SOEC - THE green hydrogen solution
2:32
Material selection and corrosion
7:50
Pilot testing of renewable feedstocks
10:36
Topsoe at COP26 | EFuels
0:34
2 жыл бұрын
Topsoe at COP26 | EFuels
0:34
2 жыл бұрын
Topsoe at COP26 | Green Ammonia
0:35
Topsoe at COP26
0:31
2 жыл бұрын
Join us at COP26 | CEO Roeland Baan
0:38
Project development
7:15
2 жыл бұрын
TK-6001 HySwell™ at ERTC
0:48
3 жыл бұрын
Green ammonia as a marine fuel
4:24
3 жыл бұрын
Green ammonia as a marine fuel
4:24
4 жыл бұрын
Methanol catalyst - from nano to mega
35:22
Fuel for thought: Renewables
1:26
4 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@kemster9495
@kemster9495 3 ай бұрын
Has to be catalysis that can store co and h2 gasses
@StephenFirth-ui7oz
@StephenFirth-ui7oz 3 ай бұрын
Is it really just me, i think the production of hydrogen is completely immoral, why does the manufacturer and others think it is acceptable to destroy the most important liquid on the planet, the very liquid of life, water, what am i not seeing
@A3Kr0n
@A3Kr0n 4 ай бұрын
We couldn't just burn corn food for energy, now we go right to the fertilizer that grows it. This is what a mass extinction looks like.
@richriley5832
@richriley5832 5 ай бұрын
As I was researching the feasibility of solar islands, I came across ammonia a an efficient option. Glad to see it does seem to be viable. See my blog for additional concepts. thoughtsonclimate.blogspot.com/2023/12/thoughts-concerning-climate-change.html
@mattdaddy_888
@mattdaddy_888 6 ай бұрын
They should make a biodiesel friendly DPF system.
@thomasciarlariello
@thomasciarlariello 6 ай бұрын
Only to fill articulated airships.
@dalsenov
@dalsenov 9 ай бұрын
"...All electricity and heat generated in the stack".... As I know an electrolizer inputs electricity and water and outputs hydrogen and oxygen. How come stacks generate electricity? Out f what is electricity generated in a stack?
@kishore807
@kishore807 11 ай бұрын
Informative ...
@user-pt1ow8hx5l
@user-pt1ow8hx5l Жыл бұрын
Bang on target, the video! Thanks.
@flaviopalmiro
@flaviopalmiro Жыл бұрын
That is very informative. I have a doubt. Does the stack heats up by itself or all the heat comes from the steam temperature? Does the stack need to be in a furnace? Is it possible to operate this at 171 degrees Celsius with that stack thermically isolated? Thanks
@flaviopalmiro
@flaviopalmiro Жыл бұрын
Hi. For water solid oxide electrolysis. Do I need to input 600oC steam or the electrolyzer heats up with electricity?
@SeaworthyShippingServices
@SeaworthyShippingServices Жыл бұрын
👍
@romanchomenko2912
@romanchomenko2912 Жыл бұрын
This is green washing hydrogen at the moment it takes 50kw of electricity to make 1kg of hydrogen so only 70 percent efficient. The other losses is heat and increase of caustic KOH that might eat away the electrodes . The byproducts are oxygen and heavy water, heavy water is in short supply so there is demand for it in medicine. With the 200MW electrolyser you need a step up transformer the best source of 24/7 energy is nuclear power plants. For Scientists aim and goal is to lower 50kw to 40kw it is possible.
@kanenscott8883
@kanenscott8883 Жыл бұрын
Very informative video
@user-pt1ow8hx5l
@user-pt1ow8hx5l 2 жыл бұрын
This is poetry to my ear! And what a lady. A real treasure to science. And Topsøe.
@sao9995
@sao9995 2 жыл бұрын
All hydrogen stocks suck and will continue to suck until electrolyzers are conceived, designed, and built that can produce millions of tons of hydrogen per annum. Right now, this is not even close to possible and there is not one shred of evidence by alkaline cell, PEM, SOEC or any other electrolyzer design that it will be possible in the future. Hydrogen electrolyzers and fuel cells are total nonsense in India and everywhere else, the "Hydrogen stocks" are hopeless losers because none of the electrolyzer companies can deliver industrial-scale capacity. They only offer small-scale electrolysis capacity, so they can't provide anything but small-scale revenue. Small-scale revenue will never eclipse their operating budget, so they cannot show a profit (earnings). Small-scale electrolyzers cannot make enough H2 from water to reduce CO2 output at an industrial scale, so they are irrelevant. Renewable energy is coming on line quickly, but to reduce global warming, one must decarbonize all of the greenhouse gas emitting sectors -- transportation, agriculture, residential & commercial building and industrial sources (primarily concrete, glass, steel and industrial chemicals). That means we must create decarbonized fuels such as green ammonia, whereby we take cheap and abundant renewable energy and split water into cheap hydrogen and oxygen. Then, humanity can remove nitrogen from the air (air is 78% Nitrogen) and, using the Haber Bosch method, combine the green H2 and N to make green ammonia (NH3). Ammonia, as a "liquid carrier of hydrogen fuel," can carry more hydrogen/BTUs by volume at a reasonable temperature and pressure than gaseous or liquid hydrogen. Large-scale electrolyzers (no existing electrolyzer manufacturer can provide) would allow green ammonia to fuel and power all greenhouse gas emitting sectors. When electrolyzers are scaled to provide ammonia-scale plants producing four million metric tons of anhydrous ammonia per year, replacing methane feedstock; call me. It is important to realize that to produce one ton of ammonia using today's methane "steam reformation process" conventional ammonia producers for nitrogenous fertilizers release 2.84 tons of CO2.
@anonymousAJ
@anonymousAJ 2 жыл бұрын
What's SCR technology? Is it a non precious catalyst? Can you just burn rich then a second stage lean to reduce NOx production in the first place?
@BillSmith-su4jt
@BillSmith-su4jt 2 жыл бұрын
Ammonia has great potential. However, I doubt using wind and solar to produce it is the best. I suspect Ammonia from Nat Gas would be cheapest, as Carbon Capture becomes more used. Also, geothermal and Hydro and Nuclear are better sources of electricity to make Ammonia, than wind and solar. Wind and solar would require a 500 fold increase in mining for all the minerals. And many minerals are rare earths. There is no logic to the massive use of wind and solar.
@Alessandro-1977
@Alessandro-1977 2 жыл бұрын
Indeed, that' s why a biomass gasification approach with methanol does make more sense. The biomass input is minimal and the energy need can be reduced to perhaps 2-2.5 kWh per liter (gasoline equivalent) vs more than 10 kWh/l for ammonia (at the very least...)
@wazza33racer
@wazza33racer 2 жыл бұрын
making Ammonia from natural gas? thats VERY NAUGHTY! straight to the glulag camp for you! there the WEF commissars will re-educate you!
@TrickyMickTrucking
@TrickyMickTrucking 2 жыл бұрын
If we didn't have the DPF systems, every restaurant, home, and business in America would be able to send their used oils into the fuel tank of a semi truck. We would have $2 a gallon biodiesel, readily available, made by smaller companies, making a more decentralized source of energy production not subject to wild swings in fuel costs. Regular biodiesel is easy to make and almost any type of waste oil can be used to power a semi truck without a DPF system, LOWER EMISSIONS TOO!!!
@UhTemplate
@UhTemplate 5 ай бұрын
Or feed stock .
@loraine9002
@loraine9002 2 жыл бұрын
wish the camera could focus on the graphs more than the guy walking back and forth.
@asp1072
@asp1072 2 жыл бұрын
Hello Topsoe, i may need your contact email, i want to send a project proposal to be reviewed and studied about a steel foundry factory in Indonesia. My superior and EPC company already chose Topsoe company as they project licensor. Indonesian Topsoe representative couldnt provide such that services, thats why my superior priority is to get contact directly to Denmark HQ
@Alessandro-1977
@Alessandro-1977 2 жыл бұрын
Just curious, what is the benefit of ammonia over other bio-fuels like methanol, for example, that is liquid at ambient conditions, similar to produce and more energy dense, as well ?
@BillSmith-su4jt
@BillSmith-su4jt 2 жыл бұрын
Ammonia does not take food away from millions of people who are starving each year on this planet. And if all energy was supplies by methanol, there would be no food for anyone to eat.
@Alessandro-1977
@Alessandro-1977 2 жыл бұрын
If it were *ethanol* I certainly agree with it. But to produce *methanol* through biomass gasification and an external source of energy, hydrogen and/or heat it needs very little biomass. Methanol is even an excellent fuel for IC engines and an interesting one for fuel cells, as well. Swedish university of Lund KZbin channel has 2 interesting videos about that kzbin.info/www/bejne/oqe1qYNpnNOqeKs kzbin.info/www/bejne/nWKpdWyvoriEm7c
@anonymousAJ
@anonymousAJ 2 жыл бұрын
Ammonia (NH3) can be "cracked" to produce N2, and power a fuel cell with hydrogen, emitting H20. No carbon reacted, no carbon in the fuel, no CO2 increase over the intake air. Alternately you can combust it but this produces nitrous oxides which requires either multi-stage combustion (to prevent) or catalytic conversion (to treat). Assuming the nitrous oxides can be reduced and removed, the exhaust outputs are N2 and H2O In comparison methanol will emit CO2 during combustion
@wazza33racer
@wazza33racer 2 жыл бұрын
@@anonymousAJ however, if the Methanol is made from captured, recycled CO2 (from fossil combustion) or even better, the surplus CO2 from Biogas production.....it would be half or in the case of biogas, completely zero carbon emission.
@hyric8927
@hyric8927 2 жыл бұрын
Very informative!
@abhishekpandey21790
@abhishekpandey21790 2 жыл бұрын
Are you ready to commercialize it on gigawatt scale ?
@bhaskarsurisetti7788
@bhaskarsurisetti7788 2 жыл бұрын
Checkout Bloom Energy !!!!
@abhishekpandey21790
@abhishekpandey21790 2 жыл бұрын
100% efficiency...thats really amazing.....complete conversion of electricity to H2....fantastic HT
@sunlaser6587
@sunlaser6587 2 жыл бұрын
I call bullshit on that one. Pure marketing more or less. Nothing is 100% efficient. ur lucky to get 90 on a large scale. Maybe they got up to 98 or 95 in lab but no way they got it on a megawatt scale, on longer periods of time that would actually be viable. Bet there is a reason why they are not yet selling them to every wind farm. (and i don't think that this is due to ppl not interested)
@Virtueman1
@Virtueman1 2 жыл бұрын
It's complete bull maybe 99% at the very best.
@angellestat2730
@angellestat2730 Жыл бұрын
​@@Virtueman1 electrolysis can reach up to 125% efficiency if you measure from the electrical input, they reach 100% because they are using waste heat as external energy input, usually that waste heat comes as steam at 150c. Heat reduce the electricity required to split water.
@Virtueman1
@Virtueman1 Жыл бұрын
@@angellestat2730 funny definition of efficiency in that case
@angellestat2730
@angellestat2730 Жыл бұрын
​@@Virtueman1 if you can get the waste heat for free as it happen in most cases of cogeneration and your cost depends on the electricity that you use, then not sure why is wrong to measure the efficiency from the electrical input which is what would define your cost of production. In fact.. even PEM electrolysis at ambient temperature requires less electricity than doing the same at lower temperatures. A lot of process does not measure the overall efficiency from all parameters who contribute to that reaction or process. They are not lying either, they are showing they are taking waste heat from industrial process.
@craigpichach3591
@craigpichach3591 2 жыл бұрын
Awesome presentation! Drop in renewable fuels are the future!
@jandersen6802
@jandersen6802 2 жыл бұрын
Surely there must be a more energy dense liquid hydrogen carrier!? Why not just use synthetic E-kerosene?
@nattapongpongboot6162
@nattapongpongboot6162 2 жыл бұрын
A very informative presentation about metallurgy!
@richdobbs6595
@richdobbs6595 2 жыл бұрын
An obvious first step is to retrofit bulk ammonia tankers to dual fuel use, burning ammonia on the way out, and bunker fuel on the back-haul.
@sarojininaidu3398
@sarojininaidu3398 2 жыл бұрын
Green Ammonia as fertilizer too
@sarojininaidu3398
@sarojininaidu3398 2 жыл бұрын
Europe has GHG targets but like my place in India too can a small part of it can it be applicable
@frankielopez3338
@frankielopez3338 2 жыл бұрын
The damp locust fittingly suggest because caterpillar intraperitonally join out a awake wedge. adhesive, skillful professor
@wazza33racer
@wazza33racer 3 жыл бұрын
pity that anhydrous ammonia is highly toxic and corrosive.............imagine that leaking inside the hold of the ship...........even just a wiff of it is a powerful burning,corrosive sensation inside the airways. Its far preferable over something a dangerous and explosive as hydrogen gas, but it still has significant challenges.
@FelonyVideos
@FelonyVideos 2 жыл бұрын
AA is already used all over the place. Farmers use it every spring. Almost no accidents.
@wazza33racer
@wazza33racer 2 жыл бұрын
@@FelonyVideos for sure, farmers are out in the open, in paddocks and not inside a steel structure where ammonia gas can congregate. With the right precautions, like gas detectors, and sealed bulkheads to contain any leaks it would be practical and still 1000% better than hydrogen.
@jeswanthsrini7311
@jeswanthsrini7311 3 жыл бұрын
very useful for my project. Thank you
@bloodbathmcgrath2717
@bloodbathmcgrath2717 3 жыл бұрын
Are there any companies in America currently focusing on research and development on this energy technology
@truthexplorer1852
@truthexplorer1852 2 жыл бұрын
Fuel positive, canadian company
@LeeLee-tm3hx
@LeeLee-tm3hx 3 жыл бұрын
Very promising direction with the core technology SOEC from topsoe, where I used to work. All the best!
@AV314
@AV314 4 жыл бұрын
Are there any working green ammonia ships?
@ruslanzakirov3238
@ruslanzakirov3238 3 жыл бұрын
I never heard about any working green ammonia ship. Who is going to order these type of vessels? First, you need to develop infrastructure, built bunkering vessels. Ask how many ammonia carrier ships are built by now? There are mor equestions than answers.
@jordansage9655
@jordansage9655 3 жыл бұрын
@@ruslanzakirov3238 um a little company called Maersk will be.
@ruslanzakirov3238
@ruslanzakirov3238 3 жыл бұрын
@@jordansage9655 I worked for Basic Design team and Engineering Management department at the second world's biggest shipyard Samsung Heavy Industries, at DSME, HHI in Korea, at Keppel FELS and PPL shipyard in Singapore, in Russian shipyards. Green ammonia ship? Is that built by Japanese shipyard for ammonia transportation? Will be? Let's see how they will put together the econimics of shipbuilding and ship management. For now, the economics do not work for this type of fuel.
@anirbanchandra8496
@anirbanchandra8496 4 жыл бұрын
Very informative
@seaversityinnovations1239
@seaversityinnovations1239 5 жыл бұрын
Thank for publishing this video... truly informative..
@yanspak6631
@yanspak6631 6 жыл бұрын
special thamks for the air craft Admiral Kuznezov Russian navy fleet to keep clean our planet in good order. pls see smoke the fex haust pipe of this ship.