@@Midnight_MoonFiM sure that tracks with lots of reasonable assumptions: 1. god is real, 2. He/she would wish someone who is manifestly unpleasant, racist, misogynistic and entirely self centered well, 3. God is happy with the world burning in man made climate change

@@gxro6883 God bless our Trumpkins every one.

@@gxro6883 redditor, may god damn you to california

honestly, and as a citizen of the same planet as everyone else, I believe it would be difficult for there to be a worse candidate than trump. Harris seems intelligent, normal and as much as a politician can be, nice.

@ so the reason you prefer harris to trump is because you think trump is mean sometimes?

@ I think he is a danger to everyone, internally if you believe what he says about rounding up the left and in other countries because of the inevitable impact that will have on co2 emissions globally - if America can still have loads of new oil so can we.

@@gxro6883 Have you heard Harris speak? She is dumber than Biden, and Biden's brain doesn't even work!

@@bibasik7think what the soup that is trumps brain will be like in four years.

@@neil9333 not American and sadly the rest of the world will suffer if the climate policies of trump get adopted.

@@gxro6883 You mean if they don't get adopted, right? Imagine what impact Kamala's communistic America would hold for the rest of the world.

Why not?

@@gxro6883 nah trumps better

@@gxro6883paying random countries won’t solve the weather. As an American, I’m voting for Trump!

Best comment

@@quinnbutler1609 sorry I can’t agree, the direct input cost of a large amount of what get measured for cpi went up by several hundred percent. Nothing to do with money supply.

@@MaZe741 it’s world bank - I can’t comment on how good it is! Search hcpi global data. There’s an excel download. The colors are excel conditional format on a cleaned up version.

@@gregorymalchuk272 sorry that’s not how it works regarding price, there is plenty of supply. Renewables are the only way to stop the apocalyptic consequences of climate change. And there are now cheaper but sadly not being rolled out fast enough.

@@gxro6883 When we relied purely on thermal power generation from coal, electricity was cheap. Renewables impose externalities onto the grid which cause astronomical prices. The IPCC does not suggest that. The consequences of climate change are not apocalyptic. The nuclear war caused by the bloodthirsty war criminals in your government, will most certainly be apocalyptic. But at least the soot and sulfur aerosols from our burning cities will alleviate the warming.

I’m sure you are right ref cost of transport going up, I don’t think several hundred percent though and obviously not everywhere had this problem and prices went up everywhere

Nat Gas and LNG is a giant sleeping market on a global scale. It's surprising how little it's used in comparison.

It's funny, because electricity was dirt cheap when we only burned coal and gas. It's almost like renewables are the most expensive form of electricity on earth, as Lazzard shows.

​@@gregorymalchuk272 did you miss the point above, gas is the most expensive generation method, thus all other generation methods input to the grid is billed at that price, so the statement above is saying renewables are cheaper than gas, or coal was, and thus you are being charged extra because gas is part of the system and artificially inflates the prices of all other cheaper generation means. The upfront cost of any new generation infrastructure is always a big number but what must also be considered is ongoing costs of maintaining that generating capacity as that must be factored into the price.

Above our paid grades but yes it certainty looks like that. Best not to think about too much I guess😭

@@gxro6883 Knowing how forked the world is due to these few greedy forkers is maddening and depressing at the same time.

@@BigAussieDonkey the pace of progress today is amazing

@@treesway2241 I don’t remember people bidding up the prices of anything, things like food and power got more expensive because of input costs going up - direct link

we're all busy watching youtube at work. hth

@@lechproteanwhilst being monitored by absolutely nobody 😮

my bad sorry!

kzbin.info/www/bejne/pJyngGtubbFgh5I Customer service!

@@davidthegamer9108 thanks it has been pointed out - my bad.

kzbin.info/www/bejne/pJyngGtubbFgh5I there just for you!

Cheers, can’t take any credit, mid journey to become a laser cut pumpkin

Thanks. There are other controversial topics also covered, I got into thinking about transport a bunch also

Same here. odd thumbnail was intriguing - as was the 'imagined bit' - but you really backed it up. wow. excellent video - ..... but one side effect; I'm now depressed.

@@jamestidd5119 sorry to do that, I didn't start out with that intent, more trying to bend my mind around the logic of raising interest rates to control supply side inflation, which also baffles me.

@@raggamuffin6862 sure but the input cost of 60% of GDP went up by a massive amount. That is factual. Cost get past through to final consumption. That is factual.

Not gdp, cpi

@@raggamuffin6862 gas 200% in 2021

In Europe. And row in 2022

Money supply is NOT the primary driver of inflation. period. money supply have very little to do with it actually. No, more money is not chasing less goods. do you have more money now than you did pre covid? i know i dont. Which means the VELOCITY or how fast money changes hands matters substantial more. faster money velocity higher inflationary pressures.

@@ryanneysmith1547 thanks I know, my bad

kzbin.info/www/bejne/pJyngGtubbFgh5I as suggested

@@jimgossett1154 I’m fairly sure that there is a near direct correlation between the input costs and prices. It can also be seen globally at more or less the same time which fits. I have entirely no knowledge of the prevailing money supply situation by country beyond there must be a lot of it sloshing around somewhere I presume as a result of central banks printing it during Covid. However CPI is weighted to a lot of purchases that are very easily impacted directly by gas prices and would not have been a result of more money being in the system - food housing etc. I’m sure you are right there is some money supply impact as seen historically but the bigger impact to CPI has got to be from gas prices. In my view at least!

@@gxro6883 So you made an entire macroeconomic video and had no knowledge of the money supply? 70% of consumer spending is on service which has nothing to do with gas.

@@jimayakasuki392 I’m reasonably sure that a doubling of spend on a commodity we spend a couple of a percentage of gdp on and that is a significant constituent part of 60% of the contributing factor of CPI doesn’t need extra money to drive up inflation, even if that also contributed. Scale of change and complete common sense should tell you that. Electricity prices didn’t go up because people were using it more, fruit prices didn’t go up because people starting to get healthier. If you feel like picking further holes feel free to get the data and make a video explaining where I’m wrong exactly

@@jimayakasuki392 I made the video about cpi and the direct or one step removed from the rise in input costs of several hundred percent for about two years. This extra cost could have done nothing other than raise prices. There is no reason to add anything else to understand this.

Money supply is NOT the primary driver of inflation. period. money supply have very little to do with it actually. No, more money is not chasing less goods. do you have more money now than you did pre covid? i know i dont. Which means the VELOCITY or how fast money changes hands matters substantial more. faster money velocity higher inflationary pressures.

Inflation forced that cost cut, mono is cheaper.

Thanks my bad

Yes it is only in the left earbud for me

Didn't your Jesus said the last will be the first? Another fake christian with fake morality

Thanks, culled a lot of detailed stuff. A product selling model that separates out the functionality at different price points and for different purposes is going to be more beneficial to him than giving everyone a version that can do all things. Only very few people can afford those, thus giving him a tiered membership potential. Possibly rent the functionality.

And obviously agree ref tiers. Everyone’s wealth will be measured in robot equivalents

@@jeffg6924 thank you, I really (and clearly) don’t have a firm grasp of what the hell I’m doing in Davinci resolve. Plus I’m playing output through a cheap Logitech speaker! I’ll look at fixing it in future

I don't disagree with your point regarding infrastructure, there are also huge infrastructure issues regarding total energy provision and downstream tear down and recycling millions of batteries each year. The question is which delivers better outcomes? Making a video recording your own voice is a pain is the arse, I'm not doing this for financial reasons so suck it up or don't watch

@@gxro6883 The problems with battery swapping has been gone over in detail, the fact that you cannot easily predict demand for battery packs you dont want sat at 100% for long periods, and actually having enough electrical capacity and physical storage capacity during peak use hours. There are also implications for wear with the contacts, as the batteries are being removed and replaced constantly; a worn contact area is prone to arcing, and heat build-up that can, under high current loads, be catastrophic. As an industrial electrician, I have seen what happens with a 150 amp, 440volt flow through a bad connection; luckily, no one died, or was seriously injured, but the machine was toast; as was everything else within 20 meters of it. As for battery failures in the millions - it just isnt happening; various recycling companies were set up to strip down and recycle these batteries, and they are ALL struggling to stay in business, as there just arent enough failing and being sent for recycling.

It was that or cut stuff out, if I had video of the build I'd use it!

What’s a quart? Is that like a bale?