In terms of driver safety, it's unparalleled. And we have the evidence and testimonies to prove it.

No

@@dalalei8020 yes

@@evanjonez914 it looks worse

Yeah didn’t he get hit by a bolt or something during his time with Ferrari?

@@JumpFree-Music it was a spring.

So true.

and today hamilton❣

And Hamilton

It hit Daly's front wing, not his aeroshield

Remind me, what happened with Leclerc?

sadly not everyone agrees still

Its no shame to change opinion about a topic. That's what discussions and testphases are for. I was against them at point of introduction, now I support them. Would only be bad if I was still against it.

@@JuliAltx Agreed. The power of time (specifically hindsight, in this case) is unparalleled in its effectiveness with changing opinions

When for leclerc

@@tescopiwo belgium gp 2018, alonso was flying and the tyre hit leclerc's halo

When you say so. It didnt cost anyone elses lives to have none in the last decade. Look at the bianchi. No halo in the whole world could have protected him.

Massa and Vettel aren't really "Halo-haters", they only said they don't like closed-cockpits. A halo is not a closed-cockpit, that's why it's a great solution. So these guys aren't really "Halo-Haters".

@@spudbencer7179 is that the intention of the halo? No did bianchi get hit in the head? No So this doesn’t make any sense

28

Bianchi wouldn't have been saved from the Halo, the FIA said so themselves. As for Massa it's positive to have the Halo but the problem with small objects is that it could still go through the gap of the Halo. However it's better to have it there nevertheless - it's an improvement over no Halo.

"Many" counts all 3 of last 3 decades lol

Leclerc....

I think Senna needed the hans device

@@stepladder3257 Senna needed the Hans device and the collapsible steering column with a quick release wheel

Who cares?

@@DaveMcIroy u care cause you replied. bye

@@unknownknown360, doesn't makes sense.

@@DaveMcIroy if you didn’t care , you would’ve scrolled past

@@mlvendetta2492, maybe not everyone is ignorant...

Yeah. I think the halos look dumb, but F1 fans need to remember these are real people with real lives. They shouldn’t have to risk their lives for our entertainment for a few hours

@@cameronpfister8855 yeah I’ve always thought that too. Hopefully some day soon they’ll find a better solution

Are you serious? I would be all anti halo if I raced myself. Its simply the danger thats part of the sport. Also the view is still blocked by this thing. I bet we will see at least a couple of serious incidents that are actually caused by the halo even if we wont hear about it.

@@spudbencer7179, what drugs are you on?

@@motorsportsworld5089 Look at Grosjean incident. Clearly caused by halo visibility.

Time to exit for bottas

Nope, it’s saved so many drivers lives now, I couldn’t care less about everything else it’s changed.

@@motorsportsworld5089 that's fair. I'm glad it's in F1 now I just hold the pre Halo era closer to me

Why am i the only reply

@@thomasvanberkel8257 Why am i the only reply on a reply

Why am I replying to the to two “only replies” two years later?

Shut it

Knoe2020 no

He got a puncture cuz he made a stop much earlier

Grosjean would’ve still got him

Nah

Now we see thar people SAY that it did. Wouldnt it have been suprising that in the last decade nothing happend except for bianchi and now all of a sudden eversince the halo was implemented it saved many lives?

@@harryfluellen No, he wouldn't. A halo breaks like a stick under the weight of the thing he drove into (a fucking crane). The halo wouldve actually made it even worse, probably. Because the halo is not as well formed as a helmet.

@@harryfluellen If it can take 12 tonnes, then for short impact, not for any considerable time period. Considering that bianchi drove into the crane with what? 200kph? You can do the math yourself. In a rather optimistic calculation that would make 10 Million kN at impact. That is 80.000 times more than any halo can take. It would have broken and most lilkely penetrated both his helmet and his skull. Due to that last logical assumption, based on the math, the halo would have made sure he doesn't even survive until reaching the hospital. unlike without the halo. Due to the fact that huma body can deform rather well. We are flexible.

@@harryfluellen no. Grosjean didn't run into a crane. He ran into a barrier made for impacts like these. Maybe not as fast as his impact was, but generally it was built for impacts. It bends accordingly and the force on the halo was not even close to what bianchis crash produced. Idk bro. I took this www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/impact-force-calculator.php And I took the 1000kg of the car. And assumed the crane moved like 30cm on impact. And duration I forgot what I chose. Nonetheless even if I am completely wrong it is obvious that the halo would have broken like a stick. It would have done nothing but cost space for bianchis body to bend according to impact, or potentially penetrate is helmet and body.

It wouldn’t have saved bianci 🤦‍♂️

@@mlvendetta2492 you sure? I think it would have at least helped deflect the tractor, as without the halo his head took the main hit

@@mlvendetta2492 it would have increaseed his chances of survival.... Rip JB17

@@thebaguettecompany he would’ve died either way

@@mlvendetta2492 maybe....