Function? Context?

Sounds a bit like the Sapir Whorf hypothesis?

❤❤❤

Don't matter what All linguistics people have to talk about... professor Noam Chomsky...he is the modern father of linguistics....to day....👍😀

❤❤❤

❤❤❤

❤❤❤

To swim in the deep end, youtube search "Terrence Deacon" "moving naturalism forward" For more on properties of mind and agency emerging from matter at different scales, look for "michael levin" "bioelectricity"

Great video

THE SCIENTIST

THE SECRET

DEFINIÇÃO DE SUCESSO PENSAR COMO UM BILIONÁRIO PENSO E ACONTECE Bob Proctor

We need Bigger Physics, do you mean Metaphysics?

I remember Miss Prentice when she was a child actress on the PBS series POWERHOUSE in 1982. It's so good to see that Jess has now matured into a fine outstanding citizen!

Ah my philosophy degree was all about Searle, Russell, Wittgenstein Frege etc. Read the books but great to see the writer in person. Only real reason i keep KZbin

Francis Crick was a liar. He didn't invent anything. He stole Rosalind Franklin's work and took credit for it. He and Watson were both weasels.

It's amazing how a perfectly reasonable perspective takes the world so long to accept. Even a lot of the people who are familiar with psychedelics tend to exaggerate and misinform. We've got to get rid of all the urban myths and BS associated with the subject.

On that question about redshift, I'm interested to hear what Glenn has to say about the JW telescope images.

Just great to take part of this 🙏

I've done the heroic dose when I was younger. at the time I had a absess tooth looked like a marble under my upper lip and throbing pain about 30 minutes the pain was gone and within 24 hours the swelling was completely gone and never came back .had that tooth pulled 10 years later

Very good conversation with professor John Searle. The intreviewer is also very nice person who rises very good questions. Thank you very much for both of you and also to our ability to exchange our thoughts about the philosophy of language

لا نعرف بالضبط كيف أن الدماغ البشري، ينتج الوعي؟ بعبارة أخرى كيف ان الوعي، هو نتاج عمل او مسلسل عمليات تحدث في الدماغ البشري؟ ما علاقة الدماغ بالوعي؟ كيف يمكن تجاوز ثناءية الروح و الجسد؟... من بين الاسءلة الأخرى التي ذكرها الأستاذ القدير جون سيرل، تلك المتعلقة بوجود عدد محدود من المفردات و القواعد اللغوية، بينما عدد الجمل التي يمكن تركيبها هو لا نهائي!

💋💋💋🫶🧬🌠👌🎶🩷🌟🤘🪽☀️🌎💐🤍🌳✌️🇦🇷🐧🫧🙂👁🍄

I took the terrence mckenna route, Shit was insane, Not recommended for the light hearted.

Lived with PTSD for years and it almost killed me with the nightmares, sweatings and the constant light sensitivity and god knows what elese it did to me. that fucking shit killed me. i am not the same man because of it. If this sort of therapy can even help one person - I am 115% supporting it! Because what I went through was hell - nothing short of it. (I did not talk to anyone for 4.5 years!!)

I like this interview, but I have to respectfully disagree, if you really wanna unveil this this thing, my recommendation is to go beyond the 5g and on to 10g and beyond. The super high dose isnt for everyone, but there are groups of ppl out here doing it and once you go that deep you truly get to experience who you are.

and watch she has a nasty tongue too LOLOLOLOLOL

LOLOLOLOLOLOL I retweeted this, I must have watched portions of this video and skipped the intro or my mind was vacant, I have just watch it again and I have exploded in laugh. Yes, it has that 70's vibe, the leg movement while seating, the conservative clothing. The rest is just an explosion of laughters. It's an actual pleasure of distraction to watch, its just a laugh after another one. She even thanks him when hi says "beautiful pottery" , she is so japanese she does not correct him and very precise when she says "complex society" with the hands. Great entertainment. I do remember playing this in the background and she caught my attention when she spoke the agricultural remnants which were of no use, so why were they being cultivated, I thought at first while watching this and the pottery vessels used for fetching water, now that is a very, very complex 'hunter, gatherer" LOLOLOLOL. Ah thank you! That pottery is very artistic! lololololol. Sigma range in carbon dating the two overlaps lololololol. Sedentary lives with parasite eggs in the cities, and they were potteries made earlier. Very Hypnotic

I bet Searle's dog is smarter than most..

🔝👆Look up that handle They've got all kinds of Shrooms and other authentic psychedelic products at affordable prices. Ships swiftly and are reliable.

Chomsky doesn't neglect the fact that sentences are used to perform speech act, even Habermas agrees

Hasn't this guy heard of "observer effect" in quantum mechanics? He's a philosopher yet having very dogmatic scientism based views.

The moment he compared brain function and consciousness to stomach and digestion, I know he's just gas bag trying to sound smart aka pseudo-intellectualism garbage of attempting to quantify qualitative property of the Universe.

he is totally right.listen to this before dropin` in

Awesome

I didn't understand shit. Very cool tho!

No ice cream at all is best for the cow. Non dairy and vegan is the way to go. Great interview.

Not that radical or new, but valid.

"Those who don't make no effort to retain their own rights, historically don't keep them too long." We shouldn't wait until the governments will allow us to live as we want!

I take mushroom 🍄 I go boom boom 💥

How am I just running into person like him now…. I needed him like 15 years ago. This man understands the world. Respect 🙏🤘

True there have been crimes of indigenous cultures. Some north American Indians did torture and sacrifice.

The brilliance of this system is that it explicitly draws on ancient Greek wisdom and then develops it in modern scientific terms. The mechanism of Limit vs. Limitless as organising principles is first found in the Pythagoreans and then Plato (in some way also in Heraclitus, whom Deacon mentions, as the Measure that organises the ever-flowing boundless potential of the universe). The core idea is that rational order, life, and the self arise from these two interacting principles. The downside of Deacon's theory is that it assumes the notion of "self" in general (self-organising structures) to explain the emergence of the conscious "Self". I don't think this works as well as he thinks it does. On the one hand, it begs the question because it introduces an unexplained notion of selfhood in order to explain conscious selfhood - it just assumes that something like the Self as we experience it exists, without further explanation. On the other hand, it assumes the notion of conscious representation, which is what pertains inherently to conscious experience and self-consciousness (representing one's self to one's self), but it does not explain how this self-representing could emerge from stuff that does no representing. Simply put, I think that Deacon does an amazing job at explaining how the Self is compatible with the mechanic world (they work based on the same principles), but he does not quite reach the demonstration that one emerges from the other. He has demonstrated compatibility, not emergence.

what year was this interview?

Determinate Negation?

Reminds me of Levi-Strauss structuralism

Looks like this interview was shot in the late 70s... instead....

The Correct thing is Langusgeof Philosophy. Philosophy has come from language. This mistake is because the people neither know what is Langusge and what is Philosophy. The Guru of Both is the same Prajapati'Paramesti. One must first distinguish literature and then Philosophy.

Thanks for the interview