Okay, it sounds like you thought you needed more support when starting with the Beast and then progressed to the Adrenaline. The Kayano is a little less supportive again than the Adrenaline, see our review of the Kayano here - kzbin.info/www/bejne/qaXJh6ubg7yLntk The Glycerin GTS is now very similar to the Adrenaline GTS 24 - or should I say the Adrenlane is similar to the Glycerin because the Adrenaline GTS24 now has the same DNA Loft v3, nitrogen-infused foam. The Glycerin is simply a little higher stacked. We have a review of the Glycerin here - kzbin.info/www/bejne/gnytYmqYqaulY9U this is the regular version, the GTS adds the GuideRail support system. We also have a review of more Brooks shoes here - kzbin.info/www/bejne/n4WVm5SArsiAe7c

yes, will be doing it soon.

@@FindMyFootwear Thank you🥰

Hi, the HOKA Mach X2 is the faster, more energetic shoe and responds the more you put in. It can accommodate longer runs and slower paces if you're ok with the more hugging race fit. The HOKA Mach 6 still has energy but it's probably a safer bet for longer distance cruising, overall stability and protection. However, I know new runners who've logged 2-hour half marathons very happily in the Mach X2.

@@FindMyFootwear thank you! I did my second run in the mach x 2 today and found it extremely comfortable. I did a 13k run and got 10k PB without going all out... I'm edging towards keeping these and rotating them with my superblast 2. Sound like a good idea?

Congrats on the 10km PB, that's ace and glad the Mach X 2 are working for you. Between those and the Superblast I'd say that rotation that should cover 99% of your runs.

Glad you enjoyed it!

This is something HOKA said they've addressed in the Speedgoat 6 with a foam that retains its resilience longer. However, in testing so far we've not yet hit the 300km mark so we can't vouch for that yet. No signs of worrying degradation so far though.

@ Thx for the response! Hopefully, they have fixed the issue. 300K for a trail shoe at that price point is really disappointing

Looks preety good after 20+ marathon training miles.

The Beast comes in 3 widths: medium (D) , wide (2E) and extra wide (4E) , so you should find the medium ok.

The Beast differs from the Adrenaline GTS by being a straighter last, broader base and slightly firmer cushioning. These things all contribute to make it more supportive and offer more control than the Adrenaline. These features also mean Beast is more suitable for heavier runners.

@@FindMyFootwear thank you, i have adrenaline and glycerin both gts but I have a friend asking about stability so it's nice to know especially as he's 6 ft 6 so a heavier guy

The Triumph 22 is the same PWRRUN foam as the previous model, it's just a slightly different geometry. Overall most runners won’t notice too much difference and if you liked the Triumph 20/21 you’ll like this update. The nearest comparisons would be things like the New Balance 1080 and Brooks Glycerin. The New Balance is a little softer, but not as responsive as the Triumph but the Glycerin has quite a similar feel in terms of the responsive ride. It comes down to personal opinion. We have videos of both of these here too - check them out.

It's a great all-round shoe. Not super cushiony, but ideal for the workouts you mentioned.

@@FindMyFootwear thanks for the reply! I will buy these sneakers then!

It does come in X-Wide sizes. But if you are looking for a wide toe box, best to go for a runing shoe from ALTRA.

Pretty much similar in the toe box for all the 3 shoes.

@@FindMyFootwear thanks a lot

Fit is true to size in length and width 👍