Thank you! We are developing a lot more, on Typogram main platform as well as Typogram plugins for other platform like Canva or Figma. If you are a designer and also interested in helping us shape the future of Typogram, help me take a look at this short survey: tally.so/r/wvxPND

Thank you felix! I appreciate your encouragement! Make me want to make more videos like this!

@@wentinz thank you for your time spent, I appreciate it a lot. It is a good way to study or review design content when you create something for other people.

@@felix49721 Happy that you enjoyed it. If there is a particular work that you would like me to create a video for, feel free to suggest it!

The AI icon generation is using a feature in typogram.co. It can generate vector-based icons using AI, you can get the SVG code directly from it! you can try it in the free plan. the other example (to generate background image) is using Canva!

@@wentinz thank you for sharing!

Using AI can be creative, it is up to the user.

​​@wentinz Nah, there is no creativity just because you say so. There is no direct control over the output. You have as much creative control as you do when commissioning someone, except instead of actually paying anyone, you're commissioning a robot. Language is not a suitable medium to communicate your intent to your tools.

The big issue and pit fall of AI supporters is they can't see the AI is aimed to eliminate their intervention. The reliance on humans. One person can use text AI to write a story, then feed that story to text to image AI to get illustration then send it to the publisher who will use AI to proofread and then send it to the print. A book got made within a week and very cheaply. Sure, the time and money got reduced but so did the quality and humans required. The supporters think companies will hire them when all they r looking for an AI that can do 10 people's job within a second. No need of them.

Let's break it down: Thinking "I want to replace the counter space of the letter ‘o’ with a dragon icon" is creative. Commanding AI to create that dragon icon in circle? That's creative too. It's not fundamentally different from choosing a geometric font for an architecture poster instead of drawing it from scratch. Would you call using a pre-made font uncreative? Nah. AI is just another tool, like fonts, Photoshop, or Typogram. The creativity stays with the person wielding the tool. And let's face it - AI is the reality for graphic designers now. Refusing to use it is like insisting on hand-painting everything instead of using Adobe in this day and age. In a few years, that'll look as outdated as paste-up techniques do today. The point is, creativity isn't about doing everything manually. It's about vision, problem-solving, and using whatever tools you've got to bring your ideas to life. Whether that's AI, fonts, or good old-fashioned elbow grease, it's all creative if you're using it to make something new and interesting.

@@Vor567tez Job security is a legit concern, no doubt. We don't know if the AI windfall will benefit the 99% or just line the pockets of the 1%. But that's more of a societal issue, isn't it? It's not about whether using AI in creative work is good or bad - it's about how we distribute the time and money saved by AI back to us creative types. Sure, we're not guaranteed to come out on top with AI. But blaming AI itself misses the mark. We need to look inward at our society's structure and wealth distribution. It's not that different from when machines replaced manual labor. The issue isn't the tech - it's how we handle its impact. Using AI to write a story isn't just letting a machine spit out a novel. It's about our core idea, with AI fleshing it out. Same goes for graphic design. That dragon icon in the 'o' counter? That's my creative concept. Whether I hand-draw it or use AI to speed things up doesn't diminish my role in the creative process. The key is, AI is a tool. It's not replacing creativity . We're still the ones with the ideas, the vision. AI just helps us execute faster, explore more options. It's on us to adapt, to find ways to use AI that enhance our creativity rather than replace it.

@@GL33T awww thank you! Yeah the original video has been taken down by the original poster, so I posted again on my own channel! Thanks for the kind words, made my day 😄

@@wentinz <3

hey we are Typogram, a design software company (typogram.co/), different entity from Typograma, if there was any confusion.

@@wentinz I was just suggestinng a name for the plugin. Typogramva?

@@drjohnswilkins oh haha! sorry for the misunderstanding! That is a great idea! I like this direction this is going, merge Typogram and Canva name.

thanks!

Thank you! It comes really handy, I develop it for myself but thought others can benefit from it!

As far as I know, it is not easy using formula because it can't get their local time zone. I think your best luck might be widget or in general embedding

in my attempt during the video, I also had this problem, like 6:18 should really be 06:18 when we write time. To solve it, I would add another formula, check if the number is smaller than 10, if so, convert the number to string and add a "0" in front of it.

aww that makes my day! thanks!

thank you!

Thank you! We want to build an app that is both educational and functional!

Thank you so much Andrew! : )

thank you! I am also making an app to help people design regular logos, I wrote an weekly newsletter about my journey and other tech things I care about: build.typogram.co/

hey thanks for your nice words! I recently started a daily newsletter about what i am up to next, check it out: wentin.substack.com/

Also, your way only works for you to see other's local time. While if other teammembers from other timezones open this page, they will see wrong time(

One way you can address this to change your time offset to positive numbers only since you we don't worry about the date. For example, if the offset should be -7, instead you can put in 17. Theoretically there shouldn't be a problem because when you do remainder(module) operation on a negative number, it should always return a positive number. So you may want to look into how you set up the remainder function. It might be just something that you missed about formatting numbers or else. Because of how the remainder operation works, you can also add 24 for all numbers, regardless if it contains a negative sign or not. Although in my theory, you don't need to add 24 in the first place, it will always return the correct number with a remainder operation. But I could be missing something. Hope this helps!

using worker javascript via cloudflare. I am making it into a tutorial, please consider signing up for newsletter (in the website)

yes! this one i made for the latest material icon set icondash.com/material this one is the original i made for my personal use day to day icons.wentin.net/

@@wentinz nice, i signed-up

So nice to hear that cssicon is useful to you!

Thanks ZvDine :)