Bound in leather excludes the Trump/Lee greenwood bible, it is falsly advertised as leather, It is not.

Thank you for this information. I did not know about Oklahoma wanting to teach the Bible in school - and then requiring all the add-ons that benefit a presidential candidate. I'm old enough to be your grandmother so I remember when Bible teachers who were on television started selling Study Bibles with their names on them, with their commentaries written along side the Scripture verses. At that time, I thought of the warning in Rev. 22:18 to not add to what is written in God's Word. When Donald Trump started advertising the Bible with add-ons that he thought patriotic Americans would appreciate, I had the same thought. The Name of the Lord and His Word deserve to be placed high above that of man and man's words. The Gideon's are supported by Christians to give the Bible to hospitals, prisons, hotels, military personnel, etc., and I'm sure they would love to supply them to all students - free! I appreciate your comments in this video.

I agree with you. By blending your nationality and your ethnicity with your Christianity in my opinion waters down your Christianity to the point where it essentially means little or nothing. What one essentially is saying is that "my nationalism and my ethnicity is on an equal footing with my Christianity". That is complete Blasphemy. There is nothing in the universe on an equal footing with Christ. He is God and he "is" the "Creator" of all things. Nothing or no one can equal that status.

Trump wants to TEACH the political part that all forgot --->"IN GOD WE TRUST" used to be the core of our government before the new playtime kings of the country Twisted it and the Children of the USA.

Why was my previous comment taken down? do it again GOD will take care of it. ;) P.S. KING <------ James made that version political. Know your Theology

The reason KJV is necessary is because it is the first translation straight form the Greek language. All other translations are from KJV and their words are omitted or added in every bible after that, do your own research. Commandment from GOD ALMIGHT to not add or take away from HIS word lest you be accursed. KJV FIRST translation. Your rhetoric is nonsense. You should know this 8f you claim to be a Christian, your a HATER of GOD! Check your Heart!

I don't usually like public Christian figures getting too political because it can harm our gospel message to those of opposite political persuasions, but this time I think it is warranted. If they really want a NKJV bible with those characteristics for some reason they should get a normal bog-standard NKJV and put a printout of the constitution in each one. This feels like an attempt to deliberately make a law specifically to make a political figure money, which is highly corrupt. Also I do think that mixing the bible and patriotism like this can risk something akin to idolatry, which is not good. And I think you do have a unique position as a Northern Irishman in calling that out; the rest of the world can all see what happened in Northern Ireland. If I was being charitable, I might say the reason for mixing the constitution in is both of them are designed to teach the historical background of the USA rather than christianity specifically. Most likely though, it's a money-grab fuelled by something akin to idolatry, unfortunately. On that survey, though: it's pretty self-contradictory. Look at question 2: "there is one god in three persons: father, son and holy spirit". Almost everyone agrees. It seems many people on the surface both affirmed and denied the deity of Christ in the same survey. This indicates to me a lot of people aren't understanding the questions correctly. It may be people read "Jesus was a great teacher..." and ticked yes before reading the rest of the statement. I'd be interested to see what the response would have been to "Jesus was not god, but he was a great teacher". Of course, you could say the same on the flip side: perhaps people say "there is one god..." and ticked yes before it got the the trinitarian bits..

A lot of American Christians think Trump is the second coming of Christ. okay, maybe I'm exaggerating a little. I'm just glad my church is faithful to exposit the the Bible, and it's up to me to decide my political views.

The photos online of Russell Brand holding an egg with Diddy tell us exactly what kind of girls Russell was enjoying with him. Google what Diddy did with eggs. Russell Brand “found god” around the time many other celebs involved started damage control. Usher deleted his social media around that time.

This is a great video. So many important points! It breaks my heart when I see people being so judgmental to new Christians. This is what made me become an atheist in my 20s. I came back to Christianity but I still struggle to find a church that I feel comfortable in.

I would love to see where in the Bible it says what the right attire is to baptise someone!? Also not to mention the other fellow in the picture is ALSO in his underwear... Sooooo if your going to poing out someone's wrong doing you have to point out the rest of the ppl as well! Before you jump to judgement asses the situation before judging someone, that's one thing I have learned from my faith in Christ

People are making way too big a deal of this. Christians need to shut the heck up.Take the log out of your eye and judge yourself! You see way worse than this at a pride parade, and that's okay.

Hmm

Seems innocent. Though at first glance I thought it was weird too.

Thank god and praise him for guiding Russell Brand to the teachings of jesus christ and I'm so proud of him for the journey that has brought him here to this point and he's bringing more into the faith. And so what he baptised his friend in his underwear, the magical moment is he's baptising someone jesus was baptised in the river and I'm sure he wasn't in his best suit. God bless Russell Brand and may he be lightened from his life of sin being cleansed from his soul

Just subscribed. Love your perspective. And your accent, lol.

Ye the realest one we got left. Everyone else seems like a puppet to me. Christianity has effectively become a control system. It was meant to free us, and usher in a new humanity. It has been reduced by the powers at be to a hierarchal performance based club.

I hope critics of Brand here are aware that we have records of people commonly being baptised in the nude in the early church. (This isn't to say we should do so today, and certianly not take a photograph of it. It is no longer culturally appropriate. Neverthless, I find it interesting.)

I remember being a baby Christian . You can get overzealous and can mess up . At least he's not snoresville dead like way too much of the church seems to be happy in .

Here's an idea, why don't you speed up her video so that she sounds like a ridiculous cartoon character?

What about the obj job

Let's all keep praying for Justin ❤

There is no Scirpture that says that a wife CANNOT leave her husband. The closest thing we have, is I Cor 7:10-11, where it says that she should not leave him, but it comes with the caveat that if she does, she should either remain single or else be reconciled. So that option to remain single, is given, according to the apostle Paul. Obviously Eileen was not rying to marry another man, for if she were, the church would not have been trying to force her to reconcile with her husband. Jesus did NOT say marital unfaithfulness was the grounds for divorce! He said pornia, which is not really abuse, is the exception to the husband causing his wife to commit adultery. This obviously does not apply to the woman leaving her abusive husband!

You confused David and Solomon. David's sin with Bathsheba led to the rebellion with Absolom and the whole Tamar rape incident where Amnon got killed. Solomon's heart was turned away, and that led to the kingdom being divided.

The clue is in the name - Rachel MAN!!!!!!!!

Great video man,

Dear Andrew, to me regretfully, you seem to be running with the hare and hunting with the hounds. Read Paul's Epistle to the Romans, chapter 1. I f you find anything there that supports transgenderism and its propagation, please let me know. Genesis 1:28 says "So God created Man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them." In Mark 10:6 Jesus is quoted, "But from the beginning of creation God made them male and female" There is no option for transgenderism, certainly not in threassemby of God's people. Is Archbishop Welby and the band of modernists trying to say that poor God did not know what he was talking about? That modern man has progressed beyond the outdated morality of the Bible? That we should follow science? Science changes every few years. "Believe the science", we are told. What utter twaddle and codswollop! Believe the Word of God in the Bible.

This is a great breakdown. New to your channel. Keep up the good work. Yah bless you in Jesus of Nazareth name

And Nephi is not pronounced as "nephy"...its pronounced "nee phi"...a long i sound

A student came up to me at the end of class to share this after we talked in class about LGBTQ2S+. I told her that it's not for us to say it's wrong since we can't judge others but she wanted to point out that it is.

i’m not even lds but most of your responses are just “no that’s not true” without referring to sources. also it’s kinda weird that you care whether they count as christian or not it doesn’t change anything whether they fall under that label or not. also the bible contradicts itself so i don’t see a difference between the old and new testament contradicting each other and the book of mormon contradicting the bible

I appreciate your perspective and think it's super cool you're a huge Lecrae fan. Kendrick also claims to be a Christian. You should check him out because he's speaking truth. I get that some things are off putting but to get to truth we have to tolerate some off putting things sometimes.

We can do the same thing in reverse. The doctrine of the Trinity was cooked up by a bunch of old men who believed all revelation and miracles had ceased. So let's rephrase some scriptures to clarify what the scriptures actually mean in light of the doctrine of the Trinity. John 20:17 Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to myself: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto myself. John 5:17 But Jesus answered them, I worketh hitherto, and I work. 18 Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that He was his Father, making himself equal with Himself. 19 Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth Himself do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth Himself likewise. 20 For the He loveth Himself, and sheweth himself all things that himself doeth: and he will shew himself greater works than these, that ye may marvel. 21 For as He raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth them; even so He quickeneth whom he will. 22 For the Son judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son: 23 That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Son. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Son which hath sent himself. 24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on me that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life. 25 Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of Himself: and they that hear shall live. 26 For as I hath life in myself; so hath I given to Myself to have life in Myself; You like to make fun of Mormons. Imagine the fun atheists can have with your screwy man-made non-Biblical Trinity doctrine.

People who "expose" Mormonism are simply recycling the crap that's been handed down from before the church was ever established. For example, Mormons do not believe they can become equivalent to Jesus. Total lie. How could anyone arise to the level of the Savior without also doing all what the Savior did? It's too late for us to live a sinless life and pay for everyone else's sins. Duh! The Bible states we are gods, and children of the Most High. But that means "gods" with a little "g". We view Heavenly Father and His Son Jesus Christ as "super-Gods". The Savior defined godhood as having overcome all things through the Atonement of Jesus Christ. Look at the promises for the faithful listed in the Bible. It's simply a matter of definition of terms. Remember the scripture stating we can't imagine what God has in store for the faithful. So if we can't imagine what the future holds for us, how can anyone claim to know what the future cannot be? Why do Christians always limit what God can do?

Yeah? Well you know that’s just like uh your opinion, man.

In Genesis everything produces after its own kind. Man was made in God's image. Our Father in Heaven is like an oak tree and his children are like acorns that have divine potential to become as he is. That is his greatest gift to his children. Have you never heard the NT verse that says we will partake of the divine nature? Dude, take a look at your biased lens of Martin Luther/Billy Graham.

The Book of Mormon is the word of God, and testifies of Christ throughout. Anyone who reads it and prays with a sincere heart will receive a witness of the Holy Ghost. What we are not is CREEDAL Christianity of the 4th century.

But have you read the book, have you tried the pro.ise?

I'm no longer Mormon, but I find it interesting that some mainstream Christians feel the entitlement to define who is or isn't Christian based on their own belief and interpretation of the Bible. For example, the application of Ephesians 2:8-9 alone to mean that works have zero to do with salvation is interesting, especially considering how the New Testament is littered with requirements of people who want to enter into the Kingdom of Heaven. While I think I understand that ultimately, no matter what we do, grace is the only way in which we will be worthy to go to heaven, I also interpret several passages to mean that we have requirements (works?) to perform in order to be saved. Ephesians says that "for by grace ye are saved through faith" while James 2:17 says "even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone." If you were to use both of those scriptures together then you'd understand it to mean that works is a demonstration of faith, and that grace is what allows us to be saved through faith (with works). It's not completely unbiblical to think we have to do things in order to be saved, as we're told in Matthew 18 that we need to be humble like children to enter the kingdom of heaven. In Matthew 4 it says that we have to repent. In Matthew 6 it tells us that in order for us to be forgiven we have to forgive others. We're also commanded to love God and show that love through keeping the commandments. If none of those requirements matter, and it is by Grace alone, then why are we given all these requirements? Maybe I'm misinterpreting all of it, but I don't really understand how the Mormon belief is so radical or doesn't go along with the Bible. Maybe if you solely use Ephesians 2 then perhaps it doesn't go along with Biblical teachings. But the New Testament has other scriptures which point to things we need to do in order to be saved that go beyond just having faith. As far as the teachings about heavenly mother or about people having the ability to be gods, that's uniquely Mormon and not biblical, I totally agree. There are a lot of things that Mormons believe that aren't mainstream. Jesus as their lord and savior, though, is one of them, even if certain aspects of their belief around him isn't mainstream. I don't think those are valid reasons to not label them as Christians, but apparently you have the ability to gatekeep Christianity and can decide that. So whatever, doesn't really matter to me personally, but I don't get it.

I am a faithful Latter Day Saint and you frankly have no idea or no clue what you’re talking about. Why don’t you actually have a Mormon on to discuss it instead of standing on a soapbox and making yourself sound very ignorant. You are a religious bigot. It is very sad

When mormons tell you that jesus has a spirit brother named lucifer and where all spirit brothers . That's a different gospel.and we should'nt listen to it. They don't even Know jesus is jewish. And his name is yeshua. He was born a jew did all the jewish customs he died for our sins not joseph smith not brigham young they boathe died sinning and are boathe in hell.

Romans 8:15 “For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father.” So true believers are adopted into the family of God. You said you are LDS so I need to ask do you believe God was a man who earned his godhood through obedience? If so, who is his father? The one true God of the Bible is spirit, Jesus Himself said so. So as you can see it’s a different god. Psalm 90:2 Before the mountains were brought forth, or ever Thou hadst formed the earth and the world, even from everlasting to everlasting, Thou art God.

8:54 gotta love it how he just skips the paragraph explaining a part of why we believe in this.

Love your enemies is HARD!!!!!!! I personally need to work on this. 😞

There is a KZbin video of a group having a prayer service in a restaurant. It's hilarious and CRINGY! Gotta love these "See me" Christians.

While she may came from the land of Prosperity Gospel, which is extreme self love; she is not wrong about modern Christians re-defining love. Like judgement, we twist love into 'I judge you (tell you how you live wrong), because I love you. We are told to give away our possessions and serve God's people. That is the love we are asked (required) to show. We as Christians, should be at the doorstep of every politician advocating for worker's rights, fair housing, quality education, food security, a violence free home for women and children, minimum income security, more equitable tax code, accountability for squandering money by building cheap social housing, laws that protect renters, etc. We (including myself here) lack the action of true love for our fellow man. We need to vote in leaders who advocate for the poor instead of leaders who protect the wealthy, who, ironically, are the same parties (GPO & Tories) who loves to bash pride month and rail against single mothers and abortion. When we don't act in the love of God, non-believers cannot see that love. I have been in church since birth. I've seen the type of people she's talking about throughout my life. We cannot ignore these people are loud, proud and out here. They make more noise than we do. They influence our law makers. They support the wealth building parties to protect their private pensions. If I had not know of the true nature of God, I might be cynical too.

Christians often do ignore the judging others verses. Yes, the American Christian extremists are more vocal, but everyday Christians are prone to this. How often do we openly (and happily) declare how we don't support how other people live their lives? A LOT!!! We rail against same sex couples, transgendered people, the unwed who co-habitats, those who choose to be childless, etc. We condemn women who have had abortions. There are many rectors in the C of I who won't baptise children of unmarried couples or preside over the funeral of a suicide person. We rarely have this energy for tax dodgers, embezzlers or lying politicians. What Jesus meant is 'mind your business. Who are you to point out the sins of others?' or 'Get your own house right.' or maybe 'If you live holy, others will see me in you!' . She can make judgements b/c she is NOT a Christian.

Please don’t feel sorry for me. I believe in Jesus Christ. I love Him. He is my Savior. I do my best to follow him. I am a Christian. ❤

You go allthingstheology. The mormons don't like to be called out.

You butchered the apostatsy, it directly flowed from the reformation... If mormons are wrong for believing in the apostatsy so are all prodestants.