Tires. I owned a set of those MTR re-cap replicas, they're LOUD.

They also made the CUCV as a CUCV ll after 1991,they had the OBS body instead of a square body and had a 6.5L V8 instead of the 6.2L V8.That same year with the HMMWV,they went with a 6.5L for the M1025-M1046 after the M998 had a 6.2L.They still kept the 6.5L when those M1113-M1167 "ECV" came out. They retired the CUCV by 2000 in production,and then Chevrolet came out with the LSSV that has the Duramax.I don't know if the Army still uses the LSSV,but I know that they still have them in the Seabees with just a different body style.

Try hillbilly wizard. They part these things out. If you dont see something you need call em and ask. Their inventory is huge.

Dave Roberts I drove a 1984 CUCV Blazer (M1009) for several years. Very little issues...most were caused of course by the military's general neglect of vehicle services...plus people driving it that didn't give a crap because it didn't belong to them so they beat the crap out of it. Unfortunately the military got rid of them...and at least where I live they didn't bother telling us where and when the auction was so we could go over and bid on them. To get one now the few that were able to get into the auction want $8k or more for one. Anyhow, I really liked the M1009, even in 2WD it would go through quite a bit. The biggest mess was they hacked 12/24V mess that the military thought they should do...this of course caused issues for the civilians that started getting their hands on them and trying to get parts as the 24V parts weren't exactly available off the shelf at auto parts stores...many have actually converted the starting system back over to 12V. Those batteries are NOT overkill LOL. The 6.2L as well as the 6.5L engines were extremely hard cranking and pulled a lot of amps at start-up. You'll find though that batteries are expensive. Parts can be hard to get as well. I really wouldn't mind owning one of the M1009's. My national guard unit had one and I used it for doing range maintenance all the time on M1A1 Abrams Tank and M2A3 Bradley Ranges during our gunnery cycles every year. During every day driving it was easy to maintain 25mpg...these blazers being a diesel engine were pretty descent for fuel economy, the axle ratios in the M1009's were from what I recall 3.08's. You could easily maintain highway speeds 65mph was pretty standard...anything more than that and you were really sucking fuel at that point. However, they would easily do 80 if you had one that wasn't beat up to the point of having serious engine issues.

MediaKing19 Yes, but with the engine noise you'll never hear the road noise from the tires.