Can You See the Space Station?
3:53
5 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@davetaylor2449
@davetaylor2449 19 сағат бұрын
Now here we have proof that the earth is flat and not how it is, in this scaled down model. The sun a soccer ball, and then you have earth 30 yards away, and as you see its size in relationship to the sun. Now let’s take the that little pin head earth, and tilt it back, just a little, now according to summer and winter this is all it takes, just a little shift of earth this far away, moves the earth no more than what it does closer to the sun to initiate a temperature change of more than a hundred degrees. Just the earth as it is if stationary, the poles are frozen in solid ice, while the equator Is hot year round, and this distance would and could only be at the most 12 thousand 500 miles closer to the sun, and looking at the scale tilting this little earth ball, just a little bit back is enough to produce nearly a hundred degrees difference from summer to winter. Makes no sense. Now imagine all those sun rays bombarding earth from this distance, every sun ray would show up on earth as a straight line, there would be no looking at the sun and seeing rays cascading left and right of center. And cast long and short shadows would never happenen
@chrisborey1734
@chrisborey1734 Күн бұрын
Still need SRB’s
@altacc-us5id
@altacc-us5id 7 күн бұрын
The reason I searched this up is Snapple
@albertollames9265
@albertollames9265 8 күн бұрын
Is copyright free? I want to use it 😢
@Hsquared
@Hsquared 8 күн бұрын
How do they think it formed?
@DigitalAstronaut
@DigitalAstronaut 7 күн бұрын
I haven’t been able to find much information about Steeple Mountain’s formation specifically. I’ve reached out to a NASA planetary geologist with this exact question - I’ll let you know what I learn!
@aditya7069
@aditya7069 8 күн бұрын
from india
@matthewhenson2421
@matthewhenson2421 8 күн бұрын
Thanks for the info of Steeple Mountain on Io!!❤❤
@agushll74
@agushll74 11 күн бұрын
THIS IS FUCKING AWESOME ❤
@Jellyman1129
@Jellyman1129 14 күн бұрын
Alan Stern is always a delight to listen to! Planetary scientists have also shown the IAU definition is rooted in astrology. The idea that moons are different than planets is an astrological, unscientific view. Objects like Ganymede and Titan and Enceladus have been called “satellite planets” for centuries ever since Galileo’s time. But since the IAU is full of astronomers who don’t study planets, they obviously don’t know this historical fact and therefore adopted a false astrological view of the Solar System. Astrologers think planets are a small number of culturally significant things that have influence over their environment, and just from that description alone, you can clearly see this view permeating through the IAU’s definition. A true embarrassment to science. Calling the controversy a “political drama” is accurate, because it goes even deeper. Pluto was the first planet to be discovered by an American. A lot of IAU members who were at the vote reported that the primary advocate for the “clear the neighborhood” criterion was Brian Marsden. In the 80s and 90s, Marsden had a personal vendetta against Clyde Tombaugh and swore to him in public “When you’re gone, I will erase your legacy”. Tombaugh died in 1997, and fast forward to 2006, guess who led the IAU vote? Marsden. And he DID erase some of Tombaugh’s legacy and I think it’s tragic. Even today, Mike Brown’s search for what he calls “Planet Nine” is an attempt to deliver the finishing blow. These people want to completely dissolve Tombaugh’s career and pretend it never happened. It’s abhorrent and, as you said, morally wrong. It’s a shame the IAU definition is so popular among science books, online videos, and school curriculum because most people are unaware of how many planets our solar system actually has. Most people don’t know that fascinating worlds like Haumea and Sedna and Quaoar even EXIST, and that’s a big science communication fail. So I applaud videos like this that spread the truth about our solar system to the public! I was looking forward to seeing a video on this topic and you did a fantastic job! Outstanding video! 👍🏻👍🏻
@joshuaburba1048
@joshuaburba1048 14 күн бұрын
I love these kinds of videos. As a former astronomy teacher, I LOVE this stuff. It's obvious you ripped off Mark Rober's video, using almost the exact same props as well as a football field, but it was still very well done and enjoyable to watch.
@geoffreyruzgar1367
@geoffreyruzgar1367 14 күн бұрын
What is the IAU? I'm an Astronomer and have been since 1967. I never agreed to the IAU having control of the Universe. I am a free thinker and therefore do not need the IAU to dictate that Pluto is not a Planet! Pluto is and always will be a Planet, Period! Dr Alan Stern is of course absolutely correct, we should all ignore the IAU, as far as I'm concerned they are irrelevant. Way to go, Dr. Stern!🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
@DigitalAstronaut
@DigitalAstronaut 14 күн бұрын
This is my favorite comment 😁 I agree with you completely.
@geoffreyruzgar1367
@geoffreyruzgar1367 14 күн бұрын
@@DigitalAstronaut Keep up the good work. I really enjoyed your video😊
@Jellyman1129
@Jellyman1129 14 күн бұрын
Alan Stern often calls the IAU the “Irrelevant Astronomical Union”, which is quite fitting. 😄
@josephftruncale7051
@josephftruncale7051 14 күн бұрын
I am somewhat ashamed of having fallen for the fallacy. Great video. Thank you!
@DigitalAstronaut
@DigitalAstronaut 14 күн бұрын
I was as shocked as you. It wasn't until I read Dr Stern's book "Chasing New Horizons" a few years ago that I was made aware of any of this. Part of the reason I made this video was to help spread a story that, it seems, very few of us on the "outside" know about!
@Jellyman1129
@Jellyman1129 14 күн бұрын
Don’t feel bad. School curriculum and the press have failed us. They didn’t report the true story.
@lovelace7972
@lovelace7972 14 күн бұрын
This is the content I am here for.
@DigitalAstronaut
@DigitalAstronaut 14 күн бұрын
Glad to hear it! I'll try to make more of this kind of stuff, then 😉
@mechadense
@mechadense 14 күн бұрын
Exactly. Also all rouge planets are no planets according to the definition. And we may perhaps find coorbiting exoplanets as big as Earth. Coorbiting like the Sarurn moons Janus and Epimetheus do. It'd be very silly to not call them planets.
@DigitalAstronaut
@DigitalAstronaut 14 күн бұрын
So true. It makes me think about "Pandora," the planet moon in the fictional movie Avatar, that orbits a gas giant. It's essentially the same size, mass, and composition as Earth. Imagine not calling a place like Pandora a "planet" simply because it happens to orbit a gas giant and is in another star system. It's just not consistent and adds so much complication.
@JaredDixon
@JaredDixon 16 күн бұрын
Spectacular
@jorvanyjohar1503
@jorvanyjohar1503 18 күн бұрын
The Prometheus gave a fire to man… now man use it to fly to the moon….
@elli003
@elli003 24 күн бұрын
I see an American Flag and the words NASA, but I don't see U N I T E D S T A T E S or U S A. Why?
@MIAN67
@MIAN67 25 күн бұрын
I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THE ROCKETS, BUT THE ROCKET ENGINE SOUND IS MUSIC TO MY EARS
@chainsawkillers
@chainsawkillers 26 күн бұрын
What a terrific video. Ashamed it doesn't have more views.
@emelperez588
@emelperez588 28 күн бұрын
It's me or it doesn't have any sound? 😢
@kimahri2727
@kimahri2727 29 күн бұрын
🙂💧
@bracebrooks967
@bracebrooks967 Ай бұрын
Amazing video! I loved the shots from the multiple camera angles.
@MahishasuraMardhini
@MahishasuraMardhini Ай бұрын
Bruh! Plzz don't use music. We need to hear original sound so that we can feel it. ❤
@DigitalAstronaut
@DigitalAstronaut 14 күн бұрын
Great news, there is a version on my channel with the launch audio ONLY, no music. Enjoy!
@tomasabonis
@tomasabonis Ай бұрын
Guy in the moving car at 1:01 "shit.. it's so dark, there should I park? Oh.. Now I see the place".
@clementine_awesomeness
@clementine_awesomeness Ай бұрын
the most efficient engines and the most powerful boosters working in harmony
@Dragon-Slay3r
@Dragon-Slay3r Ай бұрын
Im already synced Who needs rockets? 😂
@davidk6271
@davidk6271 Ай бұрын
Give me the Saturn5 any day
@johnkennedy3867
@johnkennedy3867 Ай бұрын
Wow. Alot of this footage is the first I've seen. Excellent work
@The2bluewolfs
@The2bluewolfs Ай бұрын
No because if that was true then the moon would at least haft to be the size of the sun
@rbeigh4761
@rbeigh4761 Ай бұрын
Those shots from orbit around the moon are the real point of Artemis/Orion. NASA knows this route already. Look at that shot at 3:38 - NO crew-rated spacecraft has ever flown this far out before. Starship fans would do well to consider this - Starship isn't even crew rated yet, and has yet to go into actual orbital flight. I wish SpaceX all the best in their endeavor, but boasting might best be reserved for after the mission has wrapped up and crews are on the ground...
@rbeigh4761
@rbeigh4761 Ай бұрын
Tears in my eyes. Just to show the world that they've been there before, NASA flies the Orion spacecraft all the way to the moon, orbits it a few times, then flies out further than any other crew-rated craft has ever flown. Big steps and big thanks to all the hard workers at NASA and the contractors who keep the dream alive!
@x-celsius5905
@x-celsius5905 Ай бұрын
Even though i wasn't able to see it in person, i stayed up until 2 AM to watch this beauty take off!! I'm proud to be part of the Artemis generation!!
@P-J-W-777
@P-J-W-777 Ай бұрын
The problem is we are going backwards instead of moving forward. Even then they are having an extremely difficult time doing something that a team back in the 60’s was able to accomplish with far less technology while even building much more powerful engines. I know the Shuttle program had its problems but the success of the Shuttle program far outweighed failures. These new space craft can’t even do half of what the Space Shuttle did. At least it was able to retrieve satellites for repair, bring them back for repair, deliver satellites and one of them even had the ability to carry a lab/science module in the cargo hold. Carried more people and was responsible for building most of the I.S.S.. They should have taken what they learned from the shuttle program and built a better more updated shuttle with stronger lighter weight materials. Between the lighter weight materials and lighter weight computers and other electronics the weight savings would have been big. After all that implementation of much better management over the program. All that money wasted in all the previous programs that went nowhere could have been used to develop and build a newer and much more efficient engines.
@rosalvorodriguesmaciel1064
@rosalvorodriguesmaciel1064 Ай бұрын
😢😊
@JasinTheZombie
@JasinTheZombie Ай бұрын
Epic was to spend 4 billion dollars
@sledgehammer301
@sledgehammer301 Ай бұрын
yeah I know there are a lot of private launching of rockets. And everyone gets all giddy about it, yeah big deal. But for me, its always has been and always will be NASA that invokes the deepest emotion.
@Zyriljohnbrizuela
@Zyriljohnbrizuela Ай бұрын
pov: Your At the SLS Artemis 1
@davidfann5397
@davidfann5397 Ай бұрын
Yeah but it sure tore up the launch tower
@Megadriver
@Megadriver Ай бұрын
There is something incredibly beautiful, almost poetic and very titanic about the launch. So much power, so much thrust, fire at over 3000C spewing out the back, perfectly engineered down to the last detail not to destroy itself from all that violent combustion as the SLS slowly starts picking up speed. I can't help but smile until my face starts to hurt. The space race was the best thing ever to happen to humanity within the last 100 years. The fields of science and technology surged forwards in the space race. And now... with NASA and SpaceX at the top of their game... it looks like we have another space race. Watching this makes me feel optimistic about the future. Maybe we will get out sci-fi utopia after all.
@ShirleyEwan
@ShirleyEwan 2 ай бұрын
Thank you
@uladzislauhaidukevich
@uladzislauhaidukevich 2 ай бұрын
Wow, really great video!
@AngeltftftFtft-com
@AngeltftftFtft-com 2 ай бұрын
🇩🇴🗻🇩🇴🌍🗻🇩🇴🌍🇩🇴🌍🇩🇴💚🗻🌍🇩🇴🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🗽🗽🗽🗽🗽🗽🗽🗽🗽
@jameshowland7393
@jameshowland7393 2 ай бұрын
Amazing. However, I still have to give it to the Saturn V. The 5-pack of Rocketdyne F-1 engines can't be beat for sheer brute strength. The F-1 still, to this day, stands as the most powerful single chamber rocket motor ever produced.
@andrewhillis9544
@andrewhillis9544 3 ай бұрын
GO ARTEMIS THE HUNTER ! ! ! 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
@ToaArcan
@ToaArcan 3 ай бұрын
The most powerful operational rocket in the world, at time of writing. It's much like its Saturn V forebear in that regard. The Saturn was technically not as powerful as its soviet rival, the N1. However, the N1 never flew without turning into a fireball. EDIT: Because the meaning of the second paragraph isn't clear enough, the point I was making is that the SLS is not as powerful as the Starship. However, the Starship is not, at time of writing, an operational rocket. It's an incomplete test article that keeps dying a fiery death in the upper atmosphere. If Starship becomes operational, _then_ SLS will no longer be the most powerful operational rocket in the world, and only then. The rocket needs to be operational to be considered the most powerful operational rocket, after all. Kinda in the name. But it's not there yet.
@andrewhillis9544
@andrewhillis9544 3 ай бұрын
It WAS Until It Got ECLIPSED By STARSHIP ! ! !
@ToaArcan
@ToaArcan 3 ай бұрын
@@andrewhillis9544 Note that I said "operational." Starship is not operational. Starship has yet to fly without turning into a fireball. Starship is currently not even complete, it's a fuselage with engines and remote controls and cameras in it, and nothing else. That's why the launches have been referred to as "Test articles," they're not complete vehicles. That's why I made the comparison to Saturn V and N1. The N1 was more powerful than the Saturn, but because it never actually completed a flight, the Saturn remained the winner by default. Power is meaningless if you can't actually use it for anything.
@thomashayhurst6547
@thomashayhurst6547 2 ай бұрын
​@@andrewhillis9544starship is yet to actually achieve anything. Also having so many engines on a single stage seems like Soviet N1 levels of bad idea
@omarbaba9892
@omarbaba9892 Ай бұрын
@@thomashayhurst6547we’ll have to see, nasa does appear to have faith in it though
@starship2023
@starship2023 15 күн бұрын
​@thomashayhurst6547 The N1 problem wasn't engine amount it was having those old computers manage 30 engines at once they couldn't handle it since they had obsolete even back then flight computers on the N1 keep in mind Falcon Heavy launches with 27 engines no problem at all
@nadeeraabeywardena3686
@nadeeraabeywardena3686 3 ай бұрын
How far you get to pluto
@kevinmorton4439
@kevinmorton4439 3 ай бұрын
My sound system has 4 subwoofers connected. Whole house shakes. 👍👌😀🚀
@PolluxPavonis
@PolluxPavonis 3 ай бұрын
Very nice editing right here, sir. Thank you for sharing.
@FewVidsJustComments
@FewVidsJustComments 3 ай бұрын
So I made my own scale set using household objects, and calculated how far away everything would be. Long story short, if the sun the size of a typical flat ceiling light fixtur, (13.5 inches in my case) earth, (which would be the size of a small bead), would only be 122 feet from the sun, but Pluto would be almost a mile away. And to think that most of that is just empty space… that just blows my mind 🤯
@nadeeraabeywardena3686
@nadeeraabeywardena3686 3 ай бұрын
Why Jupiter and Saturn are the size of 2 quaters