Very much appreciate the time and energy you took putting this very understandable video together. I'm just diving into Gamma, Color Spaces etc. and have yet to shoot a video - but this will happen in the future. From what I've learned in the last week or so, I heard one statement that caught my ear (although I know what you mean). "In real life there are colors out there. There are colors out there. There's green etc". Again, sorry about this, but from what I have learned, there are not colors out there. Just spectra. Colors are spectra that are given names by humans to describe them. Silly technical point, but the video is so good, that at least I'm listening closely. I can honestly say, with the reading and watching I've done over the last few days, this entire video made sense even though I have no "learned" experience with any of this. Really appreciate the detailed and simplified view. Very helpful. I hope you have some videos for getting started with DaVinci Resolve and how to find the values needed (i.e. Nikon Z9 video, luts, etc). Very nicely done. If you don't have it already, a video on minimum requirements to work on such video would be sweet! I do have one basic question (if you come back here and check some DAE: Is the statement you make at the end, that is, working in a bigger color space and then squeezing the information down into a smaller one (i.e. REC709) a desired thing? The reason I as is two-fold. 1st: As a new photographer, I've frequently heard that picking a color space like ADOBE RGB, when your output devices are in sRGB can lead to undesired color shifts (i.e. math rounding errors) is is not worth the hassle. This point was also made with respect to the potential gamut of even sRGB of the camera, software (i.e. Photoshop), and monitor might not overlap even though you are using the same space. So, in photography and video, is working in the bigger space worth it? Depends on the intended output display? 2. Does working in a larger color space benefit from a higher bit-depth? Lastly, can you recommend any of your videos (or others) recommended for a beginner getting started with video?
@TonyDae4 күн бұрын
There are a lot of questions in here and I will try to answer what I recall. 1. Colors are a thing we see and I am using the term in a colloquial sense. I'm not going to make a philosophical debate in this video about blue actually being only a reflection of a certain goobadygoob and the object is actually every color but what we see etc. as that's not the point of the vid. 2. Shooting in a large color space and working in a large color space has advantages since capturing allows lots of information that you can then edit in a program later. Working in larger color spaces tends to allow more room to make micro adjustments to dial in the exact look you want for the final output. When you view the image while working, it should be presented in the actual output color space and all of the large gamut math is happening "under the hood" meaning you don't see it... You only see the output. Make sure your output file is in srgb for web. You can output adobe RGB for prints if your computer monitor is correctly calibrated and able to display it and if the printer can properly print argb. 3. Higher bit depth capture is always desirable if you are looking for the most flexibility in post production. In video, 12bit log encoded raw is usually more than enough data as it is practically the same as 16 but linear. In photo, 14 bit linear is enough for the vast majority of photographers.
@dance2jam3 күн бұрын
@@TonyDae Tony, thanks for the response and getting back to me. Really appreciate it. One last quick (like, right) question: Is shooting video in 8bit H264 or equivalent, like shooting in JPG? That is, is the color space and gamma "baked" in the codec? (i.e. compared to video working in RAW S-RAW, C-RAW, N-RAW)? Again, thank you for your kind response and time. I'll make sure to follow the other videos as they apply.
@TonyDae3 күн бұрын
Yes that's a good way to think about it. 8 bit gives far less room to edit than 10 bit, 12 bit far more room than 10, etc. The difference is a magnitude of ^2 where for example, 8 bit has 256 varieties per color and 10 bit has 1024. The difference is absolutely huge. But also, real raw files are different from h264 because they don't have an established color balance baked in. A 12 bit raw should always provide more room to correct than a theoretical 12bit h264 because of how the data is stored.
@dance2jam2 күн бұрын
@@TonyDae Thank you Tom.
@greasyflight66097 күн бұрын
How much $
@TonyDae3 күн бұрын
About 2 dollars.
@greasyflight66093 күн бұрын
@@TonyDae Cant afford
@unzin-rb6pm18 күн бұрын
thank you sir
@renatafortes293022 күн бұрын
Hello, I have questions about the calculation of the lens mm in relation to the crop factor of the m4/3 and the Rokinon lenses. Should I multiply the mm by 2x (for example: a 24mm becomes 48mm) and then 0.71? In other words, a 24mm is equivalent to 35mm, a 35mm is equivalent to 50mm, a 50mm is equivalent to 70mm and an 85mm is equivalent to 120mm?
@TonyDae22 күн бұрын
Send me an email or go to the discord. It will be easier to explain.
@renatafortes293022 күн бұрын
@@TonyDae can be for e-mail, unfortunately I don't speak English fluently :/ thank you very much! To which address should I send the question?
@TonyDae22 күн бұрын
@@renatafortes2930 check the ABOUT section on the main page of my channel. It will be in the Channel details.
@grahamf695Ай бұрын
Really helpful, thanks. I am getting the same problem with a DaVinci Wide Gamut timeline, after importing Canon Log from a Canon EOS R. Any suggestions?
@TonyDaeАй бұрын
Email me
@j.miskovic7224Ай бұрын
Thanks for the video, not many people talk about this feature. I also have a fairly important question about this; I had discovered "bypass color management" and I did all the color grading of a project that lasted about 30 minutes. The problem that came up is the export, it is not possible to export the project with all the corrections and color grading that I have done. Is there a way to do this even if the "bypass color management" function is active for each clip? The problem is that inside Resolve everything looks very beautiful and well done, but the exported video is faded and lifeless, as if I hadn't done anything. Thanks in advance 🙏
@TonyDae22 күн бұрын
Send me an email or head to the discord. I may have an idea of what has happened, but will need some back and forth to discover the actual problem
@DeanHarringtonimagesАй бұрын
12K...2024?
@TonyDaeАй бұрын
Not sure what this means.
@DeanHarringtonimages28 күн бұрын
@@TonyDae What do you think about the new blackmagic 12k camera that came out at NAB 2024?
@tatianaS988Ай бұрын
Can't thank you enough.
@Lakus2312 ай бұрын
ty
@shanecampbell2882 ай бұрын
mine isnt working at all after 4-5 years with the camera its stopped working
@ajitmehta52 ай бұрын
hey tony . just got a lumix, is a tutorial or video for setting up exposures and other setting for a good cinematic experience
@deproduction12 ай бұрын
Thanks for the video , So helpful! The only thing I Can’t find output tone map in davinci 18.6 , the settings are slightly different, any suggestions? Thank you 🙏🏼
@TonyDae2 ай бұрын
Send me an email
@deproduction12 ай бұрын
@@TonyDae cant find your email anywhere =(
@TonyDae2 ай бұрын
Should be in the about section
@paulmailath6122 ай бұрын
you sir are a bloody lifesaver!
@user-ok8xx8wf2c2 ай бұрын
In DR18 it has no effect.
@mylifepart22 ай бұрын
beautfiul...and y r correct....newbies like me...woulld easily think wrong as i did recently....i made a mistake and too much white was recorded...but i did correct myself and all is well now...but...yes...the tools need to be used correctly...thx...good one...
@SilatShooter2 ай бұрын
Missed this when you first published it. Agree with your findings. I went with the GM f1.4 primarily for size and weight. Love the f1.2GM, it's special but I know I will use the smaller GM more just because it's easier to handle and carry.
@craigkeyintel3 ай бұрын
I really thought matching up BMPCC6k & Pana Lumix S1 would be easier. Converted to Rec709 and huge difference. WTH!?
@yuryruban3 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@ianedits31423 ай бұрын
I don't have the option to bypass colour management with EXRs. Any tips?
@sebastiankamph3 ай бұрын
This was excellent, thank you.
@classic.cameras3 ай бұрын
Yes I am impressed with this lenses bokeh. It looks more like prime bokeh than zoom.
@LovingJesus13 ай бұрын
what camera body did you take the samples photos with
@TonyDae3 ай бұрын
Sony a7r3
@BLazLessons3 ай бұрын
Hello Tony or others...if I add the Panasonic 709 conversion lut is that doing what you're doing, changing the color space correctly? Thanks.
@TonyDae3 ай бұрын
It's a way to convert, but it is not the same as a color space transform. Luts are an individual's interpretation of color given by a specific model camera, lenses, etc. and generally the goal is to provide nice colors. Sometimea the result isn't what you expect because your model and lenses will be different from whatever was used for the lut creation. A conversion using color space transforms is purely mathematical without any personal interpretation or beautification of the color. Neither is necessarily better than the other, just different.
@BLazLessons3 ай бұрын
thanks Tony!
@TutorialsForMom4 ай бұрын
Thanks so much for making this and your other f1.2 GM video. They were super helpful and exactly the kind of info I've been looking for!
@EmmanuelQuansah-fl7en4 ай бұрын
Can l get a slightly used one ,24-70 f2.8: for my Nikon d7100
@TonyDae4 ай бұрын
That would not be the same lens. This version is a lens designed for mirror less cameras.
@RighteousHombre4 ай бұрын
Bro thank you so much! This was so helpful. I was doing export after export trying to figure out how to fix the banding issue.
@Meteotrance4 ай бұрын
I work a lot with braw shooting because of it's smaller size than prores, it's also the only way to get acces to the full 12 bit dynamic range of the bmpcc4k sensor, thank im also using ACES as an Open EXR intermediate for my CGI it's well implemented with Blender and Substance painter and designer. Those converting process was painfull in the begining, but when your final workflow is full ACES it became easier for export like dolby vision or even netflix or regular DCP and rec 709.
@AnalogMonoxide4 ай бұрын
Oh great! Yeah I pushed 8bit footage a bit too far, this made a huge improvement, cheers!
@felipica4 ай бұрын
thanks, man. This video helped me a lot
@johnclarke13194 ай бұрын
i do not want my images processed or stored on line, AIs will end up stealing them to get 'smarter' also faces of people in my images should not be on the internet. we have to stop giving big tech our private information.
@johnclarke13194 ай бұрын
i bought lightroom 6 paid cash. now they wont let me update it. I have to buy a subscription - that is paramount to stealing.
@veskoveskov10734 ай бұрын
Great video. Thank you
@AkeemKerimov4 ай бұрын
I was just thinking about IRNDs and by some magic YT algorithm recommended your video. Thank you. Great test. Just ordered kit with your link
@snookofficial72115 ай бұрын
Such a simple fix but very effective! Totally fixed the banding issue I was getting while adding lens flare overlays and lighting composites. Thanks!
@user-wi7zg1py5d5 ай бұрын
hi!My Davinci is 18.6 and i can't find ARRI Alexa (Output) and ARRI LogC (Output Gamma) when i add Color Space Transform there are just ARRI Wide Gamut4 and ARRI LogC4(gamma)
@MrAw3sum5 ай бұрын
I sure wish I could have no banding in something that was lower res...
@TheDIYFilmmaker6 ай бұрын
Hi Tony, is there any option to disable fans in this light. Thanks!
@khadiyahthomas39626 ай бұрын
Mine also stopped when i previewed it on my laptop but the audio keeps playing. is the rest of the footage gone? I'm stressed.
@MyDean296 ай бұрын
Great Vid!!! Thanks
@pyroBlastM6 ай бұрын
So the issue is with video then? How did you find with photo?
@TonyDae6 ай бұрын
Image quality is great, favorite of the set. Auto focus isn't as good as the GM but not bad. It's much heavier than the GM and feels like it.
@Lunar_Films6 ай бұрын
Does this mean that when using Final Cut the footage isn’t correct?
@TonyDae6 ай бұрын
If it cannot properly transform the color space then yes. I don't use fcp.
@arminmunoz46216 ай бұрын
And the configuration for delivery on you tube?
@JAWNIEAPPLETREE6 ай бұрын
can you use hlg2? for this
@mrransak6 ай бұрын
Thank you! I am a newb but am coming along pretty well with DR Studio because of people like you who are smart and care enough to help others.
@Yitzhakk6 ай бұрын
CLear and to the point. Thumbs up from me and a save!!! Check out my ROCKED out tracks if you get a chance.
@CornOffTheCobb7 ай бұрын
What if I shoot ISO 1000 to expose for highlights, leave it over exposed and bring the gain down later. Won’t that give me the highlight details and clean up the noise? Essentially a combo of high iso and ETTR?
@foubert457 ай бұрын
When I link to Sony generated proxies, I get an invalid proxy selected error. It says I have to select a clip with matching frame rate and time code…
@TonyDae7 ай бұрын
I made this video using the Sony in camera proxies, so I know it worked before when I made the vid. Not sure if you're having an isolated error or if it's some other issue
@Will-Field7 ай бұрын
Great video thank you 👍😀
@inkusaido7 ай бұрын
Honestly many DOP's choose not to use LED on people's skins... There's many comparatives on this site about that. As good as LED can be, tungsten delivers a better range in the color spectrum. Ofc video is mostly more "guerrilla" than cinema but it's getting up there in terms of expected quality.
@TonyDae7 ай бұрын
I'm aware of that, and many dops use led anyways because of the things it does do well, which is a big part of my argument here. I'm not a dop and the people I work with can't tell any difference between heavy and hot tungsten output and cold, lightweight led output. The statement to never use led is silly.
@unseen_nepal8 ай бұрын
what about in camera proxy in sony camera? i searched vid on youtube but couldnt find any. i m new to davinci ,