I thought you were Kiwi from an earlier video, but I may have misheard you
@سلمانقتل6 күн бұрын
Good video also The crescent moon is not the simple of Islam the only reason people use it because colonialism is actually Turkish also Bangladesh choose Islam before the culture even with other Bengalis in India they do not except them because they are Hindu and for a lot of people religion is a very important thing to choose religion before the culture a lot of countries actually for another example European muslims a lot of people do not except them
@lynnboartsdye19437 күн бұрын
Ooooh human culture not bacterial culture got it Thanks for the detailed vid, feel like this is something teachers should be showing in Highschool classrooms!
@williamsutton67387 күн бұрын
5:36 I KNEW that that was Afro-Eurasia. It looked so much like it. Plus, the southwest continent being super close to the southernmost one? I KNEW IT.
@joshuagreenwood66217 күн бұрын
What a great breakdown of a topic that takes years to deliver into 😁
@No-xu3gn8 күн бұрын
You know i had stuff to do today and now i gotta find out more of how we live in a society
@THECHEESELORD698 күн бұрын
Ok jokes aside, we do actually live in a society. When I’m alone or with my family I do a bunch of weird stuff, but when I go out in public I’m practically a different person.
@BigToody9 күн бұрын
I heard the domestication of animals drives us vs them mindset cuz you wanna protect your flock or something?
@SocialBubblia11 күн бұрын
Melatonin is the sleepy sleep. The melanin is the dark dye.
@isamekailmahmud930211 күн бұрын
you don't gotta excuse yourself for having an existential crisis honey
@doberman230411 күн бұрын
love it when a leftie turns into a doomer, welcome to the club lass, here have an energy dring and a ciggie for breakfast, your hair and odor wont matter once the water runs out
@garvinanders235511 күн бұрын
So my degree is in anthropology and the fun thing here is your nationality can be very divorced from your culture! This isn't new. For example, for a long time, the modern-day Czech Republic was a territory in the Austro-Hungarian empire. They were subjects of the empire but didn't speak German or Hungarian, the two official languages had different traditions, and at times had different religious practices as well. Granted the Austro-Hungarian Empire was never the best unified state on a cultural level but that led to the Czechs considering themselves a distinct and separate people instead of just imperial subjects and wanting their own state that would look out for their collective interests.
@kelijahf12 күн бұрын
7:02 Okay, very important question then, does she, like basically every lactose intolerant person I know, still eat dairy?
@TekoMuto12 күн бұрын
Protoculture
@chasethechase229812 күн бұрын
"I'm not saying I dislike them I'm just saying they're inherently patriarchal, like animals, and at the same time unnatural". Historically women of power have had many consorts, although often more erased by history. Catherine, Isabella, Elizabeth, Cleopatra. Plenty of cultures, especially matriarchal ones, had women with multiple husbands or consorts in them: Tibet, India, China, and many more in Africa and Asia. You sure use "all" and "every" when you're trying to make a point in your favor, when it is blatantly untrue. Humans aren't made to love more than one person? Do you stop loving your parents when you are in a relationship? Do you stop loving your spouse when you have a child? Do parents with one child love them more than parents with many children love their children? It's simply not true. Most of the animal kingdom is polygamous. It's not a unique and cool thing for chimps. In fact, it's more unique when animals are monogamous, like some birds. These generalizations about how human relationships are "supposed" to work stem from colonial propaganda and don't serve the purposes of either the empire or humanity at large.
@mryoutbegivemeavid933512 күн бұрын
29:03 if you want an organic example just look at any uncontacted group of people through out history, if there’s nobody to talk to then your culture will start and end at your border
@drpigglesnuudelworte520913 күн бұрын
Oh yeah no I’m not doing human sacrifices in mine bc that’s not fun, it not an issue that needs commentary anymore (at least not that I know of except for random one off instances), I just don’t want to :) I don’t know why but it’s always given me a visceral reaction to the point where I’m starting to wonder if I died that way in a past life
@kelijahf13 күн бұрын
I feel like it would make the most sense if it was a mix of the different ideas from the different schools, probably likely depending on where the people that made them likely are, geographically speaking. Probably also depending on some societal things in there depending on the group size.
@parallellia150913 күн бұрын
although im not really a worldbuilder, i usually take my inspirations from anatolia. you got cold mountains, dry cold mountains, mountainous area with insane amounts of trees, grasslands, types of steppes, mediterrian places and a few more different types of places. it usually works out well for any games i host due to the simple reason there is a lot of difference between one place and another, with resources/water sources distributed accordingly.
@evermoonn13 күн бұрын
this my fav utube channel
@drpigglesnuudelworte520913 күн бұрын
Girl i just realized if you make every comic span about 50 years you have to write 1,000 comics. Is you make them span 100 years (that’s a lot of societal changes in one book) you have to write 500… good luck and Godspeed 🫡 I have a slightly similar project and personally I will make them use magic to develop society quicker
@r.e.d.l621914 күн бұрын
Did you forget about languages that don't use sound. Written, signed, touched. The deaf and mute communities don't communicate with sound. Also leads to them being a subset culture if their own within their local cultures. 18:10
@purplepotato261214 күн бұрын
What an amazing video and introduction to your channel. Looking forward to whatever else you make! Your art is charismatic, your explanations are detailed without being overbearing, your voice is soothing, and you are even a fellow South African! I am here for whatever is next
@morgoth187715 күн бұрын
I'm begging my 3rd year of social and cultural anthropology degree, the more i learn about cultures and culture as a whole thing, the less I'm able to define my subject of study, thank you for making me being deeper in this rabbit hole (great video)
@Par-Alice-sis15 күн бұрын
Culture is so fascinating, amazing video! I’m learning about ontological design at university and you described it so well. I also really appreciate the metaphors, it makes theoretical concepts a lot easier to wrap my head around. I am already planning to steal your newborn river 😈
@psikeyhackr691416 күн бұрын
What is the Culture of the Laws of Physics? If some people do not understand physics are they part of the Culture. Your smartphone is based on and depends on physics. So have we created a technological Culture that does not understand itself? Economists who cannot figure out planned obsolescence in automobiles. 🤣
@jamalkhan-fm9wz16 күн бұрын
A.D.S.=after the death of saddat B.D.S.=before the death of saddat
@Zane-It17 күн бұрын
Culture is the thing that cancels you.
@Sam_Sam218 күн бұрын
Do you have a citation list for your videos?
@ConfusedApe18 күн бұрын
The greeks had a word for blue. This is a historical myth perpetuated on KZbin
@vincenzopiras976517 күн бұрын
Well, from what we know it seems that there was no word for blue properly speaking. In reality it is really difficult to define what the color is because the linguistic passages are really convoluted. It seems that the Greeks had a category for red-purple, and that for them at a certain point it went from dark purple to blue. In other languages the passage comes from green. It is however a complex subject, I refer you to an article by Emanuele Miranda in which she talks about it. The Ancient Greek Lexicon of Colours between Universalism and Relativism.
@mountainmanmike10142 күн бұрын
@@vincenzopiras9765 you're twisting what we know. they used different words for different shades of blue with no unified term like we use. you wouldn't say a culture with 6 words describing different alloys of copper, but no name for the grouping of copper alloys don't know what bronze is.
@vincenzopiras97652 күн бұрын
@@mountainmanmike1014 But I mean to say that there is no term for blue as a group. It is true, they had terms for certain specific colors, but if you don't have a color to define the color group then it changes a lot. For us to define the sea as the color of wine is strange, because we have three terms to define three different color groups (red, purple and blue). They had only one group to define it and for them this association is legitimate, even though clearly red and blue are different colors.
@1337w0n18 күн бұрын
Not all humans communicate with sound, and sound is not required for a language.
@vincenzopiras976517 күн бұрын
We are not talking about individuals here. Obviously there are people who, unable to hear, have developed other ways to communicate and certainly there are many languages in which visual support is fundamental (just look at Italian gestures) however, humans basically communicate through voice and every culture has a spoken language at its base. Even sign languages start from a basic spoken language, and the same goes for writing. There are types of writing that are separate from spoken language (such as Chinese ideograms) but you cannot say that they do not start from at least one spoken language.
@duder638718 күн бұрын
The issue with “learning from our history” is that how we interpret history is itself a part of our culture. There is no learning; there is only constructing the past to match your worldviews. Since categories are, by their nature, subjective and arbitrary, there is no way to have a worldview that is objective. You seem to acknowledge this, but then you make claims about the world as if they weren’t your beliefs born out of your small, subjective perspective. For example, at 18:41, you have a cartoon wherein a man says, “all these criminals are just bad apples. Why should I address socio-economic factors,” implying that socio-economic factors are more legitimate as a cause than criminals being bad apples; is this perspective though not just another worldview created from your culture; if it is, then how can this claim have any legitimacy? This goes for every other claim you make about history, biology, and language.
@congruentcrib18 күн бұрын
I truly believe any and every major issue can be boiled down to a single word; Definition. Everyone wants to save the world. We just can’t agree on how. Everyone wants to do the right thing for the world… we just don’t agree what is “right” and “wrong”. I’ve recently been focusing on why people feel the way they do politically. It’s lead me to some awkward questions, but I want to know why someone thinks what they think. What is going on when we have the same data, but we find different results. It almost always boils down to how we define our data. As an example, I leaned far to one side of a political spectrum for my entire life, but I wanted to know why the other side thought they were right, so I befriended multiple people who I disagreed with. Now I have a completely different perspective of things. I feel completely different about the topic(s). I know it’s hard, but listen to the “them” before you decided which “us” you become. Both sides have valid points, so you need to know what those points are before you condemn one or the other,
@drbelanger7318 күн бұрын
I've always loved the Scarred Lands setting, but they never paid attention to anything like this. The only world map I could find was buried in a forum, despite numerous references to continents and seas across multiple books. The more I look into content like yours, I realize how bad their layout really was (epic facepalm).
@DigitalGhost26919 күн бұрын
I heard the concept culture defined as stages of an "intellectual contagion" and i can't unhear it
@drbelanger7319 күн бұрын
Late to the party on that one, but yeath. The part about lead is me. I was researching how to draw a mountain pass. Ended up studying Brenner Pass and then the geology of Brenner Pass. Eight hours before my pencil hit paper.
@sammysweetroll19 күн бұрын
you should do more streams
@sammysweetroll19 күн бұрын
A 1500s blacksmith used urine to temper their blades... But when I ask a cute, effeminate red haired boy to fill a trough with his piss NOWADAYS I'm "Banned from this Home Depot" and they call the police?? Unfair.
@prosamis19 күн бұрын
One of the most useful pieces of information I learned in my anthropology studies in college is the fact that culture is *patterned*. You tend to see one thing in one part of the culture in another part of it A simple example is: misogyny in law is often accompanied by misogyny in the workplace and misogyny in the household This goes for *everything* and makes writing cultures so much easier. So by identifying core "notable values" and spreading it into every part of the culture, you very quickly get a much better understanding of it Of course this has to be accompanied with the idea of individualism and the fact that values, ideals, etc of a culture all get opposed within the same culture That's also an easy way to make sub cultures! I know this is grossly oversimplifying it, but gods does it make the bigger picture so much easier to understand and work with Religion should mirror aspects of culture and vice versa Another very important topic is the concept of homeostasis. Every culture has a set of norms/values and taboos, moving away from them (or committing taboos) generally results in the judicial part of the culture (let it be a justice system, a tribe elder, a captain, etc) to bring back the balance whether it's through punishment, ostracism, banishment, deatch, et cetera These 3 concepts mixed together, I find, makes writing a fantasy culture way way easier to approach than the absurd nuance of irl culture (where every single person is arguably a sub culture. Good luck writing that!) I'm worldbuilding an entire dnd adjacent world from scratch and these concepts are helping me a lot with my process
@isaacchristensen65920 күн бұрын
Very well done!
@CybronautLoaf20 күн бұрын
I'm so happy the algorithm recommended this channel to me and equally ecstatic I took the gamble on a smaller view count, your content deserves orders of magnitude more love Please keep up the awesome work, kind stranger!
@sevencubed_20 күн бұрын
I think that is a very good video for understanding how cultures are in their current forms, best video I've found on it I'd say, but it does disappoint me that this video just shows cultures as inanimate objects rather than the changing organisms that they are It gives so much help for the comprehension of how cultures affect people, but not how they are formed or changed by the interactions between people, or how people share cultures between eachother Edit: NEVERMIND APPARENT'Y! I do wish this part was addressed from the beginning of the video but oh my goodness sorry for commenting this half way through
@vincenzopiras976520 күн бұрын
In my opinion it is better to start from the definition before explaining the changes, then the substance does not change much.
@menosproblemos699320 күн бұрын
I love listening to ... hard to define what I love listening to 🤔 But I'm enjoying myself very much, gaming while listening to this ^^
@menosproblemos699320 күн бұрын
Lol 😄 The Disclaimer 😁❤
@000Dragon5000020 күн бұрын
Polyamory is interesting in that it's a specific intentional refutation of both parts of monogamy (Both the single partner thing (which I can attest to in that loving multiple people romantically at the same time is just as possible as having familial love to multiple people at the same time.) and the idea that romantic relationships are lesser if they don't lead to an eventual marriage), and ends up inadvertently taking the opposite societal role to Polygamy. Polyamory is, not necessarily exclusively the domain of minorities, but of the polycules I know, they are absolutely dominated by minorities, and those otherwise disadvantaged by society like disabled folk. Which does seem to carry some weight, as human monogamy doesn't seem to have historically been a thing before societies started adopting patrilineal inheritance structures- which is when it became super important to know exactly who each person's dad was, cultures were influenced by that to start restricting people to keeping one partner... Hence the creation of marriage. But when you have the privilege to ignore social norms, you claim more privilege and power for yourself, leading to Polygamy And when you're already on the back foot and don't really gain anything from clinging to social norms, you don't bother even trying, leading to polyamory. The modern polyamory community has also put a lot of work into learning how to make such an unconventional structure healthy, because obviously they have to... and that's honestly given them a lot of tools that monogamous folks could use even with just their one partner. It is wild just how much more a polycule will communicate about everything, particularly contrasted with a cishet mono couple.
@truexenith859615 күн бұрын
Thanks for pointing this out. Found it strange that this video was painting having multiple romantic partners as unnatural so heavily. Polyamory is just as natural as monogamy, and it is not polygamy.
@InkLore-p3h20 күн бұрын
You aren’t being political, you’re being philosophical, which for the topic you’re discussing is necessity, not accident.
@NamMyohoRengeKyo-d9u20 күн бұрын
Fuck calling it culture -Kendrick Lamar
@dickyyy11620 күн бұрын
Found you today - love the videos as I started creating a fantasy world a few years ago, finally putting thought to paper. Would love a video in your style about foods/delicacies throughout ages.