Very interesting presentation. I fully agree to the trends, but I don't see a DAM or a OCP between all the different information and service systems. I think, this will be dedicated automation and distribution systems with interfaces to all the systems. Thank you very much.
@TrevorCarr2 жыл бұрын
What about the Google GMP/GCP stack?
@djmihalis2 жыл бұрын
That was EXCELLENT!!!! You guys bring tremendous value. Anyone who know the implications of their Martech and the pros and cons of navigating it, understands that this shows them that they are not alone. Thank you guys.
We have been looking for a dam for a long time and your way of doing things today corresponds to what I think more and more., Great and Thanks
@kelvinnguyen60483 жыл бұрын
lol
@IgorGabrielan5 жыл бұрын
rss.ai
@speedphreax6 жыл бұрын
Great presentation, as usual. But using a historic 90's 4:3 format powerpoint template to tell me how to select technology in 2019 is a bit dubious.
@lymankirkland13527 жыл бұрын
Great stuff.
@plamenmanov26947 жыл бұрын
Excellent overview, thanks!
@irfanqalamkar73398 жыл бұрын
When Will it be available?
@RobertWarrenHess8 жыл бұрын
Good thoughts but it could have moved along a bit faster. My key takeaways are that many organizations are looking at these tools to modernize their aging intranets and that specific use case product demos will be much more insightful in the selection process than canned demos.
@jocow210 жыл бұрын
Hello, I am a bit suprised seeing that in the vendor WCM/Dig.Exp overview on min. 21.17, IBM is mentioned as a 'legacy' platform. This is surprising to me as IBM seems to be investing a lot of focus/money on their Digital Experience platform offering. They are also marked as a leader in the most recent Forrester wave. Can you please comment on what you mean with 'legacy platform' ? Thanks
@tonybyrne506810 жыл бұрын
Hi Johan- Thanks for writing in. Our take: IBM doesn't really have a "Digital Experience Platform." They have a collection of different tools, mostly but not entirely centered around the WebSphere stack. From a purely WCM perspective, IBM definitely falls in a legacy category with older technology that is mostly just an add-on to its portal platform. We have never seen any firm purchase IBM WCM solely on its own merits. In fact, the typical customer gets to buy it for free with their Portal licenses. FYI, it's not unusual that we disagree with Forrester... ;-) Best regards, Tony Byrne RSG
@larscowe333310 жыл бұрын
Tony Byrne Thanks for the feedback Tony
@jocow210 жыл бұрын
Tony Byrne Thanks Tony. For all clarity, I am not an IBM vendor, just a (worried) IBM customer... Just some more thoughts from my side : - Regarding the 'legacy' technology aspect, if you refer to the fact they are building on top of portal technology (JSR286), I read in one of RSG's other reports that portal technology is not dead yet. Functionally I also can understand the reasons behind their portal based strategy, as more non-WCM data (like commerce data) will be integrated into 1 frontend customer site experience. To avoid the 2-site-syndrom. - On the matter of being not offering a platform, please see www-01.ibm.com/software/collaboration/digitalexperience/index.html - Your comment on customers selecting it solely on its own merits, looks very usefull. When there is interest in blending it with a commerce platform like Websphere Commerce, then this IBM PLATFORM brings value. Still, I learn from you that choosing a second WCM PRODUCT is a valid strategy. But what, after a while, if the business needs drives a product driven website towards platform needs? Big rëngineering costs ? I pitty that this dual strategy can not be avoided, by offering a 'one fits all' technology solution (product + platform + portal)... Perhaps this is exactly the USP that IBM is offering ? - IBM is also listed as leader in Gartner's quadrant ... :-)
@jonworth901511 жыл бұрын
Great overview, despite the intermittent audio problems. Thank you for posting.