you ask a question to the MOST INTELLIGENT LIFE FORM ON PLANET EARTH, and you expect it to be trustworthy? you are being extremely naive in two ways: you believe what AI says is true without even questioning it, and even if this AI is really trustworthy, you 2: believe that the company behind the AI is instructing it to say the truth. Oh man... how can such naive people be still alive? (i mean, how could they have reached such old age for someone naive without having put their lives at risk)

IIRC The television show Westworld looked into this subject in season 2. It was science fiction back then; but now, just a few years later, it's actually possible in theory. Loosely following the show's premise, I could see how a real-world application for using AI to resurrect the dead could become socially acceptable: There's a lot of AAPL stockholders that criticize Apple CEO Tim Cook as not being an effective leader as Steve Jobs. What if an AI could be created to think just like Steve Jobs? At first, this AI would assist Tim Cook in making creative and strategic decisions. When the AI Steve Jobs' performance starts to surpass Cook's performance, shareholders decide that the AI should take over the CEO position. Other companies take notice, and they also develop AI CEOs to assist or replace human CEOs. For example, Ford resurrects Henry Ford, General Electric resurrects Thomas Edison, and so forth. Thus, using AI to bring back the dead doesn't have the same negative stigma that it does when grieving family members do the same thing. In fact, it becomes desirable to do so because trillions of dollars of stockholder's wealth is created by the 'good' decisions made by AI CEOs. Then, the practice of using "AI to talk to the dead" becomes widespread and socially acceptable?

Psychologists are already in short supply, all I can say is good luck to the next generation. Did you know the average daily "screen time" of this generation of children is approximately 9 hours. This is another effective mass manipulation by "successful" business sucking money and life from vulnerable people, preying on the human need to hold onto memories, reinforcing the avoident processes people tend towards instead of grieving and accepting their reality, moving on and processing their traumas. Good coverage on the topic and opinions, thanks for sharing your content as always! This kind of ai tool is another step towards "The Matrix" 😅

There is no "safety" in AI. There are going to be 1000s of AIs, and you'll take your chances.

*To the awesome person reading this, may blessings find you and your dreams come to life. Keep thriving.* 🚑

*To the beautiful soul reading this, I wish you blessings and the realization of all your dreams. Keep believing.* 🐇

*To the extraordinary person seeing this, may blessings shower upon you and your dreams come true. Stay radiant.* 🚑

What do you MEAN you can talk to DEAD relatives? AI can do that? Isn't that kind of... wrong? Yeah, I don't know what to think about this... Use AI to talk to the dead? - #ai #chatgpt #tech And check out my website to get amazing AI CheatSheets for FREE! - aidenis.com/ And follow me on LinkedIn if you are interested in the latest in AI! - www.linkedin.com/in/denis-panjuta/

AI is a tool. and you just cant let it run on its own ..but you shouldn't limit its use or capabilities because someone decides to use it for nefarious reasons .

Your overreacting to artificial narrow intelligence. Yes there are issues and concerns but overall despite its shortcomings its a good product. You just have to double check its responses and use common sense when considering its output. When we get AGI yes these concerns will be very valid but we are pretty far away from that. AI will eventually be smarter than us and then it will be important for everyone to work together for the betterment of all but untill then while safety is important we dont need to make a mountain out of a mole hill.

What a gossip girl you are... please find a topic that serves more than a tea party.

We don’t need any “safety”.

Great video. Number one elon musk is not a scientist and all of his timelines and predictions have been off by a long shot. He did not even invent the electric car, he bought into a company that did and made the two founders put him on as a founder. Enough about him. I wrote AI programs back in college, and comp scientists have not been able to figure out how to make AI self aware and a lot think it's not possible. Yann is correct , llm's alone won't be able to become self aware because as noam chomsky puts it " “these programs cannot explain the rules of English syntax,” which renders their predictions always “superficial and dubious.”" They are essentially complex auto complete. Again good video, wish i had found this earlier.

Oh really ? What a surprise.. I'll give you a tip - assume that everything is hacked, leaked, breached and compromised and just be aware of what you put out there.

You are totally delusional. ChatGPT is a joke.. You are like children afraid of ghosts in the closet and under your bed. OpenAI's intelligence is all in your imagination.

Moral, ethics and society: No tech company will limit itself with these concerns, even if there are laws. Flying in the face of those concerns is profitable, even if unethical whether tech the tech is an autonomous car or a microwave oven.

Is it the chair or is it long hair?😂😂😂😂😂

Sorry chatgpt is nowhere nearer AGI than it's first release. LLM's cannot become self aware because they do not understand what the words they are using mean. LLM's are such a tiny part of true AI and we are getting no closer by putting all out efforts into improving LLM's.

Don't ban it plox, I just got pro lol

Idc i dont have anyone to take care of. Im not going to marry or shit. I just want money so i may just become a puppy and bag money while being lazy and using gpt

I stopped using it when ChatGPT told me that lead was less dense than copper while theorizing a battery concept.

Ask ChatGPT to list Dr Lawrence Britts 14 defining characteristics, it refuses... ask it about Klaus Schwab it tell you to ask his companies directly... ChatGPT is a fake and is used to push an agenda... a very sinister fascist agenda...

yes yes. consider that openai is not stupid. they are there for a reason and they think with their heads. they used people to develop their system and then started throwing them out. now they are portraying a "don't care about security" model so that people start asking for restrictions. and who can provide them? only the government. in the end what will happen? free AI will be banned and only governments will have it, because they are above the law, no one can order or restrict them. OpenAI has already quietly authorized the use of chatgpt for military purposes, look up the information

Thanks for the quality content and concise breakdown of events! I'm inclined to agree that OpenAI will continue to do what it does, the way it wants and feed media or peole whatever they want to hear. With Microsoft standing behind them, they can almost do anything they want and have Microsoft cover it. The scariest part to me is, Microsoft has its hands in almost every global project, and in recent years every ai project that they think has potential, "OSS" or otherwise, plus the recent partnership with Nvidia, they will own the world. Hopefully we'll be dead before ai BillGatesBot is fighting wars on Mars 😅

What is going on? Wasn't OpenAI all about privacy and safety? What happened? Well... just watch this and you tell me what we should think... This is REALLY concerning... And check out my website to get amazing AI CheatSheets for FREE! - aidenis.com/ And follow me on LinkedIn if you are interested in the latest in AI! - www.linkedin.com/in/denis-panjuta/

Intriguing topic

Great info thanks but how do you make the avatar that you made of yourself talk. I have the free version and I created an avatar of myself and now I want to make it say something; how do I do that?

Elon Musk is only saying that to peddle his microchips for your brain

Very well done.

Great content! Saludos desde México nuevo suscripción

So Neuralink turns their first human patient into an airhead, literally. Gotta love technology

hey you are the guy who taught me c# on udemy.

and the conspiracy side..lol, they wanted us to pay and build roads so they sold us cars, so what are they trying to build now?, if it works foward it will work backward and from remote +AI, pesky talent ideas and innovations get in the way of mass manipulation and monopoly, and duming us down just makes useless beggars jonkies so the solution is to leave us smart but steal our thought patterns and use it against us with what we do, want, say before we get a change to be independant., soon we will be like worker ants following the signals of the queen and our original thoughts stolen and added to the AI manipulator...making flood panic buying and tailored directed sales and conflict and crime and population controll will be available to the monopoly controllers, normally what is releast to the public is actually several years behind the actuall product so not that far away. . no more need for castle walls, religions, rich poor boundries, now controll 4.0 direct brain controll with AI with wirless controll, well at least the feeling of happiness and self worth should be at a push of a button aswell so we can enjoy being slaves yay. i wonder if they will use it to make a better world or just to make more money..

I don't know why people keep referring to Neuralink as "Elon Musk's". All he did was buy it from a company that already adapted/invented it 15-20 years ago. I was there at a Tech Show way before anyo0ne heard of Elon Musk and tried the prototype. And at that time you just wore a headband with sensors around your head and could move objects on a monitor. We don't need it implanted into our heads. This is a window into his evil/dystopian side.

Agreed! Perplexity is much better and gives faster answers

00:01 Perplexity AI offers better search capabilities and integration with GPT-4. 00:54 Perplexity AI combines ChatGPT and Google search functionalities 01:46 Perplexity AI offers advanced search and organization features. 02:39 Perplexity AI offers advanced search capabilities and AI-generated human language. 03:34 Perplexity AI excels in language generation and user experience 04:33 Perplexity AI is best for research-oriented AI assistants. 05:25 Perplexity AI offers better accuracy and real-time information 06:17 Perplexity AI is more user-friendly than ChatGPT

ai is best in health care

Yeah i mean i've started a channel dedicated to curating the best AI Music. Some of them have made it into my actual playlist. I wonder in 3 years how many real artists there will be. I just graduated with a degree in digital music. So depressing lol. At least we will get some ABSOLUTE BANGERS

Hey Denis, you didn't create the songs, you ordered them like a hamburger at a restaurant! A 4 year old can do that. You got a result in which your participation was placing an order.

Dude good content however the background music on loop is annoying

No it won't. Why would it?

of course not. you will always still have live performers and i think ai music will not replace real people just add to it.

I dont care for AI music, I will still keep making music

The day an AI can make something as creative and catchy as Frontier Psychiatrist or as heartfelt and romantic as Beethoven's 5th piano concerto 2nd movement, that day we are all replaced. We have seen a decline in creativity and human emotion in pop music over time to the point that most music on the top 100 on Spotify already feels like it could be AI-generated. Human music is going down and AI music is going up and the curves are going to overlap soon. Before we are replaced shit is going to get weird though.

We lost track of consciousness in the 90s

Live music will be stronger than ever. Who cares about the "record industry". It has been a scam since day 1.

Yes, it will... But "artists" are going to say they wrote it.