Scientists know the universe contains 50% energy and 50% matter, that's a given. But how did they come up with the estimated percentage of dark energy and dark matter if they can't be measured or observed directly? Well, it's because of all the motion occurring to visible matter. Out of all the visible matter in the universe scientists are only able to explain about 4.6% due to gravity and the laws of motion. The remaining motion occurring to stars in galaxy disks and the accelerated motion of entire galaxies that the theory of gravity and the laws of motion can't explain is around 95%. That's a huge error in their calculations, aka, sigma. All these years scientists have boasted how accurate Einstein's theory of gravity is, yet now we find it's not very accurate after all. Is there really dark matter and dark energy missing from their equations or is the laws of motion and theory of gravity wrong? I do not believe in dark matter or dark energy because they can't be observed and can't be detected in any experiment. Just like Aether, I believe they're pseudoscience. Scientists however can't refrain from the narrative posed upon them by academia else lose their credentials. Thus academia will not allow the truth to come out. Why do they insist in believing in things that can't be measured or detected in experiments or instruments? I believe it's because they don't want to admit Einstein and Newton were wrong. They've placed them so high upon a pedestal that they're afraid of losing their grip on science altogether. That and they've already received billion of dollars to study the things that don't really exist. Maybe they're using them to milk the governments around the world of money? Easy money. Like looking for a spirit in a computer. They don't want the grant money to end, so they continue the deception and lies hoping nobody will realize what they're doing. Every time the laws of motion and theory of gravity can't explain the motion of stars and galaxies scientists pin the motion on either dark matter or dark energy. Basically they are wildcards to fill in the gaps of their understanding. Yet they still can't explain 95% of all the motion occurring to the visible mass in the universe. They don't know why it happens. They don't know what's causing it. They don't know how to make any accurate predictions, thus dark matter and dark energy are only hypothesis, not even theories. Dark matter and dark energy are speculations, assumptions, simple concepts that will never be confirmed because they don't exist. After the big bang rapid cosmic inflation was proposed to explain why galaxies were spread across the cosmos. In order for rapid inflation to happen it would have to have spread all the matter and energy out evenly. Yet scientists have found massive voids that do not contain much matter at all. The massive cosmic voids are empirical evidence a big bang and cosmic inflation didn't happen. Yet nobody brings these facts to the table or even mentions it. Why is that? Then telescopes like Hubble, Subaru and the James Webb discovered old, fully mature galaxies at the edge of their observable horizons. Empirical observations refuted the predictions made by the laws of motion, theory of gravity, laws of thermodynamics, big bang, cosmic inflation, age of the universe, speed of light and even the LCDM model used to explain the universe's evolution over time. Every one of the theories and laws of physics they held with such regards to be true, were shown to be wrong. Every one of them. LOL. They are about as clueless to the intricate working of the universe as a 5 year old child. What I want to know is, why are they still receiving grant money to do research if they don't even know what they're talking about? All the theories and models they've proposed pertaining to the universe was shown to be wrong. Am I the only one to see this?

Things do not coalesce undergravity. That breaks all the laws of physics. Gas naturally rapidly wants to expand in a vacuum not compress. The electric universe model not only as accurate in its predictions but the observable universe fits with the math, science, and duplicable lab experiments. It also shows there's no such thing as dark matter and dark energy, things which modern cosmologists keep trying to invent to plug holes in their previous faulty theories.

Dose the big bang hold up now

The background music … noise is annoying , painful and distracting.

The Universe is not expanding, there is a more reasonable solution to Hubble's observation that does not require an implementation of 'Dark Matter' among other things

The observable universe is theorized to be only 13.7 billion light years in radius or 27.4 billion light-years in diameter per the speed of light, theorized age of the universe and how long it took stars to come together after the big bang. The estimated 93 billion light-years in diameter was based on what's called co-motion or proper distance due to the accelerated expansion of space. Example, the bodies observed at an actual light distance of 13.7 billion light-years away by now would have receded away from us by an estimated 45.6 billion light-years because of the expansion of space. Making the diameter of the universe to be 93 billion light-years. That's not the diameter of the observable universe. It's an estimated diameter based on proper distance from the expansion of space. The JWST discoveries don't challenge existing theories and laws of physics, they refute them. Galaxy F200DB-045 has a redshift of z=20.4 placing it further than a light distance of 13.8 billion light-years away, refuting the big bang, cosmic inflation, age of the universe, relativity's look-back time, speed of light, 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics, and the evolutionary cosmological model of the universe. The JWST found more than 300 old, massive galaxies further than an actual light distance of 13.5 billion light-years away. One galaxy was more than 25 times larger than our own galaxy but at a light-distance of 13.5 billion light years. That should be impossible according to the laws of physics and widely accepted theories. Hence why they're called an Impossible Early Galaxy Problem. Galaxy HD1 was confirmed to be a light distance of 13.5 billion light years away having a redshift of z=13.2 and contains a supermassive black hole in it's core weighing 100 million solar masses. It's 20 times the mass of the supermassive black hole Sagittarius A in the center of our own Milky Way galaxy but located at the edge of the observable universe. Again, impossible according to prevailing laws of physics and theories. I published the paperback book SECRET UNIVERSE : GRAVITY by Ron Kemp on 09-27-2021, 3 months before the James Webb was launched. On page 48 I wrote, "The JWST, James Webb Space Telescope will discover old, fully grown galaxies as far as the telescope can see, further than 13.8 billion light-years away." I then went on to explain how I came to that wild conclusion. I accurately predicted old, massive galaxies in the early universe almost a year before astronomers confirmed them using the James Webb and Subaru telescopes. Amazing, I know. God Almighty is Awesome. I would not have done it without His guidance, leading me down the correct path of knowledge.

i don't like the reference of dark matter as "Dark Energy" although it probably applies it's not scientifically based.

They can be anything you want them to be lol since we know very little if anything about the universe, and James has proved now we know nothing lol.... Actually this video brings nothing new to the table just regurgitating what's been thought before... you have to think original lol

My G.U.T In the antiverse our Sun is eating consuming dark energy.. A death star 🌟 consuming there to shine life giving light here in our universe . If our universe is expanding, then that means the antiverse is shrinking.. Some how , particles responsible for gravity and time itself are finding harder and harder to get back to and remain in the antiverse..therefore excelarating our universes expansion and the antiverses collapse...a particle of dark energy that upon entering our verse becomes light.. Through and by way of stars and black and white holes these T.A.ps flow between our universe and theirs.. Creatures aware and alive made of dark matter..so scary..

The known, fundamental phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) perfectly explains galaxy rotation curves/dark matter. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation, it's not just time that gets dilated. A graph illustrates its squared nature, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers. It can be inferred mathematically that the mass at the center of our own galaxy must be dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate that we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. More precisely, everywhere you point is equally valid. In other words that mass is all around us. Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has recently been confirmed in 6 very low mass galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter, in other words they have normal rotation rates.

I NEVER watch a video where the producer has the gradiosity to emblazon his words in text.

It will all need to be changed I believe. EMFSYSTEMS, ring systems. The infinite ♾️ vacuum space is trying to remove the matter-verse as these are separate properties. And should not be studied as a single object. Galacty science should be a main focus I believe, moving forward. Also let's not just assume all the galaxies we can see are from the same prior event. Andromeda should be looked at much more closely to look for subtle differences from that of our own. It may be from colliding great attractors? Just a thought. Peace ✌️ 😎.

Is there a way to calculate how many time is needed to 'clean' all the interstellar space between galaxies and galaxies clusters from the primordial gas and dust... how is this possible, in so vast space ?

The butchering of the names make me hate this video

whoever the producers wish to win would prevail

It was Jon, 100%.

I really hope they bring Daenerys back, she deserves a second chance. And I really hope that GRRM has more love for his great work than those who made Season 8 and especially that ending

Can you do a Video where he Tywin lanister become King.

Lets go Greens because they know how to manage a kingdom unlike Rhaenyra given she gave the Greens 6 YEARS TO RULE. Rt for all her good heart says she will create a new order but does nothing to help herself, her children, her relationship and image with the people over the course of when she is named heir. 1. Has 3 obvious bastards 2. which weakens Rt claims n creates succession crisis 3. Supports a law that mutilates people( it’s TREASON TO TALK ABOUT MY TREASON) 4. Marries a man who was DENOUNCED as Heir which is the SOLE REASON y she was named heir in the first place. 5. Encourages her uncle publicly in FRONT OF HER FUTURE IN LAWS n help say that rumor was TRUE in episode 5. 6. Makes EVERYONE believe she killed her HUSBAND INCLUDING HER FOMER IN LAWS. 7 and 8 Marries a man who killed his FIRST WIFE AND IS NOT ALLOWED IN THE VALE WHICH IS ONR OF THE SIX KINGDOMS SHE WILL GOVERN N NEED SUPPORT IN THE UPCOMING WAR. 9. Didn’t visit her father for 6 years 10. Didn’t visit king landing for 6 years the place she will rule later. 11. Let greens RULE THE KINGDOM FOR 6 years 12. Didn’t build any alliances for 6 years on dragonstone. 13. trying to USURP THE DRIFTMART THRONE 14 and 15 last minute marriage proposals that were denied by Alicent and Rhaenys 16. Advocated for the torture of her brother in episode 7 17. Didn’t visit her father until she needed something from him a man who is loosing body parts by the minute. 18. Didnt know who her Allies were before she went to war. 19. Sleep with men knowing if they r caught they will be tortured n killed. (Criston +HARWIN) 20. Sent her sons REMINDER LETTERS to the LORDS SHE WILL NEED TO MAKE ALLIANCES 21. Offered NOTHING IN RETURN FOR THE ALLIANCES / EMPTY HANDS. Rt comes with to much baggage as an heir while Aegon faults are not publicly known and lets be honest Aegon will be doing what he and Rhaenyra was doing for the last 6 years lets Otto, Alicent, and the rest of the council do the work lol I would still choose Aegon because he can be manipulated by his competent counselors. Rhaenryra had the chance to build alliances but instead had to rely on her father to protect her from all the mistakes SHE made. I choose the side that will not destabilize the realm and that will respect the traditions and culture of westeros.....granted my choice would be Rhaenys over the horrible two choices of Aegon and Rhaenyra.

Do you pay royalties to the GOT franchise for supplying your content? I doubt it.

It's not valerian the black dread it's balerion the black dread

Team Green 💚

BRING HER BACK!!!! and he had to be taking her somewhere!!!

Hes only going after small dragons so how is he the most feared

Team Green

Rhaenyra should have won. There never should have been a question about it at all. Alicent misunderstood what Viserys said on his death bed.

Team Black Queen Rhaenyra over Team Green

AI tell good story with all info.

Which source confirms that cannibal gonna appear in season 2?

Oh man I hope George RR Martin makes this happen. Hope he retcons the entire last few seasons. It’d be a weird thing for him to retcon the ending to his own book tho lol.

Ass high? 😂

Click bait and not true.

Daenerys: Jon, why don't you have silver hair and purple eyes? Jon: Mah queen!!, i dun wan et

Dude what the hell you messed up the names lol.

Bro google exists, how did you manage to mess up Rhaegars and Lyanna's names so badly💀

It was not "cancelled", you can't cancel something that never was going to happen. Being "in development" meant very little. HBO did not commit any money for it. They couldn't think of one idea for it other than Jon Snow being sad for 8 episodes.

This video was, sadly, utterly worthless. It had NOTHING new in store, especially no "REAL REASON", just some wild interpretation. Smells like clickbait, which I dont get at all. Raising hopes and then being nothing but a let-down doesnt exactly get you a fanbase. You should really reconsider what you re doing!

Why can't we just accept that dark hair is a dominant gene lol which is why it was super obvious that none of king Roberts children were biologically his lol

I'm hugely disappointed.

Thanks A.I. Robot

From a story perspective, how would you make it more interesting? New Super White Walkers? Daenerys comes back from the dead? Sansa decides to kill her uncle? It'd be like doing a Lord of the Rings 4, three days after the Ring was destroyed? What would you follow up with?

House of yhe dragon is the only spin off we will ever see, if the books are not over , this story will be forever forgotten

Can't even get the damn names right. How is anything else in this video supposed to be taken seriously?

Remove the music

Agreed

HBO/ Netflix/ anyone out there I would watch the hell out of any show reviving Kit’s role as Jon Snow. Just saying…

If you are reading this - I am trying to save you 7 minutes, do not watch. waste of breath, dude can talk for minutes without saying a word

U got a subscriber from india

a Jon Snow story with the main-book series not finish is ridiculous. They have no foundation for it to begin with.

Because they have nothing to base it on.