Thanks for simplifying the difference between clock and sensor! Great job Judith!
@Infleqtion3 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@Zsule3 ай бұрын
Um, What?
@joshd794 ай бұрын
Wut
@forheuristiclifeksh78364 ай бұрын
1:00
@ladc89605 ай бұрын
😮 🤘🏅 SuperNenna!
@schlabbervatty6 ай бұрын
Thx great Video
@gabrho6 ай бұрын
Thank you for such a detailed and easy to understand presentation!
@Infleqtion6 ай бұрын
Thank you, I'm glad it was helpful!
@Infleqtion6 ай бұрын
Learn more about Infleqtion's new 5-year quantum computing roadmap as well as new partnerships and customer wins that underscore the company’s progress toward commercializing quantum solutions at scale: www.infleqtion.com/news/infleqtion-unveils-5-year-quantum-computing-roadmap-advancing-plans-to-commercialize-quantum-at-scale
@upaige9116 ай бұрын
🖤🖤🖤
@Jocularious6 ай бұрын
Oh wow, this is awesome. I am writing my MSc thesis on BEC physics, and i saw this video. This is really cool to see. Question for you. You state the OD, are you using an on-resonant probe, but for an OD near 1, I assume you're detuned by a linewidth? Is this a parameter that you have added in the code?
@Aaron-pw1zt7 ай бұрын
👍 Promo sm
@SK83RJOSH7 ай бұрын
And yet, we're not getting exponential improvement, and quantum still seems to be decades away from being useful. What we really need right now is better material science. 😢
@Infleqtion7 ай бұрын
Use cases in financial and pharma applications are much closer than, for example, breaking encryption. They require a lot less qubits and less error correction than other applications!
@brendawilliams80628 ай бұрын
👍to our engineers
@brendawilliams80628 ай бұрын
10007/101359 can’t always be cut and dried😊
@brendawilliams80628 ай бұрын
The table isn’t exactly right. You will always be missing a 5. Linearly a 3
@brendawilliams80628 ай бұрын
Thankyou.
@Infleqtion8 ай бұрын
You're welcome!
@kieran-29910 ай бұрын
RDF for hams to be revolutionized.
@alihejazi4276 Жыл бұрын
👌
@Johken888 Жыл бұрын
Very cool endeavor...thanks for the info!
@ZhanCaitao Жыл бұрын
Nice talk!
@kushyywosshy Жыл бұрын
SOO CRINGE SOOOOOOOOO CRINGE
@kipropkigz1285 Жыл бұрын
Vague... we need specifics... what are your philosophical approaches? where are the papers... i have Xanadu's and PsiQuantum's ... still waiting for yours... something substantial ,something better than this PR gimmick
@xgniu5003 Жыл бұрын
How much...
@kangheelee6485 Жыл бұрын
28:14 As an engineer in THz photonics, this work is fantastic for me! Thank you for such an excellent webinar.
@Infleqtion Жыл бұрын
I'm glad it was helpful!
@ichigokurosaki2838 Жыл бұрын
Need to see some useful products that people can use every day. I like autonomous driving idea for vehicles, eVTOL would be great too. Maybe partner with AMD.
@frankdimeglio82162 жыл бұрын
How are F=ma AND E=mc2 dimensionally consistent (and extensive ON BALANCE) with what is the fourth dimension?  Frank DiMeglio 34m The dimensions of SPACE are CLEARLY, necessarily, AND fundamentally balanced. That is obvious. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental (ON BALANCE). E=mc2 is taken directly from F=ma. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE. Consider what is a TWO dimensional surface OR SPACE ON BALANCE. (Fully consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE.) ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE, AND consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. This CLEARLY explains the fourth dimension ON BALANCE. By Frank DiMeglio
@jacobvandijk65252 жыл бұрын
They know all about quantum systems, but they have no idea how an ordinary microphone works.
@2456321112 жыл бұрын
realmente una maravilla, llegue atrasado tres años a este video. felicitaciones ColdQuanta
@user-gq4qm2uv3h2 жыл бұрын
ColdQuanta (How close are we to human teleportation? Successes in quantum teleportation experiments abound) In fact, a fun 2013 study by physics students at the University of Leicester came up with useful numbers to show how complex it would be to teleport a person, even if we approached it as sending information that is used to re-create the person elsewhere. They reasoned that the transferable data for a human would consist of the DNA pairs that make up genomes in each cell. As such, the total data for each human cell would be approximately 1010 bits (b), while the data for a full human would come in at about 2.6 x 1042 b. Sending this gigantic amount of data would need the kind of computing technology we didn’t invent yet. By 2013 tech standards the students used, transferring data for just one human (at the bandwidth of 29.5 to 30 GHz) would take up to 4.85×1015years, much longer than the age of the universe. "Teleporting humans presents technical and philosophical challenges. A recent experiment achieved tremendous accuracy in quantum teleportation over 27 miles. Human teleportation may be possible with advances in technology to process huge amounts of data." We ask technicians and engineers to use the DNA transfer experiment in the field of teleportation Then conduct experiments to transfer mice in the field of teleportation Mistakes must be studied in order to develop new plans for success, because failed experiences lead to a successful experience (Please send these suggestions to engineers and technicians in the field of quantum entanglement and quantum computing)
@hiepnguyenthe29082 жыл бұрын
It is not a quantum core.
@AcceptanceDevOps2 жыл бұрын
How is this not even in DVD quality in 2021?
@dobingify31302 жыл бұрын
How to invest in ColdQuanta??
@ichigokurosaki28383 жыл бұрын
Could you use quantum computing applications in ADAS (Advance Driver Assistance System) to get L5 EV's on the road and even eVTOL? LiDAR tech with quantum computing.
@silver-ep8wn3 жыл бұрын
what happened to it?
@leon_noel16873 жыл бұрын
Great lecture, my theoretical introduction to quantum mechanics was very unintuitive, it all begins to make sense when you look at the experiments, even if you are more theoretical interested like I am.
@bahamutrgrg95823 жыл бұрын
Do they talk about error rate and coherence time?
@samirelzein19783 жыл бұрын
got more interesting when we started talking variation and matrices :)
@rahulrannvardhan70153 жыл бұрын
❤️
@rahulrannvardhan70153 жыл бұрын
Love this ...
@rahulrannvardhan70153 жыл бұрын
Love your videos sir ❤️
@targeted-individualdallas-99633 жыл бұрын
The deep state deleted my first and only comment. Thanks for vid.