And ‘a case of the ringworms’ he was on fire that night.

Imagine not being able to spell Manly? What a tosspot.

hahahahaha dum ass...independent referee........u dimwitted pom!

When we talk about dimwitted no one does it better than Australia and the most overrated country on the planet and also rugby league in the UK is only a peripheral sport.

@@stephendavies8510 Typical Whinging Pom Bastard ! You Pricks couldn't win a Chook Raffle , even if you bought all the Tickets .The most useless sporting Nation in the World .

@@georgemacpherson1992 phew what stinks ? Oh it's a filthy pom.

And when you stinking filthy poms played Australia in the Test series, what happened ?| Ha,ha You filthy dogs...

conan McGuire gay boy

I'll let them know lol

+poitty1978 1988 was the last year that I know of where an alternate numbering system was used in Australian league. Lock was 8, 9 and 10 were second rowers, 11 and 13 the props and 12 the hooker. No longer used, and if I understand it was retired for the 1989 season

That’s correct. It led me to confusion when I watched rugby league for the first time - reading a sporting manual led me to think Phil Daley, a specialist prop, was playing “loose forward” (lock) - back in 1986 if my memory serves me right. Between 1989 and 1991, although the numbers were changed, players were still listed by David Middleton’s ‘Rugby League’ annual in the old order of lock, second row, second row, prop, hooker, prop. From 1992, forward packs were listed in the stardard international order prop, hooker, prop, second row, second row, lock.