@SpicyCactus thanks, appreciate the view

Yes that's the one

@gabrielboutilier2961 you probably have a better idea than me. If you go on BCM's website and check it out there might be more information. I'm not even sure they make it anymore. It's the only rifle I've personally encountered with that specific profile. It shot well

I have several from gunstockcover.com Jon Klein makes good butt cuffs. I also have one from Diamond D Leather and Hill People Gear. All good cuffs. My favorite are the gunstockcover ones

Well, let me preface my answer with saying you should not pass up a rifle soley based on having a cross bolt safety as it’s largely personal preference and you can work around it. Several reasons I do not prefer them. The first being aesthetics. I like how they look with a solid receiver vs. the safety. 2. With the winchester I have had the cross bolt safety bump on when I did not want it to, attempt to fire the rifle and it’s on safe. 3. Function. I prefer to carry my rifles on half cock. This allows me to cock the hammer while shouldering the rifle and fire quickly. I predominantly track and still hunt. This means that the bulk of my shot opportunities are 4 seconds or less and often on running game. Bringing the rifle off half cock is far faster and more intuitive than disengaging the cross bolt safety. This same scenario, I’ve also had issues when the safety gets bumped on accidentally and I snap the gun to full cock and try to fire on a running deer and the hammer falls to a click on the cross bolt safety. The Rossi I have has a safety mounted on the hammer and I just don’t use it. i use the half cock instead. I prefer that style of safety or a tang safety like the mossberg 464 to the cross bolt as it alleviates issues 2,3 and 4. The last issue with it particularly in the winchesters is they are not as desirable. This is a pro and a con as it allowed me to purchase that 94 for relatively cheap compared to post ’64’s without cross bolt safetys. Again, if that’s what you have it’s not a huge deal. You can certainly work around it and be effective. BUT If given the choice I’d rather have one without. Many of my shotguns and rifles have half cock hammers and no safety and that is what I am used to. I would prefer to keep that the same with all my hunting or frequent use rifles to provide some consistency with manual of arms.

@@G.I.JeffsWorkbench thanks for watching and for the comment

@@MrChikoSticks ?

@@camakazi48 At your disservice! 🫡

@@r23s82 thanks a lot. I'm glad you enjoyed it and I appreciate you watching and leaving a comment. Happy Fourth

Yeah at least that. Probably 500 to 1000 of it has been utm and Sims as well. No issues, still running on original bcg, o rings, barrel, everything.

Thanks for sharing. It's an impressive round no doubt. Still my first choice to carry into the woods. Thanks for the view

Thanks for the view and the input. Appreciate you stopping by

Just the front camera on a phone. Its a right handed gun lol

Witchcraft.

Thanks for the input and the view. I've been very happy with mine

You'll have to refresh my memory

Front camera on my phone. Thanks for the view

No problem. Glad I could help. Thanks for the view

Glad it helped. Thanks for watching

Thanks for the view and the input. Glad you enjoy your rifle.

PSA sucks you know what. So tired of psa

They're fine for what theyre made for. It's a $300 rifle for people that aren't gonna shoot thousands of rounds or to get people into an AR until they can afford to upgrade. If i was on a budget and needed a rifle i wouldn't have any qualms about a psa and some cases of ammo to take some some classes or have around the house until i could afford something better. It's unrealistic to expect a $300 rifle to do the same thing as one that costs $2000. You get what you pay for​@justusbryant7366

@camakazi48 them stupid daggers. Trying to be a glock clone.

Thanks for the view

Thanks for the view and the comment

Thanks for the view and the comment. Smith and wesson just came out with a .44 that has the removable tube. Be interesting to see how those play out. I have several big boys from henry pre loading gate and they are very smooth guns! Good luck with your search. Hope this helped

Thanks for the view and the imput. It's possible it was me, I'm not claiming to be an expert, however I believe that specific cartridge does not feed great in that marlin. The winchester and my other 336 don't mind it but not the same rifle. Perhaps the action needs work but I'm incline to try some different ammo and some lubrication first and see how it does. Thanks for the suggestion. It's a burris fast fire 2

Thanks for the view and the comment Kyle. Definitely a good shooting rifle. It'll do whatever you ask of it. Thanks again for the view

I have a 94 with angle eject in 356win. Impressive cartridge.

Awesome, nice caliber choice. Thanks for the view and comment

Good luck finding ammo or cases to load for that.

@@aaronwilcox6417 same reason I haven't bought a model 71 in .348... oh well. Maybe some day if I win the lottery lol

Great guns. Quick handling in the woods

Thanks for the clarification Matt. I have always like the idea of the .444 but it's tough to find ammo for it around here. Never handled one personally. I'll add that as a note on the video. I also quite love lever guns. There will be a part 2 at some point once I get the rest of the up here from my in laws place. Limited on space right now. Thanks for watching and for the input. Be well

Thanks for the view and the comment!

Great choice! I also have a 12 gauge hanging over the back door for the same reasons. Got a similar video on shotguns in the works. Thanks for watching and for the comment!

@@camakazi48 I look forward to the shotgun video! 🙂

I believe the website is gunstockcovers.com. the guys name is John. He does fantastic work. I have 4 of them. All hand made. This is the "mountain man" but he has a lot of designs and materials. The winchester is wearing the sitting bull and the rossi has the rough rider

They make good rifles for sure

No problem. Thanks for the view and the comment

It's not necessary. The sop for the unit I was in was to rip the mag in the case that it stuck or you had a malfunction you did not lose time figuring out the mag was stuck and going back to do it. I trained that way for years and now it's habit. No one has to do it that way if they don't want to but I don't lose anytime ripping the mag, it's never stuck and I am used to doing it like that. I'm also using a BCM. Their magwells are tight. Hope this answers your question

Thanks a lot man. Same to you. Logistics of 2 countries and busy schedules made it tough. We miss making it. Once things settle down more content will return in some form. Thanks for watching

@@camakazi48 For sure I know logistically can be a challenge and life gets complicated quick, either way have always enjoyed the content and will be on stand by.

@@alexanderabdskyy glad to have you 🤘

Not as of right now. Possibly a future project if there's enough interest? There are nomadic fieldcraft shirts coming out, the other partner of 1st Response Fieldcraft. I believe he has the link on his Instagram. Thanks for the view and support anyway. I will consider shirts in the future

Either way you're going to get a good carrier. The APC is pretty similar to the lbt old school carriers. There's a lot of molle space. The shoulder pads are more cushioned stock than the jpc and it comes with a traditional cummerbund. The jpc is more breathable and lighter weight, but it also has less material and space. There's still a generous amount of molle on the jpc. I have mine configured to carry quite a bit. The 2.0s have the changeable back panels too. I use my apc at work still but I've modified it quite a lot. I added gel shoulder pads to both carriers. I also put a skeletonized cummerbund with first spear tubes on the apc. It also has qore ice vents I've used as a bumper system to increase ventilation. They're both durable, comfortable carriers. I don't think you could go wrong with either. I wouldn't say I like one more than the other. Just kind of depends what you're looking for. If you want a more traditional carrier you want to put pouches all over the apc is probably a better base but it's heavier and less breathable, again negligible not enough to really notice while wearing. The jpc is lighter weight and you have more mobility in your arms. I haven't found shouldering the rifle to be an issue in either, but I've used plate carriers for a long time and usually just shorten my stock or shoot it off my chest anyway. I would say if you want more feature for your 200 get the crye. If you're just looking for a solid base carrier to upgrade things as you go that's going to last, get the apc. I don't run placards so I haven't used that system in either the crye or the apc. I have been super happy with the apc but I also bought it before the jpc and ferro and all that stuff came out. It's a great carrier but there's probably more stuff out there now with different options this doesn't have. But it's a good base carrier. I still use it at work. With a couple upgrades it goes from good to great. Sorry if that's a little unclear. I know it's long winded

@@camakazi48 Gotcha, thank you for responding and typing all that out. The information is very helpful.

Thanks man. Old Vietnam Era trick. Can't take credit for it