What do you mean "No"?

Which part were you complimenting? And, What's Promo SM?

Okay. He's a little too passive-aggressive for my taste. Always reacting.

Really?

I heard about that. It could be really good. But, unfortunately, I don't care about MCU Spiderman, anymore. I'm in a situation of: Fool me Once, Bite me. Fool me Twice, Y'all Busted. Try to Fool me a Third time, you're Officially THAT guy.

Let me get back to you on that.

@@cinemagraphic6324 it's not the way she's supposed to die but it's still a great scene

@@davidcarlton2513 I still have *mixed feelings* about it, not helped by the fact that it's instigated by the Double-One Dumbassery that is *Harry "Daddy never loved me" Osborn.*

Well, fair enough. What I meant was that I felt Andrew Garfield had more to work with than Tobey Maguire. My instincts tell me that Maguire does the best he can with what he's given. The problem is that it's not much. Maguire's Peter Parker is mostly *passive-reactive* at best and *homicidal* at worst, both as himself and as Spiderman. His primary motivation is that he wants Kirsten Dunst to be his girlfriend. *That's about it.* And, if you really think about it, Parker luck or not, it's very Superficial. And besides the fact that it's his last name, at no point in the trilogy does the subject of Peter Parker being a *Parker* ever come up in conversation, like "The Parker men are Responsible" or anything. That's because they weren't writing or directing him as a responsible person. Why is Peter's *Responsibility* as Spiderman important to *Peter?* We know superficially why it's important to the city, but why does matter to him? Why is it *AS* important to Peter as Kirsten Dunst seems to be? Does the guy even *care?* And, the Harry Osborn trilogy pretty much tells us that it doesn't matter whether Peter cares about it or not, because he's being dragged through the narrative, to the point where Spiderman himself is barely even a persona. It's just metahuman Peter Parker in a Spider-man costume. Spiderman isn't really there in the story, but we're repeatedly told in the first two movies that Peter has a Responsibility to *Spiderman,* a metaphysical persona that has no identity *of his own* *in the Raimi trilogy,* without bothering to tell us how Peter feels about it.

@@cinemagraphic6324 I agree but Tobey had more responsibilitys in hardships in he look like a nerd like delivering the pizza in the lady was like your late I was like that Spider-Man Andrew his jokes his aunt may i was like that Spider-Man tom Holland homecoming I was like where the nearest gun so I can shoot myself

@@cinemagraphic6324 like the new Spider-Man manga series Spider-Man freshman year that comic made front of homecoming that comic blew my mind of how Peter in mj came to know each other

I'm pretty sure "Nerd" isn't synonymous with reactive or homicidal. If I were Peter Parker, and I had metahuman powers given to me by a genetically modified super-spider, and for whatever reason I *decided* to fight crime, I'd pick a lane, and stay in it. The operative word being "decided."

Haven't seen any of the DLC content for that game yet. I haven't had time to keep up with it.

Well to just give you a quick summary of the part that was off putting in the DLC is the fact insomniac made the plot for the first one about Peter under the assumption that he “slept” with Black Cat in the past for she clams to have a son which Peter is wondering if it can be his own, the problem with this is that insomniac later confirmed on Twitter that nothing may have happened between the two that it’s just up for fan interpretation for fan service, so if that’s the case why waste a DLC on something so predictable, if you know Felicia you understand were this is going.

Hey, I'm not holding it against you. It's just the CW-isms. If Arrow had enough time to define and develop the Oliver and Laurel romance, it would be less questionable. The same could easily be said for all the Arrowverse shows.

The creators of the show also promised some time ago that the real Laurel will return to life before the show ends.

@@supermarshall2.053 Fair enough.

Don't take this the wrong way, but I didn't really understand her in Arrow. And, she makes even less sense in Legends. It often feels like Legends is trying to be funnier than it should be. *(SIDE NOTE: White Canary isn't an identity. It's still Sara Lance. You're not really fooling anyone.)* It's funny how Barry Allen gets cussed out for changing the Timeline, and yet whenever Sara Lance and the Scooby gang do something to mess around with the Timeline, nobody bothers to call them out on it, except for Rip Hunter and Ava Sharpe, and...that rarely goes anywhere. When Ray Palmer, a character who was introduced as part of a love triangle with Green Arrow and Discount Chloe Sullivan, has more common sense than the "White Canary", who was an assassin, you're doing something wrong. So, the answer is...the actor is Okay, but the character? Not so much. Also, I didn't mention this in the video, but for women who are supposed to be Black Canary, if you're in any way whatsoever familiar with Black Canary, it's a little strange that neither Laurel or Sara seem to have a natural metahuman Canary cry, particularly since it's one of the few defining traits associated with Black Canary.

@@cinemagraphic6324 The reason you don't understand Sara is because she's not a character, she's basically a clone of Oliver and Black Widow, a psycho assassin that doesn't care who she hurts and doesn't have real feelings. FFS her backstory's identical to Oliver's which means the writers/producers trying to desperately shove her into a watered-down, cheap Black Canary clone was never going to work. And Sara's not even a "good" assassin, if you get my meaning, she needs to use a stick to snap someone's neck, plus she's been killed off of BOTH SHOWS SEVERAL TIMES so that doesn't prove that she's good at anything very well. You're being nice about the actress, she's trash, she has NO EMOTIONS/her expressions never change. Laurel SHOULD'VE had the sonic scream but the writers don't know how to tell a story and by the 2nd season it started to transition to Guggenheim who hated Laurel's character so that wasn't going to happen under his watch. Thank Christ for the Flash and Earth-2 Laurel. :)

@@radicalreactions1633 Well, I had certainly come around on Earth-2 Laurel. She be killin' it.

What do you mean "willingly?"

@@cinemagraphic6324 Watch the beginning of The Amazing Spider-Man 2 when Spider-Man comes in, Spider-Man instead of stopping the Rhino just tells jokes and as soon as he's done he swings away to save one guy Max Dillion and let's the Rhino run over a bunch of cars, with people in them!

@@robertsavageau112 Well...when you say it like that... First of all, if I remember correctly, that taxi was about to hit Max Dillon. Details can often be distracting. THAT'S why they're important. Next, Spiderman can't always account for car crashes - see Marvel's Spiderman PS4! In TASM2, he didn't really have any control over where those cars were going! I'm more surprised that people drive on that road at all, with the amount of car chases that ensue, or MIGHT ensue in that New York! Then again, a simple walk in the park alone is probably asking for trouble! As for telling jokes, isn't Spiderman supposed to be jokey and funny as a defense mechanism?! I think he was just having a little fun. Levity is theoretically supposed to relieve tension. Just sayin'.

@@robertsavageau112 Also, outside of that opening scene, and the scene in Time Square, where the Spider sense kicks in, part of me tries to forget that Amazing Spiderman ever had a sequel.

Well, I don't want to promise anything! I'm still trying to work out how I feel about Infinity War as a whole! Suffice it to say, I was with Avengers Infinity War, up until that busted ass ending! You might not get a full review until I hear something positive about the Avengers 4. On top of that, there are other videos I'm still writing scripts for! But, thank you for asking!

Well, to your point, Spectacular Spider-Man handled the high-school aspect of Peter Parker in a slightly more believable way. Because, it knew when to focus on the Peter Parker side, and when to focus on the Spiderman side. In Homecoming, there's so much emphasis on Peter's high school years that the Spiderman side feels arbitrary, not helped by the fact that Spider-man doesn't feel enough like a different character, aside from Peter. Or, Imagine that you've never heard of Spiderman before this movie. Would you ever guess that a movie called Spiderman was just an hour and a half of Peter Parker at high school, making promises he can't keep? And, I realize that the first Raimi Spiderman was 45 minutes of set-up, and so was The Amazing Spiderman! But, the difference between Amazing Spiderman and both THIS movie and the first Raimi film is that ASM tried to tell a story within the setup; the operative term being "tried!" And, perhaps I should clarify: when I said, "Does anyone care about Peter's high school years, I meant "Does anyone care about Peter's high school years, when it tells us absolutely nothing about him, or doesn't tell us anything new!" My issue was with Peter's school time feeling like mean-spirited padding, not with the fact that he's IN high-school! A little bit of that is fine, but it shouldn't be the ENTIRE movie! The movie IS called Spiderman, after all!

Alright you made your point, lol.

Well, I liked the beginning of Spectre, but the rest of the movie kind of drags in places, and there are parts of the story that feel forced, particularly with Bl===ld and Madeleine Swann! I chose not to see the Ghostbusters remake. The problem with the Ghostbusters remake isn't that it's an All-girl cast (I can't really say that I'm THAT offended by the All-girl Ghostbusters. I barely remember the Original Ghostbusters aside from Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, and Ernie Hudson. Though I couldn't tell you their names). It's that the movie was trying to be just a comedy (while trying to be a remake of something that already existed), and it wasn't particularly funny. If you found it funny, that's fine. I saw the trailers for it, and was immediately put off by it!

Well being an SNL fan me and my mom loved it, it's your opinion. Also I just really love James Bond as much as SpiderMan.

@@supermarshall2.053 Well, fair enough! SNL is kinda hit-and-miss for me! There are some skits I found funny, others...not so much!

If by "risk," you mean telling a Spider-man story that's about Peter AS Spiderman, and not Peter Parker the movie, and that involves Spiderman bringing down a big A-list bad guy (and No, the Goblin barely counts) that has a life-threatening plan, I'd certainly agree with you!

No what I mean is they are afraid to take the risk of having to take the situation seriously, which is controversial to some of Marvel recent flicks.

I was introduced to Geekvolution in 2011, during a weird year! - Smallville had wrapped up. -I started watching Cinema Simpleton (because even Hollywood can't fool an idiot), which led me to the Nostalgia Critic, which led me to Geekvolution! Just to clarify, I've only seen the movie once, and haven't gone back to it since. But, everytime I've thought about it, I noticed more things about the movie that didn't make sense! I've since done an addendum review of this movie!