I am surprised such monumental work has no likes??? lol I don't know, for me coming across the Threshold Concepts Framework was transformative in how I think about my work as an Instructional Designer. I have tutored some of my peers during my undergraduate years and saw how gateways of understanding can just open up through conversational engagement.
@СтаниславСтоименов-ы6х3 жыл бұрын
These French intellectuals are such an awful CRINGE... 🤕
@nathanli30243 жыл бұрын
Economics can benefit more from philosophy than data since the action of humans and their behavior have been studied by philosophers for millennia while data and the method of collection in such a complex place like the society is always flawed. The last people who thought science and data is the right and the only approach to the economic solution are the Marxists and their collective farms.
@astrolonim20323 жыл бұрын
ok idiot. maybe think before you post next time lol, philosophy is a hell of a lot less based on fact than data collection is, and no philosopher now thinks that the ones more than a few hundred years ago had anything right at all, so the longevity of the field seems irrelevant. These guys also certainly don't say this is the only way to approach economics, they stress that economic theory is a valuable framework for understanding data.
@katrinetroelsen3 жыл бұрын
I dont know if Heckman intended for it, but his policies is now being used for technocrats to destroy kindergardens etc - they are turning kids into "capital". Its gross. In Denmark our politicians have used Heckman as the base for their ideas and one of those ideas is to forcibly adopt newborns away from the parents bc if the data tells them the parents will "squander" the childs "value", its best that the state steal that child. Thats what technocrat ideas like Heckmans does. It makes politicians think of humans as data.
@edredwhittingham44174 жыл бұрын
What a wonderful and humble man!
@joni62564 жыл бұрын
Thank you. These videos helped me a lot on my course
@thisisleonwalter32054 жыл бұрын
Really Great book Alvin....Thank you for the insights
@80085ftw4 жыл бұрын
Very interesting, thank you
@evanviala94385 жыл бұрын
A l’aide
@mutatio98346 жыл бұрын
Nice accent !
@Atanu7 жыл бұрын
This is subtle nonsense. Not outright nonsense but subtle nonsense. Which makes it very dangerous.
@thegladreport5 жыл бұрын
Explain...
@viccctv91063 жыл бұрын
I agree 100% your comment is outright nonsense. Cheers
@lasseskoulindstad80479 жыл бұрын
I don't understand why this isn't already an integrated part of economics.
@Atanu7 жыл бұрын
The idea that economics needs data is fundamentally flawed. Data is needed for the hard sciences to validate its theories. Economics is the study of human action -- and since we are all humans, we have immediate and unmediated access to the subject matter of economics (humans) and therefore the theories do not need data to validate them.
@vantage49126 жыл бұрын
Information about human interaction is not generally intuitive. If it were, social sciences wouldn't exist.
@kizombeiro81305 жыл бұрын
@@vantage4912 It is. Its just too often ignored.
@aaj14154 жыл бұрын
@@Atanu "we have immediate and unmediated access to the subject matter of economics (humans) and therefore the theories do not need data to validate them." and you dare to call what is in the video nonsense :)
@RJVeld4 жыл бұрын
@@aaj1415 Fortunately what he is saying is outright nonsense, so it is not very dangerous :)