I so much have passion for this work. How do i get in touch with you.

Excellant great work ,proud of you Dr anjana

🌑🌑🌘🌒🌕🌘🌒🌑🌑 *SR🌘GR🌒HH* There are issues with linear thinking based on the Hubble constant and reverse inflation. Having a singularity as zero point, even in QM, is problematic because it requires time dilation to be instant. Using holographic principles and implementing applied graduality in Möbian mathematics provides a much smoother transition regarding transfer of energy and entropy. Understanding that time dilation in relativity also is less drastic locally because of quantum fields, quantum entanglement and holographic principles. Once you approach extreme gravity fields, such as neutron stars and black holes, the normal attributes and effects of gravity is less severe within the local relativistic grid, because the matter that is caught in the gravity field is indeed light itself and gravity is a function of light, so the acceleration experienced by the subject is much more gradual and doesn't necessarily lead to spaghettification, because matter is fundamentally made of light, thus rendering a smoother transition within local fields. There is a possible misconception that black holes are more destructive to local events, because we have implemented a differentiation between matter, light and energy. Proposing that light and motion are the fundamental forces in physics solves several of the empirical findings in our universe - from local events to the very large. IMPORTANT NOTE: There is also a possibility that the laws of nature might change from region to region in the universe. Applying the same unified functions everywhere might not be applicable - based on the observer. Quantum Mechanics combined with holographic principles in conjunction with relativity might produce variations that are stable within physicality as a whole. But they might also produce temporal shift variations that might fluctuate between timelines, not compromising the stability of the system as a whole. Temporal shifts pose little/no threat to quantum fields in macro or micro, because the energy transfer between two or several more points are conserved within holographic principles. Best way to explain is superpositions of quantum fields. But using spherical understanding we might end up with hyperpostions in addition, meaning that within multiverse theory and/or paralell physics, we can propose that local variations might occur elsewhere. One might suspect that this could be inherently unstable, but hopefully stability is ensured by *Special* and *General Relativity* in conjunction with *Hypertensored Holigraphy* QM & QFT are ultimately functions of HH, because all forces, all phenomenons, energy, polarities and particles are fundamentally holographic, thus made of light. Diverge Planck and apply Hypertensorality to: v=d-(t³c³) If one might observe local effects that seem irreversible to the observer, the stability/instability of said system might return to its relative position in space as they where when the temporal shift gradually occurred. A Rosen/Einstein bridge might be folded back onto itself, reestablishing pre-existing physicality relative to the initial motion through space time. Quantum Entanglement might provide a reasonable solution to reoccurance of paralell shifts that within time dilation could possibly be "stored" in the same field, but according to the observer. Matter and energy that exist in local time at one point might be shifted and parallaxed with EPR that in reality is the same as ER. Local EPR might occur continously between substances that share the same locally observed quantum field and the energy accessible could possibly be much greater than within relativity, because e=mc² isn't truly applicable when dealing with motion on a quantum level. When taking into account that matter in itself consist of light, e=mc² is rather moot. Energy is indeed conserved within relativity and as we know we can't break relativity within relativity itself, but when we apply quantum and holographic principles, we could propose that e=cc² The accuracy of this correction must be investigated, but it is strongly suggested through quantum entanglement and holography that the state of energy in the universe is much greater than what relativity proposes. Considering sphericality to QE in EPR we might unlock a deeper understanding between gravity, relativity and QM. There might be spherical and macro EPRs that beam QE through quantum fields in absolute zero and this might give us access to zero point energy that is much greater than fission and much less complicated than fusion, because the input energy is more or less the device itself. Stability and security is better overall because zero point energy doesn't require usage of unstable materials... This has to be investigated further to test the hypothesis. IMPORTANT NOTE: There is never one singular source for any given system. There are always a plurality of systems and subsystems to ensure the stability and security of the spectrum of the laws of nature, physics and life. If there was only one singular source for any given system, it would ultimately lead to instability and degradation. Stability of the laws of nature are almost impossible to compromise, because ultimately light is the very foundation of matter and gravity. Even though quantum mechanics might seem random at certain conjunctions, the configurations are governed by quantum entanglement that principally are benign in nature, because changes to the information/polarity exchange are secured in relativity that ensures a certain degree of stability. Complete equilibrium in any given system are prohibited by the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, but it may at the same time be rendered void when entering the quantum realm, where exotic effects might be empirically observed. This is easiest explained by double slit experiments that prove quantum entanglement can not only give parallel energy patterns, but also plural outcomes without loss of energy but possibly provide divergence of energy, thus rendering the 2nd law of TD moot, possibly invalid or maybe incorrect in its current understanding. This can lead us to energy production that leave us with little to no loss of energy. Runaway effects that might go critical such as in fission production are less hazardous, given the correct protocols are in place. Weaponizing quantum energy production should be avoided at all cost and is not feasible, because subatomic particles cannot be concentrated in practical weapons. Using such technology should either way be separated from military science regardless. Civilian and military sciences SHOULD always be maintained. How life itself originated is a whole other field and might be discussed both metaphysically and naturally. As I view it, I think it is interesting to entertain several avenues instead of focusing on a singular source. Life itself is pluralistic, so why shouldn't there be several sources without excluding any existing. Information is fundamentally secure within systems. It cannot vanish and is stored within SR/GR/QM/HH. 🌘🌗🌘🌖🌘🌕🌘🌔🌘🌓🌘🌒🌘🌑 🌑🌒🌑🌓🌑🌔🌑🌕🌑🌖🌑🌗🌑🌘 🌕🌒🌘🌑🐬🌑🌒🌘🌕

🌑🌑🌒🌘🌕🌒🌘🌑🌑 *SR🌘GR🌒HH* There are issues with linear thinking based on the Hubble constant and reverse inflation. Having a singularity as zero point, even in QM, is problematic because it requires time dilation to be instant. Using holographic principles and implementing applied graduality in Möbian mathematics provides a much smoother transition regarding transfer of energy and entropy. Understanding that time dilation in relativity also is less drastic locally because of quantum fields, quantum entanglement and holographic principles. Once you approach extreme gravity fields, such as neutron stars and black holes, the normal attributes and effects of gravity is less severe within the local relativistic grid, because the matter that is caught in the gravity field is indeed light itself and gravity is a function of light, so the acceleration experienced by the subject is much more gradual and doesn't necessarily lead to spaghettification, because matter is fundamentally made of light, thus rendering a smoother transition within local fields. There is a possible misconception that black holes are more destructive to local events, because we have implemented a differentiation between matter, light and energy. Proposing that light and motion are the fundamental forces in physics solves several of the empirical findings in our universe - from local events to the very large. IMPORTANT NOTE: There is also a possibility that the laws of nature might change from region to region in the universe. Applying the same unified functions everywhere might not be applicable - based on the observer. Quantum Mechanics combined with holographic principles in conjunction with relativity might produce variations that are stable within physicality as a whole. But they might also produce temporal shift variations that might fluctuate between timelines, not compromising the stability of the system as a whole. Temporal shifts pose little/no threat to quantum fields in macro or micro, because the energy transfer between two or several more points are conserved within holographic principles. Best way to explain is superpositions of quantum fields. But using spherical understanding we might end up with hyperpostions in addition, meaning that within multiverse theory and/or paralell physics, we can propose that local variations might occur elsewhere. One might suspect that this could be inherently unstable, but hopefully stability is ensured by *Special* and *General Relativity* in conjunction with *Hypertensored Holigraphy* QM & QFT are ultimately functions of HH, because all forces, all phenomenons, energy, polarities and particles are fundamentally holographic, thus made of light. Diverge Planck and apply Hypertensorality to: v=d-(t³c³) If one might observe local effects that seem irreversible to the observer, the stability/instability of said system might return to its relative position in space as they where when the temporal shift gradually occurred. A Rosen/Einstein bridge might be folded back onto itself, reestablishing pre-existing physicality relative to the initial motion through space time. Quantum Entanglement might provide a reasonable solution to reoccurance of paralell shifts that within time dilation could possibly be "stored" in the same field, but according to the observer. Matter and energy that exist in local time at one point might be shifted and parallaxed with EPR that in reality is the same as ER. Local EPR might occur continously between substances that share the same locally observed quantum field and the energy accessible could possibly be much greater than within relativity, because e=mc² isn't truly applicable when dealing with motion on a quantum level. When taking into account that matter in itself consist of light, e=mc² is rather moot. Energy is indeed conserved within relativity and as we know we can't break relativity within relativity itself, but when we apply quantum and holographic principles, we could propose that e=cc² The accuracy of this correction must be investigated, but it is strongly suggested through quantum entanglement and holography that the state of energy in the universe is much greater than what relativity proposes. Considering sphericality to QE in EPR we might unlock a deeper understanding between gravity, relativity and QM. There might be spherical and macro EPRs that beam QE through quantum fields in absolute zero and this might give us access to zero point energy that is much greater than fission and much less complicated than fusion, because the input energy is more or less the device itself. Stability and security is better overall because zero point energy doesn't require usage of unstable materials... This has to be investigated further to test the hypothesis. IMPORTANT NOTE: There is never one singular source for any given system. There are always a plurality of systems and subsystems to ensure the stability and security of the spectrum of the laws of nature, physics and life. If there was only one singular source for any given system, it would ultimately lead to instability and degradation. Stability of the laws of nature are almost impossible to compromise, because ultimately light is the very foundation of matter and gravity. Even though quantum mechanics might seem random at certain conjunctions, the configurations are governed by quantum entanglement that principally are benign in nature, because changes to the information/polarity exchange are secured in relativity that ensures a certain degree of stability. Complete equilibrium in any given system are prohibited by the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, but it may at the same time be rendered void when entering the quantum realm, where exotic effects might be empirically observed. This is easiest explained by double slit experiments that prove quantum entanglement can not only give parallel energy patterns, but also plural outcomes without loss of energy but possibly provide divergence of energy, thus rendering the 2nd law of TD moot, possibly invalid or maybe incorrect in its current understanding. This can lead us to energy production that leave us with little to no loss of energy. Runaway effects that might go critical such as in fission production are less hazardous, given the correct protocols are in place. Weaponizing quantum energy production should be avoided at all cost and is not feasible, because subatomic particles cannot be concentrated in practical weapons. Using such technology should either way be separated from military science regardless. Civilian and military sciences SHOULD always be maintained. How life itself originated is a whole other field and might be discussed both metaphysically and naturally. As I view it, I think it is interesting to entertain several avenues instead of focusing on a singular source. Life itself is pluralistic, so why shouldn't there be several sources without excluding any existing. Information is fundamentally secure within systems. It cannot vanish and is stored within SR/GR/QM/HH. 🌘🌗🌘🌖🌘🌕🌘🌔🌘🌓🌘🌒🌘🌑 🌑🌒🌑🌓🌑🌔🌑🌕🌑🌖🌑🌗🌑🌘 🌕🌒🌘🌑🐬🌑🌒🌘🌕

thank you for sharing it online for free T^T i learn scientific illustration just recently and it's hard to find a free way to learn it first

I was expecting to see Brian Greene.

.. a great fruitfly man... a combination of words I never expected to encounter in my life!

his drug addicted cousin indeed! 🐞😆

Echo chamber...

Col

It's mind boggling to think that there are 200,000-350,000 species of beetles in the world and to meticulously draw and illustrate every one by hand...Digital photography and AI image processing will definitely advance the field of scientific illustration beyond our wildest dreams. That 200 mp Hasselblad is damn near approaching the resolution of the human eye.

Great to catch up and know that you are still at this Col!

🌐

🌐

Maybe every scientist should read, "Myside Bias, Rational Thinking, and Intelligence" by Stanovich et al. Then take a step back and wonder if they are part of the cause of growing scepticism of scientists. The worst things we could do is project an image that we are always dispassionate arbiters of truth and take out our frustrations by berating "the masses." I think a little more humility would go far.

So much mumbo jumbo elaborated upon by "physicists" for the purpose of self-employment. Much ado about nothing.

so beautiful

Excellent artwork although I feel the human effort is over-exagerated upon zooming in. I notice the layered impact of colors which is visually appealing but from an artistic perspective I feel it is worth highlighting that some of these works may have been autocompleted technologically -please correct me if I am wrong. I mention this because upon zooming in and looking at some of the artificats it's hard to believe that they were in fact entirely done by hand (by eye it looks to me as though some of the art is computer generated). Again please correct me if I am wrong as I am an aspiring artist and some of the patterns I see look to be autocompleted.

Oof, there’s some weirdness in the timing of the speakers that I wish the moderator handled differently. He did his best but the cringe hurt sometimes 😅 Once I saw the topic, I was super excited to watch this session, but was delighted to see it discussed on a panel of predominantly women! Loved hearing from all the speakers, but personally I ADORED Katie’s explanations - really made it “make sense” imo. It’s priceless to hear from someone with so much experience, such as herself, who can explain very complex concepts but communicate them in such a way that it’s easily digestible for folks simply passionate about science (but who are not in the field), yet without losing any of the integrity within the explanation. Lindsey’s more practical/tactical responses made it feel more “real” and imagining how these concepts can be compared to things in our livable experience; and while I feel like Nicole was quicker with the more mathematical, abstract explanations that (for me) but I can tell she’s got the numbers in her pocket ready to go.

Brett "slugger" Sutton, the worlds grubbiest looking Chief Health Officer. He did not follow the science, he followed the parts that suited his purpose and ignored the rest. He says nothing about the lockups doing nothing more than delaying the inevitable at catastrophic financial and societal cost, he says nothing about the Vax NOT being safe or effective as it was sold to the public. The list of the outrages perpetrated by this charlatan is long. Good riddance! We will call you again when the inquiry starts.

Me agrada la técnica avanzada estrabajo muy fino gracias por mostrar

The interviewer is having a blast, having a great laugh at the time.

Wow, thank you for posting this fascinating presentation!

I am sure the lady at the start was trying to be funny but the comment regarding millennials not holding a job role for more than 6 months was rather tasteless, I am sure she wouldn't appreciate being stereotyped - something her generation is good at doing but bad at taking when the tables are turned, we can really dig in there about the different circumstances regarding jobs during her time and now a days in most cases people have no choice but to move jobs unlike the privilege of her generation where you get a job and you become like unmovable obelisk refusing to retire so someone younger and with fresh ideas can come in and perhaps bring in some innovation? I really liked the way Geoff presented the material but this lady was really rather grating on my nerves.

this makes me appreciate Brian. he is just very very good at conducting these interviews. idk if it's the vast knowledge he possesses or his interview skills but he never lets the listeners attention drop..

This stupid c*nt should be strung up. Incompetence doesn't explain it. This is intentional harm he's after

Interesting comments just b4 58 minute mark about the worst premier ever in 🇦🇺. And he looks like being re-elected. How?

A thousand degrees celcius and you can't figure out what to do here on earth with temperatures rising. There is no water on Mars, are you from Mars originally or is your head up your Okole? What business do we have wasting time and energy on Mars when our planet is going down in flames? CooCoo! Probably spending too much time at "Star" bucks on $5 coffee when you can make it at home for $.50 cents.

We haven't figured out the problems on earth, people dying, water running out, over heating, gas and oil dependence unsolved and you are wasting time and energy about a planet that has no benefit to any of these problems. WTF? Are you a bunch of spoiled people with no courage or humility to help the problems of over population on the planet that is out of control? Hello. Don't waste my tax dollars on Mars.

Who was just on? 2 priests debate 2 jpirnalists on does god exists

WSF always publishing top tier content. Loved the chat, was very interesting!!

Thank you very much for new LEARNING again this day very good wonderful application to how to connect the corals to the people and vision of the booth kind of spices very much helpful to the nature of climate change in the ancestors history and the world...

The universe is actually dark. Light can’t be seen until it hits a sensor, biological or man made, or until it hits a gaseous substance. However photons are everywhere.

this moderator is so annoying. anyway in our 5 % of the universe we are the only proven intelligent life ( loosely) and we cannot see the rest of the universe. well could that not mean that mean that 95 % of the universe cannot see us , so where should the universe actually have the majority of intelligent life and physics ?

*SOOOO... Fritz Zwicky DIDN'T discover dark matter in the late 1930s...AND give it its name, "dunkel materie", which LITERALLY TRANSLATES to "dark matter"?* Your deliberate attempt to falsely give credit to a female scientist over the male scientist who first discovered the "missing matter" problem has been duly noted. It's a REALLY GREAT way to fix the past injustices toward women in science, because "Two Wrongs" clearly make "A Right" when you're on a modern day PC Mission! And to think that Dr. Green allowed this flat-out LIE to be propagated in his body of work...

Vera Rubin never won the Nobel Prize, a tragic and scandalous oversight. At the very least, she deserves a posthumous award of the Nobel Prize for her pioneering work.

Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong. No matter how fast light travels, it finds the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it. Terry Pratchett

p̷r̷o̷m̷o̷s̷m̷

Where can learn and get a job, currently I'm working in india as environmental air quality monitoring engineer

Sasha - Connection to Whales?? That's not our totem!! LOL! You got no shame!! Stop lying you was raised white ways and you don't know our culture or our stories. You not qualified to speak about family or culture, as you have neither!! Step out in the sun get a tan ya pale faced ff!

Great stuff!

,,cool video keep up the great content.. Thank you…

I know the lady is cool, but when she tried to excite the audience "for sciiiiience" in the beginning it sounded kind of anti-climactic. Like she was disappointed. Although when I listened further and heard her say the word "science" more I realized it was just her accent.

Want to look at the program.

great intro, Bernie Hobbs!!

Well done you guys! All of you! Get on you tube daily. Radio. TV. Everywhere! Keep talking. Thank each of you,

Wow wonderful congratulations

Amazing Very informative video

प्रेरणादायक धन्यवाद डाक्टर अर्चना सिंह नीरज सिंह 'अजेय' संरक्षक मातृभूमि जखनियां संगठन

Great Anjana Proud of u