This was a hilarious watch! You did so well

🤩

100% agree on the task progression

The nobles get their own area but it’s still completely open to everyone 😂 I wonder if any a beggar would wander in lured by the smell of wine and cheese

😂 you can drop money, you can even drop tomatoes but don’t you dare drop bones!

Yeah hygiene in this setting….

Comment for algo ❤

Is it weird I want to experience the paint roller 😂? It sounds like a fun roller coaster

adding more warehouses DOES increase the storage cap, the 22500 is the total shared between ALL warehouses, the 7500 is EACH warehouse, therefore once an individual warehouse reaches 7500 you must build /connect to another

33:35 If you hover over the warehouse parcel button it explains that all warehouses share the same storage, but their total storage is combined. So that particular warehouse has a storage of 3500 but since you have 3 of them the total combined storage is 10500 The reason you are running out of coal is because you were using 1 coal miner to supply every building with coal. You really should have a separate miner for the power plants and for your production buildings to avoid this in the future As for your questions about throughput: The extractors have an unlimited output speed but the production parcels have 8 (16 with the upgrade). So if a production parcel is generating more than 16 you either have to hook it up to multiple parcels or to multiple nodes. Each parcel has a different input and output throughput that you should look into, as it is very beneficial to know when designing optimal factories

37:08 literally the same experience as me making a MAM in shapez 1

From this video it looks like you are just programming the factory's PLC system using SFCs (Sequential Function Charts) instead of ladder logic.

nice nice! congrats! I made two blueprints for my MAM I really like. one is a module that checks all lanes (12) for a wire input and trashes anything that doesnt match. so I can check for any criteria I want. and second is one that trashes everything that comes in... until all 12 belts are full then allows them to pass. this helps keep inputs uniform.

12:00 🤦‍♂ Not hard to fix, but saw that coming lol 33:15 😁 Oh boy, what a moment to find out! 34:24 😏🤣 Legit walked through the exact reasons why it wouldn't work, and proceeds to state with absolute confidence that it's gonna work 😂 36:05 Perfect reaction LOL 😆 36:28 🤔 🤨 🤔 🤨 Are you sure about that? 36:53 😆 Oh no, he's lost it 37:12 And there it is! Time to realization: I don't know, because edits 🤭 Thanks for the series! Great game! And this vid came out just in time for me to be done with my playthrough of this game as well 😃 Looking forward to Satisfactory 😎 🤖

by the way I think that at 23:03 you could just use space belts to merge the outputs

At 15:00 I see a bug: ...((entity == Entities.Bush or Entities.Tree)... That would be evaluating wrong, you need to write it out: ...((entity == Entities.Bush or entity == Entities.Tree)...

Not the outhouse unclogging minigame 💀

Just started this game loving it so far

im going to be honest, im not sure I understand your wiring. you can read the color and shape of the upper right corner with analyzer. I use that as a starting point for all my wiring, one for each quarter.. with the painting, my thought process is, dont read the belt, you know the shapes are uncolored. read the incoming color, then match it to a signal you set. so for example, if the incoming signal is unpainted, send it to the bypasser. create a signal that says red, if the incoming signal is red, go to the red painter. repeat for all colors. although with pipe filters now, we can make just one painter and just pipe in the correct color. unless im missing something

0:25 Fun fact, you can't "uncolor" a crystal. Probably because crystals can't be painted in the first place. So, if you need to check uncolored crystal, you need a different method (I went with creating a pin signal and passing it through a virtual crystalizer with "uncolored" as color input) 29:10 It may not have been available when you recorded this, but there's now an option on the Equal gate to change it to a "Not Equal" gate, so you don't need to use space on the individual Not gate. 🙃 Can also set it to < or > variants!

@Zahait You probably want to put coordinates in tuples, not arrays: harvested.append((currLoc[0], curreLoc[1])). Tuples are immutable, and can therefore also be used as keys in dictionaries, whereas lists, which are mutable, cannot be used as keys.

Hey Zahait! Big fan! You can feed belt filters a signal that contains a shape and colour, and if the contents of the belt is the same it will bypass (go down the tick), if not it goes on the x. Colour is important as well, so you might need to shape analyse or grey-paint for pre-painted shapes. Either way, you don’t need to be using the belt sensors to do the equals checks everywhere!

The thing I like about this series is that, unlike the other super-optimized builds on those channels that look a bit overwhelming, this is not perfect, but it works. The process to that point is starting to motivate me to try to attempt a MAM😅. I have to say I saw this one guy with a MAM that has a big output and big factory, but I wonder how long that took him as he did it a few days after the game's release while I was still busy with the story and my blueprint builds😂.

Is there a shape analyser in shapez 2?

Huh, an idle factory game... interesting. At least you don't have to worry about belting everything everywhere. However I can see myself not liking this game. First thought is because I think idle games and factory games are for different purposes that don't gel well together. One is for making a number get bigger quicker, the other is for designing a system that can take things and turn them into other things. Obviously the similarity is "make more of end product quicker" but with idle games there's just one end product: the number. Factory games have multiple end products that most of the time aren't even end products, like Yellow Bels in Factorio, they thems3elves are used in their upgraded version etc.

ComfyUI user: I been playing game the whole time?

“Shrek?!” 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Looks like an awesome game. Factorio to a degree but Satisfactory especially always felt like I'm wasting bunch of time micromanaging the infrastructure by hand, when it's the tech tree, production schedules and resource managmemt that I find engaging. This looks like those games, just with removed burdensome graphics, leaving us with sweet, sweet numbers.

Great video can't wait to see the next one. Keep up the good work, got yourself a new subscriber!

This must be Factorio from the eyes of a drone. No eyes, so everything is just internal data. 😆

Not the easiest to understand for me, but I think I also need to watch 'another' video LoL ;-)

nice. I played this months ago and it seemed a bit under done. its looking better now!

womp womp you did not think before buying the belt and cutting upgrade

While True: trade(Items.Egg) use_item(Items.Egg) harvest()

18:25 😧 I am hurt 😭 You think I would LIE to you?? 😤 19:05 Uh huh... apology accepted 😛 At least, I'm SURE you intended that to be some kind of apology. 🙃 Also, nice work on downsizing! Looking good so far! As others have pointed out, there's this handy thing called a "shape analyzer", looks like a magnifying glass icon. Typically you would use THIS to break your shape into it's constituent pieces, including what color each piece is supposed to be. I only used what you have here to filter out unwanted pieces after each assembly step, since it comes pre-painted, though you could also just recombine the color and shape with the paint simulator like you were testing out at the end.

If you “uncolour” the entire signal shape before separating it into quarters via the logic it will read as a fully uncoloured shape and work with your current factory, then worry about painting as its own step

is the shape analyzer in shapez 2?

Is there a shape analyser in shapez 2? That would be really useful if its there

maybe you could type in color-u so you maybe paint in with the uncolored paint

ohhhhh I love your bypasser! so much better than the one I made. I took an entire platform just to bypass..... I do think you have the equal rotated wrong. the two inputs that it compares come from the side and outputs the result into the middle output. not sure how you got it working otherwise. as for the color, there is a shape analyzer. you input a shape signal and it will read only the upper right corner, one output will give you the shape of the upper right corner, one output will give you the color of the upper right corner. you can then use that signal to send it to the correct colorizer. or actually now with fluid filters, we can add the correct color to a single painting module.

First comment also nice work!

Loving this game although the water mechanic could do with a little work

My wires aren't crossed, they are missing😂. I think the more I watch this, the more I might regain some wires to try my very first MAM ever (depends on how much time Tales of Arise or FF15 takes).

Everything looks so amazing!

I don't think I'll try to attempt building a MAM, but watching this and how you go through the thinking process might get my little to no braincells working (I did finish it all and manually build the changing milestones).

I'm going to hold off on suggestions so I can watch the authentic struggle ☺ Already you're doing better than I was when I started off. I was pretty insistent about making my first MAM handle at least 4 belts LOL! I was also reusing my blueprints instead of making new platform builds... at least until I had to wire it all up, but that wound up just being wires added into my blueprints... messy 😅 NOTE: You don't need a signal generator for NULL, a wire with no signal is NULL, so to compare for NULL you just don't hook up one side of the logic gate 😉 I'm almost to the MAM in Insane mode. The shapez in this mode are just... silly. And the shape "sequences" often just rearrange and/or repaint themselves entirely, requiring frequent rebuilds unless I properly planned ahead for specific changes in the sequence. Going to aim to complete the second Random Shape with this next MAM, meaning CRYSTALS! Woo... 🙃

I think you've overcomplicated the wiring a bit. You are comparing each belt with all 4 corners of the goal shape, but a belt with bottom right corners is never going to equal the top left part of the goal shape, so you only need to compare each belt with one part of the goal shape.

major pain incoming xD

Good luck

Oh my god, the frying pan smack, immediately 😂😅 My fave of your quotes: “You’ve got tomatoes falling off of you!” Also the puking sound - recognized straight away! 😷🤣