4 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
10 ай бұрын
11 ай бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@mohammmadraza774 21 күн бұрын
Graphic card?
@adnanulhaq3349 Ай бұрын
i like ue5 animation and D5 snow fall effect
@LuisAmdPro Ай бұрын
8 horas. 8 H O R A S! 😮
@juancarlosgzrz Ай бұрын
How do you get such crispy sharp renders out of ue5?
@FarDesCorp Ай бұрын
The comparison of D5 Render and Chaos Vantage with Lumen in Unreal Engine is incorrect. Path Tracing is an offline renderer for photorealism, while Lumen is real-time dynamic lighting. It would be more appropriate to use Path Tracing in Unreal for a fair comparison. Lumen in Unreal Engine is an additional real-time lighting calculation technology that offers an advantage over others. It allows for much faster rendering: instead of 10-15 hours, you can achieve results in about 3 hours. This is the main advantage of Lumen - dynamic lighting that significantly speeds up the rendering process.
@mahbodamin5139 Ай бұрын
Well, I see flickering in both Vantage and UE scenes, which is more common in UE interiors even with the best lighting-baked method and path tracing. noise radiance misplays sharply even in shadow lines and gapped details in both scenes!! so if you could have a budget to access the "render farm" and have Corona renderer+12 make your own animation frames with 0 flickering and more realistic in less than 2 Hr. Corona Renderer > UE5.4 > Chaos Vantage
@Farins79 2 ай бұрын
7 Hours of rendertime in Vantage? seriously? mah...i dont think you have choose the best setting
@punmije 2 ай бұрын
I think Cycles should also be considered. I’m pretty sure Cycles could be as fast as Vantage, if not faster.
@JoseHerrera-nf8qp 2 ай бұрын
Un enorme orgullo ser Lobo de la BUAP👏👏👏👍
@PaulinaParra-gh5jy 2 ай бұрын
Hay departamentos o dormitorios ahi? Me dan ganas de estudiar nutricion una maestria, doctorado Los alumnos pueden trabajar dentro de la misma?
@vectorchizu 3 ай бұрын
Vantage is better overall, D5 is also awesome
@manuzid6837 3 ай бұрын
Lumion IS thé worst
@MrSheduur 3 ай бұрын
Vantage easily looks the most plausible of them due to the better accuracy in rendering it offers. Rendertimes are generall double of UE5 though.
@RMNN-STUDIO 3 ай бұрын
7 hours real time 😁
@ngarcia-t6l 3 ай бұрын
Honestly, the industry reach to a point when is up to the artist to get a good render. I believe is about workflow speed now...
@DJanGAta 3 ай бұрын
that is pretty much the case indeed. Even workflows are generally similar between applications and are quite simplified. Long gone are the days where you had to tweak individual samples for materials, lights, AA and actually have good technical knowledge to get something to look good and do it quickly.
@MrPCchain 3 ай бұрын
UE5 IS THE BEST ! TIME AND QL
@StudioReplica_Arch 4 ай бұрын
I just read the fact that D5 is a modified version of unreal engine....
@leonardoaguilerahonduras2067 Ай бұрын
True that
@محمدموسى-ب5ك 4 ай бұрын
Vantage يطور تعقيد vray
@krixtval4764 4 ай бұрын
UNreal Engine is the winner
@Duc11HD 4 ай бұрын
UR bester, but for work it not comford
@cgimadesimple 5 ай бұрын
great comaprisson!
@andresruizsouza2472 5 ай бұрын
PUEDES BRINDAR EL 3D ?
@paulofernando7858 6 ай бұрын
Chaos Vantage looks better
@juancarlosdelariva5676 6 ай бұрын
Me gustaría poder utilizar su vídeo para una premiación que tendrá la universidad, como podría obtener el permiso por parte de los creadores?
@ramsesmelendez835 6 ай бұрын
Sabes cómo usar el teclado numerico
@alanmichellev 6 ай бұрын
El de unreal es con PT o lumen?? Por que se me hace mucho tiempo con Lumen
@mohammedismail4758 6 ай бұрын
Unreal engine is the best it is make you feel that more realistic
@noeegel9627 6 ай бұрын
UE5 Lumen - time 1.2 hours?? 🤣 guys he is LYING!! maybe its 1.2 minutes not hours!
@Farins79 2 ай бұрын
yea i agree, and also vantage... 7 hours of rendering its absolutly strange. this test dont seem realistic
@alvarogzz7 6 ай бұрын
D5 Render sweet spot , time and rsults
@АлександрИванов-р2з3ф 6 ай бұрын
unreal gpulightmap or pathtracing?
@SingSingLd 6 ай бұрын
Lumen
@slavonovotny6714 7 ай бұрын
of course, that UE is glorious and much better.. but.. 1.2 h??? simmilar result we can do with enscape with sophisticated lighting, in 5minutes... its big fail this long time rendering i think... because, lot of architectural work is not about visualizatons, but its going about lot of versions... example... ryzen 9, nvidie 3080rtx 16gb/160w tdp... this video 90sec /1,5min/ kzbin.info/www/bejne/bWPSdoBsaLurntEsi=EUg7z5MO2smCoMfK
@x3merx3mer 7 ай бұрын
Unreal always has some annoying flickering here n there.
@wilsonql3395 8 ай бұрын
HERMOSOS. PERO EN TIEMPOS.. MUCHAS VECES.. EL TEMA DEL TIEMPO NOS HACE DECIDIR POR UNO ..YA QUE NOS DA POSIBILIDAD DE CORRECCIONES
@c.pereira3082 8 ай бұрын
3060 6GB OR 8GB?
@Nick-tl7ts 8 ай бұрын
unreal is absolutely the best in terms of stability and indirect lighting contribution, material response and shadow accuracy. the other 2 are just ok
@Sergo-ik6cl 8 ай бұрын
It's an interesting video, but I think you've badly set up the scene in the vantage, a couple of small manipulations and there you can get rid of the highlights that make the video worse. I use vantage myself and really like how easily it interacts with 3d max and how easy it is to edit materials there. I wonder how this is implemented in UE, when edits need to be made to the project over time
@markkund3539 3 ай бұрын
Hello! I don`t get it how is it took 7 hours to render it, if this is a real time engine? Isn`t it the same as to just animate scene and render frames? Mbe use ai to make more FPS. It feels like customer will wait forever.
@soulonlinee 8 ай бұрын
how much ram do you have?
@enoslayuk7580 8 ай бұрын
I cry see Lumion like that 😭
@sanchos0637 8 ай бұрын
there is clearly no lumen here, look at the shadows it says “preview”, he didn’t bake them...
@ruizheng-x8z 8 ай бұрын
7个小时，毫无疑问cv完败
@L3nny666 8 ай бұрын
vantage looks best imo. but what is it with the 8 hours render time? it shouldn't take that long even with a 3060.
@ajtatosmano2 6 ай бұрын
I can render this in blender with path tracer under 8 hours, it's ridiculous.
@turabalikhan1341 8 ай бұрын
vantage is the winner for me
@anuplonkar2198 8 ай бұрын
every looks great until blender enters
@ololo9283 8 ай бұрын
Great comparison. Just a note for you: Vantage settings could be optimized a lot to render significantly faster. Probably the same is true for the others. Vantage though is quite fast even with a mid-tier RTX card today. I also think the GI results from Vantage look by far the most realistic of these three. All excellent pieces of software though!
@MrSheduur 3 ай бұрын
yeah and it is the only one that also renders proper refraction.
@juliossantos5092 8 ай бұрын
The settings are clearly wrong, the D5's is very low quality and the Vantage is out of adjustment... not even Unreal would ever take 2 hours to render a simple scene like this!!
@phalhappy8612 9 ай бұрын
despite poor dynamic range, Chaos Vantage look the most realistic to me
@slavonovotny6714 9 ай бұрын
there is no amaizing render engine, that have better comclusion in 10minutes...
@MrPCchain 9 ай бұрын
1st-Chaos Vantage,Unreal Engine 5 ,D5 Render
@pitposum 9 ай бұрын
So how many hours did it take to transfer the file to unreal and edit the materials there? :)
@estudio33arquitectos45 9 ай бұрын
It's very straightforward, Unreal recognizes the materials from 3ds Max. The only thing I configured in Unreal was the lighting.
@pitposum 9 ай бұрын
Unfortunately, there are problems with some materials. even on some models. It needs to be rearranged. It's not that short and simple@@estudio33arquitectos45
@cesarvergelhernandez3056 9 ай бұрын
wow Unreal 👍