You need to indicate the "Q" output and the "CLR" inputs on your FF boxes.
@Computer-and-Electronics7 күн бұрын
You're right
@nahuaatr9 күн бұрын
grazie mille frate buon video
@Computer-and-Electronics8 күн бұрын
Prego
@Aboflah119309 күн бұрын
جيد جداً وشرح ممتاز
@Computer-and-Electronics9 күн бұрын
Thank you
@protools4fools13 күн бұрын
Thank you very much! Very helpful videos.
@Computer-and-Electronics12 күн бұрын
You are welcome!
@Geovani-g4x13 күн бұрын
You are great and oppressed at once . Where are you from?
@Computer-and-Electronics13 күн бұрын
Italy
@ooo-pe2gc13 күн бұрын
I am trying to build this circuit, but I'm having difficulties implementing it with the commercially available components. It seems that I might not be able to achieve the proper biasing conditions. I used BC556B and BC547B transistors. What should I do?
@Computer-and-Electronics13 күн бұрын
Hi, try to find some clues from the Evil mad scientist kit for the 741. shop.evilmadscientist.com/productsmenu/762. They use 2N3904 and 2N3906 as transistors.
@Dosomeboutit19 күн бұрын
no one recommended fr was searching for it - wow
@ve2zzz20 күн бұрын
Excellent explanation !!! ...and I've just learned that unlike most of today's op-amps which use two individual emitter followers feeding a classic differential pair having emitters sharing a common current, 741's input diff uses two CC transistors followed by a common-base amplifier. Thanks for improving my knowledge !
@Computer-and-Electronics20 күн бұрын
Thank you. I am glad you like it. Yes at the time PNP were poor and opamp needs high beta to lower the base current (input current of op-amp), so Fullagar had to use npn and figure out the right configuration to improve gain and to lower input capacitance
@cryptocsguy928223 күн бұрын
1:09 You made a mistake and it's 23-18 = 5 not 2 so bring down the final 0 = 50 then 50/9=5 so the final answer for 2030/9 = 225 not 222 ignoring remainders
@Computer-and-Electronics23 күн бұрын
You're right. Incredible mistake...
@slnkomada910224 күн бұрын
Does anyone have the link of CircuitVerse for the circuits?
@Computer-and-Electronics23 күн бұрын
Unfortunately the circuit I used for the video is now useless. I changed some blocks for the series about the adders and the division circuit doesn't work anymore. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jZ6sd3mef76thZI
@slnkomada910222 күн бұрын
@ Oh, alright, thank you
@cryptocsguy928228 күн бұрын
The circuit shown between 11:18-12:33 is wrong it has too many XOR gates while the one you show afterwards is correct. Also if we use 2s complement to figure our minus numbers to add when doing binary subtraction why does the simulation software use regular unsigned numbers to help us get the correct answer ?
@Computer-and-Electronics28 күн бұрын
Yes you're right. The XOR gate in the Cout Is wrong.
@user-oz5hi1px7eАй бұрын
my fundamentals for mosfets seems to be lacking, could you please suggest any good resources to learn about the mosfets to know how these different configs of mosfet like 'current mirror' or trans-diode config. i only know the basics (i.e the drain current equation of mosfet, regions of operations). thank you so much
@Computer-and-ElectronicsАй бұрын
Hi, I suggest you these books: CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation, by Baker, Li, Boyce Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Circuits by Behzad Razavi
@Damnesia2Ай бұрын
At 12:14, when mentioning the XOR on the carry out, did you intend to put an AND gate to AND the NOT'd SUB line with the carry out so that on subtraction the bit is dropped (so that it does the following: (NOT SUB) AND Cout7)? With the XOR the way it is on Cout, it is transparent for addition as you've stated, but for subtraction, it effectively performs a NOT instead of blocking it fully. Either way, the carry out should not be modified regardless, because if you want to attach 2 adders together to extend the number of bits, dropping that Cout will disable that ability. If you intend on finding whether the addition resulted in an overflow, you should XOR the carry in and carry out of the last FA which will give you an overflow bit that is accurate for both addition and subtraction in signed notation. Cout is only reliable for unsigned addition overflow, not signed.
@Computer-and-ElectronicsАй бұрын
You are right the XOR in Cout Is wrong. Cout doesn't need any gate.
@adindajuwita3929Ай бұрын
Gak jelas, apa nama komponennya!!!????
@Computer-and-ElectronicsАй бұрын
Phase and frequency detector.
@maplinxxgd5234Ай бұрын
great video! I like that you step through the math instead of "it just works lol"
@Computer-and-ElectronicsАй бұрын
Thank you
@ThatguyyyouknowАй бұрын
Great video.is there a software you would recommend for simulating these circuits?
@Computer-and-ElectronicsАй бұрын
For digital circuit I usually use Circuitverse. It is free, online, but basic. For analog circuit I use LTspice. This is a mix of both. I didn't simulate It.
@bagaspramanaputrafadhila59212 ай бұрын
I LIKE IT
@Computer-and-Electronics2 ай бұрын
Thank you
@nihatakdamar77112 ай бұрын
Can't the AND gate be made with 4 transistors? If you change the places of the high and low voltage sources in the NAMD gate. Or if you connect serial n transistors to the high voltage source and the parallel p transistors to the low voltage source.
@Computer-and-Electronics2 ай бұрын
No, the n-MOS transitors are on with a logic one and must be below near the zero voltage. The p-MOS transistors must be above near the High voltage because they need a Logic zero to switch-on. You need a voltage difference between source and gate of the transistors and the positions matter in order to create such difference
@changed555552 ай бұрын
Nice explanation sir ,but informative channel alway have less views..
@Computer-and-Electronics2 ай бұрын
Thank you. Please share the videos you like most.
@changed555552 ай бұрын
@@Computer-and-Electronics ok
@davidesaccon2 ай бұрын
Best OP-Amp video ever! Way better than any book or uni lesson I ever came across. Thank you so much for making me understand all this!
@Computer-and-Electronics2 ай бұрын
You are welcome. I am glad you like it. Please share this video with people you know may like it.
@jorgesantos60232 ай бұрын
Most definitely
@Computer-and-Electronics2 ай бұрын
Thank you
@jason33072 ай бұрын
awesome explanation! thanks
@Computer-and-Electronics2 ай бұрын
You're welcome
@AcidDotCom2 ай бұрын
Best explanation of the circuit and how to build it. Saved me days of work. Thank you :)
@Computer-and-Electronics2 ай бұрын
I am glad you like it
@S-a-m-m3 ай бұрын
Is there any difference into using a multiplexor instead of a decoder?
@Computer-and-Electronics3 ай бұрын
Yes there is, a mux is a device that selects one of several input signals and transmits it to a single output line. A decoder select Just One of the many outputs through a few control lines. In this case we want a decoder to select the right Memory cell
@SAhellenLily3 ай бұрын
👍
@SAhellenLily3 ай бұрын
Nice explanation!Sir👍
@Computer-and-Electronics3 ай бұрын
Thank you
@Accanfo3 ай бұрын
Super good
@Computer-and-Electronics3 ай бұрын
Thanks
@franconichtgesagt30944 ай бұрын
From minute 6:25 all the equations vu=expression have the term R_C missing and aren't dimensionally correct.
@Computer-and-Electronics4 ай бұрын
Right, thanks.
@Cesar_III4 ай бұрын
Good explanation.
@Computer-and-Electronics4 ай бұрын
Thank you
@dhavies4 ай бұрын
you can master truth tables like this: AND gate is just a multiplication of the 2 inputs, NAND is an opposite of AND gate’s output, OR gate is the addition of the inputs (adding 1 +1 equals 1 since its in binary) and NOR is also an opposite of OR gates’s output
@dhavies4 ай бұрын
who else is in ai and just wants to write efficient codes😂
@isaakmwangi46184 ай бұрын
who else is here because of Andrej Karapathy 👀
@fiseticamente4 ай бұрын
awesome explanation, gave me an eureka moment. grazie mille!
@Computer-and-Electronics4 ай бұрын
Prego. You're welcome.
@seankhatiri33934 ай бұрын
Couldn't imagine someone explaining how a simple 4-byte RAM works better than this!
@Computer-and-Electronics4 ай бұрын
Wow, thank you. I am flattered.
@Aditya-wc9sw4 ай бұрын
is this the end of the Scott's CPU series?
@Computer-and-Electronics4 ай бұрын
Yes that is the end of videos based on Scott's CPU. Other videos in the playlist are about CPU but not based on Scott's book .
@Aditya-wc9sw4 ай бұрын
@@Computer-and-Electronics Thanks for making this course, its very Informative and Helpful!
@mohitjani23904 ай бұрын
andrej got me here, definitely not disappointed
@Computer-and-Electronics4 ай бұрын
Thank you
@M4th3www4 ай бұрын
Amazing video
@Computer-and-Electronics4 ай бұрын
Thank you
@hareeshrajendran4 ай бұрын
Man oh Man!! Watched only one and this is a banger
@Computer-and-Electronics4 ай бұрын
Thanks
@MadhavanSureshRobos4 ай бұрын
Why does a NOT gate require two transistors exactly? Why not just use a p-type transistor? It works exactly as a NOT gate even without a n-type
@Computer-and-Electronics4 ай бұрын
Yes you are right, but you should use a resistor instead of the nMos (otherwise the output Is always connected to ground or zero logic). But in Integrated circuit a transistor Is always better than a resistor because It takes less room. Moreover, there are other considerations related to speed, simmetry, power consumption and IC process which make you prefer the two transistors solutions.
@MadhavanSureshRobos4 ай бұрын
@@Computer-and-Electronics ohh got it. Very interesting!!
@antonsidorov75314 ай бұрын
As many others, I came here from twitter. I would like to ask a question about a NOT gate. I don't understand why you need two transistors if having a single P-Type transistor, supposedly, already achieves the same effect (outputs 1 when input is 0)?
@Computer-and-Electronics4 ай бұрын
Yes you are right, but you should use a resistor instead of the nMos (otherwise the output Is always connected to ground or zero logic). But in Integrated circuit a transistor Is always better than a resistor because It takes less room. Moreover, there are other considerations related to speed, simmetry, power consumption and IC process which make you prefer the two transistors solutions.
@PriitKallas4 ай бұрын
Great video! the man from the internet sent me here
@Computer-and-Electronics4 ай бұрын
Thank you
@KrAceZ-z9r4 ай бұрын
Someone recommended this series on twitter and it went viral. Excellent work 👌🏼
@Computer-and-Electronics4 ай бұрын
Yes Andrej Karpathy recommended... x.com/karpathy/status/1818897688571920514
@vev4 ай бұрын
there should be option to switch voices now for narrative etc .. transcription is already good
@tp2264 ай бұрын
Bro gonna do numbers
@Computer-and-Electronics4 ай бұрын
:-)
@surajsamal41614 ай бұрын
andrej made me watch this
@Computer-and-Electronics4 ай бұрын
Thank you
@drmanhattan15124 ай бұрын
Great video, thank you
@Computer-and-Electronics4 ай бұрын
You're welcome, I am glad you like it.
@fdvideoarchive96594 ай бұрын
Very good tutorial.Thak you
@Computer-and-Electronics4 ай бұрын
You're welcome
@gearman81774 ай бұрын
Andrej karpathy recommended on Twitter. Congrats bro
@Computer-and-Electronics4 ай бұрын
Thank you
@Sanchit_Bhardwaj-134 ай бұрын
Andrej recommended it, so I definitely have to watch it.
@kapsclip84004 ай бұрын
same bro
@louis-dieudonne59414 ай бұрын
Same😂
@gileneusz4 ай бұрын
it was recommended by Andrej so I have to watch it...
@Computer-and-Electronics4 ай бұрын
Thank you, please can you provide me the link or video in which there is the recommandation by Andrej? Thank you