsxrTrash You don't have to. But you will be the one who chose to lose.

@@atigerclaw Excellent info. Not being an Airedale but enjoying flying games, this helps me be a better pilot and use the equipment as close to "design" as possible. Professional v Mimic Mechanic. Thank you for explaining this

I LOVE that feature and use it often so I guess I'm elite? I dunno, I still have a lot of learning to do. :/

Originally it was called the F-45 because the maker of the game wanted to protect himself legally

What?

@@RED-wk1vh I think he's trying to say your video deserves a hundred star rating plus the rest haha. no clue what else it could mean haha

I think he jettison all his bombs 🤣💐

It's probably really hard to pull irl.

This definitely has happened in real life before. C. W. Lemoine did a review video of a accident report of a civilian accidentally ejecting from a fighter jet mid flight. kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y6usqaSBrNR7qa8

It takes 20 lbs of force to pull on the aces 2

no, because most pilots who eject from an aircraft suffer injuries such as: - broken spines - broken necks - severe hypoxia - snapped femurs - broken/shattered pelvises

you can tilt the engines with the left trackpad/joystick while holding the throttle. You should see the degrees of tilt on the hud.

Kerosian1 hey thanks 👍🏾

superluminarius late response but you need to put ur controller straight up to your headset. (As if you were adjust some glasses) and toggle a the grip button

Chicken_Nuggets_Are_Pretty_Good lol thanks I hope it helped

RED 1791 it absolutely did. Thanks again haha

switch through the modes till you find smooth look

Game Forge thanks for the reply. From talking to people in the discord, I learned that you can make the real application take up half of the screen and the vr view the rest. You can also record the first person view with a separate software than the actual s-cam, and then put the two vids together