Thanks!

Thanks!

Glad you enjoyed!

That’s due to age and clay tax Come up with a better argument

@@Alexx22570 Not true. Even when Nadal, Djokovic, and Murray were young players they were already beating Federer (who was in his mid-20’s at this point) at a better rate than the older and more established stars of that era. Federer is an all time great who was lucky to not have another all time great in his prime to compete against him for most of the 2000’s.

@@hitthurdeaux it is very true actually, if you remove clay then the slam final H2H is actually 3 - 2 in favour of Roger in regard to Nadal. Also the reason why the new gen were beating Roger slightly more was because everyone from Roger’s gen were already washed due to injuries. You aren’t fooling anyone.

@@Alexx22570Rogers most frequent slam competition during his prime was Roddick. Tells u everything.

For the most part it's easy as most players had one clear prime. In the case of players like Agassi, Nadal, and Djokovic who had more than one I used Slams won to choose the years IF win % was within one percentage point, if it was higher I used win %

Calling agenda-botovic educational uno

Couldn’t agree more brother.

@@John-lr4hp well, temm me what wrong did he say? 😂

@@hristijandimitrovski8664 in that specific vid: 1. Elo is a relative metric , not an absolute one. 2. Ranking points: Flawed comparison, Federer had to win more matches for the same number of points + masters were not mandatory. 3. No mentioning of opposing facts when comparing the best seasons (Fed higher win percentage, more titles, more match wins, losing to fewer rivals). Hope that helps

@@John-lr4hp LMAO🤣🤣🤣🤣FEDERER DIDN'T HAVE BETTER MORE WINS THAN DJOKOVIC IN 2015😂😂😂😂 Elo Rating is totally valid metric because Elo Rating improves with winning and declines with loosing and of course. If you win against tougher opponents, your Elo rating increases much more. You can say everything you want, the facts are the facts. Djokovic in 2015 had much tougher competition than Federer in 2006, not only that he had twice more top 10 wins, BUT HE FACED FEDERER TWICE, WAWRINKA IN HIS PRIME TWICE, MURRAY TWICE AT GRAND SLAMS, than when he won his 6 masters titles, he defeated Nadal on clay, Federer, Wawrinka and Murray 4 times. On other hand Federer faced Nadal twice at grand slams and defeated him once and other toughest player that he faced was Roddick🤣🤣🤣🤣 eho is obviously weaker than both Murray and Wawrinka and not to mention that Djokovic faced both Federer and Nadal, not only Nadal😂😂. Also, not only that Federer won 2 less masters than Djokovic in 2006, but there wasn't any grand slam winner that he faced in semi-finals and finals while I already mentioned, Djokovic faced Federer, Nadal on clay, Wawrinka and Murray 4 times. Waay, waay tougher competition. And yeah, even Djokovic's 2nd best season is better than Federer's 2006.

Great question. Because I chose only one 4-year period per player, for Djokovic I was in between 13-16 and 20-23. 13-16 he won 7 slam and 90 win %, while 20-23 he won 8 slams but just 88 win % so he would've been right above Nadal (11-14: 6 slams/89 win %)

@@G4meSetM4tch That makes sense! Thank you for your reply and for your videos! ☺

Thanks! Agree, guys that can come up with big shots on crucial points are more exciting to watch than merely pushers

They sure have

I appreciate the support!

Thank you!

Thank you, I appreciate that!

Yes, I agree, it would be nice!

Agree. And 6 years is not a small time

The title highlights that Sinner dedicated his life to tennis very late, but at 22 years old is already n.1 in the world.

​@@dsavkay Alcaraz was practicing consistently at 7/8 years old......

Thanks, agreed!

Thanks, I hope so!🤞

Thanks!

The only fraud are people like you…shut up

i AGRE about the drugs, but he's not boring at all, the hitting is just sublime to watch

He is a doper. He shames the sport

😂😂😂 You all are so pathetic! You should really start a life outside, get some fresh air and stop writing bullshit thinking you have the right to judge anyone who is better than you! Real life is based on facts, not on opinions. The facts are that the ITIA certified that it was contamination, not doping, and that part of the ruling was not questioned by Wada. Now Wada is appealing to the CAS claiming he was guilty of negligence, because he trusted his physiotherapist and his athletic trainer. It's funny that you don't even know what a biological passport is: athletes with that classification are tested weekly! Maybe starting to read the rulings and doing some research before writing could help you solve your existential problems. It's never too late to start a new life.

Ignorance speaks here. His physiotherapist cut his finger and treated himself before giving massage to Sinner. That's why he got the unrelevant one billionth gram, which clearly leads to no improvement. But you blatant haters are here just to hate. The envy of the weak

Thanks, I appreciate that!

Thanks! More videos coming soon!

Glad you enjoyed it!

It's really hard to say if he will win another GS event. You've got 2023 but then JS / CAA have risen up. If it goes his way with the draws and upsets, that could be what he needs in 2025 to add another one. Who knows? Could get two. He's got 24 and a full career, but there are still some great match and ATP longevity stats to play for.

Also: the Novak commentary here and elsewhere reminds me of how casual Serena fans reacted anytime she lost to those kids 6-7 years ago: Naomi, Andreescu, etc The reputation of Serena preceded her, but those shocks Serena fans hadn’t actually watched her tennis earlier in the season, and were blindsided by her loses. Good enough to beat the field, but nothing for the eventually champion. Federer was there. Nadal was there. Sadly, Novak has reached there now. Food for thought, kids. At the least we can’t also lie to ourselves…

Because until 2017. Federer just couldn’t figure out how to beat Nadal

Working on it, thanks for the feedback!

He had one top 10 win in 2024, OLY Gold Medal Match Massive career achievement, but a career worst year as wins are concerned Fed and Rafa fans accepted the writing on the wall. Novak is the youngest of the Big3, but Jannik and Carlos are already here. And they aren’t kids any longer