Пікірлер
@remcool1258
@remcool1258 50 минут бұрын
I was wondering where can you get a good bidirectional amplifier?
@remcool1258
@remcool1258 50 минут бұрын
Can't wait to see that.
@joshuazukerman6616
@joshuazukerman6616 4 сағат бұрын
For test purposes only in the US. >.>
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Сағат бұрын
Thanks for a disclaimer haha
@Mstats-r2d
@Mstats-r2d Күн бұрын
Wait is this cable modem tutorial?
@AgentOffice
@AgentOffice 3 күн бұрын
Wow
@alertsemail7057
@alertsemail7057 5 күн бұрын
The antenna's those come with are not too good. Go look for for ones that are meant for LoRA or Mesh and you can find antennas that have been tested to get the best performance in the 900mhz range. I've even slapped on 4g LTE antennas and they do much better.
@Mendozaop
@Mendozaop 12 күн бұрын
was hitting duds till I stumbled upon this video. Beyond awesome work. ! Channels like this need more subs
@LANRanger
@LANRanger 12 күн бұрын
@@Mendozaop that means a ton to me thank you. Blessed to be able to do this content for sure!
@Mstats-r2d
@Mstats-r2d 13 күн бұрын
No tutorial?
@LANRanger
@LANRanger 13 күн бұрын
@@Mstats-r2d i slowly push content. So. Eventually. Yes.
@Mstats-r2d
@Mstats-r2d 13 күн бұрын
@LANRanger please quick asap i want to watch tutorial.lol
@Mstats-r2d
@Mstats-r2d 13 күн бұрын
Camt wait!
@ha1fdan
@ha1fdan 13 күн бұрын
can you link to the products featured in the video?
@LANRanger
@LANRanger 13 күн бұрын
Absolutely! WiFi HaLow, Wireless Bridge... www.amazon.com/dp/B0CDZF7DVH?ref=ppx_pop_mob_ap_share
@internet155
@internet155 15 күн бұрын
cool stuff man, i used to mess around in my car with old b/g wifi gear and homemade antennas
@LANRanger
@LANRanger 15 күн бұрын
I just now bought an amplifier for these. 1us switching from Rx/Tx so I am interested to see the range increase soon.
@TenForceFalls
@TenForceFalls 16 күн бұрын
Was about to go to sleep but i just needed to watch this!
@LANRanger
@LANRanger 15 күн бұрын
Man this means so much to me ! Thank you.
@nom9505
@nom9505 16 күн бұрын
Great video! Also 1:23
@LANRanger
@LANRanger 15 күн бұрын
That’s Noodle!
@Yoturu_mc
@Yoturu_mc 29 күн бұрын
I dont know what I am doing here i dont understand much
@ZippyDooDa435
@ZippyDooDa435 Ай бұрын
It’s so refreshing to see something other than a stack of Unifi gear. I’d love one of those EX4100s at home.
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
Not downplaying Unifi gear, but I have personally used and troubleshot networks that use Unifi, I'm not a fan at all... The gateway max has the worst possible logging and overall practically useless for proper site to site IPSec configs. I just... meh.. They make wonderful hardware for SMB, but that really is all. Apple of the networking world haha.
@bahumatneo
@bahumatneo Ай бұрын
IpDaily
@veganovus
@veganovus Ай бұрын
Security by obscurity lol
@skaramicke
@skaramicke Ай бұрын
So what I’m hearing is that people will perceive it as safe to leave their IPv6 stuff open to the internet without any security and when the bot coders finally move on to IPv6 all kinds of shit will hit all kinds of fans and 80 year old senators will blame IPv6 in hearings.
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
@@skaramicke haha. Not necessarily, carelessness will be the same problem with v6 as it is v4. Nothing is safe, really.
@foobarturkey
@foobarturkey Ай бұрын
Why so much ICMP?
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
Neighbor discovery, PMTUD, other things. Normal behavior.
@jon9103
@jon9103 Ай бұрын
Be careful, this works as long as you maintain radio silence but once you start transmitting it's only a matter of time before your address gets sniffed.
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
Oh for sure! This is a proof of concept and merely a test. I can go grab another /48 and break down /64s anytime to add obscurity.
@aidvokbr5943
@aidvokbr5943 Ай бұрын
I am just a random brazilian arch linux user, i think its safe to let my router firewall disabled right? I am behind cgnet so the only ip open to the internet is my pc ipv6.
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
@@aidvokbr5943 By default, most consumer routers do not allow inbound traffic from the internet on IPv6 unless specific firewall rules or ACLs are configured. However, since IPv6 does not use NAT like IPv4, devices with a GUA IPv6 address are potentially reachable from the internet unless the router blocks such inbound traffic. Therefore, while traffic isn’t explicitly “allowed” by default, it is more exposed on IPv6 compared to IPv4. Though, I can’t tell if this is a rhetorical question or not. Also, CGNAT plays in your favor for this scenario. Edit: added a few more because iOS comment replies are tough so sorry!
@aidvokbr5943
@aidvokbr5943 Ай бұрын
@LANRanger Thanks for the info mate, i basically just sometimes need to ssh into my computer from outside my home network and i disabled the router firewall to do that, since i am behind a cgnet i can only ssh into it using ipv6, also thinking about making a minecraft server for me and my friends and i will be using ipv6 for that since its my only option, the router firewall blocks ssh when i tested it from outside my network, dont know what more it blocks.
@JohnSmith-yz7uh
@JohnSmith-yz7uh Ай бұрын
Do you use any IPv6 sub domains shared with IPv4 domains? Scanning DNS for IPv6 adresses seems much more efficant than brutforce IPv6 address spaces.
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
@@JohnSmith-yz7uh no, that’s actually mentioned in the video as text on a few of the frames. This was purposely left opened with no records anywhere.
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
@@JohnSmith-yz7uh but yes, it is more efficient that way I agree. Wait till you get a certificate for your web server though, that’s when all of the scans start haha
@subanu468
@subanu468 Ай бұрын
Thanks for the short! I learned something new about IPV6!
@mrhobbeys
@mrhobbeys Ай бұрын
Great video! With IPv6 having 2^128 addresses or 3.4*10^28, it’s much harder for bots to randomly find open ports compared to IPv4. They say security through obscurity is bad but I’m thinking it works… 34,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 I think I counted the zeros right 😂
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
I can’t count that high. Ha
@hermi1-kenobi455
@hermi1-kenobi455 Ай бұрын
I like your funny words, magic man.
@A-Litte-Catnoreplay
@A-Litte-Catnoreplay Ай бұрын
Does it depend on what kind of network like is says hosted by your isp ore Hosting comp
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
What do you mean? I may be misunderstanding so sorry
@A-Litte-Catnoreplay
@A-Litte-Catnoreplay Ай бұрын
@@LANRanger No, I mean to say, is this an IPv6 from an ISP, or is it from a hosting service? Because bots often target hosting IPs, hoping to access misconfigured or outdated servers, while home IPs are often attacked by bots that target IoT devices like cameras and outdated Wi-Fi routers
@85JamesTX
@85JamesTX Ай бұрын
​@@A-Litte-Catnoreplay I was going to ask about this too
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
@@A-Litte-Catnoreplaythis is a /48 prefix provided by Hurricane Electric. Their POP in Virginia. So it’s a tunnel broker and not by my ISP. Funnily enough, it’s still very unscanned or monitored on the sea of bots and other things.
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
@@A-Litte-Catnoreplayit doesn’t necessarily matter. There are so many v6 addresses that it wouldn’t really make sense to scan everything. With that being said, tunnel brokers usually get blacklisted by a lot of sites because of them being abused. Otherwise, no, inbound isn’t really an issue.
@Pipping-Hot
@Pipping-Hot Ай бұрын
I don't know how I got here or what is going on. Where's Matlock?
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
Ha
@huntersutton7270
@huntersutton7270 Ай бұрын
That’s pretty cool. It makes sense because the IPv6 address space is so much larger than the IPv4 space, so it is much harder to get a hit on something useful when randomly scanning IPv6 addresses.
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
This is 100% correct. :) unless you have a valid AAAA record and cert on your box.
@WiktorWorks
@WiktorWorks Ай бұрын
i just have dell optiplex mini 3060 with proxmox and raspberry pi 5b for docker 😅
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
I would love a raspberry pi man!
@protogen_1414
@protogen_1414 Ай бұрын
Holdon BGP peered over WAN?
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
@@protogen_1414 that depends, over the public internet? Yes. Encrypted? Yes. It’s using an IPSec tunnel with VTI. Tweaked timers.
@protogen_1414
@protogen_1414 Ай бұрын
@LANRanger interesting!
@3stadt
@3stadt Ай бұрын
You should take a look at DN42 :)
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
@@3stadtit’s awesome. I’m aware. :)
@riccardobassini9452
@riccardobassini9452 Ай бұрын
Having bgp peering with friends is such a flex lol
@jamess1787
@jamess1787 Ай бұрын
Gotta tell me if you bought the nsg exo after i recommended it. Would be the icing on the 2024 cake.
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
Yessss
@northernbrother1258
@northernbrother1258 Ай бұрын
Wait, am I supposed to have a home lab??? 😭
@0nly-cl1pzz
@0nly-cl1pzz Ай бұрын
You too smart! So cleannnnnn though
@AffectionateLocomotive
@AffectionateLocomotive Ай бұрын
Your STACKED. damm.
@StellaRPollard
@StellaRPollard Ай бұрын
Great job, Lane!
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
Thank you! That is so kind of you. Happy to see you here.
@DannyBokma
@DannyBokma Ай бұрын
This is so nerdy, but man I love it!!!!
@ilinskyus
@ilinskyus Ай бұрын
Hey man let’s try to connect it to PyHss, wanna get rid of mongo and implement normal PCRF
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
I’m down!
@ilinskyus
@ilinskyus Ай бұрын
@@LANRanger i am in trouble. just got my B210 clone , connected it and getting [INFO] [B200] Asking for clock rate 23.040000 MHz... [INFO] [B200] Actually got clock rate 23.040000 MHz. ==== eNodeB started === Type <t> to view trace Setting frequency: DL=1845.0 Mhz, UL=1750.0 MHz for cc_idx=0 nof_prb=50 [INFO] [UHD RF] Tx while waiting for EOB, timed out... 5.2169 >= 3.59154. Starting new burst... at the end i have all tx rx leds off and no signal could be foubd on phone. srslte eNodeB. How did you configure yours?
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
@@ilinskyus I have a setup video posted on the channel. You have to use the custom binary for the FPGA.
@ilinskyus
@ilinskyus Ай бұрын
@ do I need any clock or gps antena ?
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
@ nope.
@ilinskyus
@ilinskyus Ай бұрын
Thanks for your research! Will this setup work on B210 Chinese clone ?
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
@@ilinskyus that is the device I’m using.
@ilinskyus
@ilinskyus Ай бұрын
@ awesome ! I’m waiting for mine from china . What max distance could you achieve with decent antenas ?
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
@@ilinskyus about 5 feet from the SDR
@ilinskyus
@ilinskyus Ай бұрын
@ that’s short . I had similar experience with bladeRf + raspberry setup when I was running my 2g setup years ago
@ayylien
@ayylien Ай бұрын
I lived on a street where there was fiber on one side and cable on the other. To think I could set up my own Docsis cable ISP selling better cheaper cable internet to a neighbor.
@kevinbradt835
@kevinbradt835 Ай бұрын
Where did you get the Cmts
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
eBay! I put the eBay listing in the video. It shows you the item number. These things are more expensive now after this video for some reason (the NSG)
@NicolasCageIsActuallyARobot
@NicolasCageIsActuallyARobot Ай бұрын
IP address ending in .69. Nice.
@redashrajal
@redashrajal Ай бұрын
I took it down, I’m sorry.
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
@@redashrajal hey! No worries man. I was really confused about this haha
@redashrajal
@redashrajal Ай бұрын
@@LANRanger Well I did wind up watching the whole video. For you Making your own DOCSIS lab, big props. Also just got added another sub. 😀
@burnz163
@burnz163 Ай бұрын
In an ISP setting, this device would be in the head end. Usually located at your local cable company. There are forward and return lasers that trunk it to the neighborhood where you would use an optical node. We used moto sg4000 but there are several. The node can be split into 6 (i believe) with their own rx/tx fibers you dont really want more than 2-300 modems on one set of fibers, but we had 500 in some before g-pon.
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
@@burnz163 that’s interesting. From the white papers from NSG these are supposed to be further south. Thanks for sharing. Edit: by these, I mean this particular CMTS is apparently designed to be last mile fiber and not at a hub
@burnz163
@burnz163 Ай бұрын
@LANRanger I guess theoretically you could, but you would want it close to your modulators and combination network. We used the harmonic NSG qam modulators to put the channels in. But there are some areas where things are being inserted with a backwards two-way splitter up to a backwards 16 way. The old school setup was crazy where there was a satellite receiver or antenna for each channel and a separate modulator that all got combined tweaked and balanced and shipped out
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
@@burnz163 man that’s awesome. I love this stuff thank you. I have some very fun things planned for this CMTS and it includes an RF amplifier.. we will see how it goes.
@burnz163
@burnz163 Ай бұрын
@@LANRanger I'm not good at programming but I have fun in the industry. With the experiment you just did. You have the ability to find some apartment building that doesn't like their current service. Order a pipe from hurricane or cogent set this thing up in the utility room and you could pull their lines off and hook them to your system. And now you're an ISP. I thought about building rural pon so many times. But the bigger guys are taking grants and eventually getting it done
@smnkp-t8i
@smnkp-t8i Ай бұрын
DOCSIS 3.1 getting me 1 GBit/s download in Germany
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
@@smnkp-t8i that’s awesome.
@BeardedTaz-Official
@BeardedTaz-Official Ай бұрын
Brother, the pink ethernet cable... The bend / stretch in it... Giving me some anxiety... Also, I would LOVE to get 100 Mbps on upload. My MAXIMUM so far on Crapcast here is 20 Mbps. And I pay $120 for 800 Mbps down / 25 Mbps up. Supposedly Comcast (Xfinity) is doing upgrades, but completely skipped my little stretch because our infrastructure is so old where I live. Can't get ATT Fiber, Can't even get ATT Cable, I get ATT 10 Mbps DSL. Otherwise, it's Starlink at over $120 for a lot less on speeds or I get another satellite or LTE provider.... Ugh. Heeeeeeeeeeeelp! lol
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
That Ethernet cable is bent to make it go faster. Hahaha. Only playing, I do remember DSL and honestly love how terrible it was compared to everything around us. Starlink is on sale right now though so you may wanna check in your area.
@nicholas8045
@nicholas8045 Ай бұрын
This video will definitely blow up. I've worked for a major MSO since 2009 & it's interesting to see that your home setup (performance wise), particularly with your US MBPS numbers, blows current subscription plans (on coax[currently not symmetrical]) out the water. Interesting video bro.
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
@@nicholas8045 thank you! I hope so I enjoy making this type of content. Also be aware I have absolutely no SNR or loss here. It’s a really clean signal on the tuner. Do you have any modem recommendations for me to really max this speed out here?
@steampog
@steampog Ай бұрын
The upstream is due to no rate limiting in place because he only has 1 customer 🤣
@steampog
@steampog Ай бұрын
@@LANRanger Try an Arris TM8xx series eMTA as well, see if you can integrate voice as well to the onboard voip hardware. That would be cool. Really any eMTA but I find this used to be one of the most common besides Surfboards
@jfbeam
@jfbeam Ай бұрын
Well if your MSO had only a single customer, you could sell them an uncapped service. When you have to share that ~120Mbps upstream spectrum with a hundred or so others, letting a single user have all of it is a Very. Bad. Idea.
@jfbeam
@jfbeam Ай бұрын
@@LANRanger Any 32x8 modem... SB6183 or 6190 (yes, puma6), or any cheap DOCSIS 3.1 modem (they have to support 32x8) If it supports mid-split, change the upstream range to 85MHz and get those extra channels.
@zaneslacker8522
@zaneslacker8522 2 ай бұрын
I work for one of the large cable companies as a lineman, and let me tell you, it is blissful seeing docsis work so well.... If you really want some fun, find yourself a viavi one expert meter. I'll give you some other useful info: When it comes to signal levels at CPE, you want an RX between +12 dBmv and -10 dBmv along with a TX between 30 dBmv and 45 dBmv. As you experienced, too high a RX will literally burn out a cable modem. What you didn't see (due to this being a lab environment), was what having too low a tx does; A low tx causes the cable modem to fall below or talk at the noise floor. This prevents you from getting usable upload speeds. Adding the pads you did was a wise move, you not only brought the RX down to a safe level, but forced your modem to talk louder, bringing it above the floor. I would love to write a book on every little bit of docsis knowledge I have, but its easier to answer questions as they come in, by which i mean, please feel free to ask me any questions you might have. I am happy to teach, docsis is a highly complicated standard, and cable systems in general make it even worse (ie, ingress)
@Nate-hf8hm
@Nate-hf8hm 2 ай бұрын
Honestly super intresting, Thanks for posting this!
@LANRanger
@LANRanger Ай бұрын
Thanks
@Jenstyler1
@Jenstyler1 2 ай бұрын
Theres a screen recorder built into mac cmd+shift+5
@LANRanger
@LANRanger 2 ай бұрын
Oh that's awesome! I use Kap on Mac I just didn't have it on for this one. Thank you.
@TenForceFalls
@TenForceFalls 2 ай бұрын
Sounds like you should work for them
@TenForceFalls
@TenForceFalls 2 ай бұрын
Also makes me want to try this