Glad you like them!

We have no say in the organisation of tournament's or referee's instructions or decisions. If we are told there is a Walking Football Tournament and the rules are 3 runs and it's a penalty to the opposition, and that rule is clearly adhered to as there was many fouls given and penalties awarded on the day, sometimes at the cost of losing the match or at least dropping points. Then that is clearly a Walking Football Tournament. If a player chooses to run and risk a foul or even a penalty then that's his or her choice. There will be times when a player runs and the referee doesn't see it or chooses not to give a foul for reasons usually only known to him but it doesn't change the rules or require a change of name. The referees have a lot more to think about than referees of regular football because they have added rules such as 3 touches, head height, no heading, players not allowed in the box, keepers not allowed out of the box etc etc

Yes of course Adam but leaving that until last. One game at a time. I just hope the file doesn't get corrupted in the meantime. 😏

@@talkingwalkingfootball The Refereeing was poor .Running all the Time !!

@@talkingwalkingfootball 🤪

Hard to beat GK of that calibre unless you practice taking penalties especially with these goals

According to Walking Football Scotland rules “ if any of the following occur prior to the ball being kicked; feign/fake/shimmy/pause/jump the kick will be void there is no reference to your heel slightly raised for some reason referee’s are ruling this as an infringement of the penalty rule.

I agree, it is difficult for a right footed player to kick it to the right so the natural movement means the ball will go to the left although not necessarily to the bottom left. One of those penalties went to the top left.