Jimbo is the goat 1 only 16 seeds harder draw 2 only played aussie open once how many more slams 3 rackets which didnt do the work for you 4still record titles

Wow!!!

Echo Is awful and background music Is too loud bro

This is like Woodstock. Was I there or was I NOT there? I mean, I am pretty certain me and a friend, in separate places, watched this match on TV as it happened, however I am no longer 100% certain.

Formidable Monica Seles

Consider that he also played the heart of his career with a repurposed tree branch , sheep gut for strings and cowhide for a grip. Try that combo for five sets in 100 deg heat and high humidity . GOAT , Rodney George Laver is on the list for more 50 years....That's pretty great.

Two Grand Slams - The Rocket was #1

It takes a great player to win one of the big 4 tournaments. To win the Grand Slam, all 4 in 1 year is an amazing achievement. Laver did it twice. No other male player has achieved that.

Да, ТОВА Е ИСТОРИЧЕСКА ПОБЕДА ЗА СТРАХОТНИЯ ГОРАН ИВАНИШЕВИЧ!!!❤❤❤🎉

Wow!!! I remember this. I was 5 years old and at my Aunt's beach house, I remember seeing it being recapped on TV as an absolutely incredible match, but didn't know it had so much going on!

Wow!!! I remember this. I was 5 years old and at my Aunt's beach house, I remember seeing it being recapped on TV as an absolutely incredible match, but didn't know it had so much going on!

Wow!!! I remember this. I was 5 years old and at my Aunt's beach house, I remember seeing it being recapped on TV as an absolutely incredible match, but didn't know it had so much going on!

J étais tellement dégoûté ce jour la 😢

Ivan Lendl was my idol then comes along Roger Federer 😮

Idos al carajo

Video creators really thought this was enough explanation 😂

And now USO finalist

Man, the graphics are all over the place

Heart of a champion! (I don't even want to get out of bed every day)

I'm wearing Stan Smith shoes while watching this video😁

Yes world number 1 points ranking process is bullshit... WHO ELSE THINKS THAT? If you don't lemme explain.......... Even after winning indian wells, french open and Wimbledon.. Carlitos was only a few points away from zverev.. how's that? .. on the either hand ... the reason I think Rafael Nadal is only 209 weeks as number 1... cz he had to pull out of 19 grand slams in total in his career so far... as champion you have to defend your points ... but you lose 2500 points by default if you don't play.. and you don't get the chance to win them back post recovery... and that's why 4-5 yeats of points of Nadal gone without getting the chance to defend them... while even defending points has it's its inconsistencies.. SA seen by zverev and Carlos points this season... bcz a lot of top players don't even play 250 tournaments... plus points are only considered from your too 19 best results... the rest of the tournament does not count.. so what if a player plays 20 tournaments and a player plays 50.... in this case.. points can be monopolized in certain tournaments with which you can get ahead of the rankings.. something which Federer used to do winning Halle and queens after losing to Nadal on clay masters and Djokovic on had masters consistently ... so I just like prize money distribution... tennis has huugggeee inconsistency in how it counts ATp points . ATP points should be counted as fresh every year from zero.. depending of the amounts of title won and counting finals and semi finals only ...as ponts defeating top 10 players is a bullshit concept..bcz in many tournaments lower ranked players defeat top 10 players to advance forward m. Doe's mean the the tennis quality in the tournament has reduced in the finals ... it just means that specific top 10 players in that tournament wasn't good enough..and we should respect those victory of lower ranked players with true sporting spirit ..so points must be also be based on rounds and level of play...not not beating ranked players ....

Good video but the audio is terrible. Not watching this.

Thats all well and good but we dont have data on courts from decades ago to compare changes over time to address claims such as "surface homogenisation".

Best upset in history on the way to another upset in Championship game against all odds!!!!!!

I was a teen ager and watched this iconic moment live. Simply legendary

Got the nickname wrong.

❤ her legacy! Dr.tyrone of Chester pa

Unpredictable temperament. You mean, trauma.

chang acted like a clown, playing all hurt, but when the points were on he was running around at full speed, after the point was over he was all hurt again

Bad sportsmanship from Chang really. He treated this match like a joke.

I’d love to do a voice over for you guys

I thought inclusivity means including everyone, even the people you do not agree with.

Lendl merda

The underhand serve, is that even legal?

4:35 Alcaraz now

2:35

Her losing two consecutive Wimbledon finals was heartbreaking

lendl underachieved. he could have won a lot more

there is many advantages with a good sliced BH. it don't cost energy. it is difficult to attack back. opponant can't read it, it can goes everywhere it gives a vey high accuracy. and it is perfect to hide dropshots :)

I do not think the part that "heavy top spin on clay will grip the surface (sooner?) and bring the ball in an upward trajectory is correct. The topspin actually works better because of the higher friction. The reason it bounces higher is the coefficient of restitution is higher and because the higher friction actually slows the ball (as you correctly mentionned) converting it in topspin. That said, if the ball bounce with less X speed and same Y speed, the bounce will be higher, but its not because of the original topspin

Bro I need like a 3 hour video going in depth into each of these tournaments along the way and what makes them special

Guys, where are you? Your content was and is fire

🐐broke Nadal at the Roland Garros he hasn’t Bern the same

Never watched the whole match , ; still when the chips were down hard to believe Lendl didnt simply hit Chang off the court Maybe the sheer tenacity of Chang on a slower clay was too much ?

Chang is win at all costs. That includes sportsmanship.

ultimately the question whos best of the 3 is a question of personal preference. for me it will always be federer. but im glad i got to live at a time where i was able to see the three best players of all time duke it out regularly

Ever since Novak started doping mid match he started to dominate. No coincidence he suddenly becomes an insufferable twat

Was my favorite player when he was an active player. Then along came Federer a decade later

The only other person to win all 4 in a calendar year was don budge in 1938

Rip nadal not included