Limp.

Pax Americana perhaps 🤔

When I saw this 3-man panel, I thought of the quote: Do not argue when laughter is more effective.

This came out in a time in which the "Alt Right," which was a term for the briefly unified anti-neocon right wing social movement in the United States, was firmly anti-war and opposed to American interventions in other countries, particularly those in the Middle East, due to their opposition to Israel. This woman grew up surrounded by a family of immigrants, artists, intellectuals and academics in New York. Various family members were influenced by the ideas of Murray Rothbard, Ayn Rand, Milton Friedman and strident anti-communism. To me, it seems highly likely that Angela Keaton is a Jewish woman who has inserted herself into this libertarian movement not because she is opposed to war, but because she did not want the libertarian movement to shift to the right. She goes on to describe the Alt Right as "undesirables." I can only listen to so much of this woman. No wonder so many people left the libertarian movement and joined the Alt Right at the time.

I started watching this channel due to game design, but now I'm more interested in this Judeo-Libertarian Zentrum pipeline. What is even going on here? Also, is that a reference to Hans Hermann Hoppe? This all brings back memories of arguing with anarcho-communists and liberals on the internet over a decade ago. Also, the title reminds me of that catchy song that Jesse Dunstan made a few years ago, "remove in a physical way," which was a parody of "move in mysterious ways."

could it possible to get handout as a pdf form

On one hand, historical realism does not seem to lead to better board wargames. If I recall correctly from a decade ago, the rule change involved choosing roles. The change was that the lead player chose a role. you then went around the table choosing a different role, from the remaining roles, until every player had chose a role. The lead player then rotated, and the new lead had first choice of role. The point of the change and lab exercise was to show how you could test different rules to see which one was better. Most playtesters agreed that the alternate rule, which I may not have described correctly was not as good as the original rule.

What was the rule changed in the game puerto rico?

Thanks man good work

12:24 Fascinating to note that only 4 years after this video, the AI program AlphaGo would beat Lee Sedol, the Go world champion.

And then there's the battalion tactical group. :D (which I believe has been abandoned.)

The biggest weakness of civilian wargames is the ignorance of OOB. Military wargames are staffed as an actual battle would be. In the civilian sector, we try to be everybody from General to Sergeant, which removes possibly the most important aspect of warfare: CCC. There is no practical solution, but it's a noteworthy limitation.

The greatest tragedy of the American Civil War is the employment of Napoleonic tactics with weapons that had made it obsolete. In principal, not much different than the M-16 analogy. Especially with weapons like the Spencer, line infantry was brutally obsolete.

thank you greatly trying to design rpg combat and this i feel will help

HAHAHAHA, I love it, and the veiled contempt of it...totally true that a Physics textbook that contains almost nothing new about the work of the last 100 years costs astronomically more than a Game Design book that discusses concepts that have been radically changing over the last 30 years and can be applied to the methodologies of just about any field...

Somebody check this guy's hard drives. He's gonna be arguing about age of consent soon.

Lol

i hope translated to arabic language

respect from morocco

> 27:32 [chess example about sacrifices] That's probably the most famous chess game ever, Paul Morphy's opera game, with professor Phillies reciting the details a bit non-exactly. Here's some youtube commentary of the game: kzbin.info/www/bejne/jIrTYZuCeZiUbZY kzbin.info/www/bejne/qKuqhXpmadpkndU kzbin.info/www/bejne/nXqWqKqKaMiKnac kzbin.info/www/bejne/kF6Vd6Ofet-Yj6s

6:02 lookin a bit sus

I went to the wrong college, apparently

Bit old for a reply but Chinese checkers is a German game. Interesting video.

Your discussion of the Soviets attacking Finland & soak-offs is excruciatingly detailed and time-consuming.

so toy soldiers were the first miniatures

I really appreciate you taking the time to upload these lectures. Thank you.

If the rules were the same as Russian Campaign, with the same CRT as well, this would be an ok game. But as produced, the Russians win almost every time

Out of sheer curiosity: you mention your favorite game at 19:44, it sounds like "Tactics Pi", but I could find no mention of it anywhere. What game is it?

This gentleman reminds me of Br. George Wagner, FSC. He was a genius wargamer and got me interested in wargaming in my freshman tear at St. Joseph HS in Westchester, IL in 1977. This lecture brings back some very good memories!

Panzerblitz was the first real wargame I ever learned - in 1977. I have loved it and Panzer Leader ever since. Our HS wargame "club" was run by a genius Christian Brother. We played with hundreds of units over several tables. He had broken down dozens of game boxes into fully fleshed out divisions, regiments, etc. Hand drawn maps spanned large tables. Really great times! Then we started losing players to a weird sounding game called...Dungeons and Dragons...

Very helpful. Thank you, George!

Good up to date stuff as of 2021.

Yes a basic logic test for jurors would not be out of line. Then maybe OJ Simpson would have been put in jail for murder.

Nazis? Like democrat FDR executive order to put Asian Americans in concentration camps. Forcing whole families to leave their homes/businesses to be imprisoned and shot if they try to escape. Nazis like those democrats?

Gun control like in Australia where the tyrants have put a whole nation of people into one big concentration camp? Or gun control like in China where the communist dictators take a women to an abortion clinic to kill her baby? You sir are ignorant and a clear danger to a free society.

In your lecture you mentioned the CMYK printing inks but did not know why black was referred to as "K". It is because it is the KEY color to which all the other colors (CMY) are registered to. Nice lecture!

I think the flaming pigs were used earlier, against Pontus. You defeat elephants with light skirmish troops which do not run away.

great video. learned a lot.

Re Theme & Content: Ignore the artwork on the box, etc. PC games were particularly guilty here with beguiling pictures on the package concealing ghastly graphics. Graphics are better now and actually displayed in ads. But you're right that an exciting subject does not automatically lead to an exciting game. Sadly, it's usually the opposite!

Thank you, Prof. George Phillies for this wonderful lecture. It is not clear how (I-Pt)Adot(t) became K(t) when going from 26.52 to 26.53. Note that K(t) is defined in terms of PA, but in 26.52 we have Pt. I would appreciate if someone could clarify it.

Watching this video on 2021 and giggling when he mentions engineering plagues for roleplaying. Worst LARP ever. I would like to talk to the refs.

It is not clear why i is introduced in 26.37. Prof. George Phillies - could you please explain this to us?

Excellent presentation. Prof. George Phillies is cool and relaxed. I would love to have a teacher like him. I think the equations 26.30 and 26.31 are perfectly fine. There is no need to change anything. Please check.

sometimes, in wargaming, random events can somehow spawn the illusion of a personality in some of the pieces. I tried this on several occasions when playing warhammer 40000 2nd edition back when that boardgame was actually worth playing

You shouldnt have let this 4th dude in who came in late. Clearly wasnt up to the par set by the other 3 candidates

I would feel confident betting that this hippy has never heard of Europa or OCS or Zucker's Napoleonic systems, or any other actual system of wargames. Maybe if you said Squad Leader to him, he would say, "that's vaguely familiar..."

Soak off? Really?

My God! The rivers run through the hexes instead of along the hexsides--why didn't Dean Essig think of that?

Justin Raimondo was better than Angela Keaton.

I'm fairly certain this gentleman has forgotten more about any given subject in the world than I will ever know