What the Washington state supreme court finally decides is irrelevant. This case is going, ultimately, to the SCOTUS. They will have the final call its Constitutionality. 🤠

The elephant in the room is the United Nations! Civilian disarmament on a global scale....and Canada is the UN's Judas Goat!

3 minutes in. Not worth my time. I carried win STHP for decades. Bought by thousand back when under $14 for 50. 100% reliable in every 9mm I carried for serious use. The original from 86? Under penetrated a bit. Two holes in a threat is 50% more likely to cause change of attitude then on hole, little penetration. I ran out finally, changed my carry round. It’s still beats FMJ on non body armor, lite cover.

Well, restricted capacity >10 round magazines are NOT in common use. Standard capacity magazines, however, are.

I see her as more than an attorney. She is more a politician than a lawyer.

If you'll remember, at the initial introduction of President Trumps first term, he was seen and heard to endorse "red flag" laws. And, to my reluctance, this very same thing is happening again. What is disturbing is that President Trump led MAGA on the promise of protecting their, mine, and your gun rights, the very opposite is reoccurring.

Man here in Georgia finally released did not kill the man accused of; numbers of Trials pressed against the victims while those caused the pains walk freely with a smile.

I did not cross out part of my previous comment. When I hit the comment button, a line went through part of my comment that shows up on my screen, I am not sure if it shows on other screens.

The rights of the governed do not stem from the government. Rather, the rights of the government stem from the governed. Self protection is a right given to men from providence. When the American people can once decide that these rights of protection are not arbitrarily given by lawyers in black robes, just maybe they will see the true light of Providence through the moth holes in their robes. I will pray for the Washington people that God will determine their freedom, not dangerous men.

Lawsuit-----it is illegal by definition---read the currency--- this note is legal tinder for all debts public and private

I'm tired of the word smithing. It's a RIGHT. This calling a part that allows the arm to function something twisted to say they can separate it and give it separate laws. So if the gear shift is removed from the car can you operate? And is it still a car? You people are sick communist.

they are already working on Bills to do that. 25K deposit required to have a single firearm and 25K for each additional weapon or have them confiscated. SCOTUS NEEDS TO STOP BEING SHY ABOUT DEFENDING THEIR OWN CASE LAW . Will they or won't they. I suspect not, meaning that all their high words about 2A not being a 2nd class right will prove they don't believe their own words. States are on the fast track to pass as many restrictive gun laws to disarm everyone. Ask David Hog, Vice DNC Chair. He says it out loud.

It is abought freedom

What they want to stop is hunting with pcp guns

O doubt it. The supreme court has ruled. Im from florida when she was ag. I cane up with chidten should own gins. Theirvparents shouks own the weapon and the parent should suprvise trainingvifvguningvor oplimipc markmenship. Buy the actusl weapon needs to be owned by the parent. I stand by children shoud not own guns. The rest wentvto far and wasnt me. I suport gun ownership, but responcibilty when children are involved. Scotus ended permits necesary..she has to go with thst and so does everyone else. If not, treason chsrges ate fling to be charged by someone, somewhere.

Lock up verttain atf then. Done and done..

Why the law following citizens of this country are always an affected negatively and not those who don’t care about the laws of the land? Should the Supreme Court will take a look the other side of the argument?

The second amendment and the bruen decision clarification is all we need get rid of the paperwork , unless you are in prison or adjudicated mentally ill their should be no infringement of a right that is recognized in the constitution.......just saying.......

President Trump should appoint Mark Lamb as ATF director

my biggest question on this topic has always been.... what if you LIVE within the 1000 foot zone? you have a school right across the street from your house, which is VERY common.??? ok you can maybe avoid moving to the house, but what if they build a school that close to your house that was already there first? you happen to live in a house rent or own no matter, and have 15 guns and ammo to go with them, some of which WILL be loaded for home defense uses...... nobody ever talks about that issue. and what your rights are. and ofcourse you have to go to and from your home to go anywhere at all including move in or out of it completely.... you are 1000 feet of a school sleeping in your bedroom or in your living room watching tv... keep your guns in the back yard that is 1001 feet away??????

An argument I'd like to pose. You are an older woman alone in your house. A band of thugs all carrying weapons tries to break down your door at 3 AM in the morning. How would this woman possibly defend herself if she didn't have a weapon with a high capacity magazine defend herself? Does self defense of a threat only apply to a single threat? This antigun rhetoric is ludicrous and unsustainable in the true realm of self defense.

Click bait. Learn the law and stop with the scare tactics.

Screw the ATF they need to be abolished people......

AI?

Here is the combined template: # COMPLAINT TEMPLATE FOR DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ABUSES To: [Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Field Office/United States Attorney's Office] From: [Your Name] Subject: Violations of Article 6, Paragraph 2 of the United States Constitution (Supremacy Clause) # WRONGDOER INFORMATION - _Government Official/Institution Name:_ _____________________________________________________ - _Title/Position:_ _____________________________________________________ - _Agency/Institution:_ _____________________________________________________ - _Date(s) of Alleged Violation(s):_ _____________________________________________________ # SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS Please describe the alleged due process violations and constitutional rights abuses, including the dates, times, locations, and individuals involved: # SPECIFIC ALLEGATIONS 1. On [Date], [Government Official/Institution Name] enacted/attempted to enforce [Specific Law/Policy], which is in direct conflict with [Relevant Constitutional Provision]. 2. Despite being aware of the conflict with the Constitution, [Government Official/Institution Name] continued to enforce [Specific Law/Policy], thereby violating the Supremacy Clause. 3. As a result of these actions, [Victim/Group] suffered [Specific Harm/Injury], including but not limited to [List specific harm/injury]. # RELEVANT STATUTES 1. 18 U.S.C. § 241: Conspiracy Against Rights 2. 18 U.S.C. § 242: Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law 3. Article 6, Paragraph 2 of the United States Constitution (Supremacy Clause) # REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION We respectfully request that your office conduct a thorough investigation into these allegations and consider prosecution of [Government Official/Institution Name] for violating the Supremacy Clause and relevant federal statutes. # SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION Attached hereto are the following documents, which provide evidence of the alleged violations: # CONTACT INFORMATION - _Your Name:_ _____________________________________________________ - _Address:_ _____________________________________________________ - _Telephone Number:_ _____________________________________________________ - _Email Address:_ _____________________________________________________ # DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS CHECKLIST Please check the boxes next to the due process violations that apply to your case: 1. Unreasonable Search and Seizure 2. Arbitrary Arrests 3. Denial of Right to Counsel 4. Coerced Confessions 5. Unfair Trials 6. Excessive Bail 7. Excessive Fines 8. Cruel and Unusual Punishment 9. Denial of Right to Confront Accusers 10. Denial of Right to a Speedy Trial 11. Double Jeopardy 12. Vague or Overbroad Laws 13. Selective Prosecution 14. Lack of Transparency in Government Actions 15. Unlawful Seizure of Property 16. Denial of Right to Petition for Redress 17. Unlawful Surveillance 18. Denial of Right to a Fair and Impartial Judge 19. Unlawful Detention 20. Denial of Right to a Jury Trial

A 30 round mag is standard with just about any 5.56 and im betting the court knows it

LET'S MAKE AMERICAN GREAT AGAIN! Title 18 922(g)(1) has a nexus with state laws, including Michigan's Heidi law, which permanently revokes gun rights in the absence of a victim based on potential DUI outcomes rather than actual events. Consider taxpayers facing multiple FALSE DUI ARRESTS - particularly those with a third violation - who may or may not even drink and are permanently denied gun rights and home protection despite never causing harm to others. When non-violent DUI offenders have no victim, damages, or injured party, and when there’s no person to confront or question in court, the permanent loss of the gun right becomes an unjust punishment that creates unlawful servitude! [The principle of "an eye for an eye" is fundamentally flawed without a victim]. The government does not revoke the privilege to drive or vote after a DUI traffic offense; it "permanently revokes" the Second Amendment gun right, which has nothing to do with the non-violent and victimless traffic offense! FALSE DUI arrests are a multibillion-dollar industry, no other criminal offense "permanently removes" gun rights and generates greater revenue than DUI arrests! Title 18 922(g)(1) must be rewritten to differentiate between victimless and non-violent offenses! - USMC (Semper Fidelis) SGT E-5 (5811) Iran Veteran 1978/1980

There is no such thing as sensitive places. If so why are so many school shootings?

Bottom line follow the money trail. Brady has millions poring in.

Who' they?

If those magazines are particularly dangerous then why do cops have them?

Doe's that include domestic violence without hitting the person

please please please dont endlessly flap your lip and say very little thats useful. the best gun for self defense is the one you can use efectively, as the effective defense cartridge can be purchased for any caliber. be sure you stay 380 or above. you didnt say one word that any avid shooter doesnt already know.

Gun laws that limit the peoples right to maintain a defense against Government TYRANNY PROTECTION IS THE MAIN REASON , FOR THE 2ND amendment , and that is why there can be no laws of INFRINGEMENT !

We KNOW who owns the Banks. Same group who “OWN” Trump.

Repeal the 1968 firearms act!

That voice sounds suspiciously like A.I. If it is, I won't be back, end of story.

A weapon can include a piece of paper in many ways. 2A is 2A. They have no rights over mine and yours. A paper cut is dangerous. and We can walk anywhere with paper.

That is bull crap people don't believe them...

The scouts is a total joke and a bunch of idiots they all should just step down now asap for not following the contusion and the 2nd amendment which they all took the outh to up hold and follow which none of them have done there should be a 10years turm limit

If things get tough on ammo one could shoot other size rounds using a sabot out of cast acrylic which disintegrates upon exiting the barrel sending a pristine round down range with complete ballistic stability and increased terminal velocity and no internal ballistic data or with data from any previously fired round.

LETS MAKE AMERICAN GREAT AGAIN? Title 18 922(g)(1) has a nexus with state laws, including Michigan's Heidi law, which permanently revokes gun rights in the absence of a victim based on potential DUI outcomes rather than actual events. Consider taxpayers facing multiple FALSE DUI ARRESTS - particularly those with a third violation - who may or may not even drink and are permanently denied gun rights and home protection despite never causing harm to others. When non-violent DUI offenders have no victim, damages, or injured party, and when there’s no person to confront or question in court, the permanent loss of the gun right becomes an unjust punishment that creates unlawful servitude! [The principle of "an eye for an eye" is fundamentally flawed without a victim]. The government does not revoke the privilege to drive or vote after a DUI traffic offense; it "permanently revokes" the Second Amendment gun right, which has nothing to do with the non-violent and victimless traffic offense! FALSE DUI arrests are a multibillion-dollar industry. No other criminal offense permanently removes gun rights and generates greater revenue than DUI arrests! Title 18 922(g)(1) must be rewritten to differentiate between victimless and non-violent offenses! LET'S MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! - USMC (Semper Fidelis) SGT E-5 (5811) Iran Veteran 1978/1980

We can no longer trust the Supreme Court, they are for sale to the highest bidder

I could be wrong but while all of us who have fought for our country in many forigon countries believed we were fighting not only for the countries rights but to reinforce our rights also. With that being said although that what we thought we were fighting for our politicians sent us to fight for them to enhance their power and control not only us but the people we were fighting but us also while allowing the criminal can commit murder. But take away our rights to protect our family's and our pro property.

The ATF is there to enforce rules already in place. They were NEVER given the right to make their own rules and laws or to interpret the laws however they like.. No ATF rule that has not gone through congress for validation is valid.

We can and should refuse to comply. That’s what the founders told us to do, not to beg the government to stop doing what it never had authority to do in the first place.

They are doing this to run the people out of money. We pay to fight this unconstitutional CRAP and we pay them to fight us. I DO NOT BELIEVE STATES HAVE ANY AUTHORITY AT ALL OVER GUNS.,

Like Obama care Robert’s rewrote it for Obama healthcare to pass.

That happens and many will go into the buying for others business. Besides even if they try ballistic tracing data, that is all easy to get around. Fight yes, evade, avoid, Conquer. The only thing worse than no data is bad data. If it can be Conceived it can be Created.

If they don't like bump stocks make a bump ring or a bump thimble. If they don't like Suppressors make Suppressed Ammunition with cast acrylic sabot that disintegrates upon exiting the barrel sending a pristine round down range with no internal ballistic data or with data from any other weapon. Physics and Engineering overrides Man's Laws ultimately rendering them harmless. "If it can be Conceived it can be Created." Enzo Ferrari Advertisement Poster from the 1980s or 1990s.