Right!

100%

That’s why “these cuts and sores don’t heal with time or with age”…this song hits to the core for children of abuse, brings tears every single time😢

😂🤣you wouldn't turn it up to 14 would you?

I thought only I noticed this 0-:

@@jasonbyas6150 (-:

@@peteleoni9665 🤣🤣🎸🎸 I'd say there's a lot of us old farts that know all the lines in SOTL

@@jasonbyas6150 I mean the BBill look.

You thought of a different movie than I thought of. (-:

Wow this is a song I grew up with. My dad got it on CD when it came out.

Yes sir, it is possible that you do.

@@KevinR242 Thank you Mr. Clancey, I am certain that the Zapruder film shot on November 22, 1963 is the one we have all seen since then.

@@williamwhitten7820 That is fine but films are cartoons at best, but when it comes to this film it is just another piece of false evidence. The more we look at it the less it can be believed. There is more known about the plot and murder of Cesar than that which took the life of this American President. It is just another lie. I believe that the speaker was more or less just attending a symposium about the film because he had a lot to add in connection to other evidence by way of independent investigation. I think something in the way of surgery to the body prior to autopsy. It is a rabbit hole which brings to mind another famous cartoon staring Bugs Bunny, which I believed as a child to be genuine.

@@KevinR242 "That is fine but films are cartoons at best" You are really off the rails here Clancey. The modern world understands the murder of Julius Caesar from a play by William Shakespeare not through any real historical facts. It is pop fiction in the modern world's mind. You as the other promoters of the alteration of the Zapruder film obviously know zilch about film and film making equipment. If you don't know the difference between cartoons and live action film, you need to understand simple definitions as a first step. Lifton is a quack, Douglas Horn is a dupe, and Dino Brugioni is a CIA operative that ran a PSYOP on the Zapruder film. And you sir haven't the slightest idea about what you are talking about. *What is your evidence the Z-film was altered?* Do you even know how to explain what was said to have taken place?

@@KevinR242 *Ghost Images* - Sometimes there appears to be “ghost” images such as a motorcycle fender. These are real images, which because of the design of the claw cutout area occur simultaneously above and below the perforation holes of the primary image being formed. Recognized Image Anomalies in the Zapruder Original Film *Image Penetration between the Perforations:* The characteristics and depth of the image penetration are not always seen the same but do follow a consistent and repeatable pattern. The pattern is directly related to the effective image area from the exit window of the Varamat lens, the focal length of lens and in some cases, the aperture setting. We can show and conclude that: The telephoto lens setting consistently produces the maximum image penetration into the perforation area; Normal lens focal length produces some but not full penetration into the perforation area; and Wide-angle lens focal length produces the least penetration into the perforation area. *Claw Shadow* One of the image anomalies seen is a darker (higher density) band or wide bar in the image area between the perforations. This anomaly can be noted in the Zapruder frames as well as my practical test, photos. This higher density (band or streak) can be explained as being caused by the shadow of the intermittent claw (and its supporting arm) as it moves upward over the film to engage the following perforation and pull down the next frame. The pull-down is with the shutter closed, but the upward movement of the claw out of the perforation, over the area between the perforations, into the next perforation hole is done while the shutter is open and the film is being exposed. The claw movement over the area between the perforations reduces the amount of light reaching the film causing more density. (Less light is more density on a reversal film.) The reduction in exposure to the area behind the claw is not linear. The claw functions with a shutter crank pin engaging the claw slot giving a sinusoidal time relationship to the pulldown ratchet reentry action. *Multiple Exposure Areas - Perforation-Like Images* Within the perforation area, adjacent to a perforation above or below or both, an image occurs that resembles a perforation. The images simply represent multiple, i.e. double exposure of the area of the “excess” aperture cutout for the intermittent claw action. Above the upper and below the lower perforation hole, the excess aperture cutout allows an image to be formed concurrent with the primary image. When the succeeding image is formed it adds light to that previously formed causing multiple or double exposure. The shape that this image area takes, and importantly whether it exists at all, is directly dependent on the size of the exit window of the lens based on the chosen focal length together with the influence of scene content. Not all exposure conditions produce the phenomena, however telephoto in bright lighting conditions does. With blank frames between some test target exposures, the phenomenon is visible and multiple exposures adjacent to the perforations are easily seen. (See photo below.) *Ghost Images:* In the Zapruder motorcade scene, below the perforation, you were shown a white object heading toward a bystander in the primary image. This so-called ghost image has caused a lot of speculation and questions from many that examined the Zapruder film. Now, by our understanding of the multiple exposure around the perforations explained above, it is reasonable to conclude the cause as simple double exposure of a primary image super imposed on the excess image of the preceding frame. (See ghosting on test chart below.) -- ZAVADA REPORT ON ZAPRUDER FILM

Yes I totally agree with you that all films were edited. Another important fact is that Oswald was in the wrong building to shoot at the president from. If he was a lone nut (not) he would have set up in a building on Main st because that is what the newspapers said was the route the motorcade would take. Elm st was a wrong turn. Oswald was not involved otherwise you have a conspiracy and a massive one at that,.

@@KevinR242 agree and as far as the single bullet issue, this is what is so important to prove a conspiracy, no exit point to the bullet they say hit jfk in the back 5" & 1/2 down and about 1" to the right of midline, there's no exit point in the inner chest wall at all, nothing so what the bullet went upwards and then exited out jfk's neck Bullshit, also the frontal neck wound as dr perry said from day one, i really believe it exited out the back wound seen in autopsy photos, yet they say that was a entrance wound? Also the Windshield FBI drawings CE 351 shows so many cracks in it, yet the windshield at NARA only has a crack to the right of where greer sat? I really believe that the del tex bld was the main snipers position and also the records bld rooftop ( concrete drain cover ), plus the knoll and the underpass bridge on the southern end, but heres the thing, if shots were fired un supressed from the rear why is there not one person looking in that direction from all the witness standing at the crn of elm and huston etc, none are looking to their right and behind themselves? Also they never ever mention the missed shots, which there is at least 4? Also missed so far off its not funny, not even close to the jfk car at all, during the shooting? 1. James Tuage. 2. Chrome Inner chrome Strip. 3. Concrete Drain Cover on the southern elm st. 4. The roadway surface near the corner of elm st and huston st. These facts alone prove that more than one shooter and 3 shots were fired? Also not one person standing out the front of the TSBD BLD on the corner was looking up, they are all less than 60ft away from the so called snipers nest, yet every single person is looking down elm at where the jfk car is and what is going on and the dave wiegman film clearly shows this, plus a frame from that film, clearly a small puff of smoke as well, near the fort worth sign is on the grass/lawn on the knoll, as all the witness said they seen who on the triple underpass etc?

yeah its on dvd.