Roberts Architecture

Пікірлер

@hoanganhpham9008 Күн бұрын

can someone tell me theme music name ?

@BinaryStarAstrology 3 күн бұрын

I’m pulled out my pemf mat and I’m lying on it and am a little freaked that your channel came up. I didn’t speak about it. Just pulled it out and plugged it in. WTAF

@andrewashdown3541 3 күн бұрын

Bannister Fletcher: A History of Architecture on the Comparative Method Ernst Neufert: Architects' Data Clough Williams-Ellis: Building in Cob, Pisé and Stabilized Earth Maxwell Fry & Jane Drew: Village Housing in the Tropics HB Cresswell: The Honeywood File Sigfried Giedion: Space, Time and Architecture

@brandon_uk 3 күн бұрын

The G does not stand for geometry. It stands for Genesis.

@user-zl9cs4ou7p 4 күн бұрын

For those who are believers, sacred is a good way to go. For non believers it's just more mindbending exercises. Most of these are baits on hooks to lure any empty mind.

@c_o_r_y 4 күн бұрын

This is deceptive because it says a lot of things that are researched, but then says a generalization that reveals a total lack of comprehension of the material. The idea that meeting places or social spaces were not considered under “form follows function” is a conflation between utilitarian values, industrial capitalism, and modernism. Modernism simply posited that concepts have no inherent symbolic form. Postmodernism counter-posited that while abstract ideas do not have forms, no idea is truly abstract because to be an idea is to be bound to people, which do not live in abstract. Because of this, symbolic forms are concepts in and of themselves, and therefore have meaning. It’s simple really, modernism doesn’t say no gabled roofs, it says do not put gabled roofs in places that need to prioritize cooling over precipitation. Post-modernism says if *your* idea of a house has gabled roofs, then to build your idea of a house, you use a gabled roof, even if it’s not the most efficient form, because if it was any other form, it would no longer be your idea of a house.

@madgab808 4 күн бұрын

Love the video great knowledge ❤

@kenmcdavidefernandez5364 4 күн бұрын

❤

@ogcommunity8877 6 күн бұрын

why do people always get the location of the tree of life on the flower of life wrong ...if you place da'ath (unity) in the center of the FOL it can be spun around forming a perfect spinning merkaba or metatrons cube.. (side note) Whats funny about that painting of Plato (which Rafael used Leonardo as the model..being X-lovers ....Raphael wrote Timeo (coward) not Timeus..he also hid Devil faces all over him and up his sleeve, as a insult to Leo for not coming out .

@DAVERTY1 9 күн бұрын

Yes rabi,,, please do and if u can make 1 about how and what makes crystals form into there shapes and what properties or froms of either stimulations or calming protective feilds of energy that come off of the amethyst for instance wile quarts is a sorta battry or enhancer to the other crystals ,, I am trying to aquire the knowledge to do somthin all around life changing and all i need is the understanding of these minierals and frequencies ,,

@tnmrcricket 9 күн бұрын

With Greek knowledge and Greek inventions that he "took" from the library of Alexandria (which never burned down, only in front of the library the warehouse with grains burned down) he became famous and an inventor.

@Only_art_ok 9 күн бұрын

I love this architect

@Only_art_ok 9 күн бұрын

Very nice

@angelavandenberg3762 9 күн бұрын

Yes, more please!

@dearlantsov 11 күн бұрын

if it's not too much trouble, please do the design processes of more famous architects!

@robertsarchitecture 11 күн бұрын

Yes, great idea!

@dawnatilla2469 11 күн бұрын

Sacred geometry is the UNIVERSE, and as such does not belong to anyone and no one came up with it or should take credit for it. Just saying.

@carolinawren3594 11 күн бұрын

form has always followed function. The term was invented in the early 20th century as a marketing term to justify the rejection of the embrace of decoration in all the neo historical design movements of the 19th century. To assume that, in itself, it embodies some sort of universal truth of modernism per se is laughable.

@robertsarchitecture 11 күн бұрын

Yes and no. Yes, "Form Follows Function" comes from German Functionalism and the Bauhaus. No, pre-Modern architecture did not separate form from function. As F.L. Wright says "Form and function are one." It was only Modern architecture that separated the two.

@LouieGrind 13 күн бұрын

IMO Santiago Calatrava should replace SOM.

@robertsarchitecture 11 күн бұрын

See this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/mKnGXmt3fbGgY5I

@efra_gg 13 күн бұрын

yo creo que diseño con una combinacion de todos

@progettazione_case_moderne 14 күн бұрын

many thanks nice video ..

@quinholzken7051 14 күн бұрын

Bedankt voor deze mooie uitleg en informatie waar kon ik dit ander vinde nog maals Dank 😊

@varem05 14 күн бұрын

Thank You

@timothyvillars7854 14 күн бұрын

This video needs to adjust the information on the 5 platonic solids in the metatrons cube diagram. Only the three simpler shapes accurately emerge from the hexagonal diagram. The icosahedron and dodecahedron require a decagon diagram, or a golden hexagon, to accurately depict their dimensions on a flat plane.

@robertsarchitecture 11 күн бұрын

Yes, that is correct. I was going to draw the platonic solids in the diagram to show how they could be constructed, but ran out of time. Maybe for a future video I'll show how they can be constructed.

@vincentgoupil180 16 күн бұрын

Before Audrey Munson was Evelyn Nesbit and Stanford White.

@robertsarchitecture 11 күн бұрын

Yes. Definitely. I should do a video...

@leoosbrrr 16 күн бұрын

love it

@DeyanWell 16 күн бұрын

Earth is flat

@k43245 16 күн бұрын

Man i am still in school deciding what to do... this helped a lot in learning the basic... very exited to learn more and more

@robertsarchitecture 11 күн бұрын

Keep watching!

@lesegomolefe7743 17 күн бұрын

This is my first year in architecture school and I find myself rejecting the teaching being taught in my university, the main reason for this is I feel like it is centered around modernism as a way to reject colonialism but I strongly believe modernism promotes consumerism which was created by colonialism and imperialism. This movement regressive and our educators are stuck in the Industrial age, a lot is at play here.

@robertsarchitecture 11 күн бұрын

Yes. Me too. I hated Modernism in school until I discovered Postmodernism which I hated more. Modernism is a direct result of the Industrial Revolution. Postmodernism is a result of the postindustrial economy. But don't get depressed. Invent something new!

@hindsight2022 20 күн бұрын

It is the square and compass . Not a ruler .lol

@robertsarchitecture 20 күн бұрын

It is the ruler and compass. Here is the book I used for research: www.amazon.com/Ruler-Compass-Practical-Geometric-Constructions/dp/0802717764

@Larsbor 21 күн бұрын

If you are not a Japanese architect why should you know these measures..?

@robertsarchitecture 20 күн бұрын

These dimensions come from the human body. Architects should know many types of modules, from Le Corbusier's 'Modulor' to the Japanese 'Ken'.

@jonathanvilario5402 21 күн бұрын

I'm not going to lie I kinda stopped caring what you said after you brought up marxism. A lot of what you said in your video was actually really informative and worth taking into consideration. However, the moment you went anti-marxist (keep in mind I'm a staunch capitalist), it made me feel like you weren't trying to teach anything and were trying to propogate anti-liberal propaganda. If you want to inform us that's good, but using anti-marxist talking points makes it feel like you're just another anti-woke grifter trying to capture an audience through fear mongering, like those alpha youtube channels that regurgitate dumb talking points. Not saying anything in this video was wrong, but it would be easier to listen to and view as credible, if you stopped using communism as the villain of your videos. The real villain is bad bureaucracy, I'd rather hear more about that than beating a dead horse of an ideology that's completely irrelevant in the modern day.

@robertsarchitecture 20 күн бұрын

Unfortunately I agree this video did not age well. I try not to be political and create evergreen content, but this topic was overtaken by events. A year after I published this video, the State of California Architect's Board issued a requirement for continuing education classes in 'Net-Zero' for license renewal. Not 'sustainable design', 'green design', or 'resilient design' which I strongly believe in, but specifically 'Net-Zero' which I do not. I'll probably do another video on sustainable design in the future and try to keep it free from ideology.

@JepaStepy 22 күн бұрын

Please do more geometry videos 🎉

@user-hm2gb6pm6b 23 күн бұрын

Ceicily Ceicily Ceicily Sicily Sicily Sicily

@user-hm2gb6pm6b 23 күн бұрын

Associates of bible researches ....team ????

@PASHKULI 23 күн бұрын

ViNtruvius… maybe from da ViNci

@mycool4374 23 күн бұрын

Amazing, thankyou for this video. My question, is if you make a cube of the flower of life, and take all of the negative space from each and make a 3d object then would that not be the visual representation of the seed of life? hidden from most.

@robertsarchitecture 23 күн бұрын

One of the ideas I had for this video was to take the seed of life and model it three dimensionally on the computer. It would look like spheres inside of spheres. From this other shapes could be made. It would look like the cymatic wave patterns created by sound on sand or water, but in three dimensions. Very cool stuff to experiment with...

@lisahodge7541 23 күн бұрын

I really would love to know more about the sacred geometry

@lightfeatherart2831 24 күн бұрын

Great job, bravo! Two things: 1) You mentioned that the icosahedron is made of isosceles triangles. They are equilateral. 2) Not many folks, save actual geometers, payed close enough to metatron’s cube to realize that two forms are incorrectly depicted in them: Icosahedron and Dodecahedron. They is because they are phi forms and must be arrived at via a different way via straight edge and compass. I construct polyhedra with wood and if you hold them in your hand and look at metatron’s cube renditions of those forms, they are warped, or corseted in back and flat in front. I recommend trying it. Tetrahedrons, cubes and octahedrons are accurately found in MC.

@robertsarchitecture 23 күн бұрын

Yes. Everything you say is true. The way to draw the solids inside Metatron's cube is using vanishing points so the object looks like they are receding in space. This means the angles are not quite correct but follow the lines of the vanishing point. I think you are referring to M.C. Escher.? The book "M.C. Escher Kaleidocycles" is really amazing. If I do another video on sacred geometry I'll definitely show Escher's work.

@lightfeatherart2831 22 күн бұрын

@@robertsarchitecture I could see how it could be arrived via vanishing points, which omits the MC situation. George leoniak of the knewgeometry channel arrives at the phi forms using the MC template in a different way. He also creates the two solids beginning with golden circles (not MC). Escher’s work is so cool. I did mean Drunvalo Melchizadek… popularizing Metatron’s cube with the incorrect forms 40 years ago. Folks like da Vinci didn’t arrive at the phi forms using MC. A beautiful pattern it is… but all the platonics arriving from face centered packing within that pattern, they are not. Thanks again!

@timothyvillars7854 14 күн бұрын

@@robertsarchitecture its not about vanishing point. The flat diagram is attempting to calculate the component of the shapes dimensions in the given plane, like a shadow.

@AdonaiNdlovu-lj1if 24 күн бұрын

Good stuff man

@Larsbor 25 күн бұрын

I think it is a bit stupid. Why should Architects know construction details, they should know how to draw decorations and make building comfortable, pretty and functional, not try to do the engineers job, that is not what you have art schools for.

@ben-fq9cu 6 күн бұрын

Disagree. In order for architects to be able to design spaces accurately they need to know at least basic construction principles due to measurements and other considerations. For example, if an architect doesn’t understand that a wall needs to be a certain depth due to the insulation, electrical work, piping, etc. then they cannot design the space accurately. Small details like this can greatly impact the experience of the architecture.

@ArchitectMouaed 26 күн бұрын

Thank you very much for this valuable information. Although I am an architecture student and do not have enough time, I finished the video until the end. I am following you from Iraq.