The Su-75 Fighter Flop
5:17
4 сағат бұрын
The V-22 Osprey returns to flight
5:30
4 сағат бұрын
Пікірлер
@Emirhan44613
@Emirhan44613 4 күн бұрын
🇹🇷🇦🇿💪
@LockheedF-35LightningII
@LockheedF-35LightningII 4 күн бұрын
Gamechanging?
@jinnahkhan4841
@jinnahkhan4841 16 күн бұрын
GREAMY NOT QUEEN KGB MIAMI CASH SPINDING LOT CALFORNA HOMINVASON MAIL BOX FROUDUSSR WASHINGTION DC DRONE WHY CHISHING AS RIPPING OFF AS MOMMA AND PAPPA QUEEN 1980 CASH SPINDING AS CALFORINA AS MIAMI ATM FRANCE RENT TOO NATO KILLER PUTTEN CALL GREAMY TO GREAMY .
@SuperiorAmericanGuy
@SuperiorAmericanGuy 21 күн бұрын
We should totally retire and replace the F-15 due to the F-14 tomcats retirement and death.
@superflyer991
@superflyer991 24 күн бұрын
Watch them put Iranian-made American ordnance on it.
@Grangerilatabma
@Grangerilatabma 25 күн бұрын
flying coffin 😂
@avaseer
@avaseer 24 күн бұрын
infantile!!
@GabrielHarnett
@GabrielHarnett 25 күн бұрын
Palestine is not a state.....
@northeastlower
@northeastlower 26 күн бұрын
these remind me of the Civil War subs
@tomsmith2587
@tomsmith2587 26 күн бұрын
Thank you Obama for canceling the hypersonic missile program and the F-22. Now we're playing catch up thanks to you.
@Anonbot.zu23
@Anonbot.zu23 26 күн бұрын
Not only german sources Iranian military watchers and a few russian ones have said this
@raselrasen8701
@raselrasen8701 27 күн бұрын
🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩👍👍👍👍👍👍
@imtirajpoot9216
@imtirajpoot9216 28 күн бұрын
❤❤
@douglassshephard3732
@douglassshephard3732 28 күн бұрын
I would do one thing with this orca, I put the same system that the Manta Ray has for batteries, for the manta ray in the orca
@entropy_of_principles
@entropy_of_principles 29 күн бұрын
YESSSS ! Rrrromaaaniiiaaa !
@Максим-ж5п2ю
@Максим-ж5п2ю Ай бұрын
Он уже стоит на вооружении РФ и используется на территории СВО.
@flycatchful
@flycatchful Ай бұрын
You honestly think our adversaries haven't already copied this vehicle. China, in particular copies everything we have.
@tonysu8860
@tonysu8860 29 күн бұрын
Not likely to a level that can equal the US. China may copy an image or general description but the truth is that even think tanks like CSIS don't usually mention that the US has an advantage in technology and is not even special or particularly advanced. It can be surprising that China's latest vessels like the Fujian aircraft carrier exhibits a really poor hull design that is not streamlined and suggests very poor agility and maneuverability. Chinese aircraft may appear to attempt to copy American designs but likely fall short in performance. When Chinese replicas attempt to copy anything American, because the copies lack scientific knowledge they are guaranteed to be different from the original and more often than not are inferior.
@falvegas511
@falvegas511 Ай бұрын
F-35 ETC ETC SALES ARE GONNA GET BETTER & BETTER. KREMLIN MILITARY SALES MOST LIKELY HEADING FOR, THE CELLAR.
@saleemChoudhry-k4l
@saleemChoudhry-k4l Ай бұрын
It's J10CE
@saleemChoudhry-k4l
@saleemChoudhry-k4l Ай бұрын
it's J10CE
@lovely-mq4rg
@lovely-mq4rg Ай бұрын
with bajia and piripiri
@Saeedmustapha-v1l
@Saeedmustapha-v1l Ай бұрын
In other news, India has the trophy for slums. 😂😂😂
@netero1682
@netero1682 Ай бұрын
Russia has the designs and perhaps the right people, but they don't have the money to finance such a project, otherwise they would have already won in Ukraine. Italy, the United Kingdom and Japan had to join together to seek to create their own aircraft, that alone shows the complexity that is needed in terms of money. The United States could because they have the money, and China does the same, but they are far above the others because of their economy. To create those planes, Russia needs allies just as good as them and richer, why didn't they ally with China?
@alinradu6118
@alinradu6118 Ай бұрын
Cry more ... a river may be?
@Stinkfinger.
@Stinkfinger. Ай бұрын
I’m sure they ripped the usa off as always
@Racernumbersix
@Racernumbersix Ай бұрын
Labour will kill it.
@MrSonofsonof
@MrSonofsonof Ай бұрын
Labour just approved it.
@Racernumbersix
@Racernumbersix Ай бұрын
No labour did not just approve it, they simply didn’t have the justification right now to kill it. They WILL kill it, as soon as they have something or someone else to blame for doing so.
@elguapo5322
@elguapo5322 Ай бұрын
Labour just gonna print the money to pay for it?
@netrunner_pl
@netrunner_pl Ай бұрын
air show is bullshit then. This is my 3D model of H-20 concept.
@AhmadshahFarooqi-d3v
@AhmadshahFarooqi-d3v Ай бұрын
Arabian Gulf??😂😂
@allandavis8201
@allandavis8201 Ай бұрын
I get the impression from the few comments that there are is that it is about 50/50 between liking the topic and against it. In my opinion it does not matter when or how the two potential adversaries of the free world come into service, the only thing that does matter is how effective they might be, but I believe that in the long term long range bombers will have NO relevance in modern military aviation, with air defence systems becoming more and more sophisticated the bomber will be as vulnerable as a kitten, the emphasis will be placed on intercontinental ballistic missiles and ship/submarine launched missile systems that are hypersonic, and whilst current technology means that stealth aircraft can achieve their goals in relative ease (if ‘ease’ is the right word) but, again, that ability will be degraded more and more once air defence systems, including stealth aircraft, develop to the extent that stealth technology is invalidated by new technologies such as laser weapons, weapons that are on the cusp of becoming reality, no longer would projectile weapons rule the battlefields of the world, and if you think that my opinion is completely wrong then I would remind you that even a short time ago the idea of stealth aircraft was thought of as being impossible, so much of our current technology was science fiction at the end of WWII and impossible to create, so never say never to the idea that current technology is going to become obsolete and replaced by technology that is science fiction now.
@sorooshab
@sorooshab Ай бұрын
I don't understand why youtube doesnt have BS detector or notice like X , all these BS videos
@linkdiablo4476
@linkdiablo4476 Ай бұрын
it was prototype they send (T-50)
@blackbeard1211
@blackbeard1211 Ай бұрын
Su is a masterpiece
@rs_99_
@rs_99_ Ай бұрын
The Russians have been building fighter jets for decades. They are not stupid. The plane is obviously for public consumption.
@mvuletree
@mvuletree Ай бұрын
USA propaganda
@julian_bambus1285
@julian_bambus1285 Ай бұрын
Hahaha beautiful comments 😂
@AAAXXX-ch3oh
@AAAXXX-ch3oh Ай бұрын
Everyone knows that this is a test machine, not a real mass-produced machine. Only you unscrupulous media always lead the trend.
@irfansikandar69
@irfansikandar69 Ай бұрын
Full bullshit video
@toprakyildirim5333
@toprakyildirim5333 Ай бұрын
Nope we simply don't wanna purchase JF-17 Block 3. We want EF2000 or F16V to improve our F-16 fleet and bolster with AESA radar featured, highly agile plane. By doing that we can counter Greek Rafale purchase while the air force inducts reasonable numbers of 5th Kaan. 4.5 gen fighter is a way to go for us. We need to fill the gap. JF-17 is not same level with F16V. Weaker engines, worse electronics (even with B3). There is no reason to buy JF-17 we don't need it.
@COMMANDERHAWK22
@COMMANDERHAWK22 Ай бұрын
so pretty much a new f-117
@gutstompenrocker
@gutstompenrocker Ай бұрын
BS!
@Sanatani_Hindu11-MkI
@Sanatani_Hindu11-MkI Ай бұрын
Let them GO TO HELL...
@Dotherighthing1055
@Dotherighthing1055 Ай бұрын
Can it do vertical take off and landing?
@pakjai5532
@pakjai5532 Ай бұрын
No need. It has twin engines and larger bomb bay. Therefore it gets to where it needs to get faster, and deliver higher payloads than the F-35. They are not made equal.
@Dotherighthing1055
@Dotherighthing1055 Ай бұрын
@pakjai5532 Appreciate your opinion on it
@sunshinesun121
@sunshinesun121 Ай бұрын
Seems that there are MORE Arms Manufacturers from China and RUSSIA ..... than US or European countries. Interesting development.
@lmn6335
@lmn6335 Ай бұрын
As a trivia, military spending in 2023 will only account for 1.3% of China's GDP, and is expected to be about the same this year
@jelmerwalsh8973
@jelmerwalsh8973 Ай бұрын
I will Believe it, When I see it!
@RidiculousRocketry
@RidiculousRocketry Ай бұрын
I asked the YT search engine to recommend the lamest video and content creator on the platform and this is where I ended up. This kind of garbage content undermines the entire platform. I asked YT not to recommend this junk channel in the future.
@rayopeongo
@rayopeongo Ай бұрын
The B-21 is NOT the backbone of the US Air Force. It MIGHT end up being the FUTURE backbone of the USAF some day, but right now, only 3 test versions exist. The B-21 is not expected to completely replace the B-1 and B-2 bombers until 2040. Like you said in the description, "testing of the 6th generation bomber continues." Never mind being the backbone of the USAF, It is not even operational right now. Your channel is an easy ‘Don’t recommend’ choice.
@hgv1883
@hgv1883 Ай бұрын
No it is
@911good
@911good Ай бұрын
👀👁️🌞🌝🇺🇲
@VickyYadav-qj6kv
@VickyYadav-qj6kv Ай бұрын
This drone can be shot down a shoulder fire air defence....it's RCS is so high. It's good for countries who don't have air defence
@constantinradu6354
@constantinradu6354 Ай бұрын
I must admit Americans you have a lot of homeless people slipping on the streets all over your country ?? You call that your technology.😮
@oreymediaoreymedia7410
@oreymediaoreymedia7410 Ай бұрын
The only fight that American jets have is the comment righters did American taxpayers ask their country's why our fighter jets don't go fight in the air combat why fight only Afghanistan Palestine Lebanon Iraq small country's with no military equipment no air defense they like to fight these can country's