This ages very well. 30 million views give me hope back for humanity
@Sinleqeunnini14 сағат бұрын
Mearsheimer 2015: "We (the US) need Russia on Iran, on China, on Syria...." Mearsheimer 2024: "We (the US) lost Russia on Iran, on China, on Syria...."
@Mike-pb7jm14 сағат бұрын
Watching in 2024, what professor doesnt reflect on is that the US has a job to stay on top. Join us or become the enemy.
@TriPham-j3b16 сағат бұрын
Turn university into corporation make money instead of pickpocket students
@audronekeruliene9561Күн бұрын
💛💚❤💯👍👍👍✍
@stuartmckenzie80952 күн бұрын
I think in reality Nato and the US military are private mercenaries for the 1% club , Blackrock are already dividing up Ukraine for their club.
@bradforddawson36323 күн бұрын
Jesus
@LaMOi13 күн бұрын
The only thing that I don’t agree with Professor Mearsheimer about is his presumption that the decisions that the American government has taken over the years with regards to foreign policy, has been often misguided, foolish and sometimes the results have been unexpected and have caught the Americans unaware. I do not believe this is true. I believe most of the things that the elites have done not only America but around the world is by design. I think they know exactly what they’re doing.
@Chuis-gangster3 күн бұрын
thanks for bringing the back home to CHICAGO lmao
@tornado-s-20123 күн бұрын
By the way. about holy democracy - The total death toll of people killed by American troops in all major wars and conflicts since World War II is estimated to be over 12 million. This includes direct war violence in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen, and Pakistan, as well as casualties and fatalities in other conflicts.
@tornado-s-20123 күн бұрын
upd. There will be a treaty -but after an unconditional surrender-as was the case in Japan. Russia will determine the terms of the treaty, offering the people of Ukraine a deal they cannot refuse - freedom, real democracy, and a better life.
@patcartier81713 күн бұрын
"Why Are More Women Saying No To Having Kids?" I wonder. Could it be simply because more and more women have realised that they only have one life, and that this life had better be unburdened by kids? Nah, of course it couldn't be that. The reasons must be much more complicated and heart-wrenching, mustn't they?
@malaristube3 күн бұрын
Excellent🎉🎉🎉
@G.H.A.19703 күн бұрын
The conflict in Ukraine is often portrayed as a straightforward struggle: Russia as the aggressor, the West as the defender of freedom, and Ukraine as the victim caught in the crossfire. However, a deeper analysis reveals a far more complex narrative, one that implicates Western actions and multinational corporate interests in setting the stage for this devastating conflict. By alienating Russia, fostering geopolitical tensions, and allowing corporate greed to permeate the rebuilding of Ukraine, the West has played a significant role in shaping the tragic events we see today. Western Provocation and Russia's Alienation The roots of the Russia-Ukraine war lie in decades of Western policies that disregarded Russia’s security concerns. NATO’s relentless eastward expansion, despite informal assurances post-Cold War that it would not move "one inch eastward," created a sense of encirclement in Moscow. Ukraine’s potential NATO membership became a red line for Russia, yet the West insisted on pushing forward, ignoring clear warnings from geopolitical analysts like John Mearsheimer. The 2014 Maidan Revolution, heavily backed by the West, further antagonized Russia, resulting in the annexation of Crimea and the destabilization of Eastern Ukraine. By imposing sanctions and dismissing Russia’s historical ties to Ukraine, the West not only deepened the divide but also drove Russia into a closer alliance with China. This strategic miscalculation has created a powerful Russia-China bloc that now challenges Western hegemony. Corporate Interests in Ukraine's Reconstruction While geopolitics drove the war, the aftermath has unveiled a different kind of opportunism. Multinational corporations, financial institutions, and Western powerhouses have shown immense interest in Ukraine’s post-war reconstruction. This is not merely a matter of altruistic investment-it is an economic strategy. Ukraine, known as the "breadbasket of Europe," is home to some of the world’s most fertile land. The 2020 land reform law, which lifted a longstanding moratorium on farmland sales, opened the floodgates for foreign investors. U.S.-based entities like NCH Capital and agribusiness giants like Cargill and Monsanto (now Bayer) have established a foothold in Ukraine’s agricultural sector. The privatization of Ukraine’s arable land raises significant concerns about sovereignty and control over the country’s most vital resources. Simultaneously, financial institutions like BlackRock have taken a prominent role. In 2022, BlackRock signed an agreement to advise the Ukrainian government on structuring reconstruction funds, signaling the alignment of corporate interests with Ukraine’s rebuilding efforts. Citigroup has maintained operations in Ukraine throughout the war, supporting multinational clients and preparing for the financial opportunities reconstruction will bring. A Systemic Land Grab? The convergence of corporate and geopolitical interests in Ukraine has led to fears of a modern-day land grab. Critics warn that Ukraine’s devastation is being leveraged to transform the nation into an economic outpost for Western corporations. While multinational entities position themselves as saviors, their actions often prioritize profit over Ukraine’s long-term sovereignty and independence. Consider the agricultural sector: with nearly 28% of Ukraine’s arable land already controlled by oligarchs and foreign investors, the risk of land concentration is real. The involvement of companies like BlackRock in advising Ukraine’s economic future further underscores the extent to which corporate interests are intertwined with the nation’s recovery. While these entities may not have instigated the war, they stand to gain immensely from its aftermath. The Debt Trap: Financial Institutions and Ukraine's Future Beyond land and reconstruction, major financial institutions have extended substantial loans to Ukraine, ostensibly to aid in its recovery. However, these loans come with significant strings attached. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) approved a 48-month extended arrangement under the Extended Fund Facility (EFF) for Ukraine, amounting to approximately $15.6 billion. This arrangement is part of a $115 billion total support package for Ukraine. While such financial support is crucial for immediate needs, the long-term implications are concerning. The accumulation of debt, coupled with the conditions often imposed by international lenders-such as austerity measures, structural adjustments, and economic policy dictates-can lead to a loss of economic sovereignty. Ukraine may find itself in a position where servicing debt takes precedence over domestic development, social programs, and infrastructure investment. This debt dependency could render Ukraine poorer and unable to pay off its obligations for decades, effectively chaining the population to a cycle of indebtedness. The West’s Responsibility: Pushing Russia and Exploiting Ukraine The West’s actions have not only alienated Russia but also plunged Ukraine into a war that serves multiple Western interests. By disregarding Russia’s security concerns and fostering an environment of geopolitical antagonism, the West set the stage for this conflict. At the same time, the devastation of Ukraine has created fertile ground for multinational corporations to profit from reconstruction, agriculture, and financial restructuring. These developments beg the question: Was Ukraine truly a victim of unprovoked aggression, or is it also a pawn in a larger game of Western power projection and economic opportunism? The lines between humanitarian aid and exploitation blur when corporations and financial institutions take center stage in the rebuilding process, often sidelining the voices of ordinary Ukrainians. Conclusion: A Call for Accountability The war in Ukraine is not simply a battle between nations; it is a reflection of systemic failures in Western policy, corporate opportunism, and global power struggles. While Russia bears responsibility for its actions, the West cannot absolve itself of its role in provoking the conflict and enabling corporate exploitation of Ukraine’s tragedy. The reconstruction of Ukraine must be transparent, equitable, and focused on restoring sovereignty to its people-not selling its resources and future to the highest bidder. The West, having pushed Russia into confrontation, must now ensure that Ukraine does not become the ultimate casualty of greed and geopolitics. The blood spilled in this war will stain not just Russia’s hands but also those of the West, whose actions and inactions have fueled both the conflict and the corporate scramble for control.
@Mish8442 күн бұрын
"NATO’s relentless eastward expansion" at the time of russian aggression there was no ongoing NATO expansion. Before you whip out your 420IQ analysis, please get order of events right first. Is that too much to ask? To keep cause and effect order intact? "The 2014 Maidan Revolution, heavily backed by the West, further antagonized Russia" The Maidan revolution can only be treated as antagonization of Russia if you assume Ukraine in russian jurisdiction. It isn't since 90s. Not to mention the fact that Maidan was over EU, not NATO. Do I have to explain the difference between the 2? Is there any point to address the rest of your bubbling?
@G.H.A.19702 күн бұрын
Oh, where to begin with this masterpiece of intellectual dishonesty? Let’s unpack it, shall we? First off, the claim that NATO wasn’t expanding at the time of Russian aggression. Really? So, the 2008 Bucharest Summit declaration promising Ukraine and Georgia eventual NATO membership didn’t happen? Or maybe it just slipped your mind? Sure, no troops were marching eastward that very moment, but let’s not pretend NATO hadn’t been steadily cozying up to Ukraine for years, fueling Russian paranoia. Just because the knife isn’t in mid-stab doesn’t mean it hasn’t been drawn, mate. And then we move to the Maidan Revolution, where you so generously downplay the West’s role. “It was about the EU, not NATO,” you say, as if those two things exist in a vacuum. Of course, it was just a peaceful protest for trade agreements, right? Ignore the leaked Victoria Nuland call where the U.S. literally picked Ukraine’s new government. Ignore the billions poured into “democracy promotion.” But sure, let’s pretend the West was just an innocent bystander. Very convincing. Oh, and my personal favorite: the jurisdiction argument. Apparently, pointing out Russia’s reaction means I think Ukraine belongs to Moscow. What a leap! Maybe take a moment to understand that Russia, right or wrong, views NATO’s encroachment and Western meddling as existential threats. It’s not about “jurisdiction”; it’s about security. But no, let’s reduce it to some cartoonish notion of land ownership to make your argument seem stronger. Clever tactic, but no dice. Lastly, your dazzling insight that Maidan was about the EU, not NATO. Oh, bless you. You think Russia differentiates between the two? To Moscow, they’re two sides of the same Western coin, both symbolizing the West prying into its backyard. But hey, let’s just gloss over that because it doesn’t fit your narrative. So, to answer your question, yes, you do have to explain, because your argument collapses faster than a cheap lawn chair under scrutiny. Next time, bring something stronger to the table, because this is just embarrassing.
@Mish8442 сағат бұрын
@@G.H.A.1970 Ok, chronologically. I did say that "at the time of russian aggression there was no ongoing NATO expansion". That was in 2014. Your response? 2008 expansion. 2008 ended in 2008 with result of Ukraine being rejected. Do you have trouble with grasping the concept of timeline or were you not aware of smth? Because this reeks exactly of the dishonesty you were seeking out. You wouldn't be the first to whip out this manipulation. Not only that but in 2010 iirc Sevastopol leasing started, rendering NATO expansion an impossibility, not to mention that NATO expansion requires ALL members to accept, which is why 2008 ended the way it did. So in short: yes, it was expected not to end in Ukraine's membership due to events you omited: Ukraine taking explicit turn towards neutrality as evidenced by Yanukovich's policy on top of Ukraine having a nonblock clause in constitution. How is that cozying suppose to look in between 2008-2014 considering those facts? Hell if I know, you don't even acknowledge existence of those facts, so you don't either. "Of course, it was just a peaceful protest for trade agreements, right?" I'm sorry, but if you can't tell the difference between USA and west that is on you and your geographical illiteracy. Because Ukraine wasn't even seeking out NATO membership in Feb 2014 and the counterargument you mention revolves around expansion that ended in 2008. Ended with rejection, mind you. Chronology of events simply doesn't support your condescending attitude. What was however in progress was Ukraine trying to get to EU, which Yanukovich tanked and that, without a dispute, sparked the first protests that we today know as euromaidan. Note - Euromaidan, not NATOmaidan. To try and disprove by mentioning "as if those two things exist in a vacuum" without specifics how exactly one is supposed to affect another is a very convinient tactic, right? I can't disprove the cause and effect chain that you don't even disclose. " Ignore the leaked Victoria Nuland call where the U.S. literally picked Ukraine’s new government." They didn't. Please don't lie about content of the call. Not only that, in this call they prefer... Yanukovich to stay in power. The content of that call doesn't even make sense for the accusation you're leading ffs. How many vatniks do I have to catch redhanded on this lie before you call it a day, guys? "let’s pretend the West was just an innocent bystander." Keep putting words into my mouth, please. Or better yet - talk to me instead of your imaginary version of me. What I do however insist on, instead of whatever you hallucinated, is that Maidan was first and foremost Ukrainian effort, and 2nd it was supported by west. Yea, Ukrainians revolting against their president representing russian interest, and acting in their own interest. Unthinkable, they must have been misinformed by american propaganda. It's lik you can't comprehend eastern Europe not being docile russian bots. Btw, western support that came through channels open and legal so hard that it wasn't a secret a decade ago. Just like it wasn't a secret that russians entered Ukrainian territory and attacked, including Donetsk Donbass and all that "presumably" civil war that was definitely not just a russian attack impersonating internal conflict *wink wink*. On the offnote, never ask a vatnik who Anton Rayevsk is for example as it tends to fry their brains. "Apparently, pointing out Russia’s reaction means I think Ukraine belongs to Moscow." Either it is their territory, or it isn't their business. I'm sorry vatnik, but that's how it is. When UK applied to leave EU... they left. Shocking for a russian simp, I'm sure, but that isn't my problem. "ou think Russia differentiates between the two?" Again, the counterargument that they presumably are incompetent to the point of illiteracy is not as great defense you might think it is. Because you're painting a picture of a regime that is so vastly impossible to negotiate with that we SHOULD actually be as aggressive to Russia as they imagine we are, just to ensure they don't start a nuclear war over hallucinating being nuked by Poland or smth. On top of you just makign excuses for why facts don't align with russian perspetive, instead of trying to make sense of it. Bonus points, because you were explicitly informed that EU is distinct from NATO, and your response doesn't even contradict it, merely states that Russia doesn't perceive it that way, implicitly conceding the fact that USA isn't part of EU. Oof. Extra bonus points because your made up mechanism not only doesn't make sense due to USA being a main actor on theater that revolved around EU - it doesn't make sense even if we assume Maidan exploded around Yanukovich tanking NATO membership. Ok, let's say USA successfully coups and gets a proNATO candidate into Ukraine. Let's assume leasing agreement regarding Sevastopol disapears and Ukraine's territorial integrity is still intact. Ok, so Ukraine applies to NATO and then what? May I remind you that NATO membership requires ALL preexisting members to accept? In order for your conspiracy to even make sense USA would have to directly control all other memberstates and that is just full tinfoil hat mode, even if we didn't have evidence contradicting you from 2008 when Germany and France tanked Ukraine's admission. Jfc, nothing in your story aligns with facts. It's also worth reminding that this revolution did in fact get a prowestern leader into presidency and Ukraien STILL isn't part of NATO. A decade later. "prying into its backyard" Ukraine isn't Russia's backyard. It was literally one paragraph earlier when you mocked me for insinuating that you'd think Ukraine is in russian jurisdiction. Jfc, you think that all people have a vatnik's attention span? So, dear varnik, what would it take for you to stop lying?
@G.H.A.19702 сағат бұрын
Ah, Mish, your prose is as bloated as your argument. Let me simplify this for the sake of anyone else trying to wade through your swamp of pseudo-history. Chronology lessons, eh? Let’s start there. You claim NATO expansion was dead after 2008, yet somehow forgot to mention the ongoing NATO cooperation programs and military exercises in Ukraine post-2008. Or do you believe such activities were just friendly neighborhood barbecues? "No ongoing expansion"-sure, if you ignore how the groundwork was laid for everything that followed, especially after 2014. But don’t let context ruin your narrative. Oh, and this Sevastopol leasing argument? Please. As if Russia didn’t see NATO’s increasing influence in Ukraine as a long-term threat. You think Moscow’s paranoia has an off switch because of a leasing deal? That’s laughable. Their strategic mindset doesn’t work like a landlord’s lease agreement, mate. Now, Yanukovych and neutrality-what a tale. Yes, Yanukovych talked neutrality while simultaneously cozying up to Moscow. Funny how you gloss over the public outrage when he pivoted away from the EU deal, sparking Euromaidan. But, of course, the protests were "entirely organic" and "Ukrainian-led," right? No Western handshakes or PR campaigns in sight? Bless your faith in fairytales. The Victoria Nuland call-ah, classic. You’re telling me the "Yats is the guy" line wasn’t about picking favorites? Sure, mate, and water isn’t wet. Even if they didn’t explicitly say "coup incoming," the tone and content reek of meddling. Call it what you want, but let’s not pretend the U.S. was just observing from the bleachers. Your "EU isn’t NATO" distinction is adorable. Yes, we know that, genius. But pretending Russia views the EU as distinct from NATO in this context is peak naivety. Both represent the same encroaching Western bloc to them. You can argue semantics all day, but to Moscow, it’s one beast with two heads-and one of those heads has nukes. And finally, your masterpiece: the "Ukraine isn’t Russia’s backyard" gem. Bravo, truly. You managed to contradict yourself so thoroughly it’s almost impressive. If it’s not their backyard, why did the West spend decades prying into it? Why was regime change necessary? Why were billions funneled into "democracy-building"? It’s not about ownership, mate-it’s about influence. Pretending otherwise is delusional. So, Mish, before accusing others of dishonesty, maybe tidy up your own timeline gymnastics. You’ve got more gaps in your argument than NATO does in its membership list. Let’s call it a day, eh? Or do you have another novella for me? You are again, embarrassing yourself with so much intellectual dishonesty.
@FreeThePits4 күн бұрын
Many points came into full effect.
@astrobat874 күн бұрын
George Clooney sponsored you.
@beergood834 күн бұрын
Jean-luc do you know you biological father? If not you need to look up John Benoit of Chicago ridge. He looks exactly like you
@Rozarez2134 күн бұрын
hell yeah
@AlexanderKristofer-sf9px4 күн бұрын
Why is a russia agent teaching at your school
@tornado-s-20123 күн бұрын
Why do you need to show your stupidity in public?
@Mish8442 күн бұрын
@@tornado-s-2012 why do you hate people speaking truth?
@RoboticPolishingBuffingDeburr5 күн бұрын
john mccain was also mentioned. Victor Yanukovich, Vladimirovich putin, angela merkel. francois Hollande.
@orhanbagirov33515 күн бұрын
I deeply apologize, but as someone who has lived their entire life in Ukraine, I can assure you that there has never been a civil war there. This highly respected lecturer seems more like a "good friend of Putin" (if you know what I mean) than an objective analyst of the situation. Yes, for the United States, Russia is more important than Ukraine, and this is true for any other country in the world for understandable reasons. But does this mean that Russians have the right to take away Ukrainians' language and statehood? And how will this affect the international image and respect for the United States of America?
@gittelniha64784 күн бұрын
Wait, so what happened back then in Lugansk and Donetsk? And Odessa? And what about the ban of russian language? And destroying Lenin's statues? And what's The Ukrs? And why are people from Lugansk saying that they were attacked by Ukraine's military? I met a few guys from Lugansk, and they told me this
@orhanbagirov33514 күн бұрын
@@gittelniha6478 I’ve spoken Russian my entire life, living in Odessa. I consciously chose to speak Ukrainian in university, but all my classmates, both then and now, continue to speak Russian. The demand from the Russians is to make their language the official state language. You can point to examples in progressive Western democracies with multiple official languages, but in the case of Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, or Georgia, this is unacceptable! These countries are neighbors of the bloody empire that terrorized them for 300 years! One of the symbols of the genocide of the Ukrainian people is Lenin and the entire Soviet government. It is completely understandable that Ukrainians are no longer willing to tolerate their own destruction. If you are genuinely interested and not biased, I suggest you read about the Holodomor-a genocide of millions of Ukrainians. Yes, in Donetsk and Luhansk, the population is pro-Russian. But you in the West don’t fully understand what “pro-Russian” means. It means they are carriers of Russian culture. For them, there is no Ukraine, Georgia, or even Lisbon! Their president has said this many times! They believe dying for foreign countries is a noble thing. That’s why they have the largest part of the land! So what do you expect the pro-Russian people of Luhansk to say? That they were attacked by Russia? They want Ukraine to not exist. These are uneducated people who have worked in coal mines for three generations. On the other hand, there’s the aggressive Russian propaganda that operates not only in Luhansk, but even in New York. Also, you might want to look into how these Russians got there and why in deep Russia there are vast territories where people speak pure Ukrainian (hint: because Stalin deported Ukrainians from these territories and resettled them with Russians). I’m not saying that I consider a historical excursion an objective analysis for decision-making, but it’s difficult for Westerners to understand, so I bring these facts. In Odessa, separatists were eliminated-these were people who came out with banners saying "PUTIN, SEND TROOPS!" How would you expect your authorities to deal with such people? Ukraine is pursuing a very wrong policy both domestically and internationally, but that doesn’t mean Ukrainians should be exterminated and the remaining ones forced to become Russians. By the way, this is the 22nd war in history between Ukrainians and Russians. I can explain and dismantle any Russian argument because they are all fabricated, and any reasonable person living next to this evil empire will tell you the same. As for who was shelling Donetsk and Luhansk, please don’t believe the words, just look into it yourself. There is a million pieces of evidence online proving that the shelling was done by the Russians.
@tornado-s-20123 күн бұрын
no need to lie - you were not the only one who lived in Ukraine - I am from Donbass,
@tornado-s-20123 күн бұрын
@@orhanbagirov3351 how in 10 years in Holy Democratic Ukraine has no one been sent to prison for burning 50 people alive in the center of Odessa 2 of May 2014?
@tornado-s-20123 күн бұрын
@@orhanbagirov3351 " neighbors of the bloody empire " - brainwashing from Soros NGOs
@kellymoses85665 күн бұрын
This guy is a complete moron
@tornado-s-20123 күн бұрын
cope harder reality hurts
@Mish844Күн бұрын
@@tornado-s-2012 here's some tough reality: Memeheimer was wrong
@annaynely5 күн бұрын
Resource based economy. No money.
@Quality_hse_fse_and_projects6 күн бұрын
Nice
@chari---zard6 күн бұрын
Wow, uts 2024 now and rewatching this is mind blowing
@brandoncunningham46357 күн бұрын
$didnotwatch$#butgenerational-ly speaking I think crime rates USED to appear differently ,, plus statistics on like INTERIM criminals whilst,time: big helpers are statistics in parenting don’t know if it is still true but try Middle East WESTsoutth of like Afghanistan,, maybe India//GENERATIONALLY speaking// india:area too idk, could be really good parents MAYBE I.e. religious but not like NECCESARY ‘my fav’ I think not sure the years for I THINK this topic didnotfinish but it’s very for the YOU KNOW lawyers maybe ?? I’m out atCops
@brandoncunningham46357 күн бұрын
Statistics history EVEN GENERATIONAL LY SPEAKING really just clarify;: LIKE THE ‘AREA”
@tornado-s-20127 күн бұрын
Western military aid to Ukraine and Ukraine's own funding exceeds the Russian military budget between 2022-2024
@Mish8442 күн бұрын
ok vatnik
@pietrostort07 күн бұрын
The logical about "homo economicus" is amazing! Tks!
@Aragorn-877 күн бұрын
This video has helped John Mearshimer become famous
@ruy.diazdevivar8 күн бұрын
Now, TRUE LEGITIMATE LAWS are not invented out-of-the-blue, they are a natural consequence (nations are organisms, not CONTRACTS) of CULTURE (religion, language, ART, and customs), they cannot be imposed by force to the whole PLANET at once..., thus, the enforcers of this system are bound to DESTROY CULTURES, this is why they are doing it SYSTEMATICALLY for the las 200 years or more using the MONEY acquired financing the Napoleonic wars and previous WARS were committed to gain WORLD POWER using MONEY via pseudo DEMOCRACIES...
@ruy.diazdevivar8 күн бұрын
On the true origin of WESTERN LAWS I would recommend to read: Numa Denis Fustel de Coulanges' "The Ancient City".
@ruy.diazdevivar8 күн бұрын
It is not about the political system (although it is a handy vector), it is about imposing GLOBAL PROPERTY RIGHTS ENFORCED by the HEGEMON in HEGEMON's courts of 'justice".
@ruy.diazdevivar8 күн бұрын
The reality is an HEGEMON controlled by an "elite" printing MONEY, and the "right" to BUY all assets in the WORLD with that MONEY (US dollars).
@ruy.diazdevivar8 күн бұрын
I disagree with Prof. Mearsheimer in that "the West" promotes democracy because "we believe that who is getting elected would be pro Western"", not at all... It is framed in a dichotomic way, INTERNATIONALISM with an HEGEMON imposing GLOBAL PROPERTY RIGHTS against a MULTIPOLAR world precluding this to happen and preserving CULTURE...
@ruy.diazdevivar8 күн бұрын
The fault in this analysis is assuming that there re no Jews in Ukraine despite the fact that their president now (2024) Zelensky is Jewish...
@tomasnozka18 күн бұрын
I love Russian rubles 😍. J.M.
@CodedClothing8 күн бұрын
In the golden balls test what does dad receive in return for being the guarantor in his own alimony scheme of which he is not the recipient of benefits and he is the subject which gives up more than half then loses everything with oversight as sole source of advice from the test designers.
@keiwan_TA9 күн бұрын
Great information! Thanks for sharing
@linkenski9 күн бұрын
Fantastic teacher. I'm not extremely knowledgeable but I've been trying to get an overview of the issues with the world power since the Ukrainian war broke out, as a european myself, and I've listened to 2 hour interviews with Putin, revisited his 2007 Munich speech that broke the tone of the modern world, and viewed american politics and NATO articles etc. I think this teacher has such a clean and accurate overview of the western perception of things. There was a lot of propaganda I had to consume that I tried to take at face value. But it ultimately comes down to Putin being a murderer. We had reason to enroach towards him once we learned he was assassinating his opponents and using censorship against us, and once he made his position clear in 2007. We knew he was a threat. We just didn't know he was a military threat yet.
@Thatsbannanas-d8c9 күн бұрын
And guess who the President of the USA was in 2021-2022 ? America might need to read a book one day.
@ArekE239 күн бұрын
I enjoy the privy that is Martin Buber's perspective in time, and the privy that is discerning that particular element of time in his perspective. We see one who does not merely accept - but an original thinker. We are privy to an intellectual/spiritual journey and see Buber was distinct from his philosophical and religious influences. My Pops has long held, with no familiarity with Buber's work, that there is a worthy distinction to be made between having faith (Mark 11.22) and belief ("The Faith" or dogmatic faith). Unbeknownst to him Martin Buber's Two Types of Faith. I think Buber is relevant today. Modest fortitude, simplicity, and humble consideration admidst the confluence of these other chaotic energies e.g. through two world wars.
@suenowland1579 күн бұрын
17-11-24. I truly believe our mind heals our bodies and most importantly the need to be negative about yourself. I stopped feeling g sorry a week after my condition and told my mind how great I am how grateful I was to have living n caring friends and the treatment I received I was grateful. Two weeks before 28th September I had severe gastro for five n moderate for ten. Suddenly I woke 26th with pain across my right shoulder into my neck. I thought stroke. In the morning my left arm feeling was feeling heavy. I had a massage n rested. Early Friday morning I woke with right arm. Saturday morning I work and both arms couldn't work. I manage to use one finger to ring my friend. My arms were no longer useable. It was decided to take me to hospital. I manage to walk with two people supporting me for about 30 steps then suddenly collapse I was totally paralyzed from the neck down to feet. At the hospital after many test I am diagnosed with GBS. I was admitted to ICU and put on oxygen as my breathing deteriorated n a catheter was inserted as I didn't know how to pee. GBS is Gillian Barr Syndrome. It's a rare disease of about 1 in 150,000 world wide. It's where your antibodies couldn't fight the infection so it turns on your motor neurone nerves system closing done your body. I was terrified n confit, as I'm normally an active person swimming dancing living life in Bali. At day three I begged to die, day five also. Then I was told I was needed urgent treatment of immunoglobulin transfusion for five days. It wasn't under insurance so cost was 27,500 aust. Laying completely paralyzed being put in pampas- nappies.was my biggest disgrace. As I couldn't afford the treatment they decided to continue with the high dosage of steroids. In Bali hospital one must have a a friend or family stay to do the 24/7 care, again I lost all dignity. You need to provide all equipment for cleaning the body, bed mats, pampas, even water n food unless you eat what is given. The meal three times a day was a cup of soggy rice, 1/4 cup shredded chicken and egg. 1/4 salty vege soup, three bites of water melon or paw paw, one glass of water. I was also allowed two half glasses of warm milk n two bananas. I probably only ate equivalent to one cup a day. In the beginning I wanted to be sick swallowing the rice and only could eat a few mouthfuls. My friend who slept on the ground next to me introduce me to listening to iPods and talks about the mind body connection. How the mind can visualise situations. So when my meal came he got all excited saying IMG sue look what we have super special alcate. In this bowl is lemon Bintang..a lemon beer😊 over here spaghetti special. Ape pie and cream . The salty soup was a island tea😊 a tea with five spirits in my favourite drink. Actually over time I started to take in a few more mouth fulls but not enough to sustain me. The listening to mind and body connection also help me visualise. To be somewhere else when I was sweating in a ward with no aircon. I visualised being home in the pool. The ocean breeze across me n I did infact feel cooler. When it came to pain even though I was paralyzed yes the many many needles of blood testing, I also had five spinal fluid test in one episode in my ward. I acknowledge the pain then told my mind to take the pain on a cloud and go. Nurses and specliast were surprised how strong I was. They continue apologize saying this will hurt, asking me was I in pain as this was one of the symptoms. I would smile and say no then thank them for the treatment. They explained how serious this condition was and the possibility of being on a breathing tube if needed. They explained I would take 6-12 months to learn to walk, would never 24/7 care for a long time. WRONG! After 10 days in ICU I was stabled to go to second ICU which was a four bed ward. You didn't see the nurses too often say 14 I was moved to another ward. Then I was given shock treat say 15. Again the specialist kept asking was I in pain and again I replied it's ok. Through my mind I also learnt to breath through pain. I was asked how did I cope with such pain. My answer was having six children you go through pain. But having your daughter murdered in 2017 that's the worse pain I could go through yet survived so any other pain was nothing. Day 16 I felt my toes move then ankles feet up to my knees. Wow that was it. I was determined to get moving. By the evening my legs were moving slowly. I thought mind you can walk think how. After pooing iny pampas once I was determined not to do it again. I asked staff to support me to fit up. Give me the chair and with help I stood and slowly shuffle to the toilet. Yes my first poo in a toilet. The specialist were amazed on my walking. On my slow recovery being shown. My arm movements return very slowly but enough to use my thumb n forefinger so I started to try eat by myself. Though I needed help to sit up my achievements were small but I believe it's because of my mindset and working with my mind and body. My warm milk was my pain killers , my light that started from my feet working up.yhrough my body to heal. 😊 Day 19 I was allowed to go home but was advised it will be a flow hard recovery. Settling in yes first night a friend stayed but I realised I would be ok after 7pm. My only problem was the toilet as it was too low. Again a strategy. I straddle the bowl n.peed😊. Doing poop was a struggle as I needed help off the toilet. Lucky they put in a wet bidae a toilet squirter but due to weakness of hands and learning to use this bum cleaner the water went every where😊. Then my toilet chair came. Each day I listen to two talks about the mind how it can heal. How the body and mind work together. I would thank my mind for being open n big and ask with my body to send healing light from my feet up scanning my muscles, nerves organs to heal. Day three of home I was in the pool with support n by day five I was shuffling along in my villa. People were amazed on how quickly I was progressing. To making a small cup.of tea, making cereals to learning how to write, to cleaning my teeth. I have been out of hospital one month and I am totally independent. Yesterday due to my electric chair stuffing up I was forced to walk a short distance doing the pool with my cane. So another achievement. I'm yet to be able to leave the resort due to unstable road conditions and the hill but in time. 😊 I'm so happy to have been taught the importance of the mind and body is one. So here I am told 6-12 months or longer to walk and get my skills back and I achieved it in a month. I had my first dance being held last week. Where I live we have a band twice a week and I'm known as the dancing queen. The night I walked by myself to my friends they were speechless crying. Now I hope to inspire others. I'm writing a book and one day it may be published 😊
@iniRasta4209 күн бұрын
wow, very moving
@bedlam58910 күн бұрын
Oh no stigmata
@dejiamoo11 күн бұрын
The people Europeans still trying to claim Ancient egypt? Or the arabs? Sorry folks, this culture was very African. No cultural links between egyptian culture and europe or the lavant. Plenty of cultural links of ancient egypt to inncer Africa. BLACK PEOPLE BUILT THE PYRAMIDS!
@smyumyu852611 күн бұрын
great scholar
@anujsethi784511 күн бұрын
In India there is hardly any freedom
@UChicago12 күн бұрын
Get on the list: Subscribe to the Big Brains Insider newsletter for access to special behind-the-scenes content and get a bigger bite from every guest. eepurl.com/iiMiI5
@thefef614912 күн бұрын
конечно, вау! мужик молодец, глубоко смотрит, жаль, что таких мало
@G.H.A.1970Күн бұрын
No, there are lot's like him. It's our governments that are led by warmonger lobbying from arms industry, big funds and corporations that will make lots of money when they break up Ukraine. Diplomacy is non existent in the West’s mind, only money and global dominance. Russia should have been part of NATO and Europe by now, but NO! Russians, Ukrainians and Europeans are just pawns to these institutions.
@Mish8442 сағат бұрын
@@G.H.A.1970 that's interesting to which institution is my country a pawn? You seem to to know my geopolitics better than I do
@G.H.A.1970Сағат бұрын
@Mish844 Many seem to know better than you, actually. Since when being born in a country makes you an "expert", since that is what you think you are? Your comment paints a very good picture of yourself and your opinions (since that is what it all boils down to).
@Mish844Сағат бұрын
@@G.H.A.1970 maybe it isn't obvious but when someone wants a testimony, they go to ask a witness first. Not an academic form the other side of the globe, when they can't even consistently get the history of the region. You couldn't be bothered to inform anyone that the revolution in question was in interest of the country in question, that Nuland call contained the opposite of you say it did, just like Memheimer couldn't bebothered with mentioning elections and impeachment when talking about an alleged coup. Turns out that if you want a sensible diagnosis, it benefits to know full story, not just bits and pieces, so next time try show some humility when a resident is trying to inform you about the facts you missed, instead of gaslighting. It shouldn't be rocket science if you aren't suffering from severe narcisistic disorder.
@Praisethesunson12 күн бұрын
The University of Chicago spent the last century correctly predicting that any nation in Latin America that didn't surrender control over it's valuable resources to western capitalists would have their leaders overthrown by America. Incredible predictive power!
@jandzluvly13 күн бұрын
In the first Q&A response he ends up talking about how incredibly secure the USA is. I think that may be the one foolish thing he said in this presentation. At this point many are betting on the fall of the empire.