Standard Range Model 3 also uses LFP. Only long range and performance uses NMC
@Renewable_Tek_Bro4 күн бұрын
Yes, you are right. However, the standard range version stopped supplying in the US because of the tariff change on the Chinese battery supply.
@__flynrailer39044 күн бұрын
But that cell is much bigger… What about KWh/L?
@Renewable_Tek_Bro4 күн бұрын
The energy density for LFP is about 110Wh/kg, meanwhile for NMC is around 200Wh/kg. NMC is much bigger. Which means it has smaller packs with the same capacity.
@Renewable_Tek_Bro4 күн бұрын
BTW, the NMC has a higher charging and discharging speed. It can reach 5C rate. Which means can charge to full in 12 minutes. Most of the LFP can only do 2C, which means 30 minites to charge from 0 - 100%.
@copisetic110414 күн бұрын
Never net meter, use a sine wave matching inverter that will feed grid power as needed when solar is not enough, do all heavy loads during the day like washer dryer, baking etc. use battery power at night for small loads like lighting TV etc. selling back to the grid is economically a bad idea. The best use of self generated power is used on site.
@Renewable_Tek_Bro14 күн бұрын
Some places buy all your excess power generation at the same rate or just count by kWh you generated. In this case, it is useful to use net meter, sicne you treat the grid as a giant battery.
@artemisspawnofzeus773223 күн бұрын
Why are the tesla cells on screen?
@Renewable_Tek_Bro23 күн бұрын
@artemisspawnofzeus7732 has the same chemistry but in a different shape.
@TheTanman41228 күн бұрын
Overly complex. Think simply. Like installing a small battery, charged from solar the day before, to power the movement. A battery limiter, which can hold onto some charge for the next day, are built in to most modern powerstations/batteries using an app controlling charge/discharge.
@Renewable_Tek_Bro27 күн бұрын
I agree somehow it is complex. But it may be more stable and could be cheaper if there is some improvement. At the end of the day, people care mostly about cost and stability. I saw many people trying to use electric tilt racks but were eventually chosen to fixed racks. The lifecycle of motors and electronics is a big concern. These solar panels are supposed to be in service for at least 20 years.
@420BongHitАй бұрын
Bruh skipped the math class completely
@tnott001Ай бұрын
Voltage is what jumps the gap so the arc is relative to the voltage not the current.
@AMXM-do5kwАй бұрын
Solar flare
@amdy7783Ай бұрын
Idk if I’d want bare hands anywhere near open leads of a 600 something volt 7 amp line
@kayquexavierАй бұрын
DC is not nearly as bad than AC at such voltages.
@joltingАй бұрын
You need better gloves if you're going to be playing with arcs like that.
@Renewable_Tek_BroАй бұрын
@@jolting yes you are right. Safety first.
@oneautumnleaf47Ай бұрын
One typhoon and it's a wreck 😂
@Renewable_Tek_BroАй бұрын
Probably, tracking solar systems has a lot of problems. It is only useful when there is not much space for more solar panels but you need to increase your solar output. Maintenance work for tracking solar systems is very difficult. And the initial cost can be double or even triple compared to the fix tilt racks.
@kaf2303Ай бұрын
I started controlling my sun tracking greenhouse & solar array with solar controllers but a cloudy morning would let the sun get past the sensor and leave the greenhouse facing east all day . Now I use a simple timer that turns the greenhouse & array , KISS method is usually more reliable.
@Renewable_Tek_BroАй бұрын
The auto-tracking system looks fancy but is less reliable and expensive. It can create a lot of maintenance problems after installation. Many large solar farms prefer to calculate a fixed tilt that can generate maximum electricity considering the year-round data. In your case probably timer is the most cost-effective solution and it works.
@rgucaАй бұрын
you can also mount a solar panel instead of the fresnel lens and power an electric motor to rotate the panels, which would be cheaper
@Renewable_Tek_BroАй бұрын
yes, you are right. But without a battery, I am not sure whether the real-time generation can drive the motor, especially in the morning. A 400kW panel in the morning probably can generate 50W real-time power. I guess in most of the cases this type of control system is powered by utility or a centralized supply from a specific group of panels.
@rgucaАй бұрын
@@Renewable_Tek_Bro the good thing is it doesn't have to be fast. you can use a weak motor with a high reduction gearbox.
@akmalhidayat9688Ай бұрын
Theoreticaly works. How about if changing cloudy and sunny?
@Renewable_Tek_BroАй бұрын
Good question. Probably, low boiling point fluid can be useful with minimum sunlight radiation.
@falkenvirАй бұрын
Which Plant Name?
@Renewable_Tek_BroАй бұрын
don't know the project name. It is a project in the Gobi desert in China. Use tracking solar racking system, that is why it is so easy to flip around.
@beregirobert1261Ай бұрын
They missed some calculations, they will blame it on covid 😂
@Renewable_Tek_BroАй бұрын
@@beregirobert1261 Yes. The product chosen is a tracking solar rack system, which can change the tilt automatically, that is why if the control unit is faulty, the panels can flip around the axis very smoothly. Probably the wind exceeds the highest torque that the tilt control unit can stand for.
@adrianprzybyek57583 ай бұрын
I need more examples.
@Renewable_Tek_Bro3 ай бұрын
can you give more input? Like how big the size of the system you want to know. I can make some new videos related to more examples.
@adrianprzybyek57583 ай бұрын
@@Renewable_Tek_Bro At least 1 turbine model in specific terrain. Wind direction make change when you have forest from 1 side. When is better to choose vertical turbine?