Impressive!

No issues thus far?

This doesn't make sense on the mobile stuff first. Should be part of Studio. Folks that mostly care about Dolby Vision are the ones using advanced editing and understand color-space.

Great video, I just put mine together and testing out, but I can't get the throttle to work

good stuff

Hi, do you know if this cable/interface works with the SW Rekordbox? It´s a DJ SW that has a Lighting functionality thats has preset DMX for lighting. Are you able to test it? This will avoid me to spend a lot of money with the original interface.

was your horizon lock set to off when filming this?

genial la comparacion de calidades

Great video. You provided a lot of info, like the tire PSI, which was not indicated on our tires. I liked the tests that you ran it through and gave an honest opinion.

Omfg. You brought back memories of watching this on my video now. I remember the room tour and trampoline. I forget the rest. Xxxx

Gopro 12 vs insta x4 single lens mode

change language to spanish

I saw your review on Amazon too

I don't actually understand what is happening when I select from these at record time. As far as I can tell, the camera is recording full 360 spherical no matter which you select, at which point the FOV is simply a function of how cropped into the spherical footage you want to be. This is something that can be dynamically selected in post processing though, so what is even happening when we select it at record time? Is it just to determine what shows up in the screen while recording? Is it just to determine the baseline FOV that is used as a starting point in post processing?

This is exactly the footage I was looking for. I bought the X4 but was concerned about the fisheye look. So I should film in dewarp? Or is there an adjustment in the software to dewarp footage already shot? Thanks for making this comparison. Very helpful.

Its your setting

Where can you switch between the FOVs on Insta360 Studio (desktop).

Do you know how to unlock the speed on the gotrax nephele?

Any updates on if you have used it recently

nice

Wow, X3 looks much better to me. The cars are nice and sharp, they look blurry on the X4 @ 8k

I am going on a long motorcycle trip with my X4. What settings would you recommend as a set and forget? I am not a big fan of the fish eye look that I tend to get. I also find that when I am going through a heavily tree covered area that the tops of the trees are blurred. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks!

In the description of the bike on Amazon, it says three modes-normal pedal, pedal assist, and all electric. But you say it has no pedal assist. Does this mean if I engage the motor the bike will automatically go 15 mph?

Which is the best for editing sportbike videos???

Wondering about the throttle. Can I control it? Slow I hope?

may i ask u film in 8k, 5.7k or 4k?

Great!

Is there much difference between 5.7k and 8k ? Is it worth the heat and file size for using 8k ?

Can you tell the difference between 8k and 5.k on X4 ? Personally, Im not sure. Sometime I feel like 8k slightly better, sometimes I feel like they look the same. Perhaps I just have bad eyes.

Thanks for providing details many don't! In particular your height! Curious how bent your legs are at 'full extension'. Disappointed there is no pedal assist, but it is what it is.

Nice video comparison

Thanks, what a great comparison. I use dewarp if I like to have more speed in the video! It's amazing in sports like MTB riding in the woods. Beautiful natural blur and crazy speed :-)

no 60fps in X3?

I hate the new app and studio ASPECT RATIOS ! my question is why Insta360 people delete the LINEAR and LINEAR+ and Narrow they say, they changed the name but isn't true the real aspect ratio Lienar and Linear+ is very good to do a video with 0 effect of fish eye the DEWARP the say is the same as LINEAR and LINEAR+ but not if you raise up and down you'll see the video get curved fuck it!!! for X4 if you want to add a new or rename the aspect ratio ok! but dont delete a real flat aspect ratio was very good and a lot people use that LINEAR and + aspect ratio to edit videos that look normal and not fish eye i hope INSTA360 return again that 3 aspect ratios linear and + and Narrow! what a big mistake!!

I use only mega

There definitely appears to be more detail in the X4 footage, BUT, it also appears to be exposed a bit lower. I have to wonder how much more detail would be visible with the extra contrast added via lower exposure on the X3. Also, you're shooting 60 FPS on the X4 , assuming this camera's encoder is bandwidth limited, you might get more detail per frame by shooting at 30 FPS. Can you do a side by side in sunlight with the X3 with say, -0.3 or so EV dialed in, leave the X4 at 0.0 EV, and shoot both at 30 FPS, export at 4k?

very useful video, thanks

Sharpness setting? The 'low' setting on the X4 should only be used if you want it to look like an earlier model. Maybe upload one of your excellent comparisons showing a static shot of a detailed scene shot in each of the three sharpness settings in good light. But I am starting to wonder whether there is a problem with your particular X4. Search for an upload in the last few days shot in Venice, runs for about 18 mins, looks excellent.

In other tests X4 low sharpness has been shown to seriously degrade the image. Not a good setting unless you really like the soft focus look.

I caught the plastic lens cover on the X4. Did your original reframe comparison have those on also? Was the X3 also using a lens cover?

So basically absolutely no reason to get an X4. On the X4, the colors are blown out, resolution isn't any better even at 4k. There does appear to be better IS or perspective correction, as when you rotate the X4 handles the shift better than the X3, but I feel like that's just a software thing. I am absolutely and completely unimpressed with the 4K output of this. Maybe it's just KZbin compressing it? It looks terrible.

What is the meaning of 5.7k+ ?

Thank you. X4 seem to perform a very good hdr filtering before encoding the video, but 8k is not a visual quality step. Seem this sensor is not good for this resolution, i'm disapointed, resolution step up is very low. Does you can share insv original file to compare real pixels before reframe? Maybe the reframe is very bad.

Are you sure the top is the X3? Unlike your X3 vs. X4 reframe comparison, the X3 in this video looks clearer in almost every scenario. Look at the 0:45 time mark. The cars waiting to turn are way clearer. The Dental sign in the back is clearer. On the moving part of the video, the signage of the businesses are crisp on the X3 and not so much on the X4.

If I had to choose, I like "mega".

Hello. How is the bike now? Any problems with it?

Noob question, I know, but does the setting change of Mega, Dewarp, or Ultra actually change the way the 360 video is recorded or just how it is first seen in editing software? I would have thought a camera that shoots 360 would have all the possible FOV. Just got x4 yesterday and have to break 40+ years of old school video habits, thanks for help.

I find myself using Mega most of the time, the fov is HUGE!!

There doesn't seem to be much info on what exactly this does. I assume it's trying to fake some kind of HDR Dolby Vision thing, but it's not clear exactly what's going on.

Just to make sure for the x4: You shot in 360°Mode (not single lense) with 4k (how many fps?)? Thank you! Would be interested in a 360°Mode reframed x4, 5.7k/60fps video.