Coming from a woman that uses the n word... Great.. ugh...
@IvanaSt142 күн бұрын
❤❤❤
@aftabkhan19614 күн бұрын
Chopra talks utter Quantum Bollocks. He’s clearly religious and constantly tries to justify his religious beliefs through linking consciousness with nonsensical metaphysics. He’s not a moron but the numpties that follow him certainly are.
@KeizerHedorah9 күн бұрын
Deepak chopra attended too many gore habba fests and is insane.
@sandeepsuman854810 күн бұрын
Deepak chopra just white washes indian culture and philosophy and packages it for white people , so he can brainwash people
@Timestoppedbyii14 күн бұрын
Wow
@aaditkamat4995Ай бұрын
I think Deepak came off too strong here, but that shouldn't negate what he has to say. I'm glad that he's more grounded during his discussion with Dan Harris during his latest conversations on the 10 Percent Happier podcast.
@NEddy-vj4lbАй бұрын
No. Yea. It was very bad.
@iancrombie88622 ай бұрын
Anyone who believes 1 word Deepak says is a brainwashed loser°
@iancrombie88622 ай бұрын
Deepak is deep in sh*t in his total opinions..Spiritual Tw*t!
@Albeit_Jordan2 ай бұрын
deepak chodepra
@fernandohernandez16922 ай бұрын
Peter my man . Just that he got too cocky and too unstoppable that cause him the price.
@doyouevendraft3 ай бұрын
Sam asking for the answer to the Big Problem of Consciousness first up. No one has the answer to that, my guy.
@streitrhoades3 ай бұрын
How can they sit so close to Deepak? It must smell horrible. He's so full of shit.
@EP_19904 ай бұрын
Deepak Chopra talks like this is an Indian TV show debate.
@billywhizz4 ай бұрын
personally I thought Deepak Chopra was great in Madagascar as King Julien the lemur
@cyclingseth45804 ай бұрын
Look at the work of Bernardo Kastrup he would demolish Sam Harris
@wormskull24545 ай бұрын
“PEEETURR!”
@ExcitedAutoRace-jr2hp6 ай бұрын
Love statues haunting
@MikeUIibarri6 ай бұрын
His story continues to be a long one. Long may you ride, Sir!
@theultimatereductionist75927 ай бұрын
Deepshit Chokeoff has NOTHING of value to say
@koolbub80sman7 ай бұрын
Even though he was stubborn and cocky, but his death is still sad. He was suffering and his mind was not all there. I've always loved this movie 💙
@saurabhsrivastava23717 ай бұрын
I wanna shit in Deepak Chopra’s word salad bowl
@Neoghost008 ай бұрын
The slow build up in this scene is so well done. From us listening to Roger pleading with Peter to not do it until it is clear he is gone. I remembering hoping Roger wouldn't wake up, but seeing the subtle little movements and Peter's realization that his friend was gone broke me. But to top it off, hearing the chatter on the TV in the next room, seeing the world itself refusing to see the desperation that mankind was in because of the walking dead, and this one man pleading for them to look beyond their feelings and emotions and see things for what it was: them or us. Still one of my all time favorite films.
@wakeupandflow10 ай бұрын
There’s no difference between mind and brain why do yall have to such dualists ya
@davidkulesh285510 ай бұрын
If you agree with Deepok, to be clear: There is indeed a partial subjectivity independent of the brain and objective reality, seen in phenomena like emotional proccessing- however to say "mind" while implying that this linguistic framing is evidence that the mind can exist distinct from the brain and produce a totally subjective state is childish from a scientific and psychological reality. It directly opposes our current conventional scientific model of consciousness. Questioning the cause of effect model of reality, as psychic matter would need to dictate the expression of more dense matter. Thats not how reality has worked ever)
@wthomas569710 ай бұрын
Chopra is an idiot.
@generalsleepy385910 ай бұрын
Does Roger last the longest of anyone from getting bitten to turning in the "of the dead" movies? Because, that son of a gun hung in there, bless him.
@bobatlee35310 ай бұрын
The way his character was written, I thought he would have made it to the end but he dies in the film first and the buildup to it is fantastic and you really hate that he had to go.
@bahauddin043811 ай бұрын
Deepak sir 🤲 assalamualaikum 🙏namasthe
@JonasAnandaKristiansson11 ай бұрын
Sam is another pseudointellectual who is biased and pretending to be "conscious" :D
@enricestevemir796511 ай бұрын
The drum machine (possibly a Korg Mini Pops) in this song with a Bossa Nova pattern makes this OMD song very interesting and a mix of brazilian bossa and dark synth pop !
@shadrach629911 ай бұрын
So funny
@james1098778910 Жыл бұрын
Good lord that is a word salad.
@damaged2810 Жыл бұрын
The joke was actually funny
@BigMike-du9vx Жыл бұрын
You are not funny pretty boring
@janinemangubat6699 Жыл бұрын
im glad an audiece shouted when you roast Britney that you are ugly Sarah which you truly are... 😂😂😂 now Paris and Britney still have millions of followers..😂😂
@ShoestringRacer Жыл бұрын
Deepak is so desperate to be taken seriously by those that know so much more than him
@cityfreshfoodmart4312 Жыл бұрын
Do deep meditation and you will know it.Sam Harris never did. He likes beer. Ha ha ha
@brettgreenwood3658 Жыл бұрын
Deepak sounds like king Julien from Madagascar in both timbre and reasoning
@RoseCatMariner Жыл бұрын
Great diversion from the joke that referred to actual children as mistakes and had their mother sobbing offscreen. Clever girl.
@HeatherGardiner-zv4cz Жыл бұрын
WOO Woo 😮😮!!!!!!!😂😂😊😅
@aprikasoul Жыл бұрын
The white guy is still not buying it from the Indian guy even after all those negotiations...
@joenathan6478 Жыл бұрын
Can people please get a sense a humor. The joke is still hilarious and people are so damn sensitive. What a shame…
@veronikadolinska7390 Жыл бұрын
This creature is so fcking fake. She recently apologized to Paris for this ,,joke’‘ but I’m sure she never regretted it, she did it because Paris has so much power and space in the media nowadays and her fans hated her for the speech. She would never apologize.
@rafie281 Жыл бұрын
Tbh, the joke was funny. Yeah it was "rude" but it was a good one and in all honesty, I don't think Sarah said it with a negative intention. She's a comedian, she HAS to make joke and It's comedy, everyone and everything is not safe. And the fact that she went with it and said it, I applaud her for it. What's next? Y'all want to go on stage and slap her? Oh wait...
@greyeyed123 Жыл бұрын
Well, SOMEONE'S brain is not involved. lol
@Archeidos-Arcana Жыл бұрын
The issue is, there almost certainly is something "deeper" to the world that what we can typically perceive. Evolution by natural selection equipped us with only what was immediately pertinent to our survival: our ability to cognate within space and time, and our sensory organs which are inseparable from that. Sam at the end of the video: "Metaphysical statements also have to be justified." This statement, while not necessarily wrong- is missing some key nuance. From Kantian philosophy, we can understand that our phenomenal world of experience (via our senses), very well may be only a slice of a much broader noumenal existence (independent of our senses, also known as the 'thing-in-itself'). Sam and materialists/physicalists like him demand evidence for such claims of 'encountering the noumenal', as they see little reason to believe in such things. While I can sympathize with that view (I used to hold it in exclusivity), I think it's fundamentally flawed, both in terms of sociological side effects of such 'denial of spirit', and in terms of *empiricism*. Science does not float above a vacuum devoid of philosophy. Modern institutional science (as distinguished from the scientific method) makes a ontological claim. It has made this claim since it's advent in the 19th century... namely: it holds *matter* as fundamental rather than *consciousness*. This claim is not above criticism... Indeed, modern science (in physics) is hitting some very interesting walls which are making many re-think the entire 'culturally dominant' perspective of what reality is. Modern science is predicated on a very flawed starting point, because the only thing which we really know can be said to exist is our consciousness. It's the most empirical foundation. Consciousness exists; matter is theoretical. We likely do not perceive everything which *actually* exists, and there is a powerful argument (rooted in evidence, even) that we actually evolved a rare but important 'sixth sense', which allows us to tap into a greater aspect of our reality. Such a cognitive ability, would likely not be necessary to be rooted in a common level of sensory experience (which we all share)-- but evolution would deem it less important to immediate survival, and integrate it within 'closer' to our subjective experience. Personally, I believe we are currently undergoing a new Copernican revolution, and there is no shortage of evidence for it in the phenomenal world. There is even reproducible, empirical evidence for it... yet science under materialism can't make sense of it. The issue is not with the evidence, it's with the ontological assumptions of modern science. If anyone is interested, I recommend Dr. Bernardo Kastrup's work. He has a number of videos presenting a new "Analytic Idealism" in concise terms here on KZbin.
@mystic1der209 Жыл бұрын
Deepak is right but he’s terrible at explaining it