Thank you for a very specific and comprehensive narrative. Helps us interpret our MRI results and conclusions. Thank you so much for helping us understand.
@shadwilliams62705 күн бұрын
awesome video! thanks!
@Divvyupandgrow5 күн бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/f4OccneFm82hiLs
@Divvyupandgrow5 күн бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/f4OccneFm82hiLs
@mohammadjabbar30748 күн бұрын
thank you
@javedalamification8 күн бұрын
Thank you 🙏 very much for your extraordinary hard work 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@S.H-c6g9 күн бұрын
it's your life. no re-do's. get a calcium score for base line testing. anyone else advising against it = time for a new doctor 👍🏼
@navigatingradiology9 күн бұрын
@@S.H-c6g would seem logical, but in the wrong population it likely does more harm than good. A lot of other examples like that in medicine - it seems logical to just get the test and information from first order thinking. But second order considerations - we learn that statistically it would be more likely to harm than help you. There’s no re dos on net harm either
@AsifKhan-mw4mw10 күн бұрын
Amazing❤
@ItsMe-sq8em11 күн бұрын
Risk of statins outweigh benefits
@ItsMe-sq8em11 күн бұрын
Statins absolutely are wrong for 99% of people
@hoseinrahmati238212 күн бұрын
Very perfectly described , Thanks 😊
@poojasethi637813 күн бұрын
Thankyou sir
@Soforeal613 күн бұрын
Your lectures are an absolute Godsend! Thank you so much!
@QuestLore.13 күн бұрын
hello great video but one issue so far portal vain is not biphasic bi phasic waveforms cross the baseline that would be monophasic hope it helps someone
@tritanjuragraha15 күн бұрын
Your videos are immediately helpful after watching. I would like to see in the future your approach to CTA of cerebral arteries. Thank you.
@johndanczak15 күн бұрын
If you have been taking a statin, that will increase your Calcium score. Statins function to stabilize soft plaque by calcifying it. This is much safer as calcified plaque is far less likely to rupture resulting in a heart attack, stroke or sudden death. This is actually good. So an increased calcium score suggests the healing process of unstabilized plaque. So, an increase calcium score is not always bad.
@karenkathleen630016 күн бұрын
Ok I just got my calcium CT artery score results back. Mine is 449 and now I am freaking out. I stopped statins awhile ago and for the first time in a long time I have clearer mental clarity than ever before. Do I need to go back on them? Am I going to drop over tomorrow with this high score?? Do I need to see a cardiologist like, yesterday? I just recently lost 70 pounds over this past year and feel better than ever. I am not a smoker. My father passed at 32 from massive heart attack. I am fused up and down my spine and also have a spinal stimulator in my back so I am limited for exercise. Anxiety is now through the roof...help!!!
@BrettCarpenter-f1m18 күн бұрын
starting classes in january!
@Radiola1120 күн бұрын
My first Calcium score was 432, a month later after taking Statin 20mg it was 509. At the same time CTA was done which stated at LAD (left main) mild to moderate calcific atherosclerosis noted. This is non obstructive per CT-FFR. At left Anterior, there is moderate predominantly calcific atherosclerosis with 40-70% luminal stenosis. Again this is non obstructive by CT-FFR. Question is what is correct, a 40-70% Stenosis noted or CT-FFR revealing non obstructive. In short Stenosis vs non obstructive per CT-FFR? My LDL is 100, HDL 46, no diabetes
@BaliKSA25 күн бұрын
Statins significantly reduce the risk of heart attack and death? Not in absolute terms.
@johndanczak15 күн бұрын
Yes, they do.
@charlesgreenidge126 күн бұрын
very helpful thnk you
@AtikaZainab108527 күн бұрын
11:21 A doubt here... If we're detecting the signal through the XY component, then why would water not produce a larger signal than fat? Fat has more of the Z component than XY, right?
@kathielucas592629 күн бұрын
Many thanks for your clarity and expertise in explaining this important topic.
@mingqu405929 күн бұрын
R L
@mingqu405929 күн бұрын
No tumor on normal brain CT
@maiphuongtran8190Ай бұрын
excellent!!!
@hugobocanegra769Ай бұрын
I congratulate this man for his accent, considering his name. 😂
@navigatingradiologyАй бұрын
@@hugobocanegra769 haha. Born at Toronto General Hospital. Now working at Toronto General Hospital.
@manalasouileh8231Ай бұрын
i hqte u kqkqkkqkqkkqkqkqqkkqkqkkiwijdiuui😂😂
@hillaryb12Ай бұрын
Extremely grateful for this video as an R2 taking call!!
@SeenathFarook-q9zАй бұрын
In tirm food particles show hyper?
@sadiaimam2195Ай бұрын
Thanks a lot sir. Very nice presentation. 👌
@muhammadbashir9747Ай бұрын
presentation
@muhammadbashir9747Ай бұрын
sir greetings.wonderful presentaion
@jejojoje9521Ай бұрын
Heteroheneous, low atenuating lesions, are most likely benign?
@اكرمسليمان-ب2شАй бұрын
🎉
@hermes8258Ай бұрын
Hmm, food for thought. As my brother had/has serious heart disease for which they can treat only partially it is so far gone, and since out oif pocket it is only CAD100 for me in Thailand I am tempted to get it done. However, the temptation is just to skip it and instead eat and live as if I have heart disease.
@sheddkkhan6758Ай бұрын
Howmuch cac you have
@SET12DSPАй бұрын
@hermes8258 That's the question: How much do you have? It should be remembered that the score is compounding! This means it can easily double in 5 years. Further treating it with a Statin can double the progression rate. I'm reversing mine as verified by CAC. So getting at it early is better than late. Mine has gone from 660 to 458 on the Linus Pauling Heart Protocol in 20 months.
@pratapkakati565Ай бұрын
very informative
@NeginMousavi-f3bАй бұрын
Amazing
@chunni105Ай бұрын
Hello sir, can u please upload lecture and video on MRI brain
@VanessaveltrexoАй бұрын
You mentioned at 4:40 that things closer appear smaller and sharper, and things further away look magnified. Based on your explanation that follows, wouldn't it be the opposite? Thanks!
@mariloubarberan5674Ай бұрын
Indikoallamcti
@ellocodosАй бұрын
I am a victim of Key Point 5! I had a 951 CAC I ended up getting a PCI To diagnose risk and they placed 4 stents. During the procedure I had a dissection in my LAD, and that led to a 4th unplanned stent. When you are on your back and they tell you you need it You say, 'yes, please". The report stated I had 50-80% blockages. I got the CAC because I had high LDL due to being on a keto diet.
@SET12DSPАй бұрын
@@ellocodos I'm on a Keto diet and have reversed my 660 CAC using the Linus Pauling Heart Protocol to 458 in 20 months.
@BethGalloway-k4lАй бұрын
Please tell us what that protocol is.
@SET12DSPАй бұрын
@@BethGalloway-k4l The Pauling Heart Protocol. I use all powders. High dose ascorbic acid vitamin C 20-30 grams per day in divided doses. Lysine and Proline 3-4 grams each 2x per day. Throw in magnesium glycinate 800mg in divided doses per day as when magnesium is up Calcium is down.
@Gray_lyfАй бұрын
Great content
@mahmoodhemami6116Ай бұрын
This taught me much. Thank you
@meeuoshАй бұрын
Incredible video
@نهىيوسف-ل6ثАй бұрын
are there any other mri physics vodeos?
@markn4526Ай бұрын
Interesting presentation. Here in the US, we rarely hear about angina anymore. We do hear a lot about stress tests, echocardiograms, stents and bypass surgery. We also hear a lot about CA CT scans. I hate to even bring this up, but the health care systems in the US and Canada are very different and "treatment" is approached differently. In Canada, an effort is often made to decrease the number of people in the system, while in the US an effort is often made to increase that number. I'm 63 years old and in pretty good shape besides have slightly high BP, an avid cyclist and well within my recommended weight and my blood work has been good, etc. 2 weeks ago, my general practitioner suggested I get a CA CT scan performed. I asked why. He said it can provide a good baseline going forward. He also said that insurance doesn't cover it. Again, I asked why. He said probably because it's too new. I agreed to it. I had it done and got the results a few days later. The nurse who called me with the results said that my score was "very high and showed significant blockage". She suggested, via my doctor, that I see a cardiologist ASAP. This news scared the crap out of me! I was able to see the cardiologist this past Monday. His attitude about my "very high score" (2200) was much different...sort of like, it didn't matter. He did recommend I have a stress test with an echocardiogram performed, he doubled my blood pressure medication and put me on a low-dose statin. I scheduled the stress test with an echocardiogram for the earliest appointment available which is 6 weeks away. Real sense of urgency here. This all has me wondering now about the usefulness of this CA CT scan.