🫥 Even if you did everything you could to make it efficient and affordable, it’s still going to be expensive. And people need jobs. AI is meant to keep people in these industries safe- not replace. The Big Challenge going forward is defending people’s jobs from AI and giving people something to do and be able to build a future
@surfn12327 күн бұрын
Great last name Bro! Don't let us down!
@shivanshtiwari6794Ай бұрын
Are there any research opportunities for international students pursuing UG in physics?
@stevenknudsen79022 ай бұрын
very cool, to see how the cyclone shape can be optimized to remove it as a system bottleneck
@kathard9723 ай бұрын
မဂ်လာပါ
@aleee15554 ай бұрын
it is upsetting that the live stopped streaming before the presentation i was long awaiting for
@jonathancovarrubias99434 ай бұрын
What happened to the live?
@obednenyiotoo32105 ай бұрын
Can this software be used for fixed or packed bed Simulation
@obednenyiotoo32105 ай бұрын
Please can this software be used for packed bed Simulation?
@obednenyiotoo32105 ай бұрын
Can it be used for fixed or packed bed
@Football_Kingdom6025 ай бұрын
In 2024.bytheway, very helpful vedio❤
@lesthompson59076 ай бұрын
The elements described in this dissertation are used in the wood gas. & in this way, we can use a charcoal colom to produce a synth gas suitable for ruing gas combustion generators. there is a growing resistance to what is referred to as carbon pollution. Note the general move is not to ban. the use of carbon But to tax it as a reason to collect revenue as we find easier ways to be self-sufficient in energy There will be less tax income from profits in the reduction of power, It is this reason the establishment has less opportunity for income from e its power industry, the carbon tax. in my opinion their way of offsetting their loses. in the model world solar panels & betray storage technology. this is why seek a worldwide carbon tax.
@bapaknisa6 ай бұрын
Permisi.. saya mau bertanya.. pada saat pembakaran didalam furnace ,apakah posisi matetial bed terangkat sampai ke cyclone atau hanya didalam furnace?
@jonathanbaker21859 ай бұрын
Promo_SM
@DumbAsteroid9 ай бұрын
Paying for a public service is supposed to be regulated by people who aren't controlled by being paid off by rich monopoly mother f*ckers who don't even provide good service and randomly change bill prices for no justifiable reason!
@DumbAsteroid9 ай бұрын
STOP SCREWING THE PEOPLE FOR YOUR ALREADY FAT WALLETS
@DumbAsteroid9 ай бұрын
Lying scumbags filled with corporate greed!
@siericalandis730311 ай бұрын
😊😂😅😂😅😂
@sethsnyder209711 ай бұрын
You're a real rock star!
@tombloom5223 Жыл бұрын
What an exciting event. Monongalia County and the citizens will work together with the Federal Government to make this happen. Thank you to Senator Manchin, Senator Capito and Representative McKinley. IT is a GREAT DAY to be a MOUNTAINEER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@LMNzOP Жыл бұрын
👍👍👍👍👍
@eliecerguzman849 Жыл бұрын
Aburrido
@SofiaAlvaradoChavez-qw3nd Жыл бұрын
Quien más está acá por una tarea de inglés ?
@stevenknudsen7902 Жыл бұрын
Very cool. I enjoyed the parts about making the alloys and then stress and creep testing them.
@jean-pierredevent970 Жыл бұрын
The process needs to use biomass today but wastes material to deliver heat. Further some oxygen is present. I would like to see smaller insulated reactors, heated by micro waves and with added hydrogen carrier and in oxygen free conditions. We would get a lighter fuel mixture but it would make the process even carbon negative if as last step some bio char could be formed. ( not returning in carbon cycle) Yes, yes, I know it's infinitely easier to say this than to build one myself.
@lazvt8469 Жыл бұрын
Now an A. Flemming awardee....congrats!
@LebogangBaakeleng Жыл бұрын
Sir iwanted to ask if I wanted to do a little lap experiment between the moisture free coal and an ordinary one to see which one burns better,cleanly and more efficiently than the other, what materials would you recommed ishould use😅
@m.duraipandithenmozhi8162 Жыл бұрын
Superb...
@parmanlotim1478 Жыл бұрын
how to do it this simulation? guide me please
@carlosaires886 Жыл бұрын
Hi there ,how can i email you ?
@ZennExile Жыл бұрын
Anyone in a lab coat ever thrown the carbon storage potential of seasonal layers of worm castings and a thriving Rhizosphere with which to digest them on a napkin and figured out just how much, if any, carbon we can just store in the top meter or so of living soils by processing our organic waste through worms and into castings that fungus in the soil can then convert into perfect nutrition of all terrestrial life in and above it? And maybe toss the total biomass one might expect to sustain per hectare of "activated" Rhizosphere on another napkin to analyze later? Asking for a few million friends with poorly monetizable skills that lack future proofing but a strong urge to live and thrive as part of a means to build a future for their children. Seems to me as a worthless internet hobo yelling at trashbins that a fancy new carbon capture and conversion technology is all well and good, but is any of it as quickly scalable or even theoretically as efficient as Life itself? If I top soil with castings, a bit of sugar, and Mycelium spores, to grow let's say... 5 acres of appropriate local flora and fauna on recovered farmland in rural Montana, and that land cost me 3000$, and the excess 2 tons of the 15 tons I could theoretically produce, during a bad worm year, nets about 2400$ on the open market as a naturally derived fertilizer, and the cost of hauling nearby organic waste in and mixing it is negated by the fees to collect it... How much more or less productive at storing carbon is any of the headlining theoretical capture technology going to be over the next 50 years compared to my cost of around 300$ hectare, doing it myself, at the equivalent of 3 hours per day 5 days per week, with two long seasonal vacations? And will any theorized carbon storage capture technology provide a family unit with nutrition, stability, a purpose in society, or a means to truly live a carbon reductive lifestyle? Because pluck my short hairs and call me by my maiden name... it seems like there's no room in the future for actual people and like, living creatures the more I read about your organization. It's almost as if yall have just given up entirely on a solution when we've all been standing on a perfectly viable one, at least to my scatterbrained hobo math. Why not just empower millions of dirt farmers to raise a new generation of carbon cycle conscious children? Seems cheaper with a much higher ROI. Or are we all convinced now that AI is the future instead of kids? I keep forgetting which timeline this is.
@chipkyle5428 Жыл бұрын
Please explore the carbon sequestration capabilities of Prairie Grasslands. Prairie lands are more effective than forestland.
@B61Mod12 Жыл бұрын
2:35 So you burn the H2, but what happens to the C02 which was created by adding steam to the syngas to create the H2 and C02?
@burnttoast04028 ай бұрын
CO2 will go to the air, there is no efficient way of making hydrogen without CO2 being a biproduct
@SamueldeKlerk8007Ай бұрын
It can be removed and cleaned for various commercial uses like CO2 for the beverage industry, production of dry-ice, etc.
@B61Mod12 Жыл бұрын
0:50 you better tell those wildfires to dispose of their ash responsibly.... lol.
@Beanpapac15 Жыл бұрын
neat
@merlepatterson2 жыл бұрын
41 views
@kzanbusiness2 жыл бұрын
noice!
@fakhrulisback11monthsago972 жыл бұрын
Good
@austinsnow13062 жыл бұрын
😓 PЯӨMӨƧM
@alexuvarov74412 жыл бұрын
Wood and coal are not renewable recourses and this is not a "clean" process, it still releases CO2. This is not eco-friendly as stated in the video. Good video tho.
@Buzzard07132 жыл бұрын
Does that mean solar, batteries and electric cars are not “clean” or “eco-friendly” because they use immense amounts of oil and fossil fuels to mine, as well as surface strip mining to obtain the raw materials?
@MavHunter20XX2 жыл бұрын
This is what those damned "green" advocates don't want you to learn about. This technology has been in existence for a decade or so.
@anteeko2 жыл бұрын
Doesn't it take a lot of energy to run the full process?
@drewtronics74062 жыл бұрын
Excellent automotive fuel to fight the "green" revolution, and subsequent forced restrictions on access to hydrocarbon fuels. They will jack the price of gasoline, and this will level the playing field for the individual. You will need a ready source of cellulose material though in order to fight effectively.
@xiaoleitu98492 жыл бұрын
Calculating the gradient with two model simulations with differential programming is cool. But that is exactly what geophysicists did all these years in the adjoint method. The concept that differential programming can automatically do this for us is cool though!
@mafarmerga2 жыл бұрын
Off topic but in thinking about CO2 sequestration the big problem is that of CO2 concentration (0.004% of the atmosphere) is really, really low. But plants are bloody good at concentrating CO2. Why not grow fast growing plants, then burn them under a controlled conditions (i.e.; furnace) and then capture the CO2 from the smoke which will be much higher in CO2 than the atmosphere. Essentially using plants as solar powered CO2 concentraters. The energy given off from the burning could be used to make electricity and power the CO2 concentrating equipment (solving a second problem of CO2 sequestration).
@jme20062 жыл бұрын
2:02 There is absolutely nothing clean about coal. There is none such thing as clean coal, or "clean energy from coal".
@anthonypascual93472 жыл бұрын
Thank you Kanye, very cool!
@gene40942 жыл бұрын
If they use “negative-refractive indexed” materials, to magnify the ionized materials in the combustion, a “warm-plasm” could produce a less toxic by-product. This slag could more easily have mineral extraction recovery.