15:00 common law money cases

This is a good lecture, but have you considered making a Powerpoint instead of using a board?

Here in 2024 🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼

I’m having an issue perfecting summons under the iop supplemental rule an and b (compounded)… what do I do?

Thank you

Well explained. Sad that does not give feed back.

excellent-so helpful-thanks for making this so clear

As a non attorney do you mean in layman’s terms “you can ask 25 per person?” I don’t k ow math

Hottie

Thank you 🙏 I was granted motion to dismiss with prejustice.. I want summary judgment & not go to trial because the lying defendants are making more bogus claims & I have all the factual evidence they have no evidence of any claim & have provided a big nothing burger. They objected to all of my discovery & lie throught the answers also they claim keep evidence for trial. Is this even illegal? I just want damages & to move on.. dealing with lunatics. What can I do?

Thank you for all your time and effort. Your website is a GEM.

Thank ypou

This video was incredible helpful, thank you!!

It would help a great deal if we all knew what the definition of "United States" is as used in the 14th Amendment...

Will we be of this Lesson Learned???

Good review.

Four hour reviews for all your 1L classes?!?!? Dang. What's even the point of testing after all that?

+

@9:23 you said the answer was "C.", however, you showed the answer highlighted as "B.": the correct answer according to the standard for the movant concerning a summary judgment motion. Thanks.

Summary judgment 👹

I did not express, consent, sign, no clearances letter, state wave of my attorney/client privileges, nor waived work product.

Atty Little maliciously excluded me from knowing his conspirared adverse strategy. Because of his Malfeasance manipulated Malpractices, Fraud Concealment, illegal Dismisal, suppressed supported evidence, and conflict of interest with PRL Legal Counsel, etc.

I was Gaslighted Abused during depositions conducted by PRL'S Legal Counsel Atty Nancy Sprattlin and Affiliates.

Atty Kevin Little REJECTED MOST OF my supported evidence and charges.

Atty Little maliciously drafted lies, omitted and incident in my EEOC'S Investigation without my knowledge. I provided Atty Little 2 Chronological timelines which he suppressed to place in my Client File. He adversely refused my request to receive a copy via phone conversation. He also denied me the right to read, correct or confirm what he falsely wrote and / or misconstrued. As one can see in his statement, my signature and signoff were intentionally breached/blocked. The client, Helene was excluded/oppressed, because Atty Little was adversely litigating with PRL Legal Counsel. Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Fraudulent Concealment of Witness/Complainant Helene Webster.

Very beneficial for me, Thanks

According to Rule 26.1e Atty Little nor Amanda and Ben violated in not submitting initial Disclosures 26 1e to EEOC'S Investigation.

Unbeknownst to me, Kevin Little egregiously suppressed and spoliated information that did hurt me.

Atty Litttle did not do nor recommend.

Greetings Mr. Nathanson I still not sure if your right or wrong in professing treason law's in our effort of Counter-City. But, I notice on proximaty 5:19 you mention P.D.Q staffing and notwithstanding, they are responsible for the rough draft Operation just cause, what does that mean? Nathanson v. Murphy, 132 Cal. App. 2d 363, 282 P.2d 174, 1955 Cal. App. LEXIS 2196 & Candyman Kitchens v. Indeed, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121754, 2020 WL 3803936

God Bless You and Thank you so much for what you do. I think you’re awesome and I will do great thanks to you.

Thanks again

Thank you

Thanks again

Thank you 🙏🏻 for teaching. This is very useful for me learning while training

Well put together. I admit it makes me optimistic to here the words communicate and educate being promoted in civil procedure.

I just wanted to let you know that I have watched your videos over the past 2 days and you have helped me so much to study for my Civ Pro exam tomorrow!

Thank you for this video! As a pro se Plaintiff I needed this video!!!

Way better than my civ pro prof lol

Thank you sir

Your lecture makes sense, except for one thing poverty poverty is the number one problem in this country. How do you account for something that could be a remedy? Otherwise, dumb should be against the law, your right about the problem though. Jones v. Riot Hosp. Grp. LLC, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90241, 2023 WL 3603684

This is federal rules of civil procedure right?

I wanted to get mad at you at first, but something was revealed that is total madness with regards to the principal, he wants a conventional, notwithstanding. And, he haves real bad issues with his family especially his females, maybe you can help in some way, but evidently, we don't want to lead with that kind of b/s. It will hurt the world, I am not a donkey in account of earning it for them. My family fought thru all the American wars, I don't want to be the level of the street, it is about honor for this country -America.

I wish you were my civ pro professor, I am so grateful to find your channel. Thank you, Professor. Nathanson.

Thank you so much for your work Professor Nathenson. Our professor recommended your KZbin Channel for our class and I am so glad she did.

This has been so helpful thank you so much

is a Employee of the company a Party?

ADA title ll torts access ♿ to the court account mizell vr Hamilton mizell vr neuss mizell vr Hernandez x3 appeal pharma poparus disabled prosecutor prose Marshalls vagabond code for president 💯

🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕

great video, you answered all the question in was looking for.