Test

You don't need music to play the video, other than that annoyance it's a good video.

If I won't believe it then why watch it?

Hydrostatic, I understand. Electro mechanical transmission, I don't. There is no specific description of how it works. Too vague all around.

effeccient

Did you already know all these machines? And leave tips for the next videos 🚜👇

Stupid A.I. narration.

A load of bullshit

Looks like a lot of Soviet communist stuff, well simple

Stop showing the same video clips over and over and over!

I don,t know if your American or not,but here in America we use words like Gallon,and inches,no one likes your Loser system you call the metric system...SO drop your metric crap....

Look at those tractors

I guess YOU were the ONLY one that didn't know. And that COMPUTER VOICE NEEDS TO GO. Along with your videos

Did you already know all these old and amazing machines? 🤠🚜

Why are the names on the implements and tractors in reverse or read backward??

Isn't it interesting that no one noticed that all the video footage is back to front. Look at numbers and names mirror image.

I grew up running a Caterpillar D7-3t . New about 1954? Others used International TD 9

The name 'Rumely' is quite amusing to Finnish speakers because the word 'ruma' in Finnish means 'ugly.' Given that these old tractors have a very utilitarian and somewhat bulky design, the name 'Rumely' unintentionally sounds fitting, as if it's describing their less-than-aesthetic appearance. It's just a coincidence, but it makes for a funny and appropriate play on words for Finnish speakers.

Not only a mistake about Ursus, the imitation tractor of the Lanz Bulldog but also about the Munktell BM20. This one is also a hotbulp engine!!

The John Deere 6250R tractor is definitely a standout in this video, especially with its intelligent power management system. I really appreciate the shift toward making these machines more fuel-efficient while still maintaining high performance. The idea of saving fuel while the tractor automatically adjusts to the workload seems like a win-win for both farmers and the environment. However, as much as I admire these advancements, I also think there’s a part of me that feels nostalgic for the simpler machines, like the Oliver 900 Industrial. Sure, they weren’t as high-tech, but the ruggedness and simplicity made them reliable workhorses that could be easily repaired and maintained. With all the tech in modern tractors, I'm curious about how long these machines will last compared to the older ones. Are we sacrificing longevity for convenience and efficiency? I think that balance is something we need to keep an eye on in the future of agricultural machinery.

Definitely. Loose the noise music

Very good

I'm disappointed you did not highlight the thumbnail tractor. I believe an aquaintance has a pair of the wheels but has been unable to identify their application That type of advertisement is called click bait, usually in a scornful manner. Yoiu lost yet another potential subscriber.

It’s great to see these large, sophisticated machines that can handle massive amounts of work, but I often wonder about their accessibility for smaller, family-run farms. A tractor like the Case IH QuadTrac 620 or the John Deere 1110e, while incredibly efficient, must be prohibitively expensive for smaller agricultural operations. Are these types of machines making farming more dependent on larger corporations or industrial-sized farms? Not every farmer has the resources or capital to invest in machinery like this, and it’s important that we don’t lose the diversity of small, local farms in the process of mechanizing the entire industry. Maybe it’s time for the agricultural sector to think about making these technologies more affordable or accessible to the smaller players who still contribute so much to food production.

It's fascinating to see how far agricultural machinery has come in terms of innovation. The special Ferguson TE20, for instance, is such a rare collector’s item, and it's amazing to think about how two engines and independent drive systems could make a machine more adaptable to difficult terrains. However, while this kind of innovation pushes the boundaries of what’s possible, I can't help but wonder about the practical implications of these advancements. Sure, it’s cool to see machines like the John Deere 9620RX and Case IH 620 Quadtrac in strength competitions, but these machines are designed for high-capacity, industrial farming. What happens to small-scale farmers who can’t afford these types of machines? There’s a real issue of accessibility when it comes to these heavy-duty models. For all the technological advancements, it seems like the gap between large-scale industrial farms and smaller, family-run farms is only getting wider. Does anyone else think that maybe we should focus on making technology more accessible to the smaller players?

🎉🎉🎉🎉

15:34 This one so helpful!

If it wasn't for that irritating , annoying background music I might have watched this.

If you had displayed the one you used as a come on i would have subscribed

It's amazing to see how far agricultural machinery has come in terms of efficiency and innovation. The Belarus 1,500 is a perfect example of a machine built to last, even if it's an older model. Its solid design and power capabilities are still incredibly relevant today. I find it fascinating that even though it’s from a previous era, it’s still highly effective for tasks like plowing and hauling, which says a lot about the engineering behind it. But then, we have the newer John Deere 1,470 forestry machine with its crazy torque and efficiency. The fact that it’s equipped with a modern engine designed for fuel conservation while still offering power for heavy-duty tasks is a clear reflection of how much the industry has evolved. It's all about balancing power with sustainability now. The introduction of hybrid technology in machines like the Logset 12 HGTE is the future, reducing emissions while increasing productivity-now that’s the kind of innovation we need to keep pushing for. Would love to see more hybrid and electric-powered options for agriculture moving forward!

This video really shows just how far agricultural technology has come over the years. I think it's fascinating to see machines like the Bulldog 9000 and the 150 Case steam tractor, which were cutting-edge for their time, compared to the modern innovations we have today, like the Case IH Opum 300 liquid manure tank or the Samco CTS bale transporter. It’s easy to forget how much work used to go into farming before all this machinery came along. Imagine having to manually bale hay or spread manure without the precision and efficiency these machines provide! That said, while modern tech has made farming more efficient, I sometimes wonder if we’re losing touch with the simple, more sustainable practices of older times. Can today’s machines really replace the deep connection to the land that older equipment, like the Bulldog, required?

Which of these machines do you like the most? 🚜🧐

The Big Roy 8WD tractor is a beast! It’s hard not to be impressed by its size and power, but it really makes me think about the trade-offs in modern farming equipment. Sure, it’s powerful and can handle heavy-duty work, but I’m not sure we can ignore the environmental consequences of such massive machines. The excessive soil compaction this tractor causes is a real concern for sustainable farming practices. In the race for more power and faster results, are we neglecting the long-term health of the land? I think it’s crucial that we find a balance between innovation and sustainability so that we don’t end up doing more harm than good in the long run.

AI sucks Donkey Snake.

The narrator obviously has no idea about the subject which he is describing often leaving gaps, talking out of sequence with the video, and providing misinformation. You really need to address this problem.

It occurs to me that, if a farmer could afford large an complicated machine like this - why would he be working a farm? With that much capital, he wouldn’t need to be working! Courtesy of Half Vast Flying

It occurs to me that, if a farmer could afford large an complicated machine like this - why would he be working a farm? With that much capital, he wouldn’t need to be working! Courtesy of Half Vast Flying

The Bulldog tractor, where you refill the oil daily, is like a rotary aircraft engine? Burns lots of oil. . . . . and some fuel too. 😏 Courtesy of Half Vast Flying

I bet these different tractors definitely earn their keep

Ya think, that's like an all purpose tarantula

They are some massive machinery and Gentle Giants, they are a tall order

They are some massive machinery and Gentle Giants as well

Tratores dos mais antigos aos mais novos 👏👏🤠👍👍

The video had the ability to be good but the computer generated voice was unbearable. Left a 30 seconds. No US imperale when talking about these tractors.

Wow 😲

The growl of that forwarder is something else. 👍👍

Nothing to see here.

D8 is pulling a double mole plow. The long beam on the plow is to let it drift as it needs so it can deflect sideways around rocks or roots, its to produce a "mole channel" that it leaves behind of packed dirt in an open tube which greatly increases drainage - you want to always drop this plow at the edge of a field by the drainage ditch and drag it inwards. Broad/baloon tires on forestry equipment is just to keep the equipment from being stuck - trees can handle soil pressures you wouldn't believe but if you create multiple rutt roads it can interfere with soil moisture and kill the trees. So right but wrong. Huntractor is just a steiger clone but we always put 120+hp engines in ours. Steiger started making these truck-axle center-articulated tractors in the early 1950s. Absolutely right that it'd be excellent in Hungary's terrain.

The class is just a ordinary challenger tractor wit a paint job

When I first worked at a state park in Pennsylvania they had a Farmall version of the grader. Very hard to operate. I only ran it a time or two the they replaced it.