Let’s go First comment!

Great work! Seems like you're getting more comfortable in front of the mic. It was difficult to hear you in some parts. Perhaps in the future you can mention the reason WHY Trump's voices in your head and that is due to media programming .

Good vid. I really enjoyed how they didnt hold back on cgi and budget for action. Usually you can tell its the big battle or where the budget is spent. But this film carried the action, cgi, gore the whole way through and didnt hold back.

I blame Facebook and tick-tock and social media not Disney

I blame Facebook and tick-tock and social media

This ideology is killing media and culture. We need to return to God, traditional values, and escapist entertainment that inspires and thrills again.

(written without watching because I cba) im sorry but if you believe "woke" is a real thing that people believe in and not a dogwhistle that is used to brush off any legitimate concerns a marginalised person might have then you have not done your research. there is no "woke". just like there is no "antifa". none of these things are real identifiers any leftist has ever used, they're just shallow projection. also we need DEI cause otherwise every actor is the same white guy lmao. anyway go growl at homeless people or whatever it is you people do in your free time.

Underated

This movie was just ok. The 1st 2 were way better. I agree with you except for not adding any more Death Angel related info. This movie introduced the big DAs, eggs/sacs, and looks like way more dropped in on big metro cities such as NY. It just needed more action. I think the budget was only somewhere around 60 mil? I think they werent expecting this to be a successful movie due to ppl prefering to not going to the theaters anymore, i recommend everyone to watch at the theaters so we can get more big budget flicks

Great commentary

Great job. Take your foot off the brake in pointing out the insanity of this world. More people wish they had the courage that you had talking about JB.

What exactly would be the reason why a person chooses an iPhone over an Android?

Thank you for this upload. Very insightful. More men need to have discussions like this instead of watching sports

I thought it was a decent movie but I do agree I wish we’d learn more about the aliens. Definitely worth watching though.

I saw it two days ago. Its a money grab from the studio. The basic concept of seeing the beginning of the collapse makes sense, but this film wasn't that. A big mistake the film makers made was assuming that anyone would care if NYC was destroyed by the aliens. Most of the rest of the state would be throwing house parties. They should have set the film somewhere like a mid-sized midwestern city, not a large coastal city like NYC, LA, SF, etc.

I was expecting soooo much.. and when i go out from the cinema i was like, is that it? 😅

Why does this movie exist? Easy. To make money. The premise is ludicrous. Like I said, to make money....

There was nothing wrong with this movie, this guy just has bad taste in movies

What a HUGE BOREFEST of a movie!!!

Agent Smith, purpose

Dude, having an antagonistic or contrary opinion won't get your views up or make you liked. You shouldn't have watched the movie let alone make a video on it.

A quit place japan.. with swords.......ninja and yakusa.

That movie sucked a**. I'm terminally ill so let's go on a suicide mission for pizza

i liked the movie especially the story of her.

nope. was a good, touching flick.

to me it's kinda like a side quest or expansion of the 2nd movie when they also mention day1 of what happened on the first movie, and at the end of day one it basically continues to the people from the boat into the island

And huge plot flaw - how the aliens pilot their spaceship to Earth (Part 2 during baseball game) when they cannot see ?

Looks fucking good to me

Is this nothing new? We found out how people in the city would react to those creatures. The creatures make their own food. I understand this movie could be daunting for sociopaths or psychopaths because of its heavy humanity aspect.

It just seems like they wanted to pull in a more woke agenda. It’s the agenda of a lot of movies.

I agree,i watched the previous,

An amazing video 10/10, we want more!

great video

Keep up the good work!

…. Jordan lost his mind somewhere after becoming famous. Why would you bother with anything of his now?

I really enjoyed the film. It delivered what I expected. To me, it did harken back to those popcorn action flicks that I remember. It was there to be enjoyed. I loved their lampooning of the troups of their genre while using those same troups. The chemistry between Gosling and Blount was fun. Jeane Claude was a scene stealer.

We all know why. Some subjects are not allowed to be honestly researched because the results don't fit the NARRATIVE. another one is Race & IQ

I really appreciate your breakdown of these studies and the assertion. It's a common talking point various social psychology circles, and your breakdown mirrors my own experiences in reading and discussing similar articles. That is to say, people will misrepresent findings of research to suit their narratives, even when they're "trained psychology researchers" who should theoretically be far more capable of understanding their own bias and looking it things through an objective lens. I recently was part of a graduate level seminar discussion class discussing a paper on racial bias, published from University of Washington. The authors of the paper stated that "interest in the concept of microaggressions has increased substantially" and then cited Lilienfeld 2017. I'm familiar with that article, he provided a masterclass breakdown of why the concept of microaggressions lacks any sort of cohesive definition or scientific validity and needs to be entirely scrapped until those concerns can be addressed. Just goes to show how worthless "peer reviewed journal" articles are if social justice oriented social psych academics from UW can cite lilienfeld as a reason for why we should be taking microaggressions seriously.

The perception of assertiveness in men and women has been a subject of study and debate, particularly in the context of leadership and workplace dynamics. Research indicates that while men and women are perceived equally in terms of leadership effectiveness overall, there are nuances. For instance, women are often rated more effective by others but rate themselves less effective compared to men's self-assessments. Additionally, stereotypes persist, with women seen as less assertive than men by male raters, though female raters view women as equally independent and competent in leadership. Gender differences in the perception of assertiveness in social situations are a reflection of broader societal norms and expectations. Studies suggest that women's assertiveness is often interpreted differently than men's, with women sometimes facing backlash for behaviors that are accepted in men. This discrepancy can influence the dynamics of social interactions, where assertive behavior by women may be perceived as aggressive or unfriendly, whereas men may be seen as confident and strong.

Access all of the linked studies in the video description, for free, here: sci-hub.hkvisa.net/

You came um in my recommendations, good luck with your channel, stay healthy

I like your use of language.

Chamber of Secrets in Harry Potter was the most direct book to movie they made and it was awful. Prerequisite for audience understanding full source material isn't going to make you money on a box office budget. Telling a story will. The first movie was fairly boring but this movie tied it together and visually was the best VFX movie I can remember.

Stop smoking crack lol

😮 I can't believe this video has so few views and not a single comment. Great video essay!

Plot wise the movie could have done better. There is allot of important plot point that was skimmed or skipped over. Chani was supposed to have had been in a multi year long relationship with Paul, had a child and had basically been a wife in all but name. The fact that this all the movie happened in a time span of a of months not years. We deserved to see Paul’s sister as a young girl not as a fetus.

With all due respect to you and your opinion, why must you bring politics into the review? It felt uncomfortable and out of place, and left me with a slightly bitter impression of you. Otherwise, I loved your insight and I do agree with you about how the first one was slightly better than part 2.

Youre going in with the book in mind. I can definitely agree that some things felt like it either should have had a bigger impact (the destruction of a sietch) or it felt rushed (the death of Rabban) but it was definitely a defining film overall. It was a long movie but at no point was it boring or spoon feed exposition. The "show dont tell" method (the riding of the sandworms and how exposing the holes between the scales prevent the worm from diving) was used quite a bit and the acting (walken was definitely a funny choice) was good enough to convey the missing inner dialoges. I think it waa a solid 8 to 9 out of 10. The weird choice of walken and some scenes feeling rushed/missing impact do detract and break the immersion here and there. However, its only but a couple scenes in an almost 3 hour show time. I think its at least on the same playing field as Lotr.

No politics? The entire Dune saga is a cautionary tale to be weary of the charismatic leader. The books and the movies have an agenda to push.

Lmao what a shitty take