Thankk you sm!!!

Innovations in the currently existing technology certainly ensure Sustainability. Faruque Ahmed, Controller, LinkedIn Newsletter (Draft). The improved durability that we speak of is the sustainability of the technology being developed. Because it has good performance, but the durability is limited. That is why special emphasis is placed on sustainability. Innovations in the currently existing technology certainly ensure sustainability. We have to cherishes all these technologies and tries to present them properly in us. This is a very strong feature of this technology. How much do we common people know about this technology? How will they know, what technology to use and what benefits we can get from it. It is the responsibility and duty of an Engineer to inform. This technical language should be made accessible to common people. We are talking about sustainable energy. I do not see the use of these in anything else. Here sustainable means solar energy is automatically identified. Green and clean energy of solar is very important to us today. Solar energy is a promising and important potential. It is our expectation that an important and traditional company will take great care to strengthen its lean of potentially.

😍♥️

Thank you

Informative!

Thank you, very helpful!

Thank you

It’s annoying to see people in other countries uncritically pick up these things - much of it very specific to AMERICAN culture. Gen Jones in the UK and much of Europe - let alone places like China and Japan - had parents whose own childhood experience was profoundly different from those who parented American Joneses. It makes a much more solid boundary, I think, between boomer/Jones/X than it does in the US, or in a different way. What is it to be raised by people born in a Depression and raised in a war? People who endured but rarely discussed their first memories of hunger, insecurity, deadly diseases, then rationing, being bombed (often more than those in uniform were) barely parented, education interrupted, maybe even living under enemy occupation, prematurely adultified, then entering the workforce at 14 or so, in competition with mature, upskilled Greatest Gen? This late Silent Gen were starting families in the still- austere (on THIS side of the Atlantic) 1950s by their late teens/very early 20s. The last of rationing had just ended in the UK! They were still materially very poor by today’s standards. (And in comparison with the parents of the boomers, who had their delayed families not much earlier.) Within Europe, Joneses were young adults when Solidarnosc became a whole movement, when “perestroika” became a thing, when the Berlin wall came down - were often parents by the time countries declared their independence from Moscow rule. Obviously there’s a profound difference in having spent one’s childhood and youth either under it or not. And then there’s “the Troubles” which affected Gen Jones of Britain and Ireland in various ways, whether living segregated from your neighbours, seeing soldiers in your garden, being searched when you went into town, or losing relatives. Or just taking “bomb threat” evacuations from malls, sports centres, swimming baths etc so much in stride that you didn’t think to mention it to your parents when they got home. (And yelled at the TV on 9/11, “Get t-f out of there, don’t stand rubbernecking!”) Put it this way, UK Gen Jones, who do you know, your own age, who owned a car by their mid-20s? Or even had access to their dad’s? Everyone walked themselves to school from age 5. Unlike the USA, family cars were generally “dad’s car”, and not for giving children lifts to school, scouts, sports, discos or whatever. We all knew one kid in primary school whose parents did that, and pitied and envied them. David Cassidy, the Osmonds made their way over the Atlantic, but after the Beatles, what much went the other way until the later 70s apart from Fleetwood Mac and Rod Stewart? Pomp/prog rock, a whole slew of 70s pop (Bay City Rollers, Sweet, Slade, Abba, Beegees) rock (Status Quo, ELO, 10cc) glam rock and metal - were not even part of the American musical sensibility, or not until significantly later, like David Bowie and (eventually!) Queen. The 2-tone revival, or Reggae (apart from Bob Marley, also late arriving) seems to not have registered much in the USA. Punk in the UK was profoundly different from its American incarnation. The US eventually got the Eurythmic, but not the Tourists. Northern Soul is just hard to describe and explain to Americans: Motown, but not the big, well known Motown hits, spawning in the impoverished north of England a strangely graceless, touchingly introverted yet kinda athletic dance style, and a certain dress style with it. It went the other way belatedly too: Gen Jones only heard about Springsteen from our chemistry teachers and were struck by how dated the arrangements sounded. The Beastie Boys were better known in the UK. Music was such an important part of culture - reflecting and influencing culture, lifestyle and values at the time on both sides of the Atlantic, in aggregate, it’s not a small difference.

Perfection made video

Thanks

Ur saving me thank you

Who else is watching this because of a airplane company that starts with a B

Yeah, I was born in 1960 and I'm just gonna go ahead and sign on with Gen X, if you don't mind......

Thou Shalt Not Kill

but how do you test this?

Ayogu perpetual Biochemistry Well explained

Thank you

❤😂mdkalamkushtiapoliceshkulna

Thank you very much😊

❤

A manager has many roles.

Now lets look at the demographics of the people group who most disproportionately benefit from usury 😊

😂

Excellent!

Thanks a lot

Good details.

A generation is defined as around twenty years. Therefore, there can't be a Generation Jones of only ten years. They are a sub-level of Baby Boomers. As for Gen-X, we were known as latchkey kids, the lost generation and finally the MTV generation. All are subclasses of Generation X.

Done

👍👏👍👏👍

Brilliant !

fantastic work, thank you.

Does a person in a scamcallcenter have a job?

I like this. I always hated being lumped in with the hippies. I can't remember JFK, RFK or MLK. My earliest memories of national events are about Watergate pre empting all my favorite tv shows. Seemed to go on forever. I was born in 1962. That 70s Show was a lot like my childhood.

❤❤❤❤

Muito boa a explicação. Obrigado! 🇧🇷

Hi why can't I get into KZbin Regards

Thank you

"Love your Enemies and Prey for those who persecute you." -Jesus Christ

Pls make on of all Americas

Thank you

💯

Fokken excellent...thank you

I was quite surprised that this video states explicitly that "in most cases, speculators are not individuals that people admire". On the contrary, I admire speculators, especially if they are extremely smart and successful in their speculations. Likewise, I also admire investors, especially if they are also smart and successful in their investing practice. I would only dislike these individuals if there was anything dishonest about their engagements in financial risks.

good job

This video contains the UN Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

If you want to give big project, looking remote workers, then share.

Thank you for explaining

Thank you so much

From this video it's easy to get the wrong impression of a random walk. Random walks do not prevent one from making predictions about the future. Random walk does not mean every outcome is equally likely.

It seems that you do not understand the difference between the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union and the Russian Federation in general! very disappointed in the channel🤮