I can link the new "Star Wars" to The Blair Witch. I wish Rian Johnson and Kathleen Kennedy would get lost in the woods......

Love this pod cast. You guys saw this WAAAAYYYYYY too young! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I like to hear younger folks talk about this movie, though. I'm Gen-X and I didn't see it until I was a teenager, on TV --a very edited version of course. It's my favorite horror movie and I've lost count of the times I've seen it. I finally saw it in a re-release on the big screen in 2020--TOTALLY more intense experience.

It's a film/novella about marriage, relationships, jaelousy, sex, lust, trust, confidence... forget all the conspiracy theories; it's all bs. Kubrick talked about the novella with dozens of people during the decades he held the rights and figured out how to make a film adaption. His interest in the story is well known via these people.

16:20 it is set in Vienna, Austria. Not in Venice, Italy.

Absolutely the GOAT of been a hack

Yes Bill is traditional, but I think the wife is not just saying what she is saying, she's wanting a change.

if you take the day Kubrick died to be day zero, then day 666 is January 1st 2001: A Space Odyssey... i think he was killed for showing too much truth in his movies...

I like your channel. I also love 'The Shinning'

Good discussion, I love this film. I particularly like that the aliens or higher power are never seen or explained.

Math actually lines up perfectly on Sam's age.

25:55 wow

my understanding is the end part is the true story, Naomi Watts came to Hollywood and hooked up with the other chick but then got dumped leading to Watts hiring a hit man to kill her... the first 3/4 of the movie is Lynch's bizarre alternate experience--perhaps Watts' fantasy (she has a nice apartment AND crushes her audition AND is helping a beautiful stranger)... also, i think this was supposed to be the prequel movie to a TV series like Twin Peaks but then show never happened; therefor there may be parts in the movie that are hard to understand because there was supposed to be more content provided in the TV show... as the viewer its difficult to figure out the dead person in the bed is Naomi Watts given she is also alive with the other lady looking at the dead body, which makes it almost impossible to understand the plot in any logical way... once you understand the last part is the truth and the first part is some alternate universe/fantasy its not too complex...

I watched this film for the first time earlier this year and it quickly became one of my favorites. I forced my friends to watch it because it’s just that good. You would have thought my girlfriend was watching an actual chariot race live the way we were so engaged. My favorite scene is the rowing scene. Great layered drama.

You didn’t like the sabre battles in the prequels? You are no Star Wars fan - period…

#RestoreTheSnyderverse

do want to watch Jimmy Stewart follow Kim Novak's dumper around San Fransisco before the Hippies and Tech Yuppies ruined the city??? yes please, top 10 moive all-time... i got to see it at the theatre around 1997 when it was re-released... i have no idea what is going on when Stewart follows Novak to the hotel, goes inside, and she just disappears??? THEN Stewart doesn't recognize its the same women despite having the perfect job (detective) to be a face expert... it doesn't matter, its about beauty obsession and frankly what else is there in this world... fax!!!

Sunrise has been my favorite film since i saw it on tv when i was 16 in 1996 😎

This film is SUBLIME and Murnau is a tremendous director. Just as riveting today as it was in 1927. What an achievement!! Generally considered the greatest film of the silent era.

😊🙌🙌

Cassandra Peterson is a beautiful lady.

I use to work for the Dunton's. the Father Joe Dunton was close friends with Stanley Kubrick and David Lynch. Joe Dunton provided the Camera systems for Blue Velvet.

The only western that John Wayne didn’t have a horse

What a fun day. Would do again, 10/10

Enjoyed the talk 👍🏻

The Who's on First routine goes back to Vaudeville. The first comedy team that performed it is unknown. Abbott and Costello made it popular just at the ending of Vaudeville. The routine was partially done in One Night in the Tropics, and fully done in The Naughty Nineties. It was also performed in the TV show. But the funniest circumstance was in one of their movies where the characters played by Bud and Lou are hearing the Who's on First on a car radio. And Lou's character says something like "I don't know about that Lou Costello. I don't like him"

Abbott and Costello's best bit is the criminally underrated Mudder and Fodder.

Looks like I'm the first visitor to enter the screening room here.

"King Kong, an uneven film." Adamantly disgree there. Kong remains the quintessential 3-act story structure. From that standpoint, Kong is perfect. Much as I love The Invisible Man, its narrative is more uneven - and that's scant - than the Kong example.

Being very much the film historian, I'm a big James Whale fan. I love Claude Raines' Invisible Man, and here, per your comment, Whale's "explosion" is the overt black comedy pervading the flick. Edgy humor was Whale's best trademark, and that's what he brought to Wells' story. The movie is also a special effects milestone. John Fulton in 1933...it had to have blown away audiences of the day. Oddly enough, special photographic effects were just about the first thing that followed the infant technology of "moving pictures" before the turn of the century. Goes back to 1895. Photo-tricks came even before tracking camera shots.

Pleasance was PERFECT as the President! You DO know there's some New Englanders who sound British? Like Kelsey Grammer, Shelley Long, George Plimpton, Jim Backus etc etc. It was great seeing him play the noble, Van Helsing-like Dr Loomis and a career politician in the same year!

This movie is hands down my favorite of the Star Wars franchise. I saw it as child when it was first released and it has never lost its impact for me. True, Empire is a more developed and refined piece of work but the sheer impact of the first movie really can't be overstated. Sorry to sound like an old fogey, but it's hard for younger fans to grasp this as they don't remember a time when this was the ONLY Star Wars movie. On a technical level Star Wars is one of the most important movies ever made. Obviously for its special effects but also for its incredible soundtrack, fast pacing and editing and it's deceptively simplistic story and characters.

Of course the other obvious pairing with "Gladiator" would have been "The Fall of the Roman Empire" (1964), the Anthony Mann epic which is mostly the same story as "Gladiator". To prove its epic movie cred, it even has a pretty good chariot race scene, in a forest this time. Like "Spartacus", TFOTRE is unusual in that it's an A-list sword & sandal flick that has no Xtian side plot. The movie doesn't quite work, but my lord, the art direction and totally stacked cast! Actually, "Spartacus" WAS based on a novel. By Howard Fast. I'm going to say up front, I'm not a member of the Kult of Kubrick. "Barry Lyndon" kept you interested for 3 hours? I barely made it through one (theatrical) viewing, and remember nothing much about it except a combination of boredom and repulsion. I do prefer "Spartacus" to "Gladiator", but then it isn't really a Kubrick film. The difference in these two films isn't in the pacing. "Spartacus" has action, but is mostly about dialogue, while "Gladiator" is the exact opposite. The best and juiciest scenes in "Spartacus" don't even involve either the main hero or villain and are all dialogue. They are the ones with Peter Ustinov and/or Charles Laughton as the morally grey slave trainer and senator, respectively. "Gladiator" was ok, but I mostly find it rather artificial looking and predictable, like so many "modern" movies. I never got the hype. And I didn't like the way the action was filmed or the color graded dream stuff.

So you really wanted to watch a fantasy? I feel you, but in real life most women go for successful aholes and put nice guys in the friend zone. They always have done. And people cheat. None of the women we see here are being forced into these situations either, there's no "do me or you're fired" going on. Kubelik is portrayed as a victim, but it's all a result of her own free choices. If anyone's a victim, it's that sorry schlub Baxter. And maybe Mrs. Sheldrake, we don't know for sure. By the way, I agree that no one in this movie is very likable except the doctor and his wife. I kind of hated it too the first time I saw it.

Don't like BUB? Try "Libeled Lady" or "The Thin Man" or "The Philadelphia Story" or "Vivacious Lady". Same cuisine, but less of the frantic goings on, more of the sophisticated wit. And it's easy to miss, but in BUB Susan at one point admits that she is deliberately putting on the crazy just to stay close to David, with whom she is suddenly infatuated (she's in the cottage talking to her aunt). And of course Susan does just anything, because she's rich and she CAN. Does that help? One has to keep up with the pace, too. The more I've watched this one, the better I've liked it.

𝓟Ř𝔬𝓂𝔬𝐒ϻ

Batman 1989 is definitely a funny movie intentionally and a lot of that humor is aligned with the Joker. However, calling it an action comedy is a bit much imo.

You're awful 🙃

Don't stay for the parting words. Awful 👎🏼

Fun fact: Malcolm in the Middle had an episode where the mom takes the Henry Fonda role while she attends jury duty.

It was the accent. The accent brings it down Randy!

نريدو فلم كامل بجودة hd وبدون ملخص

7:45 Very, very, very LOOSELY "based on a true story".

This is awful!

Thanks for the review. I’ve been a vocal proponent of Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. Saw it opening night on 35mm film at a small artsy theater. Also saw the Ultra Panavision 70mm Hateful 8 Roadshow on opening day…they were totally opposite viewing experiences. QT knows how to please his fans by making the theater into an event. The atmosphere is the star of the show in OUATIH. It’s almost like QT took modern film equipment back in time to 1969 and filmed the movie. Each rewatch improves the viewing experience! The 4-hour cut of this movie has me chomping at the bit. The novelization was a disappointment, creepy if I’m being a generous person. As far as the Polanski & Manson stuff, what the film is saying is they don’t matter in this alternate timeline. It’s the story of Sharon Tate’s fictional neighbor being one pool party away from restarting his career. This video may be the best analysis of the film I’ve watched online: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rqvMZWmsprplo7M

Where the hell is the Movie?

Awesome!

They should of had 3 killers including Trevor...and then they betray him...so we feel less bad for him and its a love triangle for her attention between between ex and current bfs...trevor tries to make it up to her with murders cause she is crazy but she moved on and he didn't know that...he just knew there's 2 killers or maybe he didn't know charlie was part of this

15 years not 20....charlie kisses jill like natural born killers but then she betrays him...kinda wish they weren't a couple smdh gross...wonder if they did bang yet...or if they only got together to murder...or if they were in love...or maybe they would be together anyways even if one was not crazy

William loomis is billy real name

You guys missed the im gay death