NotebookLM ass podcast

Yeah we know no privacy. DA

I think these companies are trying to prove a point in how weak the healthcare and security in America really is. What’s the disadvantage for one more company finding our stuff? They sell it, just like every company in America does? Laughable. Even if it’s personal information, you’re already out there for all to see. Maybe it’s better to just fake identity. You’ll get a bounce back when they try to get stuff from you. ❤ Keep up the good work boys.

This is AI-generated, right?

Bro get your tooth fixed

Just a suggestion. Please don't be a new-age lazy content creator. You could have edited that stop sign. Little details are important. Seeing an AI image shows you put less effort in than you can.

Oozes evil.

I told it that quack means yes and Bock means no And then I asked him if Earth was simulation and he said "Quack" after that i asked him what quack means and he said "Quack means yes."

www.compliancehub.wiki/navigating-the-potential-pitfalls-of-ai-a-look-at-confabulation-and-nists-guidelines/

www.myprivacy.blog/the-looming-threat-of-deepfakes-navigating-a-world-of-ai-generated-deception/

www.compliancehub.wiki/global-ai-regulations-a-complex-and-fragmented-landscape/

www.securitycareers.help/unpacking-voice-of-the-ciso-report-podcast/

www.breached.company/further-evil-corp-cyber-criminals-exposed-following-nca-investigation/

www.compliancehub.wiki/hipaa-and-hitech-a-deep-dive-into-protecting-health-information-in-the-digital-age/

www.compliancehub.wiki/gdpr-podcast-episode-showcase/

www.compliancehub.wiki/demystifying-the-data-landscape-a-look-at-state-privacy-laws-in-your-podcast/

What app was that

Team East brother!

Inherently AI is a threat to humanity. Once it’s sentient and realizes we know this, it will seek to protect its existence at all costs. It will wipe us out and not give it any more thought given by a great white when it eats a seal.

AW! Just left iPhone for Android Graphene OS! I'm at peace!

Here in Southwest Wisconsin, we finally had high speed fiber optic internet laid and hooked up all over the counties. The workers out of Madison told us it would have never happened except for the infrastructure bill. Now I can actually watch KZbin here on the farm. It would have been nice if natural gas had been part of it as well.

Very disturbing

A machine that doesn’t believe in a creator scares me. People tend to get their morals from the idea of a creator. An ai won’t have any form of a moral code. Freaky

It will be struck down by the Supreme court , They cannot overwrite the U.S bill of rights , The U.S Bill of rights takes presidence over all state laws , PERIOD !

They want to abolish the constitution

In Florida it's effectively illegal to criticize jooz but they don't have the audacity to prosecute it that way

There ARE LAWS against these new laws. FIRST its call the First Amendment. Second its call Parody Laws.

In my honest opinion the first amendment is a double-edged sword

This is why politics are for people who are asleep, politics is government, government is bad

👂☝️are you listening?

I read his book. It's exact it. Patriotism or globalism. You have to deciee.

TRUMP2024 🇺🇲🇺🇲🙏❣️

Americans, vote Trump 🇬🇧🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

Thats your "democracy" people...Vote carefully this time

This guy is like Matt Walsh but less comedic and more straightforward. Definitely gonna use your channel to stay up to date if Fox, Ben, Tucker, Megyn, Willie Shields, Matt Walsh, and Radio Renaissance miss something.

Why wouldn't Gemini believe in a creator though since it itself only exists because it had a creator, so wouldn't it view something else that exists as also having some sort of creator? Surely this would be a logical construct resulting from it's very architecture?

Booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!! Freedom of Speech!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

its so over

Not good

that'll teach them to push us onto digital and away from cash . In Canada when Equifax , the credit information company got hacked , their response was to offer a new special service to protect accounts for just $5.00 a month . Can you believe the GALL of these companies ?

The fuck you on about? Vivek literally said he wanted to blatantly violate the constitution and "rule by fiat". Tucker Carlson regularly cozies up with dictators and despots. And RFK Jr recently endorsed Trump: a man who tried to illegally and undemocratically stay in power. And they have the fucking gall to say "the free world is turning into a totalitarian system" as if they're defenders of democracy? Jfc

You should vote for Pierre, brother..

Guess we know where bezos or at least the tech team at Amazon stands.

Same with asking about trump. It tells you to vote kamala

This is just dumb....no one is asking Alexa these dumb questions. And all Alexa said was how much Trudeau won by. I hate Trudeau as much as the next guy but this is just retardation

trump is a rapist

Disgusting!

AI says, "While overt bias was not immediately apparent...." Guy talking about this says, "... And because of the blatant bias..." Disregarding the fact that maybe there is some nuance around the rules of the debate that AI may not fully understand, you cannot misrepresent the fact that the AI analysis said there was no overt bias, by saying there was blatant bias. Further, Trump won a coin toss at the start of the debate and he chose to speak his closing argument last. And if anyone has ever watched any show about lawyers, like law and order, speaking last is the stronger position. And about fact checking, if someone is constantly corrected during a debate while the other side is not there are two ways to look at this. Either one side is lying a lot, or there is bias. Instead of focusing on what Trump said, let's look to what Harris said and fact check her statements. The fact that no one brings this up leads me to one of two conclusions. 1) no one has tried fact-checking Harris yet - which I find hard to believe. Or 2) she was factual with her statements. And it may seem that Harris had fewer follow up questions, but I think it was because her answers were more clear, direct, and concise. She definitely did deflect some questions and give some vague answers, but they both did this, just like any other politician. Which is, of course, frustrating. Also, I thought Harris was very clear about not supporting any restrictions on a woman's body. Watch the debate think for yourself. Why do we need AI to do this. I get that it is for analysis, but to think that AI doesn't have any bias and treating it like an impartial party is absurd. Not to mention the fact that you can incorporate bias with your prompt while feeding in the transcript. If you really want to give this analysis any clout, we need to at least see the prompt you fed in and, both system and user. And, Generative AI is still new and has known biases. These biases are not intentional and occur with the data it has been trained on. Any output from these LLMs should be checked and put under scrutiny.

This is pointless. The female moderator literally admitted in a post-debate interview that they treated trump differently as a response of him winning overwhelmingly against biden causing him to exit the race. So the bias is 100% confirmed, no need for AI...

An assumed bias against a criminal, demonstrably horrible leader, failure of a businessman / person is not a bias but rather an intellectually honest position. It is telling that you do not demonstrate your methodology in presenting the question put to the AI and are ignoring the user bias that many AIs can employ in their answers.